Rights Protection: Statute Law and the Victorian Charter (VCE SSCE Legal Studies): Revision Notes
Rights protection: statute law and the Victorian Charter
Introduction
In Australia, human rights are protected through three main mechanisms: statute law, common law, and the Australian Constitution. This topic focuses specifically on how statute law (legislation passed by parliament) protects human rights, with particular attention to Victoria's Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (Vic), commonly referred to as the Human Rights Charter.
Statute law represents the most common method of protecting human rights in Australia. Unlike many Western democracies, Australia does not have a national charter of human rights at the Commonwealth level, making state-based protections particularly important for residents of Victoria, the Australian Capital Territory, and Queensland—the only jurisdictions with dedicated human rights charters.
Australia is unique among Western democracies in lacking a national charter of human rights. This makes state-based protections, such as Victoria's Human Rights Charter, especially significant for residents of jurisdictions that have enacted such legislation.
Protecting human rights through statute law
How statute law protects rights
Statute law refers to Acts of Parliament (also called legislation) created by either the Commonwealth Parliament or state and territory parliaments. These laws formally recognise and protect specific human rights by making certain actions unlawful and establishing mechanisms for enforcement.
The Commonwealth Parliament possesses constitutional power to pass legislation that applies across Australia, protecting the rights of all Australian citizens. Meanwhile, each state and territory parliament has jurisdiction to pass laws protecting the rights of residents within their geographical boundaries. This creates a layered system of protection, where individuals benefit from both Commonwealth and state or territory protections.
Understanding the Layered Protection System
This dual system means that Victorian residents are protected by:
- Commonwealth laws that apply nationally to all Australians
- State laws that specifically protect Victorian residents
This creates comprehensive coverage, though it can also lead to complexity when Commonwealth and state laws interact.
Examples of rights protected by statute law
Parliament protects numerous human rights through targeted legislation addressing specific areas of concern. Understanding these protections demonstrates how statute law operates in practice to safeguard fundamental freedoms.
The right to privacy is protected through various Acts that regulate how government agencies and private organisations can collect, use, store and disclose personal information. Key legislation includes:
- Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth and Vic) – allows citizens to access government-held information
- Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) – regulates private sector handling of personal information
- Privacy and Data Protection Act 2014 (Vic) – governs Victorian public sector data practices
The right to security of person encompasses feeling safe and protected from harm. Multiple Acts work together to achieve this protection by defining criminal offences, establishing penalties, and preventing threats. Examples include the Crimes Act 1958 (Vic), Road Safety Act 1986 (Vic), Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic), and specialised legislation addressing terrorism, child safety, and family violence.
The right to freedom from discrimination protects individuals from unfair treatment based on protected attributes such as race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, age, and disability. This protection extends across various contexts including employment, education, accommodation, and access to services. Significant legislation includes the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth), Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth), Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth), Equal Opportunity Act 2010 (Vic), and the National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013 (Cth).
Protected Attributes in Discrimination Law
Discrimination legislation protects specific characteristics called "protected attributes." These are personal characteristics that cannot legally be used as grounds for treating someone unfairly in contexts like employment, education, or accessing services.
The right to vote ensures democratic participation through the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (Cth) and Electoral Act 2002 (Vic), which establish and protect citizens' rights to vote in Commonwealth and Victorian elections respectively.
The Victorian Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities
What is the Human Rights Charter?
The Human Rights Charter (Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (Vic)) is Victoria's dedicated human rights legislation. Its main purpose is to protect and promote the fundamental human rights of all Victorians. Unlike the piecemeal approach of individual Acts protecting specific rights, the Charter consolidates basic human rights into a single document, creating a framework that guides how government operates.
Victoria, along with the Australian Capital Territory and Queensland, has enacted such a charter. However, Australia remains the only Western democracy without a national charter of human rights at the Commonwealth level, despite previous attempts to establish one. This means protection of human rights through a comprehensive charter exists only at the state and territory level in these three jurisdictions.
