Changes in the Comintern (AQA A-Level History): Revision Notes
Changes in the Comintern
Stalin's approach to the Comintern before 1928
Between 1924 and 1929, the Comintern occupied a peripheral position in Stalin's political calculations. His attention centered overwhelmingly on domestic concerns: consolidating his personal authority, eliminating rivals, and formulating the doctrine of "Socialism in One Country". This ideology prioritized building socialism within Soviet borders rather than pursuing immediate international revolution. Stalin's handling of communist movements in China during 1925-1927 exemplified his general approach during this period—pragmatic, cautious, and subordinate to internal priorities.
However, as Stalin's grip on power solidified through 1929, his foreign policy orientation underwent transformation. This shift formed an integral component of what became known as the "Stalin Revolution"—the comprehensive restructuring of Soviet society, economy, and politics. The initial manifestations of Stalin's "revolution from above" appeared in the accelerated tempo of industrialization, the violent imposition of forced collectivization through the "war against the kulaks," and the adoption of more aggressive international ambitions.
The contrast between Stalin's priorities in the mid-1920s and late-1920s is striking. Before 1928, the Comintern received minimal attention as Stalin focused on internal consolidation. After 1928, it became a crucial instrument for projecting Soviet power internationally. This dramatic reversal would have profound consequences for communist parties worldwide.
The Sixth Comintern Congress and the new line
In July 1928, Stalin presented his reassessment of the international situation to the Sixth Comintern Congress. He argued that world capitalism had entered a terminal crisis, creating conditions favorable for an all-out assault on anti-communist forces in Europe. Stalin identified a particular enemy: social-fascists—social democratic parties in Western Europe which, according to Stalin and figures like Zinoviev, were actively assisting fascism by compromising with capitalism and blocking progress towards class revolution.
Understanding "Social-Fascism"
The concept of "social-fascism" became central to Stalin's new Comintern policy. According to this theory, social democratic parties in Western Europe were not merely misguided allies but actual enemies of the working class. By compromising with capitalism and preventing revolutionary progress, they were effectively assisting fascism. Stalin declared social democrats the most dangerous enemies of socialism—even more dangerous than the fascists themselves.
Stalin instructed the Comintern to purge "weak elements" (including those with Trotskyist sympathies) whilst preparing to spread revolution globally. His August 1928 speech to the Congress elaborated a historical framework dividing the international labor movement into three distinct phases.
Stalin's Three Phases of the International Labour Movement
Phase 1: Acute Crisis (1917-1921) The period of extremely acute crisis in the capitalist system, characterized by direct revolutionary action by the proletariat. This phase reached its apex in 1921 with the USSR's victory over forces of foreign intervention and internal counter-revolution, but ended with severe defeats for the proletariat in Western Europe.
Phase 2: Stabilization (1921-1928) A period of gradual stabilization of the capitalist system alongside the rapid restoration of the USSR and the construction of socialism. Communist parties consolidated but revolutionary momentum stalled.
Phase 3: Fresh Crisis (1928 onwards) According to Stalin, this new phase "will give rise to a fresh series of imperialist wars, and to gigantic class battles." He claimed conditions were now ripe for renewed revolutionary action.
This analysis provided ideological justification for aggressive Comintern activism. Stalin commanded the organization to abandon any remaining pretense of international communist brotherhood and instead function as an instrument for achieving Soviet foreign policy objectives under his personal direction.
Tightening Soviet control over the Comintern
As Stalin tightened his grip on the Comintern, he implemented strict discipline across communist parties in countries including France, Germany, and Italy. Soviet agents received instructions to infiltrate foreign communist parties and transmit intelligence back to Moscow. Foreign communist leaders found themselves encouraged—in practice, summoned—to journey to the USSR, ostensibly to participate in the collective effort to sharpen communist ideology and strengthen international unity. In reality, this served as a mechanism for controlling and monitoring them more effectively.
