To His Coy Mistress by Andrew Marvell (AQA A-Level English Literature A): Revision Notes
To His Coy Mistress by Andrew Marvell
Overview
To His Coy Mistress is a metaphysical seduction poem written by Andrew Marvell in the 1650s. The poem belongs to the carpe diem tradition, a Latin phrase meaning 'seize the day'. Marvell uses this poetic form to persuade a reluctant woman that time is fleeting and she should embrace physical intimacy before it is too late. The poem combines intellectual argument with passionate urgency, employing hyperbolic praise, fear tactics, and philosophical reflection to achieve its persuasive goal.
The carpe diem tradition encourages readers to live in the present moment and make the most of limited time. This philosophy originated in Roman poetry, particularly in the works of Horace, and became a popular theme in Renaissance and metaphysical poetry.
Context
Historical context
The poem was composed during the English Interregnum (1649-1660), the period between the execution of King Charles I and the restoration of the monarchy under Charles II. This was a time of political instability, as England experienced various forms of republican government. Marvell lived through both sides of the Civil War and the subsequent turmoil, which heavily influenced his political writing.
Despite the political upheaval of his time, Marvell notably avoids any political references in To His Coy Mistress. This absence suggests he deliberately separated his personal and political lives. The poem was considered too controversial for publication during his lifetime and appeared posthumously in 1681, along with many of his other satirical works that challenged conventional thinking.
The poem's controversial nature meant it could not be published until after Marvell's death in 1681. This posthumous publication highlights the taboo nature of sexual content in 17th-century England and the risks poets faced when challenging social conventions.
Literary context
To His Coy Mistress is classified as a metaphysical poem. Metaphysical poetry is characterised by:
- Highly intellectual content and complex arguments
- Strange, unexpected imagery (such as worms consuming virginity)
- Frequent use of paradox and wit
- Elaborate and ornate style
- References to classical and biblical sources
Notable metaphysical poets include John Donne and George Herbert. These poets were self-conscious about their position within literary tradition and emphasised skilled craftmanship in their work.
Marvell also borrows from the Petrarchan sonnet tradition. Beginning at line 11, he employs a blazon – a device where the lover's body is broken down into individual parts that are then praised. This was typical of Elizabethan love poetry and was famously parodied in Shakespeare's Sonnet 130.
The poem fits well with other anthology pieces. Like Sonnet 116, it explores the passage of time, whilst The Flea is another metaphysical seduction poem dealing with similar themes of desire and persuasion.
Andrew Marvell
Andrew Marvell (1621-1678) was an English metaphysical poet, satirist, and politician who served in the House of Commons. He was close friends with John Milton during the Commonwealth period.
Interestingly, Marvell was not particularly popular as a poet during his lifetime. His style had fallen out of fashion by the time of his death. However, he became a pioneer in political satire and proved hugely influential to later writers such as John Dryden and Alexander Pope.
Marvell was known for disappearing on extended travels throughout Europe. These journeys provided him with extensive worldly knowledge and experience, which he incorporated into his poetry. His satirical writing earned him a reputation as an intelligent, courageous critic of court corruption and a defender of religious and political liberty.
Marvell's poetic style
Marvell worked within established neoclassical traditions whilst infusing them with unique perspectives. The carpe diem lyric tradition seen in To His Coy Mistress is one such example. He combined familiar poetic forms with fresh explorations of profound questions about life and death.
T.S. Eliot identified Marvell and the metaphysical poets with what he called the dissociation of sensibility in 17th-century English literature. Eliot drew a comparison between the intellectual poet and the reflective poet, suggesting that poets of this period developed self-consciousness about their literary craftmanship and made deliberate references to classical and biblical sources.
To His Coy Mistress merges an ancient poetic philosophy (carpe diem) with distinctive linguistic features including strange imagery, personification of abstract concepts like Time, and elaborate metaphorical language.
