The Impact of Growing Urbanisation (Edexcel A-Level History): Revision Notes
The Impact of Growing Urbanisation
Introduction
During the Tudor period, England experienced significant changes in its urban landscape. Urbanisation – the growth of towns in population and economic importance – was not a straightforward process. While London grew rapidly and continuously throughout the period, other towns experienced a more complex pattern of initial decline followed by recovery. Understanding this pattern is essential for grasping the broader economic and social changes of Tudor England.
The urban experience in Tudor England was far from uniform. London's exceptional growth contrasted sharply with provincial towns, which faced a challenging period of decline before eventually recovering in the second half of the sixteenth century.
Urban decline in the early Tudor period (1520s-1540s)
The scale of decline
In the 1520s and 1530s, many towns that had flourished during the medieval period faced serious depopulation and economic decay. The evidence for this decline is striking:
Coventry's dramatic decline provides perhaps the most shocking example of urban decay in early Tudor England. Its population fell from approximately 8,000-9,000 inhabitants in 1500 to just 6,000 by 1523 – a loss of about 25-33% of its population. The physical evidence was equally stark: the town had 565 empty houses, representing roughly a quarter of all its domestic buildings. This was a town in severe decline.
Other significant medieval towns experiencing similar problems included:
- York – a major northern city
- Canterbury – an important pilgrimage centre
- Ipswich – a port town
- Leicester – a market town
- Bristol – a major port and trading centre
Town representatives petitioned the king and parliament about their difficulties, though historians note that some of these complaints were partly tactical attempts to reduce local tax burdens rather than purely objective descriptions of urban crisis.
Reasons for urban decline
The decline of towns in the early Tudor period had several interconnected causes, which varied in importance from town to town:
The shifting cloth industry
The most significant factor was the fundamental restructuring of England's most important industry – cloth production. During this period, the cloth industry increasingly moved away from traditional urban centres to smaller towns like Lavenham and to rural areas. This shift was driven by the development of the "putting out" system (also called subcontracting), where clothiers distributed work to rural workers rather than concentrating production in urban workshops.
The "putting out" system was cheaper for clothiers (cloth merchants and producers) because rural workers accepted lower wages and were not bound by urban guild regulations. However, this system was devastating for traditional cloth-working towns, which lost their main industry and source of employment.
London's dominance
The growth of London and its ports created a gravitational pull that undermined the trade of other cities. Towns such as York and Bristol found their commercial importance reduced as London came to dominate English trade. York's position as a northern trading hub was particularly challenged, while Bristol's role as a western port faced competition.
The dissolution of the monasteries
The dissolution of the monasteries (1536-1540) had significant economic consequences for urban centres. Many towns had developed economies that depended substantially on income from religious institutions and pilgrimage. The closure of monasteries and destruction of shrines meant the loss of pilgrims and the economic activity they generated. This particularly affected:
- Canterbury – home to the shrine of Thomas Becket, one of England's most important pilgrimage destinations
- York – which had numerous religious houses and was an important religious centre
Government responses to urban decline
Tudor governments recognised the problem of urban decay and attempted various legislative solutions, though with limited success:
Acts of the 1530s and 1540s
Parliament passed a series of Acts ordering town authorities to rebuild derelict properties. These measures aimed to reverse physical decay and encourage economic recovery, but they struggled against underlying economic forces.
Mary's attempts to revive urban cloth production
During Mary I's reign (1553-1558), the government attempted to reverse the shift of the cloth industry to rural areas. Legislation tried to restrict the growth of cloth production in the countryside and smaller towns, aiming to encourage clothiers to return to larger urban centres.
The Act of 1556 imposed a fine of £5 per cloth on anyone starting a rural cloth business. This was a substantial sum, intended to make rural cloth production uneconomical.
Limited effectiveness of government intervention
None of these government measures proved very effective. The underlying economic logic favouring rural and small-town cloth production was too powerful. Clothiers found the putting out system more profitable, and legislation could not reverse this fundamental economic reality. Only when the cloth trade itself faced temporary decline in the 1550s did towns begin to recover – but for different reasons than government policy.
Urban recovery and growth from the 1550s
Evidence of urban growth
From the 1550s onwards, English towns began to recover and grow. The scale of this change is evident in population statistics for major towns:
| Town | Estimated population in Henry VIII's reign | Estimated population by end of Elizabeth's reign |
|---|---|---|
| London | 60,000 | 215,000 |
| Norwich | 12,000 | 15,000 |
| Bristol | 10,000 | 12,000 |
| Exeter | 8,000 | 9,000 |
| York | 8,000 | 11,500 |
| Newcastle | 4,000 | 9,000 |
These figures reveal London's exceptional growth – its population more than tripled during the Tudor period. Other towns grew more modestly but still significantly, particularly Newcastle, which more than doubled in size, and York, which recovered strongly after its earlier decline.
