Character: Nick Carraway (Leaving Cert English): Revision Notes
Character: Nick Carraway
Introduction to Nick as narrator
Nick Carraway serves as the narrator of The Great Gatsby, presenting himself as a contemplative, thoughtful, and reserved storyteller. Originally from Minnesota, he comes from an established Chicago family who take pride in calling themselves "the Dukes of Buccleuch," despite earning their wealth through the hardware business. After attending Yale and serving in World War I, Nick travels to New York in 1922 to learn the bond business, becoming Gatsby's neighbour in West Egg.
What makes Nick particularly significant is his dual role in the novel. He functions not only as the person telling Gatsby's story but also as someone who helps us understand how the word "Great" applies to Gatsby himself. Through Nick's perspective, Fitzgerald creates early hints about the novel's tragic conclusion, as when Nick observes that "Gatsby turned out alright in the end" in Chapter 1. These ongoing observations and reflections create curiosity in readers about the other characters, allowing us to form our own moral judgments about them while being guided through the story's complexity.
Nick's positioning as both narrator and character creates a unique literary perspective that allows readers to experience the story through someone who is simultaneously involved in the events and reflecting on them from a temporal distance.
Nick as the narrator
Nick operates as what literary critics call an intradiegetic narrator, meaning he exists within the story he's telling. He moves fluidly between first-person narration (when describing his own experiences) and third-person narration (when recalling what Gatsby confided in him). This positioning allows him to be both an outsider observing events and a participating character involved in the action.
This dual perspective creates a fascinating paradox that Nick himself acknowledges at the end of Chapter 2 when reflecting on Tom and Myrtle's apartment: "I was within and without, simultaneously enchanted and repelled by the inexhaustible variety of life." This statement captures his role as both a reliable observer and an unreliable participant in the novel's events.
One crucial aspect of Nick's narration is that he never claims to have instigated any major action in the novel. Instead, he positions himself as someone who simply accompanies other characters in their decisions and adventures. This limited involvement in driving the plot forwards might lead readers to question the completeness and trustworthiness of his storytelling.
The paradox of being "within and without" is central to understanding Nick's narrative reliability. This simultaneous involvement and detachment affects how he presents events and characters throughout the novel.
Nick's key characteristics
Tolerant nature
Nick opens his narrative by recalling his father's advice and declaring "I am inclined to reserve all judgements." This tolerance has established him as a confidant to various characters and sometimes made him a victim of others' problems. He reinforces this tolerant approach by explaining: "Whenever you feel like criticising any one...just remember that all the people in this world haven't had the advantages that you've had."
However, Nick's tolerance can be seen as somewhat selective. While he initially refrains from judging others, this changes once events reach their tragic climax. He ultimately decides to distance himself from the corrupt moral environment of East Egg society, though until that point he continues to observe and interact with characters he describes as unpleasant, shallow, or domineering. Some readers might interpret his continued association with these characters as indicating a lack of genuine moral conviction.
Selective Tolerance Warning
Nick's tolerance appears more selective than he initially admits. His willingness to associate with morally questionable characters while claiming moral superiority creates contradictions that readers should consider when evaluating his reliability as a narrator.
Honesty - a questionable virtue
On the novel's opening page, Nick reveals he "was privy to the secret griefs of wild, unknown men." Most of the confidences were unsought—frequently I have feigned sleep, preoccupation, or a hostile levity when I realised by some unmistakable sign that an intimate revelation was quivering on the horizon."
This admission suggests Nick's tolerance allows him to become a trusted confidant, which explains why various characters open up to him throughout the story. Daisy confesses her cynicism about life, Myrtle shares intimate details about her relationship with Tom, and both Gatsby and Tom confide their personal conflicts to him.
Yet Nick's claim to honesty becomes questionable when examined more closely. In Chapter 3, he declares: "Everyone suspects himself of at least one of the cardinal virtues, and this is mine: I am one of the few honest people that I have ever known." However, his choice of the word "suspect" rather than "believe" subtly encourages readers to question the reliability of this self-assessment. Furthermore, his continued relationships with morally questionable characters and his enabling of Gatsby's affair with Daisy while continuing to socialise with Tom suggests his honesty may have different definitions than conventional morality would suggest.
Quiet and reflective disposition
The story unfolds retrospectively, which may affect the accuracy of events as Nick recalls them two years later. Memory can create distortions or gaps that might influence how he presents characters and situations. However, this temporal distance also allows Nick to reflect thoughtfully on events and people in ways he might not have managed during the intense moments themselves.
The two-year gap between the events and Nick's narration of them introduces questions about memory's reliability. This temporal distance both enhances his reflective insights and potentially compromises the accuracy of specific details.
