The Case of Jane Wenham, 1712 (Edexcel A-Level History): Revision Notes
The Case of Jane Wenham, 1712
Introduction: the last formal witch trial in England
The case of Jane Wenham in 1712 is historically significant as it became known as the last formal trial of a suspected witch in England. This case demonstrates the changing attitudes towards witchcraft in the early 18th century, particularly the growing tension between popular belief in witchcraft and elite scepticism. The trial took place at a time when witchcraft convictions had become extremely rare, making Wenham's guilty verdict surprising, though it was followed by an unprecedented royal pardon.
This trial represents a crucial turning point in English legal history. While ordinary people in Walkern still believed in witchcraft, educated authorities were increasingly rejecting these traditional beliefs. The case perfectly illustrates the clash between popular superstition and emerging rational thought in the early 18th century.
Background and reputation
Jane Wenham lived in Walkern, a village near Stevenage in Hertfordshire. She was over 70 years old at the time of her trial and had acquired a long-standing reputation as a witch in her local community. Her nickname was the 'Wise Woman of Walkern', which suggests she may have been known for providing folk remedies or fortune-telling services.
Early accusations
Several stories about Wenham had been circulating in the years before her trial in March 1712. A typical example involved an accusation that she had bewitched a farm labourer named Matthew Gilson. The incident began when Gilson refused to give Wenham a small amount of straw. According to the accusation:
- Wenham cursed Gilson after he refused her request
- Gilson was said to have run down the road begging people for straw
- He allegedly stuffed his shirt with manure, behaving irrationally
- When Gilson's employer publicly voiced this allegation, Wenham took legal action
Wenham's decision to take legal action shows that she was not afraid to defend herself through official channels. She reported the farmer to the local Justice of the Peace, Sir Henry Chauncy, and the farmer was fined one shilling. However, Wenham was reportedly not satisfied with this outcome and allegedly promised to get justice in another way. Subsequently, the farmer's daughter and livestock fell ill, which locals interpreted as evidence of Wenham's supernatural revenge.
The accusations leading to trial
The case that ultimately led to Wenham's trial originated from complaints made by Anne Thorne, a 16-year-old servant who worked in the household of a local clergyman named Godfrey Gardiner. This accusation was more serious and involved multiple witnesses from the local community.
Anne Thorne's symptoms
Thorne claimed that Wenham had bewitched her, causing her to suffer from:
- Violent fits and seizures
- Hallucinations of demons with cats' faces
- Vomiting pins (a common symptom in witchcraft accusations)
Vomiting pins was a remarkably common claim in witchcraft accusations throughout the 16th and 17th centuries. Modern historians recognize these symptoms as consistent with hysteria, a psychological condition that was not understood at the time. The symptoms often appeared in young women who were under significant social or psychological stress.
The incident that triggered the trial
The case came to Gardiner and his wife's attention during a specific incident. They had left Thorne alone for just a few minutes, but when they returned, they discovered she had run almost a mile to collect sticks. When Gardiner's wife placed these sticks on the fire, she claimed to see the figure of Jane Wenham appear in the doorway. This convinced her that witchcraft was involved.
Evidence presented at the trial
Supporting witnesses
The allegations against Wenham were supported by several local people, including:
- James Burville, who claimed to have seen a cat with Jane Wenham's face at Anne Thorne's door
- A total of 16 witnesses were called to give evidence
- Three local clergymen testified against her
Search for the Devil's mark
Following standard procedure in witchcraft cases, searchers examined Wenham's body for the Devil's mark (a supposed mark left by the Devil when making a pact with a witch). Nothing unusual was found during this examination.
Wenham's confession
Despite the lack of physical evidence, Wenham apparently gave a full confession. However, she claimed that:
- She was indeed a witch
- She only practised harmless magic
- She had not caused the harm attributed to her
This partial confession was highly unusual and may have been made under pressure or fear. By admitting to being a witch while denying causing harm, Wenham may have been attempting to satisfy her accusers while avoiding the most serious charges. Confessions in witchcraft cases were often obtained through psychological pressure, sleep deprivation, or threats, making their reliability questionable.
Physical evidence
An ointment found under Wenham's pillow was presented as evidence. The accusers claimed this ointment was made from human fat, which was associated with witchcraft practices.
The Lord's Prayer test
When asked to recite the Lord's Prayer (a traditional test for witches, based on the belief that witches could not properly recite Christian prayers), Wenham stumbled over some of the words. This was interpreted by many as evidence of her guilt.
The final charge
Despite all the various accusations, the only charge the accusers could agree upon was conversing with the Devil in the shape of a cat. This shows that even the accusers had difficulty providing concrete evidence.
The fact that only one specific charge could be agreed upon reveals the weakness of the case against Wenham. Of all the dramatic accusations—flying through the air, causing illness, bewitching people—the prosecutors could only prove "conversing with the Devil in the shape of a cat," which itself relied entirely on witness testimony rather than physical evidence.
Judge Powell's scepticism
The judge in the case, Sir John Powell, demonstrated considerable scepticism towards the evidence from the very beginning. His approach was notably different from earlier witch trial judges.
Powell's comments
When a witness claimed they had seen Wenham flying through the air, Powell famously remarked that "there was no law against flying". This sardonic comment revealed his rational approach to the case and his rejection of supernatural explanations.
Powell's comment represents a fundamental shift in legal thinking. Rather than accepting supernatural claims at face value, he applied rational legal principles: if there was no law prohibiting an action, it could not be a crime. This marked a crucial step toward separating law from superstition.
