The Position in 1850 (Edexcel A-Level History): Revision Notes
The Position in 1850
Black Americans in 1850: population and distribution
By 1850, the United States had a black American population of approximately 3.6 million people, representing 15.7% of the total US population. This was a significant increase from the first census in 1790, which recorded roughly 700,000 black Americans (about 19% of the population at that time). The origins of this population lay in the Atlantic slave trade, which forcibly brought West Africans to work as enslaved labourers in the Americas from the 16th century onwards.
Of the 3.6 million black Americans in 1850, the vast majority were enslaved. Approximately 3.2 million lived as slaves, whilst around 400,000 were free black Americans. This meant that roughly 9 out of every 10 black Americans were held in bondage, with no legal rights or freedoms. The position of black Americans in 1850 was therefore characterised by widespread enslavement, with freedom being the exception rather than the rule.
The ratio of enslaved to free black Americans in 1850 was approximately 8:1, demonstrating that slavery remained the dominant condition for black Americans at mid-century, despite the growth of free black communities in both northern and southern states.
The geographical divide: free states and slave states
In 1850, the United States was geographically divided between states that permitted slavery and those that had abolished it. White Americans in the 19th century referred to slavery as 'the peculiar institution' because it was unique to certain states, primarily in the south-east of the country. This term reflected the fact that slavery was not practised throughout the entire nation, but was confined to specific regions.
Slave states and territories
The states and territories that permitted slavery in 1850 were concentrated in the South and included:
- Border states: Delaware, Maryland, Kentucky, and Missouri
- Upper South: Virginia, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Arkansas
- Deep South: South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas
- The District of Columbia (the capital territory) also allowed slavery, although the slave trade was abolished there in 1850
These slave states formed a distinct geographical bloc, sharing economic, social, and political interests centred around the institution of slavery.
Free states and territories
In contrast, the northern and western states were free states where slavery had been abolished over the period 1777-1850. The process of abolition had been gradual, starting with Vermont in 1777 and concluding with Pennsylvania and California in 1850. By mid-century, all states north of the Mason-Dixon line and the Ohio River had ended slavery.
The abolition of slavery in the free states occurred through various mechanisms. Some states, like Vermont and Massachusetts, abolished slavery through their state constitutions. Others implemented gradual emancipation laws that freed the children of slaves once they reached adulthood. Several western territories abolished slavery when they achieved statehood, including Ohio (1803), Indiana (1816), Illinois (1818), and others.
The geographical division between free and slave states was not merely a regional difference but represented fundamentally different social and economic systems that would increasingly come into conflict. This sectional divide would ultimately prove irreconcilable, leading to the outbreak of the American Civil War in 1861.
Slavery and the US Constitution
When the US Constitution was written and approved at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in 1787, the issue of slavery was largely avoided in the document itself. The Constitution is the fundamental document that embodies the laws and principles by which the USA is governed, yet it mentioned enslaved black Americans only once, and then indirectly.
The three-fifths compromise
The sole reference to slavery in the Constitution appeared in the section dealing with representation in the US Congress. Congress is the national legislative body of the USA, consisting of the Senate (upper house) and the House of Representatives (lower house). The House of Representatives had 435 seats allocated to states based on population, with more populous states receiving a larger number of representatives.
Southern states wanted enslaved people to be counted in their population totals to increase their political representation, even though enslaved people had no civil rights and could not vote. Northern states objected to this, arguing that if enslaved people were property with no rights, they should not be counted for representation purposes. The compromise reached was the three-fifths clause: each enslaved person was counted as of a free person when calculating a state's population for representation purposes.
The Three-Fifths Compromise: A Fundamental Injustice
This arrangement gave southern slave states significant additional political power in Congress, despite the fact that the enslaved people who created this power had no say in how it was used. The three-fifths compromise thus embedded slavery into the political structure of the United States and gave slave states a vested interest in maintaining and expanding the institution.
The economic foundations of slavery: King Cotton
Slavery in 1850 was fundamentally an economic institution built upon agricultural production. Enslaved people were primarily used as agricultural workers on plantations in the slave states, producing several key crops including cotton, tobacco, and rice. Of these, cotton was by far the most valuable agricultural commodity in the USA before the Civil War.
The Cotton Belt and its expansion
The cultivation of cotton in the South was entirely dependent on enslaved black labour. The region where cotton was grown intensively became known as the Cotton Belt, and this area expanded dramatically in the first half of the 19th century. Cotton cultivation began in Virginia and the Carolinas and moved steadily westward into Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and eventually Texas.
The expansion of cotton growing directly caused the expansion of slavery into new territories. Wherever cotton cultivation spread, slavery followed, as plantation owners demanded enslaved workers to plant, tend, and harvest the labour-intensive crop. The wealth of what was called the 'Old South' was inextricably linked to enslaved labour and cotton production.
