Excluding Black Voters (Edexcel A-Level History): Revision Notes
Excluding Black Voters
Introduction: the reversal of Reconstruction gains
During the Reconstruction era (1865-1877), black Americans experienced dramatic political advances. The Fifteenth Amendment extended voting rights to all adult black Americans, resulting in approximately 700,000 ex-slaves being enfranchised. This transformed the political landscape of the former Confederate states - black voters actually outnumbered white voters in five of these states.
The political impact was significant, with black Americans elected to office at both state and national levels during this period:
- 42 black Americans were elected to the state legislature in Texas
- 50 in South Carolina
- 127 in Louisiana
- 99 in Alabama
Black Americans also became US senators and congressmen, representing a revolutionary change in American politics.
However, following the end of Reconstruction in 1877, southern state governments - dominated by the Democrat Party - began systematically dismantling these political gains. Through a series of constitutional changes and legal mechanisms, they effectively removed most black Americans from the voting and political systems of the southern states.
This process reversed the political achievements of Reconstruction and ensured white Democrat Party dominance in the South that would last into the 1970s - a period of nearly 100 years of systematic disenfranchisement.
Discrimination in Mississippi from 1890
The constitutional convention and its aims
A major turning point in voter suppression occurred in Mississippi in 1890. The state legislature appointed a delegation to draft a new state constitution with one explicit purpose: to deprive black Americans of the right to vote. According to a delegate quoted in The Jackson Clarion-Ledger (the state capital newspaper), this was the sole reason for creating a new constitution.
Before 1890, Mississippi's voting laws were relatively inclusive. The existing constitution allowed all male citizens aged 21 and over to register to vote if they had lived in the state for six months and in their county for one month. The only exceptions were those who were insane or had committed disqualifying crimes.
The demographics made the need for white supremacist intervention clear: in 1890, Mississippi's population was 55 percent black American. Yet of the 134 delegates appointed to draw up the new constitution, only one delegate was black. This ensured the convention would serve white interests exclusively.
Article 12: poll tax
Article 12 of the new state constitution introduced major changes to the voting system. The primary mechanism for reducing black voter participation was a poll tax of $2 required for voter registration.
This poll tax had a disproportionate impact on black voters because poverty among black Mississippians was extremely high. While the tax appeared race-neutral on paper, its practical effect was to exclude black voters who could not afford to pay.
This was a deliberate strategy - creating a seemingly non-discriminatory law that would nevertheless achieve racial exclusion through economic means. This legal approach made voter suppression harder to challenge in court because the laws didn't explicitly mention race.
Literacy tests
Another method introduced was a literacy test for all voter registration. This test required potential voters to demonstrate the ability to recite and explain parts of the Mississippi State Constitution.
The impact was devastating. In 1890, approximately 60 percent of Mississippi's black population were illiterate, compared to much lower rates among white Mississippians. This disparity meant the literacy test had a profound effect on black voter registration whilst protecting most white voters.
Unfair Administration of Literacy Tests
The literacy tests were often administered unfairly, with white registrars asking black applicants impossibly difficult questions whilst accepting minimal demonstrations of literacy from white applicants. This gave officials discretionary power to discriminate, turning what appeared to be an objective test into a subjective tool of racial exclusion.
Impact on voter registration
The combined effect of these changes was catastrophic for black political participation. The statistics tell a stark story:
The Dramatic Decline in Black Voter Registration:
- Before 1890: 67 percent of people of voting age were registered black American voters
- By 1 January 1892 (when the new constitution took effect): this proportion had dropped to just 5.7 percent
- This proportion remained at approximately 5.7 percent until the 1960s
Meanwhile, white voter registration remained high. By 1899, approximately 122,000 white males were registered to vote, representing 82 percent of the potential white voting population.
Democrat Party white primaries
To complete the exclusion of black Americans from meaningful political participation, all primary elections of the Democrat Party were made exclusively white. This was particularly significant because:
- Political parties organised these primaries as private organisations, meaning they were not covered by the state constitution
- The Democrat candidate almost always won general elections in Mississippi
- This made it virtually irrelevant whether the few remaining registered black voters participated in federal or state elections - the real decisions were made in the whites-only primary
This system created a virtually complete barrier to black political influence in Mississippi.
Louisiana's Grandfather Clause, 1898
The constitutional convention
Other southern states observed Mississippi's success and developed their own methods of voter suppression. On 8 February 1898, the Louisiana Constitutional Convention met with a similar aim to Mississippi's 1890 convention.