Powell was clearly unimpressed with both the witnesses and the evidence presented. His scepticism reflected the influence of recent critical writings about witchcraft and the growing trend among educated elites to question traditional beliefs.
The verdict and its aftermath
Guilty verdict
Despite Powell's objections and sceptical comments, the jury found Wenham guilty. This verdict was surprising given that witchcraft convictions had become extremely rare by 1712.
Royal pardon
To prevent Wenham's execution by hanging, Judge Powell took the extraordinary step of securing a royal pardon for her. This intervention saved her life but demonstrated the conflict between popular belief and elite scepticism.
The royal pardon was unprecedented in witchcraft cases. It demonstrated that even when local communities insisted on convicting suspected witches, the higher authorities—both judicial and royal—were now willing to intervene to prevent executions. This marked a significant change from earlier periods when royal authorities had sometimes encouraged witch hunts.
Wenham's later life
Although she escaped execution, Wenham could not return to Walkern due to the hostility of local people. She was offered a cottage by the sympathetic Whig politician William Cowper, where she lived until her death in 1730.
Whig politician: A member of the political faction in Parliament that favoured restraints on the power of the monarch. The Whigs were opposed by the Tories, who were more sympathetic to the Crown.
Anne Thorne's fate
Anne Thorne, the servant who made the original accusations, was ordered to be watched over until she recovered from her hysteria. This suggests that authorities recognised her symptoms had a medical rather than supernatural cause.
Why was Wenham found guilty and then acquitted?
Understanding why the jury convicted Wenham despite the judge's scepticism requires examining the local social context of Walkern.
Local social tensions
Walkern was a village of approximately 500 people with significant social divisions:
- Several upwardly mobile farming families (such as the Chapman and Adams families, both of whom accused Wenham)
- A large number of Dissenters (around 20 percent of the population)
- Growing economic inequality between rich and poor
Dissenter: A member of a non-established church outside the Church of England. Dissenters faced social discrimination and were often viewed with suspicion by the established Church.
Religious context
It seems likely that Wenham was a Dissenter herself, as her accusers mentioned this at her trial. The involvement of local clergymen may represent their desire to demonstrate the power of the Church of England against Dissenters. This religious tension added another layer to the accusations.
Economic factors
Wenham was very poor, as evidenced by her stealing of turnips and straw to survive. Walkern did not appear to have adequate provisions for the poor, and during a time when the gap between rich and poor was widening, it is significant that most of her accusers were relatively wealthy. The case may have reflected class tensions and fears about the poor.
Multiple factors contributed to Wenham's conviction:
- Religious tension: As a likely Dissenter, she was viewed with suspicion by Church of England clergy and their supporters
- Economic inequality: Her poverty made her vulnerable to accusations from wealthier neighbours
- Social divisions: The growing gap between rich and poor in Walkern created an atmosphere of fear and resentment
- Gender and age: As an elderly woman living alone, she fit the traditional stereotype of a witch
These factors combined to make her an easy scapegoat for local anxieties.
Powell as an outsider
Sir John Powell was originally from Gloucester, making him an outsider to the local community. This allowed him to approach the case in a more rational and objective way. He was able to recognise that:
- Many witnesses had personal grudges against Wenham
- The evidence was based on superstition rather than fact
- The accusations reflected local social tensions
Powell's outsider status, combined with his exposure to recent sceptical publications and cases, enabled him to see through the accusations.
Significance and historical impact
Connection to Francis Hutchinson
Wenham's case was mentioned in Francis Hutchinson's important work An Historical Essay Concerning Witchcraft (1718). Hutchinson met Wenham after her trial and reported that she was not guilty. However, he took a nuanced position:
- He accepted that supernatural phenomena were plausible in theory
- He argued that the most far-fetched accusations could only be believed by fools
- He used cases like Wenham's to argue for greater scepticism in witchcraft prosecutions
Hutchinson's careful approach shows how even sceptics had to navigate carefully in the early 18th century. By not denying the theoretical possibility of witchcraft, he avoided accusations of atheism or irreligion. However, by arguing that most accusations were based on foolishness or malice, he effectively undermined the practice of witch trials without directly challenging religious doctrine.
Importance in the decline of witch trials
The case demonstrates several key features of changing attitudes towards witchcraft:
- Popular belief persisted: The jury conviction shows that ordinary people still believed in witchcraft
- Elite scepticism grew: Judge Powell's intervention shows that educated authorities were increasingly rejecting witchcraft beliefs
- Legal protection: The royal pardon demonstrated that even when convictions occurred, the legal system could now prevent executions
- Last formal trial: The case's status as England's last formal witch trial marks a clear endpoint to the witch-hunting era
The case illustrates the clash between traditional popular beliefs and modern rational thought that characterised the early 18th century.
Remember!
Key Points to Remember:
-
Jane Wenham's trial in 1712 is remembered as the last formal witch trial in England, marking the end of an era
-
She was found guilty by a local jury influenced by social tensions, religious conflict, and class divisions in Walkern
-
Judge Sir John Powell showed clear scepticism, famously remarking "there is no law against flying" and securing a royal pardon to prevent her execution
-
The case demonstrates the gap between popular and elite beliefs: ordinary people still believed in witchcraft, but educated authorities were increasingly sceptical
-
Local context matters: Wenham's poverty, status as a likely Dissenter, and conflicts with wealthier neighbours all contributed to the accusations against her
-
The case influenced later writers like Francis Hutchinson, who used it as evidence for the need for greater scepticism about witchcraft accusations