The carpe diem tradition
The phrase carpe diem comes from Latin, meaning 'seize the day'. This philosophical mode originated in Roman poetry, particularly in the work of Horace. Carpe diem poems emphasise living in the present moment and making the most of limited time.
In To His Coy Mistress, the carpe diem philosophy manifests as an urgent plea for the woman to enjoy life and love before death makes such pleasures impossible. The speaker argues that waiting for the perfect moment is futile because time is constantly running out.
Synopsis and structure
The three-part argument
The poem presents a syllogism – a three-part logical argument where the first two sections lead to a final conclusion:
The Three-Part Syllogistic Structure:
Premise 1 (If): If we had unlimited time, I would court you slowly for thousands of years
Premise 2 (But): But we don't have unlimited time – death approaches quickly
Conclusion (Therefore): Therefore, we must embrace passion now before it's too late
First stanza (lines 1-20): The hypothetical situation
The speaker addresses a woman who appears hesitant to respond to his romantic advances. He argues that if time were unlimited, he would be content to court her slowly and patiently. He would spend hundreds of years admiring each part of her body. However, the speaker immediately undermines this fantasy by noting they do not have unlimited time.
The speaker accuses the woman of coyness – a term meaning feigned shyness or modesty designed to seem more attractive. He suggests she may actually desire sexual intimacy but is pretending reluctance.
Second stanza (lines 21-32): The reality of mortality
After the volta (turn), the tone shifts abruptly. The speaker takes time to lament the briefness of human life. He reminds the woman that once dead, it becomes impossible to embrace or experience pleasure. The imagery becomes dark and grotesque: he warns that if she dies a virgin, worms will be the ones to take her virginity, not a loving partner. Her beauty will fade, and they will have no opportunity for intimacy in the grave.
Third stanza (lines 33-46): The proposition
The speaker changes tone again, urging immediate action. He asks the woman to embrace his romantic efforts so they can make the most of the brief life they have. The language becomes urgent and passionate, filled with powerful verbs like 'devour' and 'tear'. The speaker presents their union as a defiant act against time and death.
Key locations and allusions
The speaker references exotic locations to demonstrate his worldly knowledge and create an intellectual, sophisticated argument:
- Indian Ganges (line 5): A sacred river recently explored by British colonisers. By comparing the woman to this holy, beautiful place, the speaker flatters her whilst possibly hinting at themes of conquest and possession.
- Humber (line 7): A much less glamorous English river in Hull. The speaker positions himself here, creating geographical distance that may mirror their emotional or physical separation.
- Conversion of the Jews (line 10): In Christian belief, this event marks the end of the world. The speaker is being massively hyperbolic, suggesting he would love her from over 4000 years ago until the world ends.
- Noah's flood (line 8): Another biblical reference demonstrating intellectuality and possibly appealing to a Christian woman's values.
The use of apostrophe – directly addressing an absent person – is a key device throughout. The woman never responds; we only hear the speaker's side of the conversation. This one-sided nature raises questions about whether the woman would agree with the speaker's interpretation of their relationship.
Form and structure
Rhyme scheme
The poem employs a consistent aabbccdd rhyme scheme throughout. This creates rhyming couplets where each pair of lines completes a thought. The couplets give the poem structure and rhythm, mirroring the speaker's intellectual argument whilst maintaining a playful, loose tone.
Metre
Marvell uses predominantly iambic tetrameter (four feet of unstressed-stressed syllables per line). This is significant because the more common form for serious poetry at the time was Heroic verse – rhyming iambic pentameter couplets used for grand subjects like epic battles.
By deliberately using tetrameter instead of pentameter, Marvell appears to be mocking Heroic verse. This creates a lighter, less serious tone that is more punchy and fast-paced, which perfectly complements the carpe diem theme of urgency. The choice of metre becomes a statement in itself about the poem's playful, subversive nature.
At crucial moments, the regular metre becomes disrupted. For example, 'Now let us sport us while we may' (line 37) has stress on the first syllable rather than the second, creating a trochee instead of an iamb. This stumbling rhythm suggests forward momentum, as if the speaker is physically urging them towards action.
