Decline in Popular Resistance in the Years 1570-88? (Edexcel A-Level History): Revision Notes
Decline in Popular Resistance in the Years 1570-88?
Introduction: The changing nature of resistance
After the Northern Revolt of 1569, England witnessed a dramatic shift in the pattern of popular resistance. Between 1570 and 1588, there were no large-scale popular rebellions of the kind that had threatened Tudor monarchs earlier in the century. Whilst Catholic plots and smaller disturbances continued, none reached the scale of the rebellions of 1536, 1549, or 1569. This represented a significant change in the relationship between the Crown and its subjects, and understanding why this happened is essential for explaining the stability of Elizabeth I's later reign.
This decline in popular resistance was not the result of a single factor, but rather a combination of political, religious, social, and economic developments that made large-scale rebellion both less necessary and less likely to succeed.
Elizabeth's propaganda and the "Gloriana" cult
One of the most important reasons for the decline in popular resistance was Elizabeth I's skilful use of propaganda to build support for her regime and present herself as the protector of England.
Elizabeth successfully portrayed herself as the champion of English Protestantism against the threat of foreign Catholic powers. This was a powerful message that played on English fears of foreign invasion and religious persecution. She emphasised her role as the defender of English independence, creating a strong link between loyalty to the queen and patriotic duty.
The development of the "Gloriana" cult surrounding Elizabeth reinforced her popular appeal. This cult portrayed the queen almost as a semi-divine figure, worthy of devotion and loyalty. Public celebrations, such as Elizabeth's Accession Day, became important national events that promoted loyalty to the Crown. These celebrations helped to create a sense of national unity around the person of the monarch.
Elizabeth's propaganda also consistently emphasised the duty of all subjects to be obedient to their sovereign. This message was reinforced through sermons, pamphlets, and public pronouncements. By presenting obedience as both a religious and patriotic duty, the government made it morally difficult for people to justify rebellion.
Foreign events and English nationalism
International developments during the 1570s and 1580s played a crucial role in strengthening support for Elizabeth and reducing the appeal of Catholic resistance.
The St Bartholomew's Day massacre in France (1572), in which thousands of Protestants were killed by Catholics, horrified English Protestants and reinforced fears about what might happen if Catholic forces gained power in England. This event made it much harder for English Catholics to present their cause as reasonable or moderate.
Similarly, the assassination of William of Orange, the Protestant leader of the Dutch revolt, by a Catholic in 1584 demonstrated the perceived ruthlessness of Catholic conspirators. These events helped Elizabeth's government to present supporters of Mary, Queen of Scots or Catholicism as dangerous traitors who were in league with foreign enemies.
The combination of propaganda and foreign events strengthened feelings of English nationalism and pride. Most Catholics came to see themselves as English first and Catholic second, and preferred to support Elizabeth and England rather than foreign powers trying to overthrow her. This explains why Catholic plots during this period were carried out by a small minority and did not lead to popular uprisings.
Significantly, in 1588, there was no Catholic uprising in support of the Spanish Armada, demonstrating how successfully Elizabeth had neutralised potential domestic opposition.
The Armada Portrait, painted after England's victory over the Spanish fleet, exemplified this propaganda. It presented Elizabeth as the victorious defender of England against foreign Catholic aggression, reinforcing her image as the nation's protector.
Limited support for Catholic plots
After the popular rising in the north in 1569, plots against Elizabeth did not progress beyond small conspiracies among the nobility and gentry. These plots failed to gain wider popular support for several important reasons.
The Ridolfi Plot (1571) involved the Duke of Norfolk and aimed to assassinate Elizabeth and replace her with Mary, Queen of Scots. However, Norfolk was isolated and could not rally broader support. He was executed for treason in January 1572, sending a clear message about the consequences of plotting against the Crown.
Later plots, such as the Throckmorton Plot (1583) and the Babington Plot (1586), followed a similar pattern. They were led by small groups of nobles and gentry but gained no popular backing. The leaders of these conspiracies - Sir Francis Throckmorton and Sir Anthony Babington - were members of a Catholic minority who could not persuade the wider Catholic population to support their plans.
Francis Walsingham's spy network proved highly effective at infiltrating these conspiracies, implicating the plotters, and catching them before they could act. When conspirators were caught, they were tortured and punished, with their confessions used to demonstrate the danger of Catholic plotting. This created a climate of fear that deterred others from becoming involved in such activities.
