Living Constitution ideology as against originalism. (Edexcel A-Level Politics): Flashcards
Practise the cards
15 cards from this deck
ShowHide
Practise the cards
15 cards from this deck
Living Constitution ideology view
Living Constitution ideology view
Constitution is dynamic & evolving, interpreted with modern values
Key principle of Living Constitution approach
Key principle of Living Constitution approach
Flexibility to adapt to current societal issues
Judicial Activism in Living Constitution
Judicial Activism in Living Constitution
Active judiciary role shaping policy to reflect current values
Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) ruling
Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) ruling
Legalised same-sex marriage via 14th Amendment Equal Protection
Roe v. Wade (1973) basis
Roe v. Wade (1973) basis
Woman's right to privacy under 14th Amendment for abortion choice
Living Constitution criticism: judicial overreach
Living Constitution criticism: judicial overreach
Judges impose personal views, creating new rights vs interpreting
Living Constitution criticism: stability issue
Living Constitution criticism: stability issue
Frequent reinterpretations create legal instability
Originalism definition
Originalism definition
Constitution interpreted by original meaning & framers' intent
Judicial Restraint in Originalism
Judicial Restraint in Originalism
Limited judiciary role, defer to legislature unless clear breach
Citizens United v. FEC (2010)
Citizens United v. FEC (2010)
Corporate funding restrictions violate 1st Amendment free speech
Dobbs v. Jackson (2022) ruling
Dobbs v. Jackson (2022) ruling
Overturned Roe v. Wade, no constitutional right to abortion
Originalism criticism: flexibility
Originalism criticism: flexibility
Too rigid, fails to address modern issues framers didn't foresee
Flexibility vs stability comparison
Flexibility vs stability comparison
Living = flexible but unstable; Originalism = stable but rigid
Judiciary role: Living Constitution vs Originalism
Judiciary role: Living Constitution vs Originalism
Active policy shaping vs restraint/deference to legislature
Justice known for originalist approach
Justice known for originalist approach
Clarence Thomas - interprets by historical context & intent
