Themes (OCR A-Level English Literature): Revision Notes
Themes
Themes are the fundamental and often universal ideas explored in a literary work. In The Tempest, Shakespeare weaves together multiple interconnected themes that examine justice, power, humanity, and morality. These themes create a complex exploration of what it means to be human and how power affects relationships.
The themes in The Tempest do not exist in isolation - they constantly interact and influence one another. For example, questions of justice relate directly to questions of power, whilst the theme of monstrosity connects deeply with colonial desires and the definition of humanity.
The illusion of justice
The Tempest presents a straightforward revenge story: Prospero seeks to regain his dukedom after his brother Antonio usurped his throne. However, the play questions whether true justice is ever achieved, as Prospero's version of justice appears highly subjective and self-serving.
Prospero's hypocritical justice
Whilst Prospero positions himself as a victim seeking to right wrongs, his actions reveal significant hypocrisy. He condemns Antonio for stealing his power, yet he shows no hesitation in enslaving both Ariel and Caliban to achieve his goals. Prospero's concept of justice centres entirely on what benefits him personally, creating moral ambiguity throughout the play.
The play offers no higher moral authority to challenge Prospero's interpretation of events, leaving audiences to question whose version of justice is correct. This ambiguity becomes particularly important when we consider Prospero as a representation of the playwright himself.
Justice and artistic creation
As the play develops, it increasingly focuses on creativity and art. Prospero's role mirrors that of an author constructing a narrative, and when we view him as Shakespeare's surrogate, his pursuit of justice becomes more sympathetic. Just as playwrights arrange events to reflect their own moral vision, Prospero manipulates circumstances to impose his view of what is right.
Through magic and theatrical tricks - echoing the special effects of Jacobean theatre - Prospero gradually convinces other characters and the audience that his cause is just. By the play's conclusion, when he forgives his enemies, frees his servants, and abandons his magic, he transforms into simply an old man whose work has created entertainment. The resolution suggests that happy endings in art depend entirely on the artist's imagination and moral vision, rather than reflecting real-world justice.
Exam tip: Consider how Shakespeare uses metatheatre (theatre about theatre) to comment on artistic creation and moral authority.
The difficulty of distinguishing "men" from "monsters"
Shakespeare deliberately blurs the boundary between human and monster, forcing audiences to question what defines humanity.
Caliban's ambiguous nature
When Miranda first sees Ferdinand, she describes him as the third man she has ever encountered (I.ii.449), implying the other two are Prospero and Caliban. However, Miranda and Prospero's treatment of Caliban suggests they view him as less than human. Miranda recalls teaching Caliban language when previously he sounded like "like / A thing most brutish" (I.ii.359-360), whilst Prospero claims he showed Caliban "human care" (I.ii.349), suggesting Caliban did not deserve such treatment.
Prospero later describes Caliban as a "devil, a born devil, on whose nature / Nurture can never stick" (IV.i.188-189), arguing that education cannot overcome Caliban's inherent brutishness. Similarly, Miranda states that Caliban's "vile race" contained something that "good natures / Could not abide to be with" (I.ii.361-363), suggesting his inhuman qualities overwhelm any civilising influence.
Conflicting perspectives
The play presents contradictory evidence about Caliban's humanity. Caliban claims he treated Prospero kindly upon his arrival, only to be imprisoned in return (I.ii.347). Prospero counters that he turned against Caliban after Caliban attempted to rape Miranda (I.ii.347-351). The audience must decide whether to view Caliban as inherently savage or as brutalised by oppression.
Caliban demonstrates both eloquence - as seen in his curses and his beautiful speech about the island's sounds in Act III, scene ii - and degrading servility when drunk with Stephano and Trinculo. This combination makes his character genuinely ambiguous.
Questioning human monstrosity
Trinculo's reaction upon first encountering Caliban (II.ii.18-38) - the longest speech in the play - provides crucial commentary. He imagines displaying Caliban in England for profit, noting that people "will not give a doit to relieve a lame beggar" but "will lay out ten to see a dead Indian" (II.ii.28-31). Here, the true monstrosity lies not in Caliban's appearance but in the cruel voyeurism of those who would exploit him. Shakespeare suggests that human cruelty may be more monstrous than physical difference.