Cotton production and British trade
The importance of cotton to the southern economy cannot be overstated. In 1859, just before the Civil War, the South produced 3.5 million of the 4.25 million bales of cotton produced in the United States—more than 80% of total production. Much of this cotton was grown to provide raw material for Britain's cotton manufacturing industry, particularly the textile mills of Lancashire. This made the southern states crucial to international trade and gave them significant economic power.
Cotton Production Statistics (1859)
The dominance of cotton in the southern economy can be seen in these production figures:
- Total US cotton production: 4.25 million bales
- Southern production: 3.5 million bales
- Percentage of US total: Over 80%
This overwhelming concentration of cotton production in the slave states demonstrated why southern plantation owners called cotton "King" and why they were so resistant to any threat to the enslaved labour system that made this production possible.
Southern plantation owners whose wealth derived from cotton production were extremely reluctant to see the end of slavery, as their entire economic system depended upon enslaved labour. The profitability of cotton thus became one of the strongest arguments used by southerners to defend and justify slavery.
Sectional conflict: rivalry between North and South
By 1850, a clear rivalry had developed between the free states of the North and the slave states of the South. This rivalry, known as sectional conflict, had both economic and ideological dimensions.
Economic competition and immigration
The northern free states were receiving hundreds of thousands of white immigrants from Europe during this period, which caused cities such as New York, Boston, and Philadelphia to grow rapidly. These newly arrived immigrants sought employment in factories, docks, and other industries. Many saw enslaved labour in the South as a rival system that could potentially spread and compete with free labour.
White workers in the North feared that if slavery expanded into new territories, it would undermine their own economic opportunities. They believed that they could not compete economically with enslaved workers who received no wages. This created a strong economic incentive for northern workers to oppose the expansion of slavery.
Ideological opposition to slavery
Beyond economic concerns, many voters in the free states viewed slavery as fundamentally contrary to the civil rights given to all other Americans. The idea that some people could be held as property, with no legal rights or freedoms, seemed to contradict the principles of liberty and equality that America claimed to represent. This ideological opposition to slavery grew stronger in the North over time, particularly among religious groups and reformers who saw slavery as a moral evil.
The sectional conflict was driven by a combination of self-interest and principle. Northern workers opposed slavery's expansion partly to protect their own economic position, but also because many genuinely believed that slavery violated fundamental American values. This mixture of economic and moral motivations would characterise the political debates of the 1850s.
The combination of economic rivalry and ideological opposition created deep tensions between North and South that would only intensify in the years following 1850.
The Missouri Compromise and political balance
The sectional conflict between free and slave states manifested itself most clearly in political debates over the admission of new states to the Union. Each state was allotted two senators in the US Senate, regardless of its population. This meant that maintaining a balance between free and slave states was crucial to preserving southern political power at the national level.
The Compromise of 1820
In 1819, Missouri applied to join the Union as a slave state. This threatened to upset the existing balance between free and slave states in the Senate, which would have given slave states a majority. After intense debate, Congress reached the Missouri Compromise in 1820, which admitted Missouri as a slave state whilst simultaneously admitting Maine as a free state in 1820. This maintained the numerical balance between the two sections.
The Missouri Compromise also established a geographical line (36°30' north latitude) across the Louisiana Territory, with slavery prohibited north of this line (except in Missouri itself) and permitted south of it. This attempt to resolve the slavery question through geographical division would prove to be only a temporary solution.
The Compromise of 1850
By 1850, new tensions had arisen over territories acquired from Mexico after the Mexican-American War (1846-48). The Compromise of 1850 was another attempt to maintain balance between free and slave interests. Key provisions included:
- Admitting California as a free state
- Allowing voters in the Utah and New Mexico territories to decide whether to permit slavery (known as popular sovereignty)
- Abolishing the slave trade (but not slavery itself) in Washington D.C.
- Enacting a stronger Fugitive Slave Law to help slave owners recapture escaped slaves
Temporary Solutions to a Fundamental Problem
These compromises reflected the desperate attempts by political leaders to prevent the sectional conflict from tearing the nation apart. However, they also demonstrated that by 1850, the question of slavery's expansion had become the central political issue facing the United States. Each compromise merely delayed confrontation rather than resolving the underlying tensions between free and slave states.
Summary
Key Points to Remember:
-
By 1850, there were 3.6 million black Americans (15.7% of the US population), with 3.2 million enslaved and only 400,000 free—slavery was the norm, not the exception.
-
The nation was geographically divided between slave states (concentrated in the South and border regions) and free states (in the North and West), with slavery abolished in northern states between 1777 and 1850.
-
The three-fifths compromise embedded slavery in the Constitution by counting each enslaved person as of a person for representation, giving southern states extra political power despite enslaved people having no rights.
-
Cotton was "King" in the South—the most valuable crop before the Civil War, entirely dependent on enslaved labour, with the South producing over 80% of US cotton by 1859.
-
Sectional conflict between North and South intensified over slavery's expansion, driven by both economic rivalry (free labour vs. enslaved labour) and ideological opposition (civil rights vs. enslavement), leading to political compromises like the Missouri Compromise (1820) and Compromise of 1850 that attempted to maintain balance but only delayed confrontation.