The Role of the Nobility in Maintaining Control (Edexcel A-Level History): Revision Notes
The Role of the Nobility in Maintaining Control
Introduction: The nobility's traditional role in government
At the start of Henry VIII's reign, the nobility formed an essential part of government. They performed key functions both locally and at the centre of power:
Regional responsibilities:
- As major landowners, nobles upheld law and order in their regions
- They carried out traditional medieval feudal functions
- They acted as the first line of defence against rebellion (though sometimes they joined rebels instead)
Central government roles:
- They served as the king's friends and advisers
- They sat on the royal Council
- They participated in Parliament
- They attended court
The nobility's dual role was crucial: they maintained order in their local regions while also serving as advisers and participants in central government. This made them an essential link between the centre and the localities.
How the basis of noble power changed during the Tudor period
While the nobility remained important as a link between the centre and the localities throughout the Tudor period, the source of their power transformed significantly.
The shift from land-based to court-based power
Traditional power base:
In the Middle Ages, noble power came from land ownership. Nobles maintained their own followers, known as an affinity, who formed:
- The core of a noble's fighting force
- Servants in peacetime
- A means of keeping the peace (but also potentially causing trouble)
New Tudor approach:
The Tudor monarchs gradually changed this system:
- They began recruiting their own personal followers (a royal affinity)
- They granted local offices such as Justice of the Peace to create loyal supporters
- They planted leading councillors and household members into specific regions, regardless of whether these individuals already had lands there
This shift represented a fundamental change in how power operated in Tudor England. Noble power was no longer based primarily on traditional landholding, but increasingly on access to the monarch at court and royal grants of office.
Key Examples of Crown Planting Policy:
Charles Brandon (Duke of Suffolk): Henry VIII's close friend was strategically moved from East Anglia to Lincolnshire in the late 1530s to control a region that had experienced serious unrest during the Pilgrimage of Grace.
Earl of Huntingdon: Elizabeth I appointed him as president of the Council of the North for exactly the same reason - to ensure royal control over a potentially troublesome region through a trusted courtier.
The consequences of changing power structures
As a result of these changes, noble power increasingly rested on:
- Their ability to gain grants of land from the monarch
- Their ability to secure office for themselves and their followers
- Their access to the monarchs at court
This fundamentally altered how nobles maintained control in the localities.
The nobility's vital role in maintaining control
Despite attempting to make nobles more dependent on the Crown, Tudor monarchs never tried to remove the nobility's role in maintaining control. The nobility remained essential for several reasons.
Why nobles were effective in local control
Social Authority and Local Respect
The rank and social status of nobility meant they commanded respect locally. This inherent authority made them ideal candidates for key positions in local government, where their status alone could help maintain order and compliance.
This is why nobles were usually appointed to key positions:
- Membership of the Council of the North or Marches
- Justice of the Peace
- Lord Lieutenants (under Elizabeth)
Communication with the monarch:
Nobles had links with court and the monarch, which made them invaluable intermediaries:
- They passed useful local information to the ruler through the Council or Chamber
- In times of crisis, they often had an ear to the ground and could best advise the monarch
- They acted as the monarch's representatives and mouthpieces locally
Examples of nobility suppressing rebellion and unrest
The nobility played crucial roles in managing popular resistance throughout the period:
1525 - The Amicable Grant:
The Dukes of Norfolk and Suffolk were on-the-spot witnesses to local protests. They:
- Spoke directly to the rebels
- Reported what they heard to Wolsey
Their local presence and authority allowed them to assess the situation and communicate the severity of popular resistance to the government.
1536 - The Pilgrimage of Grace:
The Duke of Norfolk was sent at the head of an army to deal with the uprising. He:
- Played an important role in negotiating with the rebels
- Advised the king on how to approach the situation
His status and military experience were crucial in managing this serious threat to Henry VIII's authority.
As Henry VIII wrote to the Earl of Derby on 19 October 1536:
We lately commanded you to make ready your forces and go to the earl of Shrewsbury, our lieutenant to suppress the rebellion in the North.
The king ordered Derby to immediately repress an insurrection at Salley Abbey in Lancashire, apprehend the captains, and have them executed as traitors. This demonstrates how monarchs relied on nobles to act decisively against rebellion.
Other rebellions:
The monarchy relied on members of the nobility to suppress the rebellions of 1549, 1553 and 1569.