This reflective distance means Nick's understanding of the characters remains relatively consistent throughout the novel, even though they may have evolved during the actual events. Nick describes Gatsby with a mixture of criticism and admiration, giving readers a sense of his balanced perspective while also revealing his personal attachment to Gatsby's character.
The novel's quieter moments often feature Nick's internal reflections, which serve as Fitzgerald's vehicle for social commentary. These pauses in the action allow for critical examination of American society in the 1920s, making Nick function essentially as Fitzgerald's spokesperson for unconventional observations about the era.
Self-awareness and caution
Despite Nick's subdued voice, he demonstrates keen awareness of his own limitations. His reluctance to speak with complete authority stems not from indifference to the events around him but from his recognition of his own constraints in fully understanding and rectifying the behaviour of others.
His detachment reflects his acknowledgement that "a sense of the fundamental decencies is parcelled out unequally at birth" and that he holds other characters to high moral standards. While this perspective colours his storytelling with personal bias, he remains honest about the fact that his criticisms stem from moral convictions. As he puts it: "Conduct may be founded on the hard rock or on the wet marshes, but after a certain point I don't care what it's founded on."
Nick also demonstrates remarkable self-reflection about his own storytelling process. He acknowledges his limitations by noting: "After boasting this way of my tolerance, I come to the admission that it has a limit" and "Reading over what I have written so far, I've given the impression that the events of three nights several weeks apart were all that absorbed me."
Nick's unreliability as narrator
Understanding Nick's unreliability as a narrator is crucial for critical analysis of The Great Gatsby. His inconsistencies and biases significantly affect how readers should interpret the events and characters he presents.
Contradictory and inconsistent behaviour
While Nick generally presents himself as honest and trustworthy, his actions don't always align with these claims. He proves dishonest about his relationship back home and is challenged by Jordan who says: "I thought you were rather an honest, straightforward person" when he fails to disclose certain information. He also praises Catherine for lying to a judge after Gatsby's death.
Although these instances of dishonesty are relatively rare, they may cause readers to retrospectively question Nick's version of events. His moral standards appear influenced by his personal feelings about the characters, particularly evident in his different reactions to Gatsby's affair with Daisy compared to Tom's affair with Myrtle. After Gatsby's death, he praises Catherine's character for lying to a judge, revealing moral inconsistencies that make his judgments throughout the novel questionable.
Sentimental and biassed towards Gatsby
Nick's portrayal of Gatsby is heavily influenced by his personal attachment to him. He both admires and feels disappointed by Gatsby, describing him as someone "who represented everything for which I have an unaffected scorn." Gatsby embodies materialism and an obsession with wealth, yet later, during the confrontation between Gatsby and Tom, Nick experiences "one of those renewals of complete faith in him that I'd experienced before."
This emotional investment in Gatsby affects how Nick presents him to readers. His mixture of criticism and praise may lead readers to believe his judgement is balanced and objective - something Nick himself encourages by suggesting he has intimate, unique access to Gatsby's story and psychology. However, Nick ultimately falls under Gatsby's influence, and this becomes most apparent through the numerous parallels he draws between Gatsby and Jesus. Nick may have become infatuated with Gatsby's capacity for romanticism, but a more critical reading might reveal Gatsby as deluded and lacking in self-awareness.
Nick's emotional attachment to Gatsby creates one of the novel's most significant narrative biases. His admiration for Gatsby's romantic idealism may prevent him from presenting a completely objective portrait of his neighbour.
Susceptible to alcohol
Although Nick appears to be one of the more responsible characters who doesn't join the drunken crowds in their social gatherings, when he does become intoxicated, he proves susceptible to alcohol's influence. In Chapter 2, Nick's narration becomes distorted when he drinks at Tom and Myrtle's party in New York. His incoherence during these events, depicted through unfinished sentences and unclear transitions, contributes to readers' uncertainty about what actually occurred.
When Tom breaks Myrtle's nose, Nick's reaction is notably unresponsive - he simply leaves and observes the "flickering lights" of the city. His confusion matches that of other characters like Tom, Myrtle, Catherine, and the McKees, suggesting that alcohol compromises his usually reliable observational abilities.
Literary techniques and symbolism
Nick's references to lights
Nick frequently references lights throughout the novel, noting "the satisfaction that the constant flicker of men and women and machine's gives to the restless eye," "the single green light," and "the constant flicker." This repeated imagery represents the instability of the economic system and the dreams that exist within American society. The material world appears as unstable as the emotional world, and the money that supposedly brings stability also carries immense uncertainty.