Stanza structure
The poem consists of three stanzas of varying lengths, demonstrating that there is no rigid traditional form. Marvell appears to have created a unique style that rebels against conventional 17th-century poetic structures.
At certain points, the closed couplet form breaks down completely. Line 37 ('Now let us sport us while we may') stands as a complete clause that doesn't require the following line to finish the thought. This deliberate isolation highlights it as the poem's thesis statement – the central argument Marvell wants to emphasise.
Pace and progression
The poem's pace accelerates as it progresses, reflecting the speaker's growing urgency:
Pace and Progression Through the Stanzas:
- First stanza: The longest section, using mild, conditional modal verbs ('would', 'should', 'shouldst'). This length mirrors the hypothetical unlimited time being described.
- Second stanza: Becomes more polysyllabic with words like 'virginity', 'echoing', and 'hurrying', which speeds up the reading pace and reflects mounting anxiety about time.
- Third stanza: Features powerful action verbs ('devour', 'tear', 'sport') and shifts from conditional to imperative mood ('let us') and future tense ('we will'). The poem ends on a confident, triumphant note.
Language and techniques
Personification
Marvell personifies Time as an all-powerful, inexplicable force with the capacity to control everything. Time is presented in several ways:
Time's winged chariot (line 22): Time is seated in a chariot drawn by winged horses, similar to the Greek sun god Helios. This godlike imagery suggests time is untouchable and beyond mortal reach.
his slow-chap'd power (line 40): Later, time becomes a person who enjoys wielding control over mortals. The possessive pronoun 'his' emphasises time's authority.
This personification creates a parallel with Shakespeare's Sonnet 116, which imagines Time as a grim reaper with a sickle that destroys 'rosy cheeks and lips'. However, Marvell's characterisation is more stately and removed, whereas Shakespeare's is overtly frightening.
The speaker positions himself and the woman as united against Time. However, the hope of defeating time only emerges in the third stanza; before this, the speaker emphasises time's gruesome effects to frighten the woman into compliance.
Hyperbole
Hyperbole (deliberate exaggeration) is used extensively throughout the poem to bolster the speaker's argument.
In the first stanza, hyperbole creates a fantastical vision of unlimited time:
- 'An hundred years should go to praise / Thine eyes' (lines 13-14)
- 'Two hundred to adore each breast' (line 15)
- 'Love you ten years before the flood' (line 8)
This exaggerated praise is so extreme that it becomes slightly absurd, perhaps mocking other love poetry that uses such grand language earnestly.
Hyperbole in the Second Stanza:
'Worms shall try that long-preserved virginity' (line 27)
The speaker hyperbolically suggests that if the woman remains coy, time will expire before she consents to intimacy, and worms will take her virginity by consuming her corpse. This is deliberately grotesque and slightly derogatory – the speaker implies he is her only option, pressuring her to accept his advances.
The hyperbole serves multiple purposes: flattery in the first stanza, intimidation in the second, and urgency throughout.
Alliteration
Alliteration creates emphasis and links key sections of the poem. Marvell uses alliteration particularly in the first and last stanzas, which both focus on desire rather than death:
'W' alliteration in the opening (lines 1-4): 'world', 'we', 'would', 'way', 'walk'
- The repeated 'w' sounds slow down pronunciation, emphasising the importance of these words.
- The speaker unifies the two optimistic stanzas (first and third) with 'we', focusing his argument on their shared experience in the living 'world'.
'L' alliteration: 'long love's day' (line 4)
- The repetition of 'l' sounds elongates the phrase, highlighting its length.
- This contrasts sharply with their actual situation, where time is short.
'S' alliteration: 'sun/Stand still' (lines 43-44)
- The triple 's' sounds create a harsh, emphatic effect.
- This phrase stands out dramatically at the poem's conclusion, creating a powerful statement against the personification of time.
