Wolsey, Cromwell and Cecil in Tudor Government (Edexcel A-Level History): Revision Notes
Wolsey, Cromwell and Cecil in Tudor Government
Introduction to the principal servants of the Crown
Thomas Wolsey (c.1472–1530), Thomas Cromwell (c.1485–1540) and William Cecil (1520–98) served as chief ministers under Henry VIII and Elizabeth I. All three played crucial roles in enhancing royal power, but their relationships with their monarchs differed significantly, which ultimately determined their fates.
A key distinction existed in their social backgrounds. Wolsey and Cromwell both rose from humble origins, making them entirely dependent on Henry VIII for their power and promotion. They lacked the traditional advantages of landed estates, wealth and noble rank that other royal servants possessed. In contrast, Cecil came from the gentry class and had spent his entire career in royal service, which gave him a more stable foundation.
Understanding Power Dynamics
All three ministers only wielded power as long as their monarchs allowed it. This fundamental dependency shaped their careers and, for Wolsey and Cromwell, ultimately led to their dramatic falls from power. The key difference was that Cecil's gentry background and patronage network gave him some independence from royal whim.
Thomas Wolsey (c.1472–1530)
Background and rise to power
Wolsey's origins were remarkably humble for someone who would become one of the most powerful men in England. Born the son of an Ipswich butcher, his intelligence allowed him to attend Magdalen College, Oxford. He then pursued a career in the Church, which was a common route for talented individuals from lower social ranks to advance in Tudor society.
Wolsey's rapid ascent began in 1509 when he became almoner (the official who distributed money to the poor) to the newly crowned Henry VIII. Under the patronage of Richard Fox, he joined the king's Council in the same year. His administrative skills impressed the king, particularly when he successfully co-ordinated the war effort against France in 1512–14.
His promotions came quickly:
- 1514: Archbishop of York
- 1515: Created cardinal by the pope
- 1515: Lord Chancellor of England (head of the judicial system)
- 1518: Legate a latere from the pope
Legate a latere
A representative of the pope who was given full powers to act on the pope's behalf. This gave Wolsey enormous authority over the English Church, making him the most powerful churchman in England and effectively allowing him to control ecclesiastical affairs independently of Rome's direct oversight.
Relationship with Henry VIII
Wolsey's power existed only as long as he could fulfil Henry's wishes. The historian John Guy has argued that Wolsey did not seize power from Henry; rather, the king allowed him to wield it for as long as he proved useful. This dependency on royal favour would ultimately prove fatal.
Wolsey's contemporary critics accused him of undermining traditional nobles like the Duke of Buckingham simply because he resented their higher social status. However, the reality was more complex. When Buckingham was executed in 1521, it was because he appeared to be plotting treason and raising a private army. Significantly, it was Henry who wrote to Wolsey: "I would you should make good watch... on the duke of Buckingham... and on others which you think suspect."
The Duke of Buckingham Case: A Warning to the Nobility
Edward Stafford, Duke of Buckingham, was descended from Edward III and therefore had a claim to the throne. The Stafford family held extensive lands on the Welsh border, which they could use to raise a private army. Buckingham's father had used these powers to rebel against Richard III in 1483. Buckingham resented attempts to restrain his traditional powers.
In 1519, his servant Sir William Bulmer was prosecuted in Star Chamber for wearing the duke's livery (uniform) in the king's presence. In 1521, when Buckingham requested a licence to visit his Welsh lands with 400 armed men, Henry became alarmed. Shortly afterwards, Stafford was arrested, tried and executed for treason.
This case demonstrates that Henry VIII, not Wolsey, made the final decisions about threats to royal authority.
Wolsey also faced rivals for power, particularly from the gentlemen of the Privy Chamber. In 1519, he expelled the 'minions' (young men friendly with Henry) from the royal household because they had too much influence with the king. The Eltham Ordinances of 1526 can also be seen as an attempt to control the Chamber as a rival source of power.
Wolsey's successes
Wolsey made significant contributions to Tudor government through his exceptional organisational abilities:
Financial reforms: He introduced a new form of taxation called the subsidy, which allowed the king to collect more revenue from his subjects. This enabled Henry to afford foreign wars and later to play the role of international peacemaker.
Legal and social reforms: As Lord Chancellor, Wolsey attempted to improve the administration of justice. He used the court of Star Chamber to prosecute local officials accused of corruption. For example, in 1519 he prosecuted Sir John Savage, a prominent member of the Cheshire gentry, on suspicion of using his local influence to protect his son from murder charges. Wolsey's aim was to teach Savage "the new law of Star Chamber". Savage was pardoned but lost many of his local offices and had to pay a fine of 4,000 marks to the Crown.
More broadly, Wolsey used Star Chamber and the court of Chancery to encourage ordinary people to seek justice for their grievances, which led to a huge increase in the workload of these courts.