Implementing government policies
Beyond suppressing rebellions, the nobility helped implement other government policies, especially religious changes:
Under Mary I: The Catholic Earl of Derby helped to investigate Protestants
Under Elizabeth I: The Puritan Earl of Huntingdon helped to enforce Protestantism in the north
The nobility's role in implementing religious policy shows how Tudor monarchs used them not just for maintaining order, but for actively enforcing controversial government policies. By selecting nobles whose religious views aligned with royal policy, monarchs could ensure more effective local implementation.
The rise of courtier-noblemen under Elizabeth
By Elizabeth's reign, members of her Council and household dominated the running of local government. Elizabeth granted her trusted inner circle of advisers both local office and land:
William Cecil (Elizabeth's Treasurer):
- Served as a JP in Lincolnshire and Northampton
Robert Dudley (Earl of Leicester):
- Controlled Cheshire, Wales and the Marches
- Served as a JP in several counties
The role of these courtier-noblemen was further extended through their role as Lord Lieutenants. Crucially, they owed their power and position entirely to the queen, not to traditional landholding.
The Bond of Association (1585):
Drawn up to defend Elizabeth from assassination, this document was the work of noble members of her Council. It demonstrated the complete loyalty of these courtier-nobles to the queen - a loyalty based on their dependence on her for their power and position.
The nobility as a source of trouble and disorder
While vital for control, the nobility could also be the root of trouble and local disorder - which is why Tudor monarchs tried to control them more closely.
Noble involvement in rebellions and plots
The Double-Edged Sword of Noble Power
The very power and influence that made nobles essential for maintaining control also made them dangerous when they turned against the Crown. Their ability to raise forces, command local loyalty, and organize resistance posed serious threats to Tudor monarchs.
Court-based plots:
- Wyatt's revolt had its roots in court-based plots involving members of the nobility
- The Northern Revolt (1569) similarly originated in court-based conspiracies involving nobles
- There was noble involvement in the Pilgrimage of Grace
Disorder in the marcher regions
The nobility could cause local disorder, particularly in the marcher regions where:
- Royal authority was weaker
- The traditional feudal power of the nobility was stronger
Government response:
The setting up of the Councils of the Marches and the North was a response to this problem.
Declining traditional Marcher lords:
The power of traditional Marcher lords declined:
- Duke of Buckingham (powerful in Gloucestershire) - executed for treason in 1521
- The Nevilles, Percys and Dacres families
New breed of nobility:
These traditional lords were replaced by a new breed of nobility loyal to the Crown:
- William Cecil
- Robert Dudley
- Earl of Huntingdon
The role of Justices of the Peace
Origins and development of JPs
The role of Justice of the Peace (JP) first emerged in the 14th century and had been gathering increasing power and influence locally ever since.
Appointment:
- JPs were appointed for each county (known as the county bench)
Powers and responsibilities of JPs
By the start of the Tudor period, JPs' powers were wide-ranging:
Legal powers:
- Could hear and decide cases of felony and trespass (less serious crimes that did not attract the death penalty)
- Could arrest potential suspects
Administrative duties:
- Supervised the regulation of weights and measures
- Oversaw the fixing of prices and wages
Regular duties:
- Had to attend quarter sessions four times a year to perform their role
- Increasingly, JPs were not just active at quarter sessions but were using their powers more widely to monitor and control local society
The JP role combined both legal and administrative functions, making it one of the most important positions in local government. JPs were effectively the Crown's representatives at the county level, responsible for maintaining order and implementing royal policy.
The importance of being a JP
Being a JP was hard work, but it was also an excellent opportunity to influence local affairs. For ambitious gentry and nobles, securing a JP position meant gaining:
- Local authority and respect
- The ability to shape local policy
- Direct access to regional networks of power
Royal control of JPs
The Tudor monarchs used JPs as a method of control:
- They tried to monitor carefully who became a JP
- They used the county benches to insert members of their court into local government to enhance royal control
By controlling JP appointments, Tudor monarchs could extend their influence into every county in England. This allowed them to bypass traditional noble power structures and create a network of royal authority that reached into the localities.
Remember!
Key Points to Remember:
-
The nobility remained crucial for maintaining control throughout the Tudor period, acting as a vital link between central government and the localities
-
The basis of noble power shifted from traditional land ownership to access to the monarch at court and royal grants of office and land
-
Tudor monarchs developed a royal affinity by planting loyal courtiers into regions as JPs and Lord Lieutenants, regardless of their existing landholdings there
-
The nobility played essential roles in suppressing rebellions (1525, 1536, 1549, 1553, 1569) and implementing religious policies, but could also be sources of disorder
-
Justices of the Peace had wide-ranging legal and administrative powers and were a key means by which Tudor monarchs extended royal control into local government