Character: Men of the Village (Scottish Highers English): Revision Notes
Character: Men of the Village
Introduction to the three men
Three specific villagers pay particular attention to the hermit: the old man, the schoolmaster, and the bachelor. Smith does not develop these as complex, individual characters. Instead, they serve as representative figures who demonstrate different ways the hermit's presence affects the community. Each man feels driven to examine his own life when confronted with the hermit's radically different existence.
The hermit becomes a mirror in which these men see the emptiness or limitations of their own choices. Their varying reactions illustrate how a single outsider can disturb an entire community simply by living differently.
Smith deliberately constructs these three men as character types rather than fully developed individuals. This approach allows each to represent a different aspect of how communities respond to those who challenge social norms. Their collective reactions reveal patterns of conformity, fear, and resistance to alternative ways of living.
The old man
The old man has spent his entire life conforming to village expectations. He and his wife have farmed the land and raised children, following the same patterns as everyone around them. His life has been productive and respectable by the village's standards.
When the hermit arrives, the old man's contentment dissolves. He becomes restless and dissatisfied, yearning for experiences he never had. Smith captures this through physical details: the old man displays "wistfulness" when watching the hermit cycle past, and he stares at the hermit's hut for extended periods. These moments of quiet longing reveal an internal struggle that the old man cannot articulate.
His frustration eventually manifests as anger directed at his wife. He mistreats her verbally, displacing his disappointment with his own choices onto the person closest to him. Finally, he announces his intention to become a hermit himself and abandons her.
The old man's physical reactions—his wistful expressions and prolonged staring—are crucial narrative details. Smith uses these external signs to reveal internal conflict that the character cannot express verbally. This technique emphasizes how deeply suppressed desires can manifest in body language and behaviour.
The old man's rebellion proves short-lived and pathetic. He takes shelter in a barn with a leaking roof, staying only because the owner tolerates his presence. The physical discomfort of this attempt at independence overwhelms him. When he returns, he is diminished and humiliated, yet he continues to regard the hermit with "wonder and fear". This phrase captures his conflicted response: he is both fascinated by and frightened of what the hermit represents.
The old man's story illustrates how deeply social conformity shapes individual lives. After decades of following prescribed patterns, he lacks the resources to break free, even when he recognises his own dissatisfaction. His failure reinforces the village's power over those who attempt to step outside its norms.
The schoolmaster
The schoolmaster is characterised by vanity and self-importance. Smith describes him as "a very vain man" who takes pleasure in expressing opinions on various subjects. He values his own intellect highly and enjoys demonstrating his knowledge. The one phenomenon he cannot explain is the hermit, and this gap in his understanding becomes intolerable to him.
Unable to comprehend how someone could live as the hermit does, the schoolmaster decides the hermit must be hiding something. He becomes fixated on discovering this supposed secret. To justify his investigation, he boasts about his wartime experiences, exaggerating them to present himself as brave and capable of confrontation. This self-aggrandisement reveals his need to maintain his image of competence and authority.
When the schoolmaster spies on the hermit, he expects to uncover hidden activity or purpose. Instead, he finds the hermit simply sitting in stillness. This discovery profoundly unsettles him. Smith writes that he is "stunned by a vision of a world he did not know existed". The hermit's contentment in solitude, without productivity or achievement, represents a way of being that the schoolmaster's intellectual framework cannot accommodate.
The schoolmaster's reaction exposes a critical limitation: his supposed intelligence lacks imagination. Despite his pride in learning, he can analyse, categorise, and explain, but he cannot conceive of value existing outside these processes. The hermit's life challenges his fundamental assumptions about what makes existence meaningful.
The schoolmaster's disturbance after this encounter suggests that witnessing true contentment without accomplishment threatens his sense of self-worth. If the hermit can be at peace without knowledge or productivity, then the schoolmaster's own achievements lose their absolute value.
The bachelor
The bachelor experiences the most severe and destructive response to the hermit's presence. In his youth, he participated fully in village life, maintaining friendships and fulfilling social obligations. At fifty years old, however, he undergoes a dramatic transformation.
He withdraws from all social contact, neglecting his appearance and refusing to participate in communal activities such as peat cutting. The bachelor attempts to imitate the hermit's isolated existence, but his isolation is hollow rather than purposeful. Unlike the hermit, who has found peace in solitude, the bachelor simply retreats from a life he now finds unsatisfying.
After a year of this self-imposed isolation, the bachelor suffers a complete mental breakdown. Smith depicts this collapse in vivid, disturbing detail: he throws furniture from his house, screams, removes his clothes, and repeatedly shouts "It is impossible to live like that". This desperate cry reveals his realisation that he cannot sustain the hermit's lifestyle. He has copied its external form without possessing the internal qualities that make such existence viable.
The narrator refers to "the asylum", reflecting the terminology of the period for psychiatric institutions. This historical detail grounds the story in a specific social context where mental illness was treated through institutional confinement rather than community support.
The bachelor is eventually taken away by medical authorities. His fate stands as the most extreme consequence of misunderstanding the hermit's example.
The bachelor's breakdown demonstrates that solitude itself is not liberating. Without the strength, balance, and purpose that characterise the hermit's life, isolation becomes destructive. The bachelor mistakes withdrawal for independence, failing to understand that the hermit's contentment comes from inner resources, not merely from being alone.
Why they become obsessed with the hermit
Something essential is missing from these men's ordinary lives. The hermit poses a threat precisely because his presence forces villagers to examine their own existence and recognise its unfulfilling nature. However, none of the three men can actually sustain the hermit's way of life when they attempt it.