Enclosure enquiry: Wolsey launched a national enquiry in 1517–18 to investigate the practice of illegal enclosure by landlords.
Understanding Enclosure
Enclosure was a social and economic trend, common in the 15th and 16th centuries. It involved landlords taking over areas of common land and enclosing them with hedges or fences. This was often associated with the move away from arable farming to sheep farming. Tudor theorists often blamed enclosure for poverty, unemployment and vagrancy.
On the basis of this enquiry, 264 landlords were prosecuted and 188 verdicts were reached.
Wolsey's failures
Despite his achievements, Wolsey's personality and ambition created problems:
Excessive wealth and display: Wolsey held multiple church offices simultaneously – he was not only Archbishop of York but also Bishop of Lincoln and Tournai. He used the profits from these positions to live in grand style. His household numbered 500 men, nearly as large as the king's own. His building project at Hampton Court was so magnificent that contemporaries called him an 'alter rex' (another king).
Overambitious schemes: Although Wolsey encouraged cases to be brought to Star Chamber, this created a backlog that he, distracted by war and diplomacy, failed to clear.
Personal feuds: Wolsey used his power to prosecute personal enemies. Sir Robert Sheffield, who as Speaker of the House of Commons in 1512 had criticised Wolsey, was sent to the Tower and fined £5,333 for "opprobrious words".
Wolsey's Fatal Weakness: Alienating the Political Nation
Wolsey managed to alienate the very group he needed – the landed nobility and gentry. In 1523, he had to reverse his policy on enclosure as part of a deal with parliament, which tended to represent the interests of the landed elites. He also mismanaged the financial crisis of 1522–23, haranguing parliament in an attempt to extract higher taxation from them, before turning to the non-parliamentary Amicable Grant.
This loss of support among the political classes left him isolated and vulnerable when he failed to deliver the divorce.
Fall from power
Wolsey's position became vulnerable from 1525 onwards as his relationship with Henry began to unravel. The critical issue was his inability to secure the annulment of Henry's marriage to Catherine of Aragon. Only when Wolsey failed to deliver what the king wanted did his position come under serious threat.
By 1529, Wolsey had outlived his usefulness to the king. His fall was as dramatic as his rise had been meteoric. Wolsey was accused of praemunire, stripped of his possessions and banished from court.
Praemunire: A Weapon Against Papal Authority
Praemunire was a legal charge used against those who were suspected of appealing to a foreign power outside the English monarch's authority. In particular, it could be used against those who attempted to appeal to the pope. The charge was used against Wolsey in 1529 and against all the English clergy in 1530.
A year later, in 1530, while on his way to trial for treason, Wolsey died.
Thomas Cromwell (c.1485–1540)
Background and rise to power
Cromwell's career path and final fate closely mirrored Wolsey's. He was a genuinely self-made man. His background is somewhat shadowy, but he was born in London around 1485, the son of a cloth maker. He left England in his teens and served as a soldier in the French army. He learned about accountancy and law, though he had no formal legal training.
By 1516, Cromwell was working for Wolsey, and in 1523 he became an MP. He was highly intelligent, hard-working and almost entirely self-taught. Crucially, he was also a political survivor.
When Wolsey fell from power in 1529, Cromwell managed to recover quickly. By 1531 he had become a member of Henry's Council. Influenced by reformer ideas, he developed strong religious convictions. Working with the faction that formed around Anne Boleyn, Cromwell was able to manipulate proceedings in a way that allowed Henry to achieve his annulment from Catherine of Aragon whilst also steering England towards a reformed Church.
Cromwell and parliament
Cromwell's genius was to realise that he could use parliament to give the king his annulment. This was a revolutionary approach that had profound consequences:
Cromwell's Revolutionary Use of Parliament
By using parliament, Cromwell and Henry were able to present the laws they made as the will of the people (since parliament represented them). By passing Acts of Parliament, the break with Rome was made legal under English law, and anyone who broke these laws could be punished.
Creating precedent: The use of parliament also created a precedent. Any further changes to these laws would also need to be passed by parliament, as indeed happened under Edward, Mary and Elizabeth.
This fundamentally changed the role of parliament in English government and established a principle that would shape constitutional development for centuries.
By 1531, all attempts to persuade the pope to grant a divorce had failed, largely because the pope was under the control of Charles V, Catherine of Aragon's nephew. In 1532, Cromwell exploited the anti-clerical feeling in parliament, which led to the first steps in breaking from the pope and Rome.
Act in Restraint of Appeals (1533): In 1533, Cromwell drafted this crucial Act, which created the mechanism to stop Catherine appealing to the pope over Henry's head. This Act is particularly famous because of its preamble, which defined Cromwell and Henry's vision of the Royal Supremacy for the first time.
