Developing Recognition of Human Rights (HSC SSCE Legal Studies): Revision Notes
Developing Recognition of Human Rights
Introduction