The allure of ruling a colony
The uninhabited island represents unlimited possibility for nearly every character who arrives there, revealing their colonial ambitions and desire for power.
Different visions of rule
Multiple characters envision themselves ruling the island:
- Prospero uses its isolation to educate Miranda
- Sycorax (Caliban's mother) practised magic there after her exile from Algeria
- Caliban laments losing his sovereignty, having once been his own king (I.ii.344-345)
- Gonzalo imagines creating a utopian society where he would rule (II.i.148-156)
- Stephano dreams of kingship with Miranda as his queen and Trinculo as his viceroy (III.ii.101-103)
Each character views the island as a space for freedom and unrealised potential, particularly the opportunity to exercise power without restraint.
Critique of colonialism
However, Shakespeare treats these colonial fantasies with scepticism. When Gonzalo describes his ideal society with no commerce, work, or "sovereignty", Sebastian and Antonio point out the contradiction: "yet he would be king on't" and "The latter end of his commonwealth forgets the beginning" (II.i.156-157). Gonzalo's vision involves ruling whilst pretending not to rule, making him a parody of Prospero himself.
Key point: Shakespeare presents colonialism as fundamentally contradictory and ultimately unfulfilling for both coloniser and colonised.
The colonised are represented by Caliban alone. Whilst we might initially sympathise with him when Prospero torments him with spirits, this sympathy becomes complicated by his willingness to degrade himself before Stephano (Act II, scene ii). Even as Caliban plots to kill one colonial master (Prospero) in Act III, scene ii, he immediately accepts another (Stephano). The play suggests that the desire to rule and the desire to be ruled are inextricably linked, creating a cycle of oppression.
Prospero's threats
Throughout the play, Prospero maintains control through intimidation and threats, revealing his violent and cruel nature.
Magical threats
Prospero's threats typically involve magical punishment. He warns Caliban: "If thou neglect'st or dost unwillingly / What I command, I'll rack thee with old cramps, / Fill all thy bones with aches, make thee roar" (I.ii.). Even Ariel, his faithful servant, receives harsh threats. When Ariel reminds Prospero of his promise of freedom, Prospero responds: "If thou more murmur'st, I will rend an oak / And peg thee in his knotty entrails" (I.ii.).
Linking to tyranny
Significantly, the tree prison Prospero threatens echoes the imprisonment Sycorax inflicted on Ariel before Prospero's arrival. This parallel connects Prospero to other tyrannical figures, suggesting his methods differ little from those he condemns.
His threats reveal that despite his claims to moral superiority, he maintains power through fear and violence, much like the brother who usurped him.
Obedience and disobedience
The themes of obedience and disobedience reveal the island's power hierarchy and its instability.
Prospero's demands for obedience
As both former Duke of Milan and master of magic, Prospero stands at the top of the island's hierarchy. He demands complete obedience from everyone: his servants (Ariel and Caliban) and his daughter Miranda. However, each subject disobeys him at some point, undermining his absolute authority.
Complex forms of disobedience
Different acts of disobedience reveal varying degrees of rebellion:
- Caliban's rebellion: Swears allegiance to Stephano, attempting to overthrow the hierarchy entirely
- Miranda's romance: Believes she disobeys by pursuing Ferdinand, but actually fulfils her father's secret wishes, as Prospero's harsh treatment of Ferdinand is designed to make Miranda fall in love with him
- Ariel's request: Despite faithful service, Prospero considers Ariel disobedient merely for asking for his promised freedom
These examples demonstrate that the island's power structure is less stable and more complicated than it initially appears. Prospero's perception of disobedience often reveals more about his need for control than about actual rebellion.
Treason
Shakespeare weaves betrayal throughout the play, from its backstory through to hints about the future.
Historical treason
The play's central conflict stems from Antonio's treason: he conspired with King Alonso to assassinate Prospero and steal the dukedom of Milan. This act represents both political treason and familial betrayal, establishing the pattern for subsequent treachery.