Key features of the Charter
The Charter imposes obligations on certain bodies to respect and uphold human rights. These include:
- The Victorian Parliament
- State government departments (such as the Victorian Department of Health and Victorian Department of Education)
- Government agencies (including VicRoads and Victoria Police)
- Local councils
- People delivering government services
These public authorities must act in ways that comply with the human rights outlined in the Charter, ensuring government action respects basic freedoms and dignity.
Who Must Comply with the Charter?
The Charter applies to "public authorities" – this includes all Victorian government departments, agencies, local councils, and anyone delivering services on behalf of the government. However, it does not apply to private businesses or individuals acting in their personal capacity.
The 20 basic human rights
The Human Rights Charter recognises and protects 20 fundamental human rights for all Victorians. These include:
Core rights protecting life and dignity:
- The right to life – protection of every person's life
- The right to protection from torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment – prohibition of torture, cruel punishment, or degrading treatment
- Freedom of movement – people living lawfully in Victoria can leave and return to the state whenever they desire, and can choose where they live within Victoria
- Freedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief – individuals can hold personal beliefs and practise their chosen religion without interference
- The right to take part in public life – citizens can vote in state and local government elections and run as candidates for office
Rights that support justice in the legal system
Several Charter rights specifically help ensure fairness and justice in legal proceedings:
The right to recognition and equality before the law requires that every person be treated as equal before the law. All individuals are entitled to equal protection of the law without discrimination, and have the right to equal and effective protection against discrimination. This principle ensures the legal system treats everyone fairly regardless of their personal characteristics.
The right to a fair hearing guarantees that anyone charged with a criminal offence or involved in a civil proceeding can have their case decided by a competent, independent and impartial court or tribunal. This encompasses the right to a fair and public hearing, though courts may lawfully exclude media, other persons, or the general public in certain circumstances to protect specific interests.
The right to not be tried or punished more than once protects individuals from double jeopardy—being tried or punished multiple times for the same offence after receiving a final conviction or acquittal. However, the law does permit retrials to be ordered in limited circumstances where this serves the interests of justice.
Rights during criminal proceedings
The Charter establishes minimum guarantees for adults and children charged with criminal offences:
Access to legal representation – charged persons have the right to be provided with legal aid if denial of such assistance would result in an unfair hearing or trial. This applies when the accused meets Victoria Legal Aid's eligibility criteria. Victoria Legal Aid (VLA) is a government agency providing free legal advice to all community members and low-cost or no-cost legal representation to those who cannot afford private lawyers.
Victoria Legal Aid (VLA)
VLA is the government agency responsible for providing legal assistance to those who cannot afford private representation. It offers:
- Free legal advice to all community members
- Low-cost or no-cost representation to eligible individuals
- Support based on eligibility criteria related to financial circumstances and case merit
Interpreter assistance – individuals requiring language support have the right to free interpreter assistance throughout legal proceedings.
Right to silence – accused persons cannot be compelled to give evidence against themselves or to confess guilt. This fundamental protection prevents forced self-incrimination.
Right to appeal – any person who has been convicted (found guilty by a court) of a criminal offence has the right to have their conviction and any sentence reviewed by a higher court. This appeals process provides an important safeguard against wrongful convictions or inappropriate sentences.
Restriction of human rights
The general limitations clause
While the Human Rights Charter establishes 20 basic human rights for Victorians, these rights are not absolute or unrestricted. The Charter includes a general limitations clause that permits public authorities (including the Victorian Government and Victorian Parliament) to restrict or limit human rights in specific circumstances.
Rights can be limited when such restriction is reasonable and justified in order to uphold a free and democratic society. Democracy refers to a system of government where elected representatives make laws on behalf of the people they represent, reflecting community views and values. In a democratic society, individual rights must sometimes be balanced against broader community interests.