Metaphor
The poem uses metaphor sparingly but effectively:
'To walk, and pass our long Love's Day' (line 4)
The speaker compares their entire lives to a single day. This is paradoxical because he's describing a hypothetical situation with infinite time, yet reducing it to one day emphasises how brief life truly is.
'My vegetable love' (line 11): This unusual metaphor suggests the speaker's love is slow-growing but deeply rooted, like a plant. It also implies his love is natural and organic. However, this can also be read as a double entendre (a phrase with two meanings, one often sexual) – 'vegetable love' may be an oblique reference to his penis. The slowness implied by this vegetable image sounds stupefying, which may convince the mistress that she should act quickly before desire fades.
Antithesis
Antithesis is a device where contrasting ideas are balanced against each other, following a 'not X but Y' structure. This technique was more common in later poetry but Marvell employs it effectively in the final couplet:
'though we cannot make our sun / Stand still, yet we will make him run' (lines 45-46)
This powerful antithesis acknowledges human limitations (we cannot stop time) whilst asserting human agency (we can make time pass quickly through passionate lovemaking). The certainty of 'will' rather than 'may' or 'might' gives the poem a triumphant, confident conclusion.
Imagery of the heart
Before line 18, the speaker focuses on his mistress's aesthetic characteristics: her 'forehead', 'eyes', and 'breasts'. However, at line 18, he turns to the heart, which symbolises her innermost character and emotions.
The speaker insists that in an ideal world, the mistress could delay revealing her true self until the end of time. He tries to convince her that he would be satisfied with a non-physical relationship: 'you should, if you please, refuse [sexual relations] / Till the conversion of the Jews' (lines 9-10). Her heart is presented as the true prize – supposedly, he values love over sex.
By foregrounding the importance of emotional intimacy here, the speaker may be trying to allay his mistress's fears that he will abandon her after achieving his physical goal. However, the sincerity of this claim is questionable given the poem's overall focus on carnal desire.
Euphemism and double entendre
References to sex in the poem are veiled due to 17th-century social restrictions. Sexual desire was generally taboo, and extra-marital intimacy was considered sinful. Marvell had to be careful that the speaker's desires weren't too overtly stated.
Key examples include:
- 'Refuse' (line 9): Coded language for refusing sexual relations
- 'vegetable love' (line 11): Possible phallic reference
- 'quaint honour' (line 29): The adjective 'quaint' was a euphemism for female genitalia in the late 16th century, adding a mocking sexual dimension to 'honour'
- 'sport' (line 37): A euphemism for sexual activity
- 'ball' (line 41): Could refer to intertwined bodies or a cannonball in battle against time
- 'rough strife' (line 43): Suggests vigorous sexual activity
- 'iron gates of life' (line 44): Breaking through these gates may refer to taking the woman's virginity
This coded language adds layers of meaning whilst allowing Marvell to avoid direct censorship.
Key themes
Love and death
The relationship between love and mortality is the poem's central concern. The speaker seems to live in fear of missing sexual opportunities and tries to instil similar fear in his mistress.
Time as the enemy: The speaker presents the 'hurrying' passage of time (line 22) as their shared adversary. While he claims his love could last millennia ('vaster than empires', line 11), it is ultimately threatened by mortality.
The grave: 'The grave's a fine and private place, / But none, I think, do there embrace' (lines 31-32). This couplet bluntly states that death ends all possibility of physical intimacy. The speaker's argument depends on convincing the woman that they must act now or lose their chance forever.
Christian imagery subverted: The speaker compares death to 'deserts of vast eternity' (line 24). In Christianity, the desert is often a place of spiritual trial and purification (Jesus spent 40 days in the desert). However, Marvell's speaker rejects these religious associations. Instead, he presents death as a barren, empty space with nothing in it – pure nothingness. This reveals his nihilistic beliefs and rejection of Christian promises of afterlife.
This nihilism serves his argument: if there is no life after death, then refusing his advances means the woman will miss her only chance at passion.