Harsh punishments and deterrents
The government's increasingly severe approach to punishing actual and potential rebels played a significant role in deterring resistance.
Elizabeth sent a stern message through her punishment of the rebels in 1569-70. The harsh treatment of those involved in the Northern Revolt demonstrated that mercy could not be expected for those who took up arms against the Crown.
From 1571 onwards, Parliament passed increasingly severe Acts against those who missed Church services, held private Masses, aided priests, or owned a copy of the papal bull excommunicating Elizabeth. These laws not only punished actual offences but also created a framework for identifying and monitoring potential troublemakers.
Bond of Association (1584)
Example of Deterrent Legislation: The Bond of Association
The Bond of Association was drawn up by Francis Walsingham and other members of the Privy Council in response to the Throckmorton Plot.
Key provisions:
- Those who signed the Bond pledged to protect the queen and to take revenge on anyone who attempted to harm her
- If Elizabeth was assassinated, anyone who profited from her death would be killed in revenge and would not be allowed to claim the throne
- This was clearly aimed at Mary, Queen of Scots
- Designed to deter assassination attempts made in her name, even if she was not directly involved
Act for the Queen's Safety (1585)
This Act reinforced the Bond of Association by making provision for a council of 24 peers to investigate any invasion or rebellion attempt made against the queen. It also provided for disbarring those responsible from inheriting the throne, creating a legal framework for dealing with conspirators.
These harsh punishments served two purposes:
- Deterrent effect: They made potential rebels think carefully about the consequences of their actions
- Elite support demonstration: They showed the level of support Elizabeth enjoyed from her nobility and gentry, who backed these measures in Parliament
This show of elite support made it clear that any rebellion would face unified opposition from the governing class.
Development of administrative control
The strengthening of local government structures helped to prevent rebellion from developing in the first place.
The Justices of the Peace (JPs) became an increasingly important first line of defence against rebellious activity. These local officials, drawn from the gentry, were responsible for maintaining order in their areas and had the authority to suppress potentially dangerous situations before they could escalate into full-scale rebellion.
The expansion of the powers and responsibilities of JPs meant that the government had eyes and ears throughout the country. They could identify troublemakers, monitor suspicious activities, and take preventive action. This network of local officials made it much harder for conspiracies to develop without the authorities becoming aware of them.
The JPs also served as a link between the central government and local communities, helping to communicate government policy and ensuring that royal authority was maintained even in remote areas. This improved communication and control reduced the opportunities for rebellion to take root.
Generational change and religious settlement
Time itself worked in Elizabeth's favour when it came to religious opposition to her regime.
The longer Elizabeth remained on the throne, the less likely it was that challenges to her Elizabethan Settlement would emerge. The older generation of committed Catholics, who remembered the Catholic Church under Mary I or even Henry VIII, gradually died out. They were replaced by a younger generation who had known only the Elizabethan religious settlement and who were more comfortable with Protestant worship.
This generational change was reinforced by increasingly effective Protestant propaganda delivered through preaching and pamphlets. Protestant ministers used their pulpits to promote loyalty to Elizabeth and to the Protestant Church, whilst pamphlets spread Protestant ideas more widely throughout society.
As the Catholic population declined through natural causes and was not replaced by a younger generation of equally committed Catholics, the potential base for Catholic-inspired rebellion shrank significantly. By the 1580s, committed Catholics were a minority within a minority, making large-scale Catholic rebellion virtually impossible.
Elizabeth's taxation policy
Earlier Tudor rebellions had often been sparked by grievances over heavy taxation, particularly when monarchs needed to fund expensive wars. Elizabeth cleverly avoided this source of discontent through her cautious financial policy.
Firstly, Elizabeth avoided commitment to major warfare before 1585. This cautious approach to foreign policy meant that she did not need to ask Parliament for taxation on a regular basis. When she did request taxes, they were less frequent and less burdensome than those demanded by her predecessors.
Secondly, Elizabeth avoided making any changes to how taxation was assessed. The system remained unchanged throughout her reign, which meant that the actual contributions made by taxpayers fell in real terms as inflation reduced the value of money. Nothing was done to increase tax assessments to reflect economic changes or inflation.