The Three Tests for Restricting Rights
Any restriction on human rights must meet several tests:
- It must be necessary to achieve a legitimate objective
- It must be proportionate to the objective being pursued
- It must be reasonable in the circumstances
All three requirements must be satisfied for a restriction to be justified under the general limitations clause.
Any restriction on human rights must meet several tests: it must be necessary, proportionate to the objective being pursued, and reasonable in the circumstances. For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020-2021, restrictions on freedom of movement needed to be justified as necessary, proportionate to the threat posed by the virus, and reasonable given the public health emergency.
Case study: pandemic lockdowns and human rights
The COVID-19 pandemic presented significant challenges to human rights protection, testing the boundaries of permissible restrictions under the Charter.
Case Study: The Housing Tower Lockdown (July 2020)
Background: On 4 July 2020, the Victorian Government ordered an immediate lockdown of nine high-rise public housing towers in North Melbourne and Flemington to prevent a COVID-19 outbreak spreading into the wider community. This affected approximately 3000 residents.
What Happened: The lockdown was announced and implemented without warning, meaning residents had no opportunity to purchase food, medical supplies, or make necessary personal arrangements before being confined to their homes. Victoria Police enforced the lockdown immediately. Eight towers were locked down for five days, while residents in one tower could not leave for two weeks.
Investigation: Following complaints about the lockdown, Victorian Ombudsman Deborah Glass conducted an investigation into the government's actions. She heard personal accounts of harm and distress suffered by residents, including testimony from people who had lived through civil wars in other countries and were particularly traumatised by the heavy police presence.
Findings: In her December 2020 report, Ms Glass concluded that while a temporary lockdown was justified and did successfully stop virus spread, the implementation without prior notice was "not compatible" with residents' human rights. Specifically, she found the lockdown breached the residents' right to humane treatment when deprived of liberty, as protected in the Human Rights Charter.
Recommendations: She recommended the Victorian Government publicly apologise to residents for the harm and distress caused. Ms Glass emphasised that "in a just society, human rights are not a convention to be ignored during a crisis, but a framework for how we will treat and be treated as the crisis unfolds."
Outcome: Over two years later, in September 2022, she noted the government had not issued an apology, calling this unwillingness "a barrier to rebuilding trust with the government." The Victorian Premier, Daniel Andrews, responded that pandemic decisions were not "made lightly" and he would not "apologise for doing everything possible to save lives."
Legal significance
This case demonstrates several important principles about human rights protection in Victoria:
- Charter rights can be legitimately restricted in emergency situations
- However, the manner of implementing restrictions must still respect human dignity
- Government actions restricting rights remain subject to scrutiny and review
- Even during crises, the Charter provides a framework for evaluating whether government actions are justified
Key Lesson from the Housing Tower Case
Even when a rights restriction is justified in principle (such as limiting freedom of movement during a pandemic), the method of implementing that restriction must still be compatible with human rights. The ends do not automatically justify the means.
Strengths and weaknesses of protecting human rights through statute law
Exam guidance
When evaluating rights protection through statute law, you should identify specific strengths and weaknesses, provide examples to support your points, and reach a balanced conclusion about the overall effectiveness of this protection method.
Strengths of statutory protection
Flexibility and responsiveness to change
The most significant strength of protecting rights through statute law is parliament's ability to introduce new rights and amend existing ones as societal needs evolve. As the supreme law-making body (the body with final law-making power that can make or change any law within its jurisdiction), parliament can modify human rights legislation to reflect current community views and values.
Example: Expanding Anti-Discrimination Protection
As society becomes more aware of harms caused by certain forms of discrimination, parliament can expand anti-discrimination legislation. In 2022, the Victorian Parliament amended the Equal Opportunity Act 2010 (Vic) to make it generally unlawful for religious bodies and schools to discriminate against people based on sex, sexual orientation, lawful sexual activity, marital status, parental status and gender identity.
This demonstrates parliament's capacity to update rights protection in response to changing social attitudes.
