Theme: Role of Women (Scottish Highers English): Revision Notes
Theme: Role of Women
Introduction: women as agents of change
Stewart presents a world where women are the driving force of the household, while men remain largely passive. This reversal of traditional gender roles becomes central to understanding the play's exploration of female emancipation during the 1930s Depression era. The playwright uses the contrast between active women and inactive men to challenge audience expectations about power and authority within the family.
The play is set during the 1930s Depression, a period of extreme economic hardship in Scotland. However, it was first performed in 1947, shortly after World War Two, when many women had experienced working in roles traditionally held by men. This timing made the play's exploration of female capability particularly relevant to its original audience.
Active women versus passive men
Throughout the play, female characters are shown in constant motion while male characters remain static. Stewart creates a deliberate pattern where women take action and men wait or complain.
The women in the Morrison household and surrounding community demonstrate their active roles through:
-
Maggie runs the household, constantly working to keep her family together. She moves throughout the space, attending to her children's needs and managing the limited resources available.
-
Lily supports her sister by helping with domestic tasks, despite having her own work serving in a pub.
-
Jenny makes the bold decision to leave the family home. Months later, she returns with money, having taken control of her own economic situation.
-
Isa breaks away from her marriage to Alec, refusing to remain in a relationship that does not serve her.
-
Lizzie asserts herself by entering Maggie's kitchen to claim food she believes she is owed, demonstrating her refusal to be passive about her needs.
-
The neighbours rush between houses sharing information and attending to their domestic responsibilities.
This constant activity contrasts sharply with the male characters. Stewart uses specific language to emphasise male weakness. Words such as "feeble, wilting, morosely, pleading" describe Alec's behaviour. The stage directions repeatedly show John "with his head in his hands or with his head bent", physical positions that suggest defeat and powerlessness. Alec spends his time hoping for Isa's attention rather than taking meaningful action. John waits for employment rather than actively seeking solutions to his family's poverty. Neither pursuit demonstrates strength or initiative.
Stage directions are crucial in revealing character weakness and power dynamics in this play. Pay close attention to physical positioning and movement—they symbolise authority and powerlessness just as much as the dialogue does.
Traditional gender expectations and domestic labour
The play acknowledges that women were expected to manage the home during this period. A 1947 audience would have accepted that housekeeping, laundry, and childcare fell within the woman's domain. John's dismissal of tidying responsibilities, even after Maggie has spent the day earning money through cleaning work, would have seemed unremarkable to contemporary viewers.
However, Stewart distinguishes between managing domestic tasks and holding actual authority. Whilst women performed the physical labour of running the household, men traditionally made the decisions. This separation of labour and power becomes important when Maggie begins to claim both.
This distinction is central to understanding Stewart's feminist message. Traditional gender roles gave women the responsibility for domestic work but denied them the authority to make important decisions. Maggie's transformation involves claiming both the labour she already performs AND the power to make choices for her family.
The challenge to male authority
John attempts to assert his position as head of the household when he feels threatened by Jenny's plans. He states "he'd an idea [he] wis the heid o this hoose". This quotation reveals the fragility of his authority. The phrase "an idea" suggests that his power has never been solid or real. He believes he should be in charge according to traditional gender roles, but he cannot enforce this position. His words attempt to defend his status and remind his family of his supposed leadership, yet the very uncertainty in his language undermines him.
Key Quotation Analysis: "an idea [he] wis the heid o this hoose"
The phrase "an idea" is crucial to understanding John's powerlessness:
- It suggests his authority is only theoretical, not real or practical
- It reveals his uncertainty about his own position
- It shows his power exists only in his imagination, not in reality
- The very act of having to state this claim proves he has already lost control
This language choice exposes the hollow nature of traditional male authority when not backed by practical contribution to the family's welfare.
Stewart shows that John "adheres to the traditional male role only in theory because in practice he can't deliver". His inability to provide financially or protect his family means that his claim to authority lacks foundation. Maggie can therefore challenge and overtake his position because it was never secure.
Maggie's transformation and assertion of control
Act III presents the most dramatic shift in the power dynamics of the Morrison household. The stage directions state "Maggie rises and takes control, leaving John to sink into a chair". These physical movements symbolise the transfer of authority. Maggie's upward movement represents her growing power, whilst John's descent into the chair shows his loss of control.