The president of the convention stated explicitly that it aimed to remove illiterate voters from the electorate - and everyone understood this meant removing black Americans, who made up the vast majority of illiterate voters in Louisiana.
How the Grandfather Clause worked
The convention delegates included provisions requiring potential voters to pass a literacy test or own a certain amount of property to register. However, this created a problem: many white men were neither literate nor property owners.
The Grandfather Clause Mechanism
To solve this problem whilst still excluding black voters, delegates introduced Section 5 of the new state constitution, known as the Grandfather Clause. This ingenious (from a white supremacist perspective) mechanism worked as follows:
- No man who had been eligible to vote on 1 January 1867 would be required to meet literacy or property-ownership requirements
- Neither would his son or grandson be required to meet those requirements
- Since black men were not granted the right to vote until the Fifteenth Amendment in 1870, they were automatically excluded from this exemption
Louisiana's law was unique in one respect: voters had to register under the Grandfather Clause by 1 September 1898, creating urgency for white voters to take advantage of the exemption.
Political support
The constitutional change was passed by 96 votes to 28, showing overwhelming support among white legislators. One state legislator, L.J. Dossman, voted in favour specifically because it would remove every black American from the electoral roll.
Impact on voter numbers
Like Mississippi's changes, the Grandfather Clause had a dramatic impact on black political participation in Louisiana:
The Collapse of Black Voter Registration in Louisiana:
- In 1896: approximately 130,000 black Americans were registered to vote in Louisiana
- In 1904: this number had collapsed to just 1,342 registered black voters
This represented a reduction of over 99 percent in black voter registration within eight years.
Legal challenge and victory (1915)
Unlike most Jim Crow legislation, the Grandfather Clause eventually faced a successful legal challenge. In 1915, the NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People) brought a case to the US Supreme Court challenging the constitutionality of the Grandfather Clause.
A Landmark Victory
The Supreme Court upheld the NAACP's challenge and declared the Grandfather Clause unconstitutional. This was significant because it represented one of the first legal victories achieved by black Americans against Jim Crow Laws. It demonstrated that legal challenges could succeed and established a precedent for future civil rights litigation.
However, southern states simply developed new methods of voter suppression to replace the Grandfather Clause, so its removal did not immediately restore black voting rights.
Impact on voter numbers across the South in the 1890s
Widespread adoption of voter suppression
Following the examples of Mississippi and Louisiana, each southern state passed constitutional amendments during the 1890s that placed restrictions on voting designed to disproportionately affect black Americans.
Three main methods
State governments employed three main methods of voter suppression:
-
Poll taxes: These placed a financial charge on voter registration or voting itself. Poll taxes had a discouraging effect on voting by poor people, both white and black. However, they affected black Americans disproportionately due to higher poverty rates in black communities.
-
Property tests: These made it illegal to vote unless you owned property. Since black Americans had been systematically denied opportunities to acquire property through slavery, sharecropping systems, and discriminatory economic practices, property tests excluded them at higher rates than white Americans.
-
Literacy tests: As seen in Mississippi, these required potential voters to demonstrate reading ability and understanding of complex legal documents. Given that black Americans had been denied education under slavery and continued to face educational discrimination, literacy tests affected them disproportionately.
Statistical impact
The combined effect of these measures across the southern states was dramatic but varied by race:
Regional Impact of Voter Suppression:
- Black American voting in the southern states saw a drop of 65 percent
- White voting declined by 26 percent
The fact that white voting also declined shows these measures affected poor white voters as well. However, the disproportionate impact on black Americans was intentional and much more severe.
The Grandfather Clause's racial impact
The Grandfather Clause, adopted by several states following Louisiana's example, was aimed exclusively at black Americans. Its purpose was to protect poor and illiterate white voters whilst ensuring black voters remained excluded.
Cementing Racial Division Across Class Lines
This had an important social and political consequence: it helped to cement the racial divide between poor white Americans and poor black Americans. By exempting poor whites from literacy and property requirements whilst excluding all black Americans regardless of education or property ownership, the Grandfather Clause reinforced white racial solidarity across class lines and prevented potential alliances between poor whites and poor blacks.
W.E.B. Du Bois: opposition to accommodation
W.E.B. Du Bois (1868-1963) was a leading black American academic and civil rights activist whose views contrasted sharply with those of Booker T. Washington.
Academic achievements
Du Bois's credentials were exceptional. In 1895, he became the first black American to receive a doctorate degree (PhD) from Harvard University, the most prestigious university in the USA. He then studied in Germany, gaining international academic experience. He conducted groundbreaking sociological studies of black Americans, and in 1899 published The Philadelphia Negro: A Social Study, which established his national reputation. From 1898 to 1910, he taught sociology at Atlanta University.