Detail and precision
Statutes protecting human rights are typically detailed and precise, protecting specific rights explicitly rather than relying on implication. This clarity helps government organisations understand their obligations and helps individuals understand their entitlements. When rights are spelled out in clear statutory language, there is less room for ambiguity or dispute about what is protected.
Enforceability and recognition
Human rights contained in statutes are generally enforceable and must be recognised by government organisations. This creates tangible protections that individuals can invoke when dealing with public authorities. The Victorian Charter, for instance, requires all covered public authorities to act compatibly with protected rights, creating enforceable obligations.
Speed of implementation
Parliament has the ability to pass laws quickly when there is urgent need to protect additional human rights or respond to emerging threats to existing rights. This responsiveness allows the legal system to adapt to new challenges without lengthy delays.
Weaknesses of statutory protection
Lack of permanence
The fundamental weakness of protecting rights through statute law is that these rights are not permanently guaranteed. As the supreme law-making body, parliament possesses the power to pass legislation changing, restricting, or even abolishing existing rights protected by statute law. What one parliament creates, another can undo. This creates uncertainty and means rights protection is only as strong as the current parliament's commitment to maintaining it.
The Impermanence Problem
Unlike constitutional rights which require public approval (through referendum) to change, statutory rights can be amended or repealed by a simple majority vote in parliament. This makes statutory protections inherently vulnerable to political changes and shifting parliamentary priorities.
Limitations and exemptions
Parliament can include exemptions, limitations or restrictions within statutes, meaning protected human rights are not always absolute. The general limitations clause in the Victorian Charter exemplifies this—rights can be restricted when deemed reasonable and justified. While flexibility can be appropriate, it also means rights protection is not as strong as it might appear.
Limited remedies
Statutes do not always enable individuals to be awarded damages if their human rights are breached. The Victorian Charter, for instance, does not create a direct cause of action for rights violations. This limits the practical enforceability of protected rights and means some breaches may occur without meaningful consequences.
Less protection than constitutional rights
Human rights protected in statute law are not as well protected as rights contained in a constitution. Constitutional rights can only be altered or removed with public approval (through a referendum at the Commonwealth level), whereas statute law can be changed by parliament alone. This makes statutory protections inherently weaker and more vulnerable to political changes.
Summary table: strengths and weaknesses
| Strengths | Weaknesses |
|---|---|
| Parliament can create new legislation and amend existing statutes to incorporate further human rights as community views and values change | As the supreme law-making body, parliament can amend statutes to restrict or cancel existing human rights |
| Statutes are often detailed and precise, protecting human rights specifically rather than being implied | Parliament can include exemptions, limitations or restrictions in statutes, so protected human rights are not always absolute |
| Human rights contained in statutes are generally enforceable and must be recognised by government organisations | Statutes do not always enable a person to be awarded damages if their human rights are breached |
| Parliament can pass laws quickly if there is urgent need to protect additional human rights | Human rights protected in statute law are not as well protected as constitutional rights, which can only be altered or removed with public approval |
Key Points to Remember:
-
Statute law is the most common method of protecting human rights in Australia, with both Commonwealth and state/territory parliaments passing Acts to protect specific rights
-
The Victorian Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (Vic) protects 20 basic human rights for all Victorians, including rights relevant to ensuring justice in the legal system such as the right to a fair hearing and the right to equality before the law
-
Charter rights are not absolute—they can be restricted through the general limitations clause when reasonable and justified to uphold a democratic society, as demonstrated during COVID-19 pandemic restrictions
-
Strengths of statutory protection include:
- Flexibility to change with community values
- Detail and precision
- Enforceability against government bodies
- Speed of implementation
-
Weaknesses include:
- Lack of permanence (parliament can change or remove rights)
- Potential for limitations and exemptions
- Limited remedies for breaches
- Weaker protection compared to constitutional rights
Key terms: Human Rights Charter, statute law, charter of human rights (bill of rights), democracy, Victoria Legal Aid (VLA), legal aid, conviction, supreme law-making body