Reasons for urban growth
The recovery and growth of towns in the second half of the 16th century resulted from several interconnected factors:
Population pressure and migration
England's overall population was growing during this period, creating pressure on employment in rural areas. This encouraged migration to towns where people hoped to find work. The movement of people from countryside to town became a significant feature of Elizabethan England.
New trading routes
The opening of new trading routes transformed the commercial prospects of several towns:
- Towns such as York, Bristol, and Exeter all benefited from new trade routes in the Baltic and Atlantic
- These routes opened access to new markets and products, revitalising port towns
- Exploration under Elizabeth I created fresh commercial opportunities that had not existed earlier in the century
Dutch migrants and the "new draperies"
The transformative impact of Dutch migrants
The arrival of migrant Dutch workers had a transformative effect on the English cloth industry. These skilled craftsmen brought knowledge of producing "new draperies" – lighter, cheaper types of cloth than traditional English woollens. This innovation rejuvenated the cloth trades in several towns:
- Norwich became particularly successful, benefiting enormously from Dutch expertise
- Colchester, Ipswich, and Canterbury also saw their cloth trades revitalised
- The new draperies opened up different markets and provided a competitive advantage
Economic diversification
Towns began to diversify their economic activities rather than relying solely on traditional industries:
- Norwich developed industries beyond cloth, including clothes making and hat making
- This diversification made towns more economically resilient and created a wider range of employment opportunities
Gentry town houses
An important social change also contributed to urban growth. Gentry families increasingly purchased houses in towns where they would spend the winter months. This brought wealth into urban areas and created demand for luxury goods and services.
Increased demand and new occupations
Growing urban populations created increased work in several sectors:
- The building trade expanded to accommodate population growth
- Food suppliers benefited from increased demand for essential provisions
- Luxury goods such as sugar and wine became more widely available
- A new occupation that developed in Tudor towns was that of vintner (wine merchant), reflecting growing demand for imported wine
New urban settlements and specialisations
Not all urban growth occurred in existing towns. Some new settlements began to develop during this period:
Birmingham emerged as a significant settlement with a flourishing trade in iron manufacture. Its growth demonstrated how industrial specialisation could create new urban centres.
Manchester was developing as a centre for linen and textile manufacture, establishing the foundations for its later importance.
Existing towns also developed specialisations: Newcastle's rapid growth (from 4,000 to 9,000) resulted from its profitable coal trade, which supplied the growing London market. As London's population exploded, so did its demand for coal, making Newcastle's coal trade extremely lucrative.
Social and economic challenges of urbanisation
Disease and mortality
Towns were particularly vulnerable to disease due to cramped living conditions and poor sanitation. Disease could spread rapidly through dense urban populations, with devastating consequences:
The 1579 Norwich plague
In 1579, Norwich's population fell dramatically from 18,000 to 15,000 as a result of a plague outbreak. This represents a loss of nearly 17% of the population in a single epidemic. Such events were not uncommon in Tudor towns, and they could temporarily reverse urban growth.
The poor harvests and influenza epidemic of the late 1550s made conditions in towns particularly difficult, leading to:
- Widespread disease
- High mortality rates
- Temporary labour shortages in the early years of Elizabeth's reign
- Increased demand for workers
- Some workers demanding higher wages
Wealth inequality
Although some urban residents were very wealthy, wealth was not equally divided among the population. There was a large gap between the wealthy minority and the poorer majority in most towns.
Many town residents owned little or no property because they could not afford it. This had serious consequences:
- They were not self-sufficient – they could not grow their own food
- They depended entirely on purchasing food and other necessities
- In times of food shortages, they had no means to support themselves
- They were particularly vulnerable to economic crises
Evidence of urban poverty
Tax returns provide evidence of urban poverty, though they must be used cautiously. These records suggest that approximately 30% of the population in most towns paid no tax. While some of this was due to tax evasion, much of it reflected genuine poverty. In times of poor harvests or disease, this group would become reliant on poor relief or might resort to begging and vagrancy.
Migration pressures
The migration of people to towns in search of work created significant pressures:
Migration to Bristol (1532-1542)
Between 1532 and 1542, over 1,400 apprentices migrated from the West Country into Bristol. This influx:
- Put pressure on house prices
- Increased competition for accommodation
- Created tensions between established residents and newcomers
- Strained urban resources and infrastructure
Government response: the Statute of Artificers (1563)
The Statute of Artificers of 1563 represented the government's comprehensive attempt to address the interconnected problems of unemployment, wages, and poverty.
