Identifying the Limitations of Financial Reporting (HSC SSCE Business Studies): Revision Notes
Identifying the Limitations of Financial Reporting
Financial reports and ratio analysis provide valuable information about a business's financial position and operational trends. However, these reports have significant limitations that investors and stakeholders must understand to avoid making poor business decisions based on misleading or incomplete information.
Why financial reports can be misleading
Businesses often work hard to make their financial reports look as positive as possible. This means that financial statements may not always give a completely accurate picture of the business's true financial position.
When analysing financial reports, you need to be aware that:
- Information can be misinterpreted or deliberately presented in a misleading way
- This impacts business decision-making and puts the business at risk
- Investors must exercise caution when examining financial reports
Six key limitations of financial reporting
1. Normalised earnings
Normalised earnings are earnings that have been adjusted to account for changes in the economic cycle or to remove one-off or unusual items that affect profitability. This adjustment provides a more accurate picture of a company's true earnings capacity.
Why normalisation matters:
Many businesses experience one-off expenses (such as large legal fees) or one-off gains (such as selling an asset). While these transactions affect the business's short-term cash flow, they don't reflect the business's long-term operational performance. Normalising earnings helps:
- Compare profitability from one year to the next more accurately
- Compare performance against other businesses fairly
- Remove distortions caused by unusual events
Example: A retailer that sells a piece of land would remove this sale from their financial statements when calculating normalised earnings. This is because their core business is selling products, not selling land.
Worked Example: Normalisation Process
Consider a company that settled a lawsuit costing $250,000. The normalisation process removes this one-off expense:
| Item | Reported | Non-recurring items | Normalised |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | $1,800,000 | $1,800,000 | |
| COGS | $580,000 | $580,000 | |
| Gross Profit | $1,220,000 | $1,220,000 | |
| Expenses | |||
| Litigation settlement | $250,000 | ($250,000) | $0 |
| Selling expenses | $100,000 | $100,000 | |
| Administrative expenses | $80,000 | $80,000 | |
| General expenses | $50,000 | $50,000 | |
| Net Profit | $740,000 | $990,000 |
This adjustment shows the company would have earned $990,000 profit without the lawsuit, giving a more accurate picture of normal operating performance.
2. Capitalising expenses
Capitalising expenses refers to how a business treats a cost on its financial statements. Businesses have two options:
Option 1: Expense the cost
- Record it as an expense on the income statement
- Subtract it from revenue immediately
- Reduces profit in that accounting period
Option 2: Capitalise the cost
- Record it as an asset on the balance sheet
- Only show depreciation as an expense on the income statement
- Spreads the cost over multiple years
How this works in practice:
Costs are usually capitalised when they:
- Have not been used up yet
- Will provide future economic value
- Are expected to benefit the business over multiple years
Worked Example: Capitalising a Van Purchase
A business purchases a van for $30,000 that will be used for 10 years.
Instead of expensing the entire $30,000 in year one, accounting rules allow the business to:
- Record the van as an asset worth $30,000 on the balance sheet
- Depreciate the cost over 10 years (the van's useful life)
- Record depreciation expense of $3,000 per year ($30,000 divided by 10) on the income statement
Why this is a limitation:
Different businesses can make different choices about what to capitalise and what to expense. This creates inconsistency and can make it difficult to compare financial statements between companies.
Real-world case study: National Australia Bank (NAB)
In 2020, NAB announced its net profit would be reduced by $1.14 billion partly due to changes in its software capitalisation policy. The bank:
- Increased the minimum threshold for capitalising software from $2 million to $5 million
- Reduced its capitalised software balance by nearly $1.06 billion
- This significantly impacted reported profit
This demonstrates how capitalisation policies can dramatically affect a company's financial statements and reported profitability.
3. Valuing assets
Valuing assets refers to the process of estimating the value of assets when recording them on the balance sheet. This can be particularly difficult for non-current assets.
