The Civil Rights Cases of 1883 (Edexcel A-Level History): Revision Notes
The Civil Rights Cases of 1883
The role of the US Supreme Court in American government
The US Supreme Court played a crucial role in denying black Americans their civil rights during this period. Although not explicitly mentioned in the original 1787 Constitution, the Court was established under the Judiciary Act of 1789 as the final court of appeal for both civil law and criminal law cases at national and state levels.
The Court's power expanded significantly under Chief Justice John Marshall (1801-1835). During his tenure, Marshall established the Supreme Court's right to interpret the meaning of the US Constitution. This meant the Court could determine whether laws and actions by politicians were unconstitutional - a power that would have devastating consequences for black Americans in 1883.
The power of judicial review - the Supreme Court's ability to declare laws unconstitutional - was not explicitly granted in the Constitution but was established through precedent. This power would prove to be a double-edged sword for civil rights in America.
Key terms:
-
Civil law: A court case between two individuals or two private organisations, usually involving requests for monetary damages caused by an action of the accused party.
-
Criminal law: A court case involving federal, state or local government against an individual or organisation that has broken the law.
-
Chief justice: The presiding judge of the US Supreme Court.
The composition of the Supreme Court in 1883
In 1883, the US Supreme Court consisted of nine justices. The chief justice was Morrison P. Waite of Ohio. Supreme Court judges were nominated by the president but could only become justices after receiving 'advice and consent' from two-thirds of the US Senate. This appointment process was designed to ensure judicial independence and quality.
Decisions by the Supreme Court were determined by majority voting. In the civil rights cases of 1883, this voting process produced a crushing result for black Americans: eight justices voted in favour of declaring much of the civil rights legislation unconstitutional, with only Justice John M. Harlan voting against. This 8-1 decision would fundamentally reshape race relations in America for decades to come.
The 8-1 voting outcome was not just a simple majority - it represented an overwhelming consensus among the justices that would make the decision extremely difficult to challenge or overturn. Only one voice stood against what would become one of the most devastating Supreme Court decisions in American history.
The five cases brought before the Court
Black Americans brought five cases to the Supreme Court, all dealing with racial discrimination by private individuals and businesses. These cases were heard together by the Court in November 1882, with the judgment issued in 1883. The cases were:
- United States v Stanley (Missouri hotel discrimination)
- United States v Ryan (Missouri hotel discrimination)
- United States v Nichols (San Francisco theatre discrimination)
- United States v Singleton (New York City theatre discrimination)
- Robinson et ux. v Memphis and Charleston Railroad (railway discrimination)
Examples of discrimination
The Robinson Case: Railway Discrimination
The Robinson case involved a husband and wife who sued a railroad company. The train conductor refused to allow the wife into the women's-only carriage because she was a dark-skinned black American. Her husband was light-skinned, and the conductor mistakenly thought he was white. The conductor concluded the black woman was an 'improper person' because he believed she was married to a white man.
The New York City Case: Theatre Discrimination
In the New York City case, William Davis, a black American, and his female friend (who was one-eighth black) were denied entry to an opera house because of their racial origin. When Davis refused to leave, he was arrested, leading him to sue the opera house.
Several cases occurred in states that were never part of the Confederacy (such as California and New York), demonstrating that denial of equal civil rights for black Americans was a nationwide problem, not just a southern issue. This geographic diversity of the cases proved that racial discrimination permeated American society from coast to coast.
Arguments presented to the Court
Arguments by black Americans (the complainants)
The black American complainants argued that they were denied civil rights guaranteed by the Civil Rights Act of 1875, passed by Congress. They presented three main constitutional arguments:
Constitutional Arguments by the Complainants:
-
The acts of racial discrimination violated the Fourteenth Amendment, which guaranteed all Americans equal protection of the law.
-
Racial discrimination represented inferior treatment and a 'badge of servitude', therefore violating the Thirteenth Amendment, which had abolished slavery.
-
Congress had the constitutional power to protect these rights through legislation.
Arguments by white Americans (the defendants)
The white Americans defending their discriminatory actions made counter-arguments:
Defendants' Counter-Arguments:
-
The US Congress had no power to tell individual Americans how to run their businesses.