The statute introduced several important provisions:
Wage regulation
For the first time, Justices of the Peace (JPs) were ordered to set maximum rates for wages in each county. This was intended to prevent wage inflation and maintain social stability. The authorities feared that labour shortages might allow workers to demand excessive wages, disrupting the social order.
Agricultural priority
The statute prioritised the collection of the harvest. This reflected the fundamental importance of agriculture to the economy and the need to ensure food supplies.
Apprenticeship regulation
Apprenticeships were regulated to ensure that unqualified people could not enter skilled jobs for which they were not properly trained. This protected established craftsmen and maintained standards, but also restricted social mobility.
Limited effectiveness
However, tensions within towns remained whenever there were poor harvests or disease. The statute could not eliminate the underlying vulnerabilities of urban life, and towns continued to experience periodic crises throughout Elizabeth's reign.
The concentration of poverty in towns
Towns were particularly sensitive to the social and economic crises that affected Tudor England. Several factors concentrated poverty in urban areas:
Physical conditions
- Cramped living conditions meant disease could spread quickly
- Dirt and poor sanitation created health hazards
- High population density made epidemics more devastating
Economic vulnerability
- Urban workers depended on the cash economy
- They could not fall back on subsistence agriculture
- Food shortages hit urban populations particularly hard
- Economic downturns immediately affected urban employment
Poor relief
Recognising these problems, major towns began to establish permanent systems of poor relief:
- As early as 1547, the city of London made contributions to poor relief permanent
- Other major towns soon followed: Ipswich, Norwich, and York
- This marked an important development in social welfare provision
- Towns recognised they had a responsibility to support their poor residents
The growing professional classes
An important consequence of urbanisation and wider social changes was the growth of professional classes – people whose careers required formal education and training. This development transformed Tudor society and created new opportunities for social advancement.
Careers in the Church
Although employment in the Church was not strictly a profession in the modern sense, those who worked within the Church had received some form of education, making them part of an educated elite.
Education and training
A boy who wanted a career in the Church would typically be educated at:
- A grammar school – schools originally designed to teach Latin grammar to boys planning Church careers
- A school attached to a cathedral or monastery
- These institutions taught Latin, which was essential for Church services and religious texts
It was not necessary for a potential priest to attend university, though this option was available to able students. Tudor governments were keen to improve the standard of clerical education, recognising that many clergy were poorly educated.
Career paths
Church careers varied enormously in status and reward:
- Some clergy were employed at low rates of pay in chantries (chapels where priests said prayers for the dead)
- Others became parish priests, serving local communities
- Some became tutors or teachers in private households or schools
- A few fortunate or able students could rise high:
- Teaching at Oxford or Cambridge
- Becoming bishops
- Entering royal service
The career of Thomas Wolsey
The career of Thomas Wolsey demonstrates what an ambitious and clever boy from a relatively lowly background could achieve through the Church. Wolsey rose to become Cardinal, Lord Chancellor, and Henry VIII's chief minister – showing the potential for social advancement through Church careers.
The legal profession
The legal profession became increasingly important and popular during the Tudor period, offering significant opportunities for wealth and status.
Training and education
Unlike Church careers, legal careers required formal and lengthy training. Potential lawyers could follow two main routes:
University training
- Study civil law at Oxford or Cambridge
- This provided a theoretical grounding in legal principles
The Inns of Court
- Training through the London Inns of Court – four institutions known by contemporaries as the "third university"
- These were: Lincoln's Inn, Middle Temple, Inner Temple, and Gray's Inn
- The Inns provided both formal education and professional organisation
- Prospective lawyers would live and study at one of the Inns
Entry requirements for legal training
Entry to the Inns of Court was competitive. Potential students needed:
- A good standard of education
- Financial support, as students had to support themselves during training
- This meant legal careers were largely restricted to those with family wealth or patronage
The structure of the legal profession
The legal profession had a clear hierarchy:
At the top:
- Judges – presided over courts
- Barristers – worked in the largest and most important central courts
- These were the elite of the profession
Below them:
- Attorneys – worked in the localities, provided advice, and represented clients in court
- Solicitors – more lowly, but still had professional training
Dramatic growth in numbers
The expansion of law courts created enormous demand for legal professionals. The growth in numbers was remarkable:
The explosive growth of the legal profession
Barristers:
- 1510: 10 working barristers
- 1569: 85 working barristers
- 1590: 411 working barristers
Attorneys:
- 1560: 200 attorneys
- 1606: 1,050 attorneys
This represents more than a tenfold increase in working barristers over 80 years, and more than a fivefold increase in attorneys over 46 years.