Urgency reflected in form: The entire poem demonstrates urgency through its fast-paced iambic tetrameter. As the poem progresses, the pace accelerates, the imagery becomes more dramatic and grotesque, and the verbs grow more powerful. The shift from conditional mood ('would', 'should') to imperative ('let us') to future tense ('we will') traces an increasing confidence that together they can challenge death through their lovemaking.
Love and sex
The speaker is primarily interested in the woman for physical intimacy. This raises important questions about the relationship between sexual desire and genuine love – a common concern throughout the anthology.
Veiled desires: The speaker seems to want to convince his mistress of his love's solid, lasting nature, perhaps to allay her fears that he will abandon her after sex. He hyperbolically claims his love could grow 'vaster than empires' (line 11) and last for thousands of years.
Playful rather than loving?: Despite these protestations, the speaker seems most interested in physical interaction. The image of 'amorous birds of prey' (line 38) is particularly telling – birds of prey are violent, vicious creatures, which seems an odd comparison for tender lovemaking. This suggests a more aggressive, playful encounter than a loving one.
Doubt about sincerity: Given the focus on bodies rather than emotions, and the aggressive imagery of tearing and devouring, readers may well doubt the sincerity of the speaker's feelings. The poem might be more about sexual conquest than genuine affection.
Traditional courtly love: The speaker makes it clear in the first stanza that he would like to demonstrate courtly, traditional love. The image of finding 'rubies' by the Ganges (line 6) suggests royal, respectful courtship. However, he argues this type of slow, chivalrous wooing is too time-consuming given their mortality.
Love and loss
Fear of missing out: The speaker's argument is driven by anxiety about lost opportunity. If the woman continues to resist, both will miss their chance for passion.
Loss of beauty: 'deserts of vast eternity / Thy beauty shall no more be found' (lines 24-25). Time promises not just death but the destruction of physical attractiveness. The speaker wants the woman to enjoy her beauty while she still possesses it.
Loss of virginity: The disturbing image of worms consuming the woman's virginity (line 27) presents virginity as something that will be lost regardless – either to a lover or to decay. The speaker argues she should choose the former.
Leveraging loss for seduction: Ultimately, the speaker uses the threat of loss to manipulate the woman into compliance. His entire argument leverages the theme of death to fulfil his sexual desires.
Comparisons with other poems
To His Coy Mistress and The Flea (John Donne)
Similarities:
- Both are seduction poems employing intellectual arguments to convince resistant women
- Both use grotesque imagery: Donne's flea 'purpled thy nail in blood of innocence'; Marvell's 'worms shall try that long-preserved virginity'
- Written in very similar periods (early 17th century)
- Both employ hyperbole and melodramatic language to create strong, structured arguments
- Both use abstract ideas and metaphysical concerns to advance their cases
- Both display wit and erudition through logic and esoteric references
- Both accuse their ladies of cruelty: Marvell's speaker suggests the woman is being cruel by refusing to 'show her heart'; Donne's speaker directly accuses his mistress of cruelty
Differences:
- Genre: Donne was a metaphysical poet; Marvell was a satirical poet writing in the carpe diem style
- Conceit: Donne develops one extended metaphor (the flea) throughout; Marvell uses multiple conceits across different areas
- Physical description: Marvell's speaker shows appreciation for his mistress's body through the blazon; Donne does not describe his lady's appearance
- Explicitness: Donne's speaker is more overtly sexual, wanting to share a 'marriage bed' without being married. Marvell uses grander, more coded language ('winged chariot', 'roll up into one ball')
- Relationship details: We learn Donne's lovers are 'almost, nay more than married are' and their parents 'grudge' their relationship. Marvell's speaker reveals nothing concrete about their relationship, though his tone suggests familiarity
To His Coy Mistress and Whoso List to Hunt (Thomas Wyatt)
Similarities:
