Attitudes to the USSR and China (AQA A-Level History): Revision Notes
Attitudes to the USSR and China
The context of détente in the 1970s
During the 1960s and 1970s, the Cold War entered a new phase characterised by reduced tensions between the superpowers. This period became known as détente, a French term meaning 'relaxation' that described the increased diplomatic contact between the USA and USSR, alongside negotiations aimed at controlling nuclear weapons. The shift towards détente emerged from practical concerns: the arms race proved economically burdensome for both sides, and the ever-present threat of nuclear war created pressure for dialogue rather than confrontation.
What was détente? Détente was a French word meaning 'relaxation', used to describe the increased level of diplomatic contact between the USA and USSR and negotiations regarding nuclear weapons during the Cold War. It represented a deliberate attempt by both superpowers to reduce tensions and the risk of nuclear conflict.
The thawing of relations took various concrete forms. In 1972, the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT) began, representing negotiations between the USA and USSR to limit their nuclear arsenals. These discussions led to the Antiballistic Missile Treaty and established caps on specific weapons systems. By 1975, the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe produced the Helsinki Final Act, which aimed to recognise existing political borders across Europe, thereby reducing the likelihood of territorial disputes and facilitating increased trade between East and West.
However, détente remained fragile and incomplete. Arms control discussions could not eliminate underlying ideological differences, and new sources of friction would emerge as the decade progressed.
The Sino-Soviet split and its international implications
Before examining Western attitudes towards China and the USSR, it is necessary to understand a development that fundamentally altered Cold War dynamics: the Sino-Soviet split. This term describes the deterioration in diplomatic relations between the USSR and China during the 1970s, in which the Chinese leadership asserted independence from Moscow and adopted different interpretations of Marxist ideology on certain issues.
China had come under Communist rule in the 1940s when Mao Zedong led the Communist party and the Red Army to victory, both in the Second World War against Japan and in the subsequent civil war against domestic political opponents. Following their victory, China became a Communist neighbour and theoretical ally of the USSR. Yet relations between the two Communist powers cooled considerably as Mao refused to accept orders from Moscow and pursued an independent foreign policy.
Why the Sino-Soviet split mattered for the West
The emergence of three competing superpowers rather than two created new strategic possibilities for Western policymakers. The break between the Soviet Union and China meant that the Communist bloc was no longer monolithic, opening opportunities for Western nations to exploit divisions within the Communist world. This fundamentally changed the strategic landscape of the Cold War.
American and British approaches to China
Nixon's strategic calculation
Richard Nixon had built his political career on strong anti-communist credentials. His political identity had long been defined by opposition to Communism, which insulated him from accusations of being soft on the issue when he pursued improved relations with China. A Democrat president or more liberal Republican politician would have faced greater criticism for such an approach, but Nixon's established reputation provided him political cover for this dramatic policy shift.
Nixon identified three specific reasons for seeking better relations with China:
- Improved international relations would benefit trade and stimulate economic growth
- The Sino-Soviet split created an opportunity to move closer to China as a means of outmanoeuvring the USSR, potentially isolating Moscow diplomatically
- China provided backing to North Vietnam, and establishing dialogue with Beijing might help facilitate an end to the Vietnam War
The Taiwan obstacle
A substantial impediment blocked the path to normalised relations with Communist China. The Nationalist government, having lost the Chinese civil war, had fled into exile in Taiwan. Since the Second World War, American governments had recognised this Nationalist regime in Taiwan as the legitimate Chinese government. How could America recognise the Communists without appearing to abandon its allies in Taiwan?
The Taiwan recognition problem
The United States faced a diplomatic dilemma: it had long recognised the Nationalist government in Taiwan as the legitimate representative of China. To establish relations with Communist China, the US needed to find a way to acknowledge Beijing without completely abandoning its Taiwanese allies. This required careful diplomatic negotiation.
Nixon's officials worked discreetly with their Chinese counterparts to prepare for a summit meeting. Henry Kissinger, serving as Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, conducted secret negotiations with China regarding future relations. Meanwhile, the United Nations debated China's representation: the Chinese seat remained occupied by the exiled Nationalists in Taiwan. The US position advocated that Communist China should be permitted to join the UN, while Nationalist China should remain as Taiwan rather than claiming to represent all of China. When the vote occurred, it favoured Communist China, which joined as the Nationalist representatives departed.