The Act in Restraint of Appeals: Defining Royal Supremacy
The preamble stated that England was an "Empire" governed by "one Supreme Head and king" who possessed "plenary, whole, and entire power, pre-eminence, authority". This meant that the English monarch had complete authority in England and owed obedience to no foreign power, including the pope. All the people, both spiritual (clergy) and temporal (laypeople), owed their obedience to God and then to the king.
This was the legal foundation for the English Reformation and the break with Rome.
Role as vicegerent in spirituals
Cromwell further extended his role in government when Henry named him vicegerent (deputy) in spirituals in late 1534. Although Cromwell was not a churchman, this unprecedented role gave him power to shape the religion of the country.
As vicegerent, Cromwell:
- Used propaganda and preaching campaigns in churches to introduce reformer ideas more widely across England
- Was the architect of the dissolution of the monasteries between 1536 and 1539
Cromwell's role in government and fall from power
Alongside religious reforms, Cromwell also enhanced royal power in 1536 through changes to the government of England and Wales. However, most historians now agree that he should not be credited with creating a "Tudor revolution in government". The changes to the Privy Council happened despite, not because of, him. The Council that emerged in 1537 was full of his political enemies, such as the Duke of Norfolk.
Like Wolsey, Cromwell was only able to act while he had the king's support. From 1532 to 1536, their interests converged: Henry wanted a divorce and Cromwell, a convinced religious reformer, wanted to advance changes to the Catholic Church. However, problems emerged:
Opposition to religious changes: In 1536, the dissolution of the smaller monasteries created the most serious rebellion of the reign. Some 30,000 rebels were involved in the Pilgrimage of Grace, and they named Cromwell personally in their complaints. Henry himself was no religious reformer, and by 1538 Cromwell was forced to end his preaching campaign.
Cromwell eventually fell from power in 1540 for two main reasons:
Cromwell's Fatal Errors
The Cleves marriage: Cromwell had arranged Henry's fourth marriage to the Protestant Anne of Cleves in 1539–40. This was part of his attempt to create a Protestant alliance in Europe against the threat of a united Franco-Spanish invasion. However, Henry disliked Anne on sight, calling her "the Flanders mare", and only went through with the marriage reluctantly. This was a serious tactical error that angered Henry. By this point, the king had already fallen for the young and pretty Katherine Howard, the niece of the conservative Duke of Norfolk.
Conservative faction opposition: Norfolk and the conservative faction took advantage of the Cleves marriage to influence Henry against Cromwell. The final accusation was that Cromwell had been protecting Protestants who had been accused of heresy.
Cromwell's enemies among the conservative faction at court saw their opportunity to remove him permanently by accusing him of treason and heresy. The king was angry enough at Cromwell to listen to them. On 10 June 1540, Cromwell was arrested. On 28 July he was executed because his policies no longer suited Henry.
William Cecil, Lord Burghley (1520–98)
Background and career
The working relationship that formed between William Cecil and Elizabeth I was conditioned by Elizabeth's own personality and style of rule. In contrast to Cromwell and Wolsey, Cecil was able to sustain his position from 1558 until his own peaceful death in 1598.
Cecil came from a higher social rank than either Wolsey or Cromwell – he was a member of the gentry and had spent his entire career in royal service. His political past was chequered: he served the Duke of Somerset until his fall in 1549 and then transferred his service to the Duke of Northumberland. Despite his close connection with both Somerset and Northumberland's regime, Cecil survived under Mary.
By 1548, Cecil was already in contact with Elizabeth. In 1558, he was perfectly placed to advise her when she became queen.
Relationship with Elizabeth I
Cecil's career under Elizabeth was so long and successful because they were both naturally cautious and pragmatic in their approach. They shared a politique outlook – they recognised the need for stability and compromise, and this formed the basis of their political relationship.
Understanding the Politique Approach
A politique was someone who prioritised political stability and practical governance over religious ideology. Both Cecil and Elizabeth believed that maintaining order and avoiding religious extremism was more important than enforcing strict religious conformity. This pragmatic approach helped England avoid the religious wars that devastated other European countries.
As Cecil's career progressed, he did attract enemies:
1569 court plot: Those of the nobility with Catholic sympathies, such as the Duke of Norfolk, sought to remove Cecil from power. Ironically, Norfolk was supported by the Protestant Earl of Leicester, who also distrusted Cecil's power.
Northern Rebellion (1569): The northern rebels wanted to remove him from power because he was pro-Protestant and they resented the amount of influence he had with the queen.
Crucially, however, Elizabeth supported Cecil rather than his critics. She rewarded him with the title Lord Burghley in 1571. In return for his unwavering loyalty, she allowed him to build up a network of supporters through patronage. This meant that Cecil never became politically isolated and was not completely dependent on the queen's whims for political survival, unlike Wolsey and Cromwell. This does not mean that Cecil was more powerful than the queen; their working relationship was built on trust and understanding that was mutually beneficial.