Each man fails for a different reason. The old man cannot endure the physical hardship and discomfort. The schoolmaster cannot accept something that lies beyond his limited intellectual comprehension. The bachelor can replicate the outward aspects of the hermit's isolation but lacks the inner self-sufficiency that makes it sustainable.
Smith's Pattern of Response
Smith creates a clear pattern in their responses:
- Initial curiosity develops into consuming obsession
- Obsession eventually leads to personal crisis
- Crisis reveals pre-existing dissatisfaction
This pattern matters because it demonstrates that the hermit does not create their dissatisfaction. Rather, he exposes dissatisfaction that already existed beneath the surface of their lives.
The men were already struggling with unfulfilled yearnings or unacknowledged limitations; the hermit simply makes these visible. Each man stands at a turning point when the hermit arrives. The old man faces old age and must confront what he has not experienced. The schoolmaster has reached the peak of his authority but can no longer grow. The bachelor confronts middle age alone, without the family life expected in the village. The hermit's presence forces each to acknowledge the limitations created by choices already made. This makes him particularly threatening to men who feel that time has closed off alternative possibilities.
The old man and conformity
The old man's behaviour reveals how thoroughly conformity has shaped village life. His rebellion is narrow and misdirected. He does not challenge the social structure itself but instead turns his anger on his wife, who represents his chosen life. This misdirection shows that he cannot conceive of true independence; he can only reject what is immediately present.
His attempt to live alone fails because he is fundamentally unprepared. Decades of conformity have not equipped him for the physical demands or emotional isolation of genuine independence. When he returns, his experience serves as a warning to others. His humiliation represents the village's quiet punishment of those who try to step outside established norms. The community reasserts its control not through open condemnation but through his visible failure and diminishment.
The old man's visible failure serves a social function: it discourages others from questioning their own lives or considering different choices. This is how communities maintain conformity without explicit enforcement—through cautionary examples that make deviation appear impossible or pathetic.
The schoolmaster and intellectual pride
The schoolmaster's reaction stems from intellectual arrogance rather than emotional yearning. He operates on the assumption that understanding comes through knowledge, classification, and explanation. His entire identity rests on his ability to analyse and comprehend.
When he discovers that the hermit's life cannot be explained through learning or measured by productivity, his confidence collapses. The hermit's contentment without achievement fundamentally contradicts the schoolmaster's worldview. His agitation after the encounter suggests that he cannot integrate this new awareness into his existing framework. The idea that meaning can exist outside intellectual understanding threatens his sense of superiority.
Smith uses the schoolmaster to explore how education and intelligence can themselves become limiting. The schoolmaster's learning has not expanded his imagination; instead, it has created rigid categories that prevent him from recognising alternative ways of living. This paradox—that knowledge can narrow rather than broaden understanding—is central to his character.
The bachelor and misinterpretation
The bachelor's fate illustrates the most extreme consequence of misreading the hermit's example. He makes the mistake of confusing isolation with independence, withdrawal with self-sufficiency. He copies what he can see—the hermit's solitary existence—without understanding what he cannot see: the inner strength and purpose that sustain it.
His breakdown reinforces a central idea in the story: solitude is not inherently noble or freeing. It requires particular qualities of character. Without strength, balance, and purpose, isolation becomes destructive rather than liberating. The bachelor's year of withdrawal strips away his social identity without replacing it with anything meaningful. When he finally breaks, his actions demonstrate the complete disintegration of self that occurs when external structure is removed without internal resources to replace it.
The bachelor's repeated cry, "It is impossible to live like that", reveals his awareness of his failure. He recognises that he cannot sustain what the hermit sustains, but this recognition comes too late. His mental collapse stands as evidence that the hermit's life requires qualities that cannot simply be imitated.
The hermit as test rather than model
Taken together, these three men demonstrate that the hermit functions as a test of character rather than a model to follow. Each man measures himself against the hermit and fails, but each failure reveals something different about his character. Their responses support the narrator's description of the hermit as a "disturbance"—not because he acts, but because he exists as an alternative to the village's rigid expectations.
The old man's failure reveals his lack of physical and emotional resilience. The schoolmaster's distress exposes his intellectual limitations despite his pretensions. The bachelor's breakdown shows his fundamental lack of inner resources. None of them truly understands the hermit, yet each believes his own response is justified. This collective misunderstanding reinforces the story's exploration of fear and social control.
Smith demonstrates that people often fear what they cannot explain. Societies protect themselves by rejecting those who challenge their assumptions, even when that challenge comes silently through mere existence. The hermit does nothing to provoke the village, but his presence is still perceived as threatening because it offers visible proof that alternative ways of living are possible.
The three men's obsessions and failures serve the village's interests by demonstrating the cost of deviating from accepted norms. Their visible suffering discourages others from questioning their own lives or considering different choices. In this way, Smith illustrates how communities maintain conformity not only through explicit rules but through the cautionary examples of those who fail to break free.
Key Points to Remember:
-
The three men—the old man, the schoolmaster, and the bachelor—represent different types of response to the hermit's alternative lifestyle, each revealing pre-existing dissatisfaction in their lives.
-
Their reactions follow a consistent pattern: curiosity develops into obsession, and obsession leads to personal crisis, demonstrating that the hermit exposes rather than creates their unhappiness.
-
Each man fails to understand or sustain the hermit's way of life for different reasons: the old man lacks physical endurance, the schoolmaster lacks imagination despite his intellect, and the bachelor lacks the inner resources to sustain genuine solitude.
-
The hermit functions as a test of character rather than a model to follow, revealing the weaknesses and limitations of each man who measures himself against the hermit's example.
-
Smith uses these characters to explore how communities maintain conformity through the visible failure of those who attempt to step outside social norms, showing that societies protect themselves by rejecting those who challenge their assumptions, even silently.