Diplomatic breakthrough through sport
While secretive negotiations progressed, China extended an invitation to the US table-tennis team to visit. This 1971 event became known as 'Ping Pong Diplomacy' by international media. The following year, Nixon travelled to China for a week-long visit, meeting Mao on a single occasion. Though Mao was elderly and in poor health, speaking little during their encounter, the meeting itself carried enormous symbolic weight and allowed Nixon to articulate his views and requirements for improved bilateral relations.
Ping Pong Diplomacy: Sport as a Political Tool
In 1971, China invited the US table-tennis team to visit China, creating an opportunity for informal diplomatic contact. This seemingly simple sporting event became a crucial step in normalising relations between the two nations.
The significance:
- Provided a non-threatening context for initial contact
- Generated positive media coverage in both countries
- Paved the way for Nixon's historic 1972 visit
- Demonstrated how cultural exchanges could reduce tensions
British engagement under Heath
As Prime Minister, Edward Heath sought to establish Britain's own connections with China. His Foreign Secretary, Alec Douglas-Home, visited China in 1972, with Heath himself making trips in 1974 and 1975. Discussions between the two sides focused on trade matters and largely avoided contentious political issues.
One sensitive topic could not be entirely ignored: Hong Kong. This island territory, leased from China by Britain, was scheduled to be returned in 1997. When suggestions arose that the deadline might be postponed, they met with rejection. However, Mao's successor, Deng Xiaoping, accepted that Hong Kong's prosperity and significance depended upon its capitalist, free-market economy remaining intact.
Western attitudes towards the USSR in the early 1970s
The Nixon-Brezhnev summit
Richard Nixon's meeting with Communist Party secretary-general Leonid Brezhnev in Moscow during May 1972 marked an important moment in superpower relations. Brezhnev had observed Nixon's February trip to China with considerable anxiety: improved understanding between China and the USA threatened to leave the USSR diplomatically isolated. Moreover, the Cold War's enormous cost had become unsustainable. If the threat of war diminished and all sides reduced their military expenditure, while simultaneously increasing international trade, all parties would benefit.
Nixon became the first US President to visit Moscow. His trip resulted in agreements addressing weapon stockpile limitations and grain trading. The USSR continually struggled to feed its population adequately, and these trade arrangements had both economic and political dimensions. Building upon earlier SALT achievements, further summits occurred in 1973 and 1974, though they produced limited additional progress. One issue proved particularly divisive: Carter's successor presidency raised human rights concerns, which Soviet authorities had no wish to discuss.
Economic dimensions of détente
The Soviet Union faced persistent food shortages and struggled to feed its population. Grain trade agreements with the USA served both economic purposes (providing needed food supplies) and political purposes (creating mutual dependencies that reduced the likelihood of conflict). This economic interdependence was a key feature of the détente period.
The limits of détente
Did détente represent a genuine transformation of superpower relations by the late 1970s? The Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979 demonstrated that Red Army forces had exceeded the boundaries established in 1945, adopting a stance that NATO regarded as threatening. This challenged the spirit of Helsinki's commitment to respect existing borders and discourse about human rights in the Soviet Union and its client states received a distinctly frosty response from Moscow.
The end of détente
The Afghan invasion illustrated that fundamental tensions persisted beneath the surface diplomacy of détente. While dialogue and arms control agreements had reduced immediate confrontation, they had not eliminated the underlying ideological and geopolitical competition between the superpowers. The invasion of Afghanistan in 1979 effectively marked the end of the détente period and a return to Cold War hostilities.
Key takeaways
Essential points to remember:
-
Détente represented a period of reduced Cold War tensions in the 1960s-70s, driven by economic pressures and fear of nuclear war, resulting in arms control negotiations such as SALT
-
The Sino-Soviet split created three competing powers rather than two, allowing Western nations to exploit divisions within the Communist bloc and pursue relations with China
-
Nixon's China policy was driven by three factors: economic benefits from trade, the strategic advantage of outmanoeuvring the USSR, and the desire to end the Vietnam War. His anti-communist credentials provided political protection for this dramatic policy shift
-
The Taiwan question posed a substantial diplomatic challenge, resolved through allowing Communist China to take the UN seat while maintaining informal US connections with Taiwan
-
British-Chinese relations under Heath focused on trade and carefully navigated the Hong Kong issue, with Deng Xiaoping accepting that the territory's capitalist economy must remain intact
-
The Nixon-Brezhnev summit of May 1972 produced agreements on arms limitation and grain trade, but détente proved limited, as shown by disputes over human rights and the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979