-
The Fourteenth Amendment only banned certain actions by state governments, not actions by private individuals or businesses.
-
The federal government was overstepping its constitutional authority by regulating private business practices.
The Supreme Court decision of 15 October 1883
The Court's ruling on 15 October 1883 caused outrage among the black American community. Justice Joseph Bradley was assigned to write the majority opinion explaining the 8-1 decision. The ruling had two devastating conclusions:
The Civil Rights Act of 1875 was unconstitutional
Justice Bradley declared that Congress had exceeded its constitutional authority in passing the Civil Rights Act of 1875. The Court's reasoning was based on narrow interpretations of the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments.
Interpretation of the Thirteenth Amendment
The Court's Restrictive Ruling on the Thirteenth Amendment
The Court ruled that the Thirteenth Amendment only gave Congress power to legislate against slavery itself, not against individual acts of racial discrimination. According to the majority opinion:
- The Thirteenth Amendment "simply abolished slavery" and dealt only with "slavery and its incidents".
- Since the cases involved individual acts of racial discrimination by private citizens and businesses (not slavery), they did not violate the Thirteenth Amendment.
- Congress therefore had no power under this amendment to regulate how private individuals treated black Americans.
This narrow interpretation effectively stripped the amendment of its potential to protect black Americans from discrimination in daily life.
Interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment
The Court's interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment was equally restrictive:
- The amendment prohibited certain actions by state governments only, such as denying the right to vote or serve on juries.
- It did not apply to individual acts of discrimination by private citizens or businesses.
- The amendment was "corrective in its character" - it could only counteract state laws and state actions, not private behaviour.
- Congress could pass laws to counteract discriminatory state legislation, but not to regulate private individuals' actions.
According to Justice Bradley's majority opinion: "Under the Fourteenth Amendment, it has power to counteract and render nugatory all State laws and proceedings which have the effect to abridge any of the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States... it must necessarily be, and can only be, corrective in its character, addressed to counteract and afford relief against State regulations or proceedings."
This interpretation created a critical loophole: while state governments could not legally discriminate, private individuals and businesses could freely do so without federal consequences. This distinction would enable widespread segregation throughout America.
The lone dissenting voice: Justice John Harlan
Only one justice opposed this decision: Justice John Harlan. Notably, he was the only member of the Supreme Court who had owned slaves before 1865, making his dissent particularly significant.
Justice Harlan argued that:
-
The Civil Rights Act of 1875 had extended to black Americans the same civil rights held by white Americans and was therefore constitutional.
-
The Fourteenth Amendment granted equal protection of the law to all Americans, both black and white.
-
Congress did have the constitutional right to pass legislation protecting the civil rights of black Americans in public spaces such as theatres, railways and hotels.
Justice Harlan's dissent proved prophetic but would be ignored for many decades. His lone voice against the majority opinion demonstrated remarkable moral courage and legal insight, though it could not prevent the devastating consequences of the 8-1 decision.
The devastating consequences of the decision
The immediate result of the 1883 decision was the removal of most gains made by black Americans during Reconstruction (1865-1877). Black Americans were now vulnerable to racial discrimination by individuals and businesses across the entire USA, with no federal legal protection.
The Decision's Devastating Effects:
The decision effectively:
- Declared the Civil Rights Act of 1875 unconstitutional and unenforceable
- Removed federal protection against discrimination in public accommodations
- Opened the door to legal segregation and the implementation of Jim Crow Laws
- Signalled that the federal government would not protect black Americans' civil rights
- Shifted the burden of civil rights protection to state governments, many of which actively supported segregation
The reaction of black Americans to the Court's judgment
Frederick Douglass's response
Frederick Douglass, the renowned black American civil rights activist who had campaigned for the abolition of slavery before the Civil War, spoke to a large gathering at Lincoln Hall, Washington DC, on 22 October 1883, shortly after the announcement of the Court's judgment.