- Both portray an attempt to conquer somebody: Marvell's poem is the attempt itself; Wyatt's retells an unsuccessful attempt
- Both feature barriers to love: Marvell's is time running out; Wyatt's is that the woman is already claimed by another man (likely Henry VIII)
- Both women resist advances
- Control and structure: Both poets work within established forms (Wyatt uses Petrarchan sonnet with confused metre; Marvell uses regular iambic tetrameter) whilst manipulating them for effect
Differences:
- Tone: Marvell's poem is playful and confident, ending triumphantly. Wyatt's is the lament of a disappointed suitor, ending in resignation
- Sexual content: Marvell employs more euphemisms and double entendres, making it explicitly clear the speaker desires sex. Wyatt's hunting metaphor suggests desire but could also indicate wanting a romantic relationship
- Address: Marvell's speaker uses apostrophe, directly addressing his absent lady ('lady', 'if you please'). Wyatt's speaker addresses anyone interested in the 'hunt', making it more universal
- Scope: Marvell's poem is more wide-ranging and intellectual, drawing on biblical references, classical mythology, and geographical knowledge. Wyatt's is more focused and personal
Exam tips
When analysing this poem, consider:
-
The speaker's reliability: Is he genuinely in love, or purely motivated by physical desire? How does this ambiguity affect your interpretation?
-
The use of logical argument: The poem is structured as a syllogism. How does this rational structure contrast with or support the emotional content?
-
Historical context: How do 17th-century attitudes toward sex and religion inform your reading? Remember that extra-marital relations were taboo and openly sexual poetry was controversial.
-
Form and content relationship: How does the rejection of Heroic verse in favour of iambic tetrameter reflect the poem's themes and tone?
-
Gender dynamics: Consider the power dynamics at play. The woman never speaks – how does this silence affect the poem's persuasiveness?
-
Comparisons: Be prepared to compare this poem with others in the anthology, particularly other seduction poems (The Flea) and poems dealing with time (Sonnet 116).
Strong essay points might explore:
- The tension between physical desire and emotional connection
- How Marvell uses and subverts literary conventions (blazon, carpe diem, Heroic verse)
- The role of mortality in shaping attitudes toward love
- The poem's treatment of female agency and choice
- Whether the poem celebrates or critiques male pursuit of women
Remember!
Key Points to Remember:
-
To His Coy Mistress is a carpe diem poem that urges seizing the day because time is limited. The Latin phrase means 'seize the day' and was popular in Roman poetry.
-
The poem follows a three-part syllogistic structure: 1) If we had unlimited time, I would court you slowly; 2) But we don't have unlimited time – death is coming; 3) Therefore, we should embrace passion now before it's too late.
-
Marvell deliberately uses iambic tetrameter instead of the more prestigious iambic pentameter (Heroic verse). This creates a lighter, faster-paced tone that matches the urgency of his message whilst potentially mocking conventional love poetry.
-
The speaker personifies Time as an all-powerful force driving a winged chariot. This makes time seem godlike and unstoppable, adding weight to the argument that they must act quickly.
-
Key techniques include hyperbole (extreme exaggeration for effect), euphemism and double entendre (coded sexual language), alliteration (particularly 'w' sounds in the opening), and antithesis in the final couplet ('cannot make our sun stand still, yet we will make him run').
-
The poem's relationship to love is ambiguous. The speaker claims deep, lasting love but focuses primarily on physical desire, particularly in the final stanza's violent imagery of 'tearing' pleasures and 'devouring' time like 'amorous birds of prey'.
-
When comparing with other anthology poems, consider that The Flea (Donne) uses similar metaphysical wit and grotesque imagery for seduction, whilst Whoso List to Hunt (Wyatt) presents an unsuccessful conquest attempt with a more resigned tone.
-
The historical context matters: Written during the English Interregnum (1650s), the poem was too controversial for publication during Marvell's lifetime and appeared posthumously in 1681. The coded sexual language reflects 17th-century taboos around extra-marital relations.