Light Symbolism in the Novel
The recurring light imagery serves multiple symbolic purposes:
- Represents the instability of both economic and emotional systems
- Connects to the famous green light as a symbol of hope and longing
- Reflects the "flicker" of dreams and aspirations in 1920s America
- Links to Conrad's Heart of Darkness through shared imagery
This "constant flicker" also references "We live in the flicker" from Marlow in Conrad's Heart of Darkness. Both Conrad's and Fitzgerald's narrators serve as historical observers - Marlow examines British imperial history while Nick observes American modern history. Though Nick sometimes only glimpses or briefly observes situations, he doesn't rely on detailed imagery but rather on repetitive symbols. This technique effectively highlights social realities and demonstrates how deeply and widely they have influenced society.
Foreshadowing through Nick's birthday
Foreshadowing appears as an important technique throughout the novel, with hints of the tragic ending woven throughout the narrative. The characters' fates seem predetermined, and the American Dream appears foreclosed upon for them.
When Nick, Tom, and Jordan leave New York, Nick suddenly realises it's his birthday. He envisions the years ahead as "a thinning briefcase of enthusiasm, thinning hair." At this moment, Nick becomes aware of his mortality and states: "we drove on towards death through the cooling twilight." While this line references general mortality, it also specifically foreshadows Myrtle's car accident that they discover down the road.
Thirty represents the age that separates youthful adulthood from mature responsibility and freedom from accountability. Nick becomes aware of this turning point in his life and begins to understand not only the temporary nature of his chosen lifestyle in New York but also the importance of social responsibility. The passage prominently features his acknowledgement that he cannot remain careless and tolerant of so much corruption and immorality without becoming careless himself.
Nick's thirtieth birthday marks a crucial turning point in both his personal development and his moral awakening. This moment of self-awareness coincides with the novel's climactic events and foreshadows the tragedy to come.
The value of Nick's narrative voice
By the end of Chapter 9, Nick's voice essentially merges with Fitzgerald's voice. He reduces his personal authority and confidence in doing so, but doesn't become invisible - instead, he makes Fitzgerald's intended messages visible. Nick's narration provides more than just storytelling; it offers social commentary.
Nick's constant movement from innocence to experience, from reality to poetry, from indifference to empathy reflects New York's own lack of equilibrium and the heterogeneous state of American culture. His narration of events accompanied by critical reflexion and commentary provides an effective method to satirise society. Nick's voice presents a realistic and modernist perspective from which to view the text.
Literary Technique: Realism and Modernism
The novel effectively combines two major literary movements:
- Realism: Evident in mundane, descriptive details of settings and situations
- Modernism: Apparent in internal monologues and psychological exploration of characters navigating an industrialising society
The elements of realism (evident in the mundane, descriptive details of his surroundings) work alongside elements of modernism (evident in his internal monologues that seek to define his role in an industrialising society) to illuminate the moral bankruptcy of post-War America. Nick participates in the story through subtle action but satirises it with constant reflexion and mockery. This approach makes Nick emerge as a moral agent in the novel who remains trustworthy despite his flaws.
Nick's relationship with Jordan Baker
Nick encounters Jordan when invited to the Buchanans' home, where she appears as one of Daisy's friends. Their relationship develops most significantly during Chapters 3 and 4, when they spend considerable time together, but as the novel progresses, their connection diminishes. Ultimately, Nick's romance with Jordan becomes symbolic of his own internal conflict - he's attracted to the excitement of New York life but also finds the lifestyle of people there morally questionable.
Nick's initial perception of Jordan relies heavily on her physical appearance. He finds her attractive and notes that she transmits "an aura of class and sophistication" through her body language and posture. In Chapter 1, his immediate physical attraction is apparent when he describes her:
"I enjoyed looking at her. She was a slender, small-breasted girl, with an erect carriage which she accentuated by throwing her body backwards at the shoulders like a young cadet. Her grey sun-strained eyes looked back at me with polite reciprocal curiosity out of a wan, charming discontented face."
Nick finds himself drawn not only to Jordan's physical attractiveness but also to what she represents: the ideal society girl of the American Twenties, with her boyish appearance. Her fame as a young celebrity golfer adds to her appeal, as Nick becomes very aware of her glamour. She also appears unattached and candid in her conversations.
Jordan Baker represents more than just a romantic interest for Nick. She embodies the new woman of the 1920s - independent, athletic, and morally ambiguous - serving as a mirror for Nick's own conflicted feelings about the era's values and lifestyle.
This casual approach seems to work well with Nick, whose relationship style appears quite unattached. There are brief mentions of women he has left back home and women he dates briefly from his office. He doesn't resist Daisy's casual arrangement of him and Jordan, perhaps because he prefers casual encounters or because Jordan represents a social advancement for him. Even though Nick acts as the everyman, Jordan does represent his own ambitions to improve his class status.