Cecil's role in government
Elizabeth and Cecil had a close partnership that lasted until his death in 1598. Cecil held several important positions:
Secretary of State (until 1572): This position gave him great influence because it gave him access to Elizabeth and her correspondence. When he was created Lord Burghley in 1571, he was able to sit in the House of Lords, from where he could influence events in the Commons.
Lord Treasurer (1572–98): In 1572, he became Lord Treasurer, a post he retained until his death.
Cecil was one of the most active members of Elizabeth's government. As treasurer, he:
- Organised the Council
- Managed parliament
- Controlled the exchequer
- Served as a Justice of the Peace (JP) in five counties
Key achievements
Religious settlement: Cecil was probably behind the document produced in 1559, the 'Device for the Alteration of Religion', which set out the religious problems faced by Elizabeth and proposed a settlement as soon as possible.
Scotland policy: He was responsible for negotiating a peace treaty with Scotland in 1560, which removed the presence of French troops (and therefore the threat of a hostile invasion from the north). He also helped set up a Protestant government in Scotland, thus neutralising the threat from England's traditional enemy. Cecil achieved this despite Elizabeth's initial reluctance to intervene in foreign affairs – he even threatened to resign to persuade her to change her mind.
Policy towards Catholics: Cecil remained dominant in government from this time. A committed Protestant, in the 1570s and 1580s he was one of the chief architects of attempts to tighten controls on English Catholics, despite Elizabeth's reluctance to follow this policy.
Mary, Queen of Scots: In 1587, Cecil supported the execution of Mary, Queen of Scots and was in disgrace for weeks, but he recovered.
Religious moderation: However, Cecil was also cautious regarding religion. Unlike his fellow councillor Francis Walsingham, he did not wish to see the establishment of a more radical religious settlement.
Comparing the three chief ministers
Similarities between Wolsey and Cromwell
- Both rose from humble backgrounds
- Both were entirely dependent on Henry VIII for their power
- Both lacked traditional landed estates and noble rank
- Both fell from power when they could no longer fulfil Henry's wishes
- Both were executed/died in disgrace
Why Cecil survived when Wolsey and Cromwell did not
Higher social status: Cecil came from the gentry, giving him an independent power base that Wolsey and Cromwell lacked.
Patronage network: Elizabeth allowed Cecil to build up a network of supporters through patronage. This meant he never became politically isolated.
Different monarch: The relationship between Henry VIII and his two chief ministers was dictated by Henry's volatile personality and style of rule. Elizabeth's more cautious and pragmatic approach matched Cecil's own temperament.
Mutual trust: Cecil and Elizabeth's working relationship was built on trust and understanding that was mutually beneficial. Elizabeth consistently supported Cecil against his critics.
Not solely dependent on royal favour: Unlike Wolsey and Cromwell, Cecil was not completely dependent on the queen's whims for political survival.
Exam focus
Understanding significance
When evaluating these ministers' contributions to royal power, consider:
- How they enhanced the monarch's authority
- Whether they increased royal power permanently or temporarily
- The methods they used (parliament, courts, propaganda)
- The limitations on their power
Avoiding Common Mistakes
- Don't assume these ministers were more powerful than the monarchs they served – they only had power because the monarch allowed it
- Don't oversimplify their falls from power – multiple factors contributed in each case
- Don't ignore the role of faction politics and court rivalries
Essay Structure Tips
For questions comparing these ministers:
- Introduction: briefly outline their roles and contexts
- Main body: address similarities and differences thematically (e.g. background, methods, relationship with monarch, reasons for success/failure)
- Conclusion: make a judgement about which was most significant, considering both achievements and longevity
Remember!
Key Points to Remember:
-
Wolsey and Cromwell rose from humble origins and were entirely dependent on Henry VIII's favour. Both fell dramatically when they could no longer deliver what Henry wanted – Wolsey failed to secure the divorce, Cromwell's Cleves marriage backfired.
-
Parliament's new role: Cromwell's use of parliament to achieve the break with Rome was revolutionary. By making these changes through Acts of Parliament, the Royal Supremacy became law and created a precedent for future religious changes.
-
Cecil's survival factors: Unlike Wolsey and Cromwell, Cecil came from the gentry, built a patronage network, and enjoyed a relationship of mutual trust with Elizabeth. He was not solely dependent on royal whim for his political survival.
-
Royal power remained supreme: Despite these ministers' influence, they only wielded power as long as their monarchs allowed it. Henry VIII's volatile personality meant his ministers lived dangerously; Elizabeth's pragmatism allowed Cecil to thrive.
-
Different methods, similar goals: All three enhanced royal power but used different methods – Wolsey through administration and courts, Cromwell through parliament and religious reform, Cecil through careful management of parliament and foreign policy.