The challenge of historical cost
Historical cost is an accounting method where assets are listed on the balance sheet at the value they were purchased for.
Advantages:
- The cost can be verified through purchase documents
- Provides objective, factual information
Disadvantages:
- May distort the balance sheet
- Doesn't accurately represent the true current worth of assets
- Original cost may differ significantly from current market value
Asset values change over time
Different assets change in value in different ways:
Assets that increase in value:
- Land typically increases in value over time
- Current market value may be much higher than historical cost
Assets that decrease in value:
- Vehicles, machinery, and equipment typically lose value over time
- This loss in value is called depreciation
Estimating depreciation
Financial managers must estimate how much value depreciating assets lose each year. While accounting standards provide rules for calculating depreciation:
- Managers can choose from several depreciation methods
- This choice affects the asset values shown on the balance sheet
- Different methods can lead to different financial outcomes
- This flexibility may mislead investors
Why this is a limitation:
Depreciation is only an estimate, which may give a false impression of the business's actual worth.
The problem with intangible assets
Intangible assets are items of value to a business that don't physically exist. Examples include:
- Goodwill
- Trademarks
- Patents
- Brand names
Challenges with intangible assets:
- Very difficult to value accurately
- No set formula for calculating their value
- Sometimes not included on the balance sheet because valuation is too difficult
- Financial managers may be tempted to overvalue them to make the business appear more financially stable
Example: Brand Valuations (2020)
Major technology companies have incredibly valuable brand assets:
- Apple: $241.2 billion
- Google: $207.5 billion
- Microsoft: $162.9 billion
- Amazon: $135.4 billion
- Facebook: $70.3 billion
Case study: Retail Food Group's valuation of goodwill
Background: Retail Food Group (RFG) is a franchising company that owns Gloria Jean's, Donut King, Crust Pizza, Michel's Patisserie, and other well-known chains. The company faced serious challenges that highlighted the problems with valuing goodwill.
The crisis:
- In 2017, a Fairfax investigation revealed serious mistreatment of franchisees
- Many franchisees claimed they were financially ruined by RFG
- Allegations included excessively high fees and forcing stores to sell expired food
- This led to a parliamentary inquiry and multiple class actions
Financial impact:
- Net profit in 2019: $15.4 million (down from $33.3 million the previous year)
- Over 50% decline in profitability
- Negative publicity significantly affected sales
The goodwill problem:
- The parliamentary inquiry questioned RFG's goodwill valuation
- The report stated that declining profits should be reflected in reduced goodwill
- If a business has no anticipated profit, goodwill should be devalued
- RFG cut goodwill from $270 million in 2017 to $52 million by 2019
Key lesson: This case shows how goodwill valuations can be subjective and may not reflect the true financial position of a business. When business performance declines, goodwill must be adjusted accordingly.
Industry insight: Research by KPMG found that valuing and adjusting goodwill and intangible assets takes up the most time and effort for auditors of ASX 200 listed companies. Around two-thirds of companies list this as a key audit matter.
4. Timing issues
Timing issues arise from deciding when to record revenues and expenses on financial statements. This relates to an important accounting principle called the matching principle.
The matching principle
The matching principle states that expenses incurred by a business must be recorded on the income statement for the same accounting period in which the related revenue is earned.
How it works:
- When an accountant records revenue, they should also record any expenses directly related to earning that revenue
- This happens at the same time, even if payment is received or made in a different period
Worked Example: Real Estate Commission
A real estate agent sells a property in June and earns a 2% commission. However, the employer doesn't pay the commission until July.
Correct treatment: The commission expense should be recorded in June (when the revenue from the property sale was earned), not in July (when it was paid).
Why this matters:
When the matching principle is followed correctly:
- Revenue earned matches the costs incurred to earn that revenue
- Provides a more accurate representation of the business's financial position
- Prevents manipulation of financial results by shifting expenses between periods
Limitation:
Businesses may manipulate when they record revenues and expenses to present a more favourable financial picture for a particular period.
