Origins and development of international law and institutions (Edexcel A-Level Politics): Revision Notes
📚 Revision Notes
27.1.1 International Court of Justice, International Criminal Court, UN Tribunals, and European Court of Human Rights (ECHR)
What are Human Rights?
Civil and Political Rights
infoNote
- Known as 'negative freedoms' or 'first-generation rights'
Social and Economic Rights
infoNote
- Known as 'positive freedoms' or 'second-generation rights'
The Human Rights Framework
infoNote
The goal is to have universally promoted and protected human rights supported by law and institutions.
Laws
| Date | Law | Strengths | Weaknesses |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1948 | The Universal Declaration of Human Rights | The first universal statement of global human rights standards. Influenced binding international covenants, regional conventions, and the human rights laws of nation states. | Non-binding in international law. Critics argue it imposes a Western or Judo-Christian viewpoint of human rights. |
| 1953 | Europe Creates ECHR | The first regional agreement on HR.A binding legal text with 47 member states. The ECHR acts as a final court of appeal of last resort. | Decisions in the ECHR are binding but lack enforcement mechanisms, allowing states to ignore rulings. Sovereignty may be challenged if ECHR judges disagree with national governments. |
| 1966 | International Covenants on Social and Economic Rights (ICSR) and on Civil and Political Rights | First inclusion of human rights in international law, though some states failed to ratify. | Economic and social rights are challenging for less developed nations to deliver. No international enforcement body. |
| 1980s | International Conventions | Address specific human rights abuses for vulnerable groups.Offers definitions of torture and prohibits reliance on torture-derived evidence. | Cannot be enforced on non-ratifying states.Examples include US torture practices revealed in 2015. |
Courts
| Date | Court | Details |
|---|---|---|
| 1959 | European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) | Operates with 47 member states. Some decisions ignored, but most are upheld. |
| 1990s | International Criminal Tribunals | Successful conviction rate but lacks long-term deterrence or guaranteed trials. |
| 2002 | International Criminal Court (ICC) | Established in 2002 with 9 convictions by 2019.Some states, including 3 of the P5, have not ratified. |
International Court of Justice (ICJ)
- Established by the UN Charter in 1945.
- Composed of 15 judges representing various legal systems and civilizations.
- Settles disputes between states and provides legal opinions to international branches and the UN General Assembly.
- Article 94 of the UN Charter mandates UN member states to comply with ICJ decisions.
- Non-compliance can be addressed by the UNSC.
Successes
- Resolved border clashes and disputes, e.g., Burkina Faso vs Mali, El Salvador vs Honduras, Nigeria vs Cameroon.
- Notable case: Rwanda genocide tribunal with 61 convictions.
International Criminal Tribunals
- ICTY (Former Yugoslavia): Established to prosecute crimes against humanity and genocide. Significant convictions include Slobodan Milosevic.
- ICTR (Rwanda): Convicted 50 individuals, including high-ranking officials.
- Special Court for Sierra Leone: Notable conviction of Charles Taylor in 2012.
- Cambodian Tribunal: Convicted leaders of the Khmer Rouge regime.
Case Studies
| Case Study | Details |
|---|---|
| Cambodia | Convicted Khmer Rouge leaders for genocide and crimes against humanity. |
| Former Yugoslavia | Convicted high-ranking officials for genocide and other crimes. |
| Sierra Leone | Convicted Charles Taylor for war crimes. |
The ICC - International Criminal Court
- Established under the Rome Statute in 1998, effective from 2002.
- Handles the worst human rights abuses when national courts are unwilling or unable to prosecute.
- Has jurisdiction over crimes committed after July 1, 2002.
- Key relationship with UNSC but lacks automatic jurisdiction for non-signatory states.
- 121 ratifying states and 34 potential future ratifications.
- 3 P5 members have not ratified the Rome Statute.
Case Studies
| Case Study | Details |
|---|---|
| Omar Al Bashir | Wanted for war crimes; evaded capture and remains in pre-trial stage. |
| President Kenyatta and President Ruto | Charges dropped due to insufficient evidence in the 2007 Kenya violence case. |
| Bosco Ntaganda | Sentenced to 30 years for war crimes and crimes against humanity. |
Effectiveness
| Effective | Not Effective |
|---|---|
| Evidence of key successes, such as convictions and the ability to prosecute high-ranking officials. | Lacks authority to prosecute non-signatory states; majority of convictions are related to African states. |
| Permanent court structure. | P5 members not ratifying the Rome Statute affects legitimacy and global cooperation. |
European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)
Features
- A binding supervisory mechanism with 47 members.
- Independent judges representing diverse legal systems.
- Covers migrants and non-member states as well.
- Rulings are binding but lack enforcement power, aiming to deter future violations.
Compliance
- Mechanisms exist through the Committee of Ministers to pursue non-compliance.
- Case examples:
infoNote
- Lambert vs France: Decision upheld allowing removal of life support.
- Al Skeini vs UK: Ordered UK to pay damages for Iraq war abuses.
- Education Rights (UK): Ruling led to reforms in child protection services.
- Defence Rights (UK): Ruled against discrimination based on sexuality.
- Hirst vs UK: Ordered changes to prisoner voting rights.
- Kavala vs Turkey: Turkey ignored ECHR's call for release.
Are Human Rights More Protected/Better Upheld?
Progress
- More specific laws and state adoption of human rights.
- Binding international laws and effective institutions like the ICC and ECHR.
- Increased monitoring by NGOs and humanitarian intervention.
Challenges
- Sovereignty and ratification issues affect the effectiveness of international laws.
- Lack of enforcement mechanisms and cooperation from major states.
- Most human rights are enforced domestically with varying success.