Living Constitution ideology as against originalism. (Edexcel A-Level Politics): Flashcards

📚Flashcards
Living Constitution ideology as against originalism.
Sign up to keep revising.Create a free account to study more flashcards and track your progress.

Practise the cards

15 cards from this deck

Show

Living Constitution ideology view

Constitution is dynamic & evolving, interpreted with modern values

Key principle of Living Constitution approach

Flexibility to adapt to current societal issues

Judicial Activism in Living Constitution

Active judiciary role shaping policy to reflect current values

Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) ruling

Legalised same-sex marriage via 14th Amendment Equal Protection

Roe v. Wade (1973) basis

Woman's right to privacy under 14th Amendment for abortion choice

Living Constitution criticism: judicial overreach

Judges impose personal views, creating new rights vs interpreting

Living Constitution criticism: stability issue

Frequent reinterpretations create legal instability

Originalism definition

Constitution interpreted by original meaning & framers' intent

Judicial Restraint in Originalism

Limited judiciary role, defer to legislature unless clear breach

Citizens United v. FEC (2010)

Corporate funding restrictions violate 1st Amendment free speech

Dobbs v. Jackson (2022) ruling

Overturned Roe v. Wade, no constitutional right to abortion

Originalism criticism: flexibility

Too rigid, fails to address modern issues framers didn't foresee

Flexibility vs stability comparison

Living = flexible but unstable; Originalism = stable but rigid

Judiciary role: Living Constitution vs Originalism

Active policy shaping vs restraint/deference to legislature

Justice known for originalist approach

Clarence Thomas - interprets by historical context & intent

Join 100,000+ A-Level students studying Flashcards with us.

Select your subjects, and get access to A+ resources today.