Methods of Control
Stalin employed multiple strategies to subordinate the Comintern to his will:
- Infiltration: Soviet agents were sent to infiltrate foreign communist parties and report back to Moscow
- Summoning leaders: Foreign communist leaders were brought to the USSR under the guise of ideological training, but actually for surveillance and control
- Installing loyalists: Stalin placed trusted personnel in key Comintern positions
- Imposing discipline: Strict adherence to Moscow's directives became mandatory, with deviation punished severely
Stalin installed loyal personnel to manage Comintern operations on his behalf. Any remaining illusions about the Comintern representing genuine international brotherhood evaporated; it became transparently a tool serving Stalin's foreign policy requirements. This transformation eliminated autonomous decision-making by foreign communist parties and subordinated their strategies entirely to directives from Moscow. The Comintern evolved from an organization theoretically dedicated to international workers' revolution into an apparatus extending Stalin's personal authority across the global communist movement.
Explaining Stalin's policy shift
Historians have debated the motivations underlying Stalin's dramatic reorientation of Comintern policy in 1928-1929. The question raises fundamental issues about whether ideology or political calculation drove Stalin's actions.
One interpretation emphasizes ideological factors. Stalin had demonstrated genuine revolutionary commitment between 1917 and 1919, and he may simply have reverted to his earlier revolutionary instincts once the imperative for "socialism in one country" had been satisfied. According to this view, Stalin sincerely believed that world capitalism faced terminal crisis and that revolutionary conditions had matured, making aggressive Comintern activism both justified and necessary.
However, alternative explanations highlight domestic political considerations. The timing of Stalin's shift coincided precisely with his intensifying struggle against Bukharin and the Right Opposition. Bukharin—the most prominent opponent of Stalin's new Comintern line—advocated continued emphasis on internal development and cautious foreign policy. Stalin's confrontational international stance may therefore have been calculated primarily to create another arena for political combat with Bukharin, demonstrating Stalin's revolutionary credentials whilst depicting Bukharin as conservative or even counter-revolutionary.
George Kennan's Interpretation
The American historian George Kennan, who served in diplomatic roles in Russia during the 1930s and later became an expert on Soviet affairs, offered an insightful assessment in his 1961 study. Kennan argued that during the 1920s, Stalin systematically portrayed Russia as "threatened", taking elaborate measures to generate confusion within the public consciousness about the actual dangers involved.
According to Kennan, Stalin exaggerated both:
- The prospect of capitalist intervention against Russia
- The threat of opposition from foreign socialists and communists
This created an atmosphere of encirclement and crisis. Kennan suggested Stalin concealed the actions he implemented to defend himself from supposed foreign socialism and communism behind apparent concern for Soviet security. This perspective implies Stalin manipulated perceptions of external threats to consolidate internal authority, with his aggressive Comintern policies serving primarily to identify and eliminate socialist and communist rivals who maintained connections with potentially hostile foreign forces.
The debate between these interpretations remains unresolved, though most historians acknowledge that multiple factors—ideological conviction, political opportunism, and genuine security concerns—likely interacted to shape Stalin's decisions.
The outcome by December 1929
By December 1929, Stalin had achieved virtually absolute control over the political system of the USSR. Internal dissent within the Communist Party, previously aired in public forums, became confined strictly to inner circles of power. Stalin positioned himself as the personification of ideology, policy, and authority, enabling him to present himself through the cult of personality as the authentic, unchallenged successor to Lenin.
Regarding the outside world, Stalin had transitioned from the "safe" foreign policy of the 1920s—which downplayed "world revolution" in favor of achieving internal stability through "Socialism in One Country"—to an aggressive international posture. Domestically and internationally, Stalin now commanded sufficient authority and organizational control to implement the comprehensive transformation known as the "Stalin Revolution." The Comintern had been thoroughly converted into an instrument of Stalin's will, its earlier character as an association of autonomous communist parties completely destroyed.
Key Points to Remember:
- Between 1924 and 1929, Stalin largely ignored the Comintern, focusing instead on internal affairs and consolidating power through "Socialism in One Country"
- At the Sixth Comintern Congress in July-August 1928, Stalin declared that world capitalism faced terminal crisis and ordered aggressive action against social democrats (labeled "social-fascists")
- Stalin imposed strict discipline on foreign communist parties, sent Soviet agents to infiltrate them, and summoned foreign leaders to Moscow, transforming the Comintern into a tool of Soviet foreign policy
- Historians debate whether Stalin's shift resulted from genuine ideological conviction about revolutionary opportunity or from domestic political calculations, particularly his struggle against Bukharin
- By December 1929, Stalin exercised absolute control over both the Soviet political system and the international communist movement through the Comintern