Frederick Douglass's Public Response
The Cleveland Gazette's Washington DC correspondent reported that the hall was crowded to capacity, with many members of the public turned away due to lack of space. Although Douglass urged the audience to respect court decisions, he drew powerful comparisons between the 1883 cases and pre-Civil War injustices:
- The decisions to force slavery on Kansas Territory
- The Fugitive Slave Law of 1850
Douglass stated that the decision "stood against the principles of liberty", making clear that he viewed it as a betrayal of the principles for which the Civil War had been fought.
Bishop H.M. Turner's condemnation
Bishop H.M. Turner, a senior black American clergyman, published a scathing pamphlet in 1893 entitled "The Barbarous Decision of the United States Supreme Court Declaring the Civil Rights Act Unconstitutional and Disrobing the Colored Race of All Civil Protection."
In this pamphlet, Turner argued that the decision:
- Entitled black people to "every species of indignities known to proscription, persecution and even death itself"
- Would lead to black Americans either leaving the United States or "occupying the status of free slaves, until extermination follows"
- Authorised and sustained "all the unjust discriminations, proscriptions and robberies perpetrated by public carriers upon millions of the nation's most loyal defenders"
- Fathered all the 'Jim Crow cars' (segregated railway carriages) into which black people were forced while paying the same fares as whites
- Made "the ballot of the black man a parody, his citizenship a nullity and his freedom a burlesque"
- Engendered bitter feelings between whites and blacks and "resulted in the deaths of thousands"
- Meant America could "never be accepted as a civil, much less a Christian, country"
Turner's passionate response reflected the deep anger and despair felt throughout the black American community. His use of powerful language - describing the decision as "barbarous" and America's claim to be a Christian nation as invalidated - captured the profound sense of betrayal experienced by black Americans.
Nationwide protests and responses
The reaction extended far beyond Washington DC:
-
Thomas Fortune, editor of the New York Globe, reported that black Americans across the country were discussing the Supreme Court decision.
-
On 20 November 1883, the Washington DC correspondent to the Arkansas Mansion newspaper wrote that the civil rights cases caused great anger among black Americans nationwide.
-
A mass meeting in Birmingham, Alabama, produced a series of resolutions condemning the decision and declaring that it deprived black Americans of the right to equal accommodations.
-
This Birmingham meeting appointed five men to a committee to present grievances to the railroads in Alabama and to request a plan ensuring that black Americans should enjoy equally good accommodations when paying the same fares as white passengers.
These organised responses demonstrated that black Americans understood the significance of the decision and were determined to continue fighting for their rights, even in the face of this major setback. The coordinated nature of protests from New York to Alabama showed a national civil rights consciousness that would eventually lead to the modern Civil Rights Movement.
Historical significance
The Civil Rights Cases of 1883 represented a turning point in American race relations. By declaring the Civil Rights Act of 1875 unconstitutional, the Supreme Court:
- Removed federal protection for black Americans against discrimination in public accommodations
- Gave state governments the green light to introduce legal segregation
- Allowed private individuals and businesses to discriminate freely against black Americans
- Set a legal precedent that would not be overturned until the Civil Rights Act of 1964
The decision opened the door to legal segregation and the widespread implementation of Jim Crow Laws throughout the South and beyond. It would be more than 70 years before the Supreme Court began to reverse this devastating ruling. The 1883 decision stands as one of the most regressive Supreme Court rulings in American history, fundamentally undermining the promise of equality established by the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments.
Key Points to Remember:
-
The US Supreme Court voted 8-1 to declare the Civil Rights Act of 1875 unconstitutional, with only Justice John Harlan dissenting.
-
The Court ruled that the Thirteenth Amendment only abolished slavery itself, not individual acts of racial discrimination, and that the Fourteenth Amendment only restricted state government actions, not private individuals or businesses.
-
The five cases involved discrimination in hotels (Missouri), theatres (California and New York), and railways, demonstrating that discrimination was a nationwide problem, not limited to the South.
-
Black Americans responded with outrage and organised protests, with leaders like Frederick Douglass and Bishop H.M. Turner condemning the decision as a betrayal of the principles of liberty and equality.
-
The decision removed most gains made during Reconstruction and opened the door to legal segregation and Jim Crow Laws, fundamentally reshaping race relations in America for the next 80 years.