However, Nick's admiration for Jordan doesn't prove lasting. As the novel progresses, Nick develops a moral compass that leaves him appalled by how Jordan reacts to the car accident. When she calls him to announce she's leaving Daisy's to go to South Hampton, he describes her voice as "harsh and dry" as opposed to its usual "fresh and cool" quality. This final conversation ends "abruptly" and marks the end of their relationship, which he regards with indifference: "I don't know which of us hung up with a sharp click but I know I didn't care."
Nick and Gatsby comparison
The contrast between Nick and Gatsby reveals important themes about wealth, social acceptance, and morality in 1920s America. While Nick neither pursues the American Dream nor needs to pursue it due to his relatively wealthy and financially secure background, Gatsby pursues the American Dream intensively, though his goal involves wealth for wealth's sake rather than financial security, given his impoverished origins.
Despite being less wealthy than Gatsby, Nick finds himself more accepted by East Egg society, while Gatsby, despite his fantastic wealth, faces contempt from West Egg society due to his nouveau riche consumption habits and mannerisms. Nick leads an ordinary life and appears mentally balanced, while Gatsby exists in isolation, shrouded in mystery and consumed by obsession.
Key Contrasts Between Nick and Gatsby
The comparison reveals several important distinctions:
- Social acceptance: Nick gains acceptance despite less wealth; Gatsby faces rejection despite enormous wealth
- Mental state: Nick maintains psychological balance; Gatsby lives in obsessive isolation
- Moral perspective: Nick analyses and judges; Gatsby remains influenced primarily by Daisy's opinions
- Relationship to the American Dream: Nick neither pursues nor needs it; Gatsby pursues it desperately
Perhaps most significantly, Nick scrutinises everything and subjects the novel's actions to his moral analysis, while Gatsby demonstrates questionable morality and allows himself to be influenced primarily by Daisy's impressions of him.
Key quotes and analysis
Quote Analysis 1: "Privy to Secret Griefs"
"I was privy to the secret griefs of wild, unknown men. Most of the confidences were unsought—frequently I have feigned sleep, preoccupation, or a hostile levity when I realised by some unmistakable sign that an intimate revelation was quivering on the horizon." (Chapter 1)
This quote illuminates Nick's role as a confidant while also foreshadowing that he regrets this role. Nick experiences an internal conflict between being a trusted listener and a moral actor. This quote represents one of many instances where Nick employs foreshadowing techniques.
Quote Analysis 2: "Within and Without"
"High over the city our line of yellow windows must have contributed their share of human secrecy to the casual watcher in the darkening streets, and I was him too, looking up and wondering. I was within and without, simultaneously enchanted and repelled by the inexhaustible variety of life." (Chapter 2)
This quote emphasises Nick's social and moral role in the novel. It takes place at the Buchanan's New York apartment where he has recently become aware of the affair between Myrtle and Tom. Nick thinks about what people outside see when they look into the lit-up apartment, imagining himself in this role. Socially, he has connections to wealthy people but lacks wealth himself. He exists "within and without" his social role. Morally, he is "within and without" as well - he internally reflects on the immorality he observes but does not outwardly act against it.
Quote Analysis 3: "One of the Few Honest People"
"I am one of the few honest people that I have ever known." (Chapter 3)
This line paradoxically invites readers to question Nick's honesty and the reliability of his narration. When this trait is mentioned by Nick himself, readers need to proceed with caution in accepting his retelling of events. This quote remains central to the controversy about the reliability of Nick's narration.
Quote Analysis 4: "On Gatsby's Side, and Alone"
"I found myself on Gatsby's side, and alone" (Chapter 9)
This quote brings the novel full circle, indicating both Nick's position as narrator and his own isolation, which he shares with Gatsby throughout the novel. Initially, Nick considers Gatsby somewhat snobbishly, admitting "Gatsby represented everything for which I have an unaffected scorn." However, by the novel's end, he doesn't view Gatsby with the same disgust as he does other characters, primarily due to his admiration for Gatsby's commitment to his dream amid a cynical society interested only in immediate pleasures.
Key Points to Remember:
-
Nick functions as an intradiegetic narrator - he exists within the story while telling it, creating both intimacy and potential bias in his account
-
His claimed honesty is questionable - while he presents himself as one of the "few honest people," his actions and selective moral judgments suggest otherwise
-
He serves as Fitzgerald's vehicle for social commentary - his reflective passages critique 1920s American society and the corruption of the American Dream
-
His relationship with Jordan Baker mirrors his internal conflict - attracted to the exciting lifestyle of the wealthy but morally repelled by their carelessness
-
His admiration for Gatsby shapes the entire narrative - despite claiming objectivity, his emotional attachment to Gatsby influences how the story unfolds and how we perceive its central character