Party Organisation in the US Congress (Edexcel A-Level History): Revision Notes
Party Organisation in the US Congress
The committee system
Congress operated primarily through a committee-based structure during the New Deal period. Each major area of government responsibility—including foreign relations, commerce, judiciary, finance, and defence—had corresponding committees in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. These committees performed two crucial functions:
- Scrutinising the operations of government departments
- Discussing and developing bills (proposals for legislation) related to their specific areas
Committee chairpersons wielded considerable influence over the legislative process. They controlled which issues were debated and which laws progressed through Congress, making these positions extraordinarily powerful within the federal government structure.
Key congressional committees
Two committees in the House of Representatives held particularly significant power:
House Ways and Means Committee
- Determined which bills were sent to which committees
- Controlled the initial routing of all legislation
- During the 1930s, dominated by southern white Democrats
House Rules Committee
- Decided on congressional procedures
- Established the rules governing legislative debates
- Also controlled by southern white Democrats during the New Deal
Together, these committees essentially controlled how the entire committee system functioned, giving them extraordinary power over the legislative agenda. This concentration of power in committees dominated by southern white Democrats would have profound implications for civil rights legislation.
The seniority principle
The seniority principle governed the allocation of committee chairpersonships. Under this system, members of Congress and senators who had served continuously for the longest periods were automatically appointed as committee chairpersons.
Consequences for the Democratic Party
Within the Democratic Party, the seniority principle had a profound effect on power distribution. Southern states consistently re-elected their Democratic representatives, meaning that southern Democrats accumulated the longest continuous service records. This created a situation where, despite the Democratic Party being a national coalition, southern Democrats dominated the committee leadership structure.
From 1933 onwards, this meant that the congressional committee system was controlled predominantly by southern Democrats, giving them significant leverage over legislation affecting civil rights and race relations. This structural advantage would persist for decades.
Southern Democrat control during the New Deal
The dominance of southern Democrats in committee chairpersonships had major implications for civil rights legislation. These politicians often opposed federal intervention in race relations and used their positions to obstruct reform measures.
Example: Blocking Anti-Lynching Legislation
A clear illustration of this power was Hatton Towers of Texas, who chaired the House Judiciary Committee in 1937. Towers was a fierce opponent of anti-lynching laws and used his authority as chairperson to block most attempts to introduce such legislation.
It required action from non-southern Democrats on the Judiciary Committee to finally allow an anti-lynching bill to be discussed in the House of Representatives during 1937-38. Even then, the bill faced significant obstacles at subsequent stages of the legislative process.
The legislative process: how a bill becomes law
The process of transforming a proposal into federal law involved multiple stages, many of which were controlled by southern white Democrats during the New Deal period. Understanding this process is essential for grasping how civil rights legislation was systematically obstructed.
Step 1: introducing a bill to Congress
Any member of Congress could introduce a bill. Typically, bills were submitted simultaneously to both the Senate and House of Representatives, making them co-sponsored legislation. Most federal laws therefore had "double-barrelled titles"—one name from the Senate sponsor and another from the House sponsor.
Step 2: referral to a committee
Once introduced, each bill received a number and was referred to a committee with jurisdiction over its primary subject matter. Some bills were referred to multiple committees.
Critical point: The House Ways and Means Committee decided which committee received each bill. During the 1930s, this powerful committee was dominated by southern white Democrats, giving them control over the initial direction of all legislation.
Step 3: committee action
The committee chairperson determined whether a hearing would be held on the bill. This was a crucial stage because the chairperson could effectively "kill" a bill by refusing to schedule hearings.
Critical point: Most committee chairpersons during the New Deal period, in both the House and Senate, were southern white Democrats. This gave them veto power over legislation at an early stage.
Step 4: committee report
If the bill progressed, the committee chairperson's staff prepared a report describing the legislation's intent and purpose. This report would accompany the bill through subsequent stages.
Step 5: floor debate and votes
The Speaker of the House and the majority leader of the Senate determined whether and when a bill would come before the full chamber for debate, amendment, and final passage.
Critical point: Both these positions were held by southern white Democrats during the New Deal, giving them another opportunity to obstruct civil rights legislation.
Step 6: referral to the other chamber
When one chamber (either the House or Senate) passed a bill, it was sent to the other chamber, where it typically followed a similar route through committee and floor action. The second chamber could:
- Approve the bill as received
- Reject it
- Ignore it
- Amend it before passing it
Step 7: conference on a bill
When the House and Senate versions of a bill contained significant differences, a conference committee was appointed to reconcile these differences into a single bill. This committee consisted of members from both chambers.
If the conference committee members could not reach agreement, the legislation died. If they succeeded, they prepared a conference report describing their recommended changes. Both the House and Senate had to approve this conference report. Rejection by either chamber meant the bill died.
Step 8: action by the president
After both chambers approved the conference report, the final bill went to the president, who had several options:
- Sign it - the bill becomes law
- Take no action for ten days while Congress is in session - the bill automatically becomes law
- Veto it - formally reject the legislation
- Take no action after Congress has adjourned its second session - this is a "pocket veto" and the legislation dies
Step 9: overriding a veto
If the president vetoed a bill, Congress could attempt to override the veto. This required a two-thirds roll-call vote of members present in sufficient numbers for a quorum (the minimum number required for official business). This high threshold made overrides difficult to achieve.
Step 10: role of the US Supreme Court
Even after a bill became federal law, the process was not necessarily complete. The US Supreme Court could declare the law unconstitutional, meaning it could no longer be regarded as valid legislation. This provided a final check on congressional and presidential power.
Impact on civil rights legislation
The dominance of southern white Democrats at multiple stages of the legislative process created significant obstacles for civil rights reform during the New Deal period. They could block legislation through:
- Committee referral decisions (House Ways and Means Committee)
- Refusing to hold hearings (committee chairpersons)
- Preventing floor debates (Speaker of the House, Senate majority leader)
- Obstructing conference committee agreements
- Influencing the legislative agenda more broadly
This structural power helps explain why major civil rights legislation was difficult to achieve during the 1930s and early 1940s, despite the New Deal's otherwise expansive federal programmes. The seniority principle, combined with the committee system, gave southern Democrats effective veto power over civil rights measures.
Key Points to Remember:
-
Congress operated through a committee system where chairpersons exercised significant control over which legislation progressed.
-
The seniority principle meant that the longest-serving members became committee chairpersons; within the Democratic Party, these were predominantly southern Democrats.
-
From 1933, southern white Democrats dominated key positions including committee chairpersonships, the House Ways and Means Committee, the House Rules Committee, and leadership positions like Speaker of the House.
-
The legislative process involved ten stages, with southern Democrats able to obstruct bills at multiple points—particularly through committee referrals, refusing hearings, and controlling floor debates.
-
This structural power enabled southern Democrats to block civil rights legislation such as anti-lynching laws, despite pressure from non-southern Democrats and civil rights campaigners.