Liability for Torts ‘Closely Connected’ to Employment (OCR A-Level Law): Flashcards
📚Flashcards
Practise the cards
10 cards from this deck
ShowHide
Practise the cards
10 cards from this deck
Traditional scope of vicarious liability
Traditional scope of vicarious liability
Torts by employees within employer/employee relationship
Tortfeasor definition
Tortfeasor definition
Person committing the tort
Christian Brothers case (2012) established
Christian Brothers case (2012) established
Framework for relationships 'akin to employment'
Cox v MOJ (2016) key holding
Cox v MOJ (2016) key holding
Prisoners can be in relationship akin to employment
Lady Hale's fundamental question (Barclays 2020)
Lady Hale's fundamental question (Barclays 2020)
Is tortfeasor in own business or akin to employment?
Independent business exception
Independent business exception
If tortfeasor operates independently, no vicarious liability
Mohamud v Morrison (2016) principle
Mohamud v Morrison (2016) principle
Personal motive doesn't exclude liability if connection exists
Joel v Morison (1834) 'frolic' concept
Joel v Morison (1834) 'frolic' concept
Minor deviation vs complete abandonment of employment duties
Morrison Supermarkets (2020) distinction
Morrison Supermarkets (2020) distinction
No liability if act disconnected from employment duties
Course of employment requirement
Course of employment requirement
Tort must have close connection to employment relationship