Lawyers in Parliament
An increasing number of men with legal education began to act as Members of Parliament (MPs):
- 1563: 140 MPs with legal training
- 1603: 253 MPs with legal training
This increase occurred because:
- Local communities particularly valued lawyers' expertise
- Lawyers could effectively promote regional interests in parliament by formulating laws
- Their professional training made them skilled in drafting legislation
- Lawyers were well paid enough to afford to become MPs (which was an unpaid role)
Lawyers in royal service
As royal government expanded and became more complex, there was increasing demand for legal expertise in royal service. Some men with legal training and the right contacts rose very high indeed:
William Paget – from craftsman's son to nobleman
William Paget exemplified the path to success through legal training:
- Son of a London craftsman
- Read civil law at Cambridge
- Rose through service to powerful men including Thomas Cromwell and Edward Seymour
- Became an MP
- Became a member of the Privy Council
- Finally ennobled by Somerset
His legal education provided the foundation for a remarkable rise through Tudor society.
Sir Walter Mildmay – legal expertise in royal service
Sir Walter Mildmay, a councillor to Elizabeth I, followed a similar trajectory:
- Educated at Gray's Inn
- Employed in the Court of Augmentations
- His financial and legal gifts meant he rose rapidly in royal service
While Paget and Mildmay were exceptional examples of those who reached the very top, law as a profession offered many opportunities to earn both wealth and increased status in Tudor society.
Physicians (doctors)
The medical profession also developed professional organisation and status during the Tudor period.
The Royal College of Physicians (1518)
The Royal College of Physicians was founded by the Crown in 1518. This was a landmark in the development of medicine as a profession. The college had important functions:
- Protect medical practitioners with qualifications from those who claimed medical skill but had no formal training
- License physicians across England
- Punish those who practised without a licence
- Give doctors professional status for the first time
Training
Doctors were trained at:
- Oxford and Cambridge
- European universities (medical education was often better developed abroad)
The foundation of the college created clear standards and gave qualified physicians official recognition and protection.
Key statistics to remember
Urban population growth:
- London: 60,000 → 215,000 (more than tripled)
- Newcastle: 4,000 → 9,000 (more than doubled)
- York: 8,000 → 11,500
Urban decline:
- Coventry: 8,000-9,000 (1500) → 6,000 (1523)
- 565 empty houses in Coventry (about 25% of buildings)
Legal profession growth:
- Barristers: 10 (1510) → 411 (1590)
- Attorneys: 200 (1560) → 1,050 (1606)
- MPs with legal training: 140 (1563) → 253 (1603)
Other key figures:
- About 30% of urban population paid no tax
- Over 1,400 apprentices migrated to Bristol 1532-1542
- Norwich population fell 18,000 → 15,000 in 1579 plague
Exam tips
When answering questions about urbanisation:
For 20-mark questions:
- Consider both causes and consequences of urbanisation
- Compare the experiences of different towns (London vs provincial towns)
- Link urbanisation to wider changes (population growth, religious changes, economic shifts)
- Use specific evidence (town names, dates, statistics)
- Consider continuity as well as change
Common pitfalls to avoid:
- Don't assume all towns experienced the same pattern – London was exceptional
- Don't forget the period of decline in the 1520s-1540s before recovery
- Don't oversimplify causes – urbanisation resulted from multiple interconnected factors
- Don't ignore the social problems that accompanied urban growth
Key themes to develop:
- The relationship between economic change and urbanisation
- The impact of government policy (usually limited effectiveness)
- The connection between urbanisation and social problems (poverty, disease)
- The role of migration in urban growth
- The development of professional classes as a consequence of urban society
Remember!
Key takeaways on the impact of growing urbanisation:
-
Urban experience varied greatly: London grew continuously and rapidly, while provincial towns experienced decline (1520s-1540s) followed by recovery (1550s onwards)
-
Economic forces drove change more than government policy: The cloth industry's shift to rural areas caused urban decline, while new trade routes and Dutch migrants stimulated recovery. Government legislation largely failed to reverse market forces
-
Urbanisation created both opportunities and problems: Towns offered employment and wealth for some, but also concentrated poverty, disease, and social tension. About 30% of urban populations were too poor to pay tax
-
New professional classes emerged: The growth of towns, increasing literacy, and expanding government created opportunities in law, medicine, and Church careers. The legal profession saw particularly dramatic growth, with barristers increasing from 10 (1510) to 411 (1590)
-
Urban problems required new solutions: Towns pioneered permanent systems of poor relief from 1547 onwards, recognising the particular vulnerability of urban populations to economic and health crises