Opposition to segregation and Washington
Du Bois was a forthright opponent of racial segregation and directly challenged Booker T. Washington's view that economic advancement was preferable to demanding full civil equality for black Americans. In 1903, he published Souls of the Black Folk, which highlighted the suffering of black Americans living under Jim Crow Laws and criticized Washington's accommodationist approach.
Civil rights activism
Du Bois was not content with academic criticism - he took direct action. In 1909, he was the key figure in founding the Niagara Movement for civil rights equality for black Americans. This movement demanded immediate civil and political rights rather than Washington's gradualist approach.
The Founding of the NAACP
In 1910, Du Bois helped to found the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), which would become the most important civil rights organization of the 20th century. The NAACP fought mainly through court cases for black civil equality, establishing the legal challenge strategy that would eventually dismantle Jim Crow.
Du Bois also served as editor and regular contributor to the NAACP magazine, The Crisis, giving him a platform to influence black American opinion and strategy.
Booker T. Washington's perspective
In contrast to Du Bois, Booker T. Washington advocated a more accommodationist approach. In a famous speech delivered at the States and International Exposition in Atlanta, Georgia, on 18 September 1895 (known as the Atlanta Compromise), Washington outlined his philosophy.
Economic focus
Washington argued that black Americans should focus on economic advancement through hard work and vocational training rather than demanding immediate political and social equality. He stated that black Americans' "greatest danger" was overlooking the fact that they would succeed through "the production of our hands" - meaning manual labor and practical skills.
Acceptance of segregation
Controversially, Washington argued that "the agitation of questions of social equality is the extreme folly". He believed that progress in civil rights would come through economic success rather than political activism or "artificial forcing". He stated: "The opportunity to earn a dollar in a factory just now is worth infinitely more than the opportunity to spend a dollar in an opera house."
Context and criticism
This philosophy, while criticized by Du Bois and others as too accommodating to white supremacy, reflected Washington's belief that black Americans needed to build economic power before they could successfully demand political equality.
The Fundamental Debate
Critics argued that accepting segregation and disenfranchisement in the short term allowed these systems to become entrenched, making them harder to dismantle later.
The debate between Washington's accommodationist approach and Du Bois's confrontational approach represented a fundamental division in black American strategy during the Jim Crow era - a division that would continue to shape civil rights strategies throughout the 20th century.
Exam tips
Strategies for Answering Questions on Voter Exclusion:
-
Provide specific statistical evidence: Use the concrete numbers from Mississippi (67% to 5.7%) and Louisiana (130,000 to 1,342) to demonstrate the scale of disenfranchisement.
-
Explain the mechanisms clearly: Don't just list poll taxes, literacy tests, and property requirements - explain how they worked and why they disproportionately affected black voters.
-
Consider the legal strategy: Southern states used seemingly race-neutral laws to achieve racial discrimination, which made them harder to challenge in court.
-
Make connections: Link voter suppression to the broader Jim Crow system - without voting rights, black Americans couldn't elect representatives who would challenge segregation laws.
-
Evaluate significance: The 1915 Supreme Court victory against the Grandfather Clause was important not just for what it achieved immediately, but for establishing that legal challenges could succeed - this laid groundwork for the later civil rights movement.
-
Compare different states: Mississippi and Louisiana used different primary methods (literacy test/poll tax vs. Grandfather Clause) but achieved similar results - this shows the systematic nature of disenfranchisement.
Remember!
Key Points to Remember:
-
The Fifteenth Amendment (1870) gave black men the right to vote, but southern states systematically undermined this through state constitutional changes in the 1890s.
-
Mississippi (1890) pioneered voter suppression through poll taxes ($2) and literacy tests, reducing black voter registration from 67% to just 5.7% by 1892.
-
Louisiana (1898) introduced the Grandfather Clause, which exempted men who could vote before 1867 (and their descendants) from literacy and property tests - this excluded all black Americans since they couldn't vote until 1870. Black registration fell from 130,000 to 1,342.
-
Three main methods were used across the South: poll taxes, property tests, and literacy tests - these caused a 65% drop in black voting but only a 26% drop in white voting, showing their racially discriminatory impact.
-
The NAACP's 1915 Supreme Court victory against the Grandfather Clause was one of the first successful legal challenges to Jim Crow Laws, establishing the strategy of fighting discrimination through the courts.