Whilst this approach stored up financial problems for Elizabeth's successors, it proved highly effective in avoiding tax rebellions during her reign. By removing one of the major causes of earlier Tudor rebellions, Elizabeth eliminated a key source of popular discontent.
Social and economic stability
The relative stability of social and economic conditions during the 1570s and 1580s reduced the likelihood of economically motivated rebellion.
Earlier popular revolts, such as those in 1525, 1536, and 1549, had been partially caused by economic hardship - lack of food, unemployment, and economic disruption. The period 1570-88, however, saw relatively stable conditions without the severe subsistence crises that had sparked earlier rebellions.
This economic stability meant that the common people had fewer immediate grievances that might drive them to desperate action. Whilst there were still economic problems and hardship in some areas, these were not severe enough to provoke the kind of mass uprising seen in earlier decades.
Social transformation and political inclusion
Perhaps the most fundamental reason for the decline in popular resistance was the changing nature of Elizabethan society itself, particularly among the yeomen or "middling sort".
Who were the yeomen?
The yeomen (also known as the "middling sort") were a social group formed of wealthier peasants who were usually landowners in their own right, but who ranked below the gentry. Yeomen were sometimes craftsmen with skills that allowed them to be self-sufficient, such as weavers, tanners, and brewers. Examples of yeomen who had been involved in earlier rebellions include Robert Kett, leader of Kett's Rebellion in 1549.
The impact of increasing literacy
By Elizabeth's reign, this group was becoming increasingly literate. In the diocese of Norwich, for example, illiteracy had fallen from 60 percent to 30 percent by the 1580s. This dramatic improvement in literacy rates had profound political consequences.
The transformation of the yeomen:
Better educated yeomen were now able to participate in local government rather than being excluded from it. They took on roles such as administering the poor law and voting in elections. As they became part of the political system, they became more likely to defend it rather than attack it through rebellion.
Literate yeomen were also more likely to use the legal system to resolve disputes rather than resorting to violence. They could read and understand legal documents, petition authorities, and navigate the court system. This provided them with alternative means of seeking redress for grievances that did not involve rebellion.
Parliament as an outlet for grievances
Similarly, the increasing use of Parliament as a forum for debate provided members of the gentry with an alternative outlet for their concerns. Rather than resorting to violent protest, gentry could voice their grievances through their representatives in Parliament.
This development was particularly important because it meant that potential leaders of rebellion - the gentry and yeomen - now had peaceful, legal means of expressing discontent and seeking change. This channelling of opposition into constitutional forms significantly reduced the likelihood of violent uprising.
Conclusion: Multiple factors producing stability
The decline in popular resistance between 1570 and 1588 resulted from a combination of factors working together. Elizabeth's skilful propaganda, harsh punishments, administrative improvements, and cautious policies combined with broader social and economic changes to create a more stable political environment.
This does not mean that there was no discontent or social and political instability during this period. However, from 1570 onwards, such discontent was managed very effectively by Elizabeth and her government. Potential opposition was either deterred, detected and suppressed, or channelled into peaceful, constitutional forms of expression.
The transformation of the yeomen from potential rebels into defenders of the system, the generational change that reduced committed Catholic opposition, and the development of alternative outlets for grievances all meant that large-scale popular rebellion became increasingly unlikely. By 1588, when the Spanish Armada threatened England, Elizabeth could be confident that she would not face a Catholic uprising to support the invasion - a confidence that proved entirely justified.
Key Points to Remember:
-
No large-scale rebellions occurred in England between 1570-88, marking a significant change from earlier Tudor period
-
Elizabeth's propaganda successfully portrayed her as defender of England and Protestantism; foreign events like St Bartholomew's Day massacre reinforced English nationalism and fear of Catholicism
-
Catholic plots remained small-scale and limited to minority of nobles; most Catholics prioritised English identity over religious loyalty; Walsingham's spy network effectively infiltrated and prevented conspiracies
-
Harsh punishments (Bond of Association, Act for Queen's Safety) deterred rebellion; development of Justices of the Peace strengthened local control
-
Social transformation was crucial - rising literacy among yeomen led to their political inclusion; gentry used Parliament instead of violence; Elizabeth's cautious taxation and warfare policies avoided economic grievances that had sparked earlier rebellions