Contemporary plots
Two parallel assassination plots develop during the play:
- Caliban and Stephano plot to murder Prospero and seize control of the island
- Antonio and Sebastian plan to kill Alonso and take control of Naples
Both plots are interrupted before causing harm, yet their existence emphasises how treasonous impulses pervade the play's world.
Future implications
Even after these plots fail, treason remains thematically present. The final scene features Miranda and Ferdinand playing chess, a game won through metaphorically assassinating the opponent's king. When Miranda accuses Ferdinand of cheating, she recalls how her uncle Antonio cheated his way to power twelve years earlier.
This moment raises an unsettling question: does the future hold more betrayal and treason? The cycle may not be broken after all.
Exam tip: Consider how the theme of treason connects to questions about human nature - is betrayal an inevitable part of human society?
Wonder and admiration
These themes centre on Miranda, whose Latin name literally means both "wonderful" and "admirable". She represents optimism and hope within a play focused on past wrongs.
Miranda as symbol of hope
In a narrative dominated by negative emotions about betrayal and revenge, Miranda's outlook provides a beacon of optimism. Ferdinand recognises her admirable qualities immediately, exclaiming "O you wonder!" (I.ii.) upon first meeting her. He later praises her perfection: "O you, / So perfect and so peerless, are created / Of every creature's best!" (III.i.).
Apart from Gonzalo, Miranda most clearly symbolises faith in new beginnings and a better future - what she famously calls a "brave new world". Her youth and innocence contrast sharply with the older characters' cynicism and bitterness.
The darker side of wonder
However, wonder carries a more sinister connotation in the play. Under Prospero's command and Ariel's magic, the island becomes a place of wonderful but disorienting occurrences. In Act V, Prospero comments that Alonso and his companions have experienced many wonderful visions that prevent clear thinking. In this context, wonder serves as a tool for manipulation rather than genuine enlightenment.
The duality of wonder - as both genuine hope and manipulative illusion - reflects the play's broader moral ambiguity.
Monstrosity
Monstrosity functions as the inverse of wonder and admiration, applying primarily to Caliban whilst wonder applies to Miranda.
Caliban as spectacle
The word "monster" appears most frequently in scenes featuring Stephano and Trinculo. Upon first seeing Caliban, Trinculo identifies him as a fishy-looking freak and immediately imagines exploiting his appearance for profit. He envisions "holiday fools" willingly paying "a piece of silver" to witness such a sideshow attraction.
Beyond physical appearance
Caliban's monstrosity derives not only from his looks but from the jarring contrast between his savage appearance and his civilised language. Trinculo expresses surprise that a creature like Caliban would use respectful terms like "Lord". This incongruity - between brutish exterior and eloquent speech - defines Caliban's monstrous characterization more than either quality alone.
Expanding the concept
Although Caliban serves as the primary example of monstrosity, Alonso also uses "monstrous" to describe illusory sounds and visions created by Ariel. This broader application suggests that monstrosity encompasses anything that defies natural order or understanding, not merely physical difference.
The theme of monstrosity ultimately asks audiences to consider what truly makes something or someone monstrous: appearance, behaviour, or perhaps society's reaction to difference.
Remember!
Key Points to Remember:
-
Justice in the play is subjective: Prospero's version of justice serves primarily his own interests, creating moral ambiguity throughout the play
-
The human/monster boundary is deliberately unclear: Shakespeare questions what defines humanity through Caliban's complex characterisation
-
Colonial desires drive multiple characters: The island represents freedom and power, but Shakespeare critiques these colonial fantasies
-
Power requires constant enforcement: Prospero maintains control through threats and manipulation, revealing the instability of hierarchies
-
Betrayal repeats across generations: From Antonio's initial treason to hints about future conflicts, the cycle of betrayal continues
-
Wonder functions as both hope and manipulation: Miranda represents genuine optimism, but wonder also serves as a tool for Prospero's control
-
Themes interconnect throughout the play: Justice, power, humanity, and morality weave together to create Shakespeare's complex exploration of human nature