5. Debt repayments
Financial reports provide limited information about debt repayments. While the gearing ratio shows whether a business is highly geared (has high levels of debt), this doesn't tell the whole story.
Understanding gearing
A highly geared business:
- Has higher risk of financial difficulties
- May struggle to meet debt obligations
- But also has greater potential for profit
- Higher debt can fund growth and lead to increased future profits
The problem: Financial reports considered in isolation can be misleading about debt.
What financial reports don't disclose about debt
Financial reports lack the capacity to provide specific information such as:
Time factors:
- How long the business has had the debt
- How long the business has been trying to recover debts owed to it
- When debts are due for repayment
Capacity to repay:
- Whether the business can actually repay its debts
- Whether debtors (customers who owe money) are close to bankruptcy and may not be able to repay
- The financial health of parties involved in debt arrangements
Recovery provisions:
- What provisions the business has for doubtful debts (debts that may not be collected)
- How these provisions are shown in the financial reports
- Methods the business uses for debt recovery
Resource differences:
- Larger businesses can outsource debt recovery by hiring collection agents
- Smaller businesses may lack the resources for professional debt recovery
- The debt recovery process is costly and time-consuming
Manipulation potential:
- Debt repayments can be held over until another accounting period
- This can give a false impression of the business's financial situation
- Businesses may use this timing to present a more favourable overview at a specific point in time
Why this is a limitation: The recording of debt repayments can distort the 'reality' of the business's status, potentially misleading investors and other stakeholders.
6. Notes to the financial statement
Notes to the financial statements are supplementary information that report details and additional information left out of the main financial reporting documents (balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement).
What notes contain
Notes to financial statements typically include:
Accounting methodologies:
- The accounting methods used for recording and reporting transactions
- Information about procedures that can affect the expected return on investment
Additional explanations:
- Further details about how figures were calculated
- Procedures used to develop the financial statements
- Context to help understand the main financial documents
Important disclosures:
- Information that may be useful to stakeholders
- Details that help make sense of the financial statements
- Clarifications about complex transactions or arrangements
Why this is a limitation
While notes provide valuable additional information:
- They are often lengthy and complex
- Many investors don't read them thoroughly
- Important details may be buried in technical language
- Critical information is separated from the main financial statements
- Stakeholders may make decisions based on incomplete information if they don't review the notes carefully
The risk:
Investors who only look at the main financial statements (balance sheet, income statement, cash flow statement) without reading the notes may miss crucial information that would change their understanding of the business's financial position.
Exam technique: Analysing limitations
When asked to identify or explain limitations of financial reporting in an exam:
For "identify" questions:
- Name the specific limitation clearly
- Examples: "normalised earnings", "capitalising expenses", "valuing assets"
For "explain" questions:
- Define the limitation
- Explain how it affects financial reporting
- Provide an example if possible
- State why it matters to investors or stakeholders
For "analyse" or "assess" questions:
- Discuss multiple limitations
- Explain the impact on decision-making
- Consider consequences for different stakeholders
- Use real business examples where relevant
- Evaluate the severity of the limitation
Remember!
Key Points to Remember:
-
Financial reports don't always show the complete picture – businesses often present information in the most favourable way possible, which can mislead investors and stakeholders.
-
The six key limitations are: normalised earnings, capitalising expenses, valuing assets, timing issues, debt repayments, and notes to the financial statements. Each creates challenges for accurately interpreting a business's financial position.
-
Intangible assets are particularly difficult to value – items like goodwill, brand names, trademarks, and patents don't physically exist, making their valuation subjective and potentially manipulated.
-
Timing matters in financial reporting – the matching principle requires expenses to be recorded in the same period as related revenue, but businesses may manipulate timing to present more favourable results.
-
Always read the notes to financial statements – these contain crucial information that explains and clarifies the main financial documents, and ignoring them can lead to incomplete understanding of the business's true financial position.