Photo AI
Which was more successful in achieving its aims, land agitation or the 1913 strike and lockout? Argue your case, referring to both. - Leaving Cert History - Question 1 - 2019
Question 1
Which was more successful in achieving its aims, land agitation or the 1913 strike and lockout? Argue your case, referring to both.
Worked Solution & Example Answer:Which was more successful in achieving its aims, land agitation or the 1913 strike and lockout? Argue your case, referring to both. - Leaving Cert History - Question 1 - 2019
Step 1
Land Agitation
Answer
Land agitation in Ireland, primarily driven by the Irish National Land League in the 1880s, sought to address issues of land ownership and tenant rights. It was instrumental in the establishment of the 'three Fs' (fair rent, fixity of tenure, and free sale) that aimed to protect tenants from exploitation by landlords. The campaign gained significant grassroots support and led to legislative reforms such as the Land Act of 1881. This agitation successfully mobilized many people and laid the groundwork for further political action in Ireland, highlighting its effectiveness in achieving broad aims related to land reform.
Step 2
The 1913 Strike and Lockout
Answer
The 1913 strike and lockout, led by Dublin trade unions, aimed to secure better wages and working conditions for workers. Although the strike garnered nationwide support and highlighted the plight of workers, it was also met with severe opposition from employers and the government, resulting in violent clashes. Despite its initial failure to secure the demands of the workers, it raised awareness about workers' rights and led to increased union organization in Ireland. The aftermath fostered a heightened sense of class consciousness, demonstrating both its immediate shortcomings and its long-term impact on labor relations in Ireland.
Step 3
Comparison and Conclusion
Answer
In comparing both movements, while land agitation was successful in achieving legal reforms and addressing tenant rights, the 1913 strike and lockout significantly influenced labor rights discourse, leading to future reforms. Ultimately, the land agitation was more successful in immediate legislative goals, while the strike laid the groundwork for future labor movements, demonstrating the complexity of assessing success in different social movements.