Maggie's language becomes "forceful and uncharacteristic for a woman" of this period. When she declares "We wull be happy!" her tone allows no disagreement. This would have been controversial for a 1947 audience, who expected women to defer to male authority rather than issue commands. The exclamation mark emphasises her determination and the force behind her words.
Analyzing Maggie's Command: "We wull be happy!"
This short declaration demonstrates Maggie's transformation through several features:
- The exclamation mark shows force and determination
- The future tense "wull be" indicates she is making a decision, not asking permission
- The declarative mood leaves no room for disagreement
- For a 1947 audience, this tone would have been shocking and inappropriatefor a woman speaking to her husband
- The command represents a complete reversal of expected gender dynamics
By the end of the play, Maggie maintains her position despite apologising for humiliating John. The apology addresses her public exposure of "her husband's sexual appetite", but does not represent a return to submissive behaviour. Instead, she repeats "I can manage him.." like a personal affirmation. The repetition functions as "a mantra", reinforcing her belief in her own capability and control.
Maggie then articulates her vision for the future: "Four rooms… an a park forbye!" She repeats the phrase "four rooms" three times. This repetition emphasises the space she imagines, where she will be "free, unrestricted by the control of her husband". The four rooms represent not just better living conditions but personal freedom and autonomy. The park adds another dimension of space beyond the cramped tenement, suggesting expansion and possibility.
Repetition is a key linguistic device that Stewart uses to show Maggie's growing confidence. Both "I can manage him" and "four rooms" are repeated multiple times, reinforcing Maggie's determination and her vision of a better future. This repetition transforms these phrases into mantras that strengthen her resolve.
Sisterhood and conflicting perspectives
The relationship between Maggie and Lily reveals different responses to the role of women in relation to men. In Act I, the sisters exchange sharp observations about each other's life choices:
The Exchange Between Maggie and Lily
Maggie criticises Lily for "servin dirty hulkin brutes a men in a Coocaddens pub". Her language reveals disgust at the idea of serving men in a rough pub environment. The phrase "dirty hulkin brutes" presents men as animalistic and unrefined, suggesting that working for them degrades Lily.
Lily responds by attacking Maggie's domestic situation: "Livin in a slum and slaving efter a uselees man an his greetin weans". She describes John as "uselees", directly challenging the idea that he provides value to the family. The verb "slaving" emphasises the endless, unrewarded labour that Maggie performs. Lily sees Maggie's traditional role as wife and mother as a form of servitude rather than fulfilment.
This exchange demonstrates that both sisters face difficult circumstances shaped by their relationships with men. Neither has found an ideal solution. Their conflict arises from defensive reactions to choices made within limited options. However, both women articulate criticism of male behaviour and the burdens that relationships with men create.
While Maggie and Lily criticise each other's choices, notice that they are ultimately criticising the same thing: the burden that men place on women's lives. Whether serving men in a pub or caring for them at home, both sisters experience male behaviour as demanding and degrading. Their argument reveals how limited their options are within a patriarchal society.
Female emancipation in context
Stewart's play presents "a world... not one run by men, but one run by women". However, this female control operates primarily at the domestic level initially. Women manage the practical realities of survival whilst men claim theoretical authority they cannot enforce.
The playwright pushes beyond this arrangement by showing "one woman [rising] up to take more authority than a 1947 audience would expect". Maggie's transformation from dutiful wife to household leader would have challenged contemporary ideas about proper gender roles. The play suggests that when traditional male authority fails, women can and must step forward to fill the void.
This theme connects to broader social changes. Although the play is set in the 1930s, its 1947 premiere came shortly after World War Two, when women had taken on roles traditionally held by men. Stewart's exploration of female capability and authority would have resonated with audiences experiencing changing gender dynamics in post-war Britain.
Summary
Key Points to Remember:
-
Stewart contrasts active women with passive men throughout the play, using language and stage directions to emphasise female energy and male weakness.
-
Maggie's rise to power in Act III challenges traditional gender roles by showing a woman taking control of household decisions, not just domestic labour.
-
John's attempt to claim authority fails because his power exists only "in theory" rather than practice, revealed through his uncertain phrase "an idea [he] wis the heid o this hoose".
-
Maggie's repetition of "I can manage him" and "four rooms" demonstrates her growing confidence and vision of freedom beyond her husband's control.
-
The conflict between Maggie and Lily reveals how both sisters struggle with the role of men in their lives, whether serving them in a pub or caring for them at home—ultimately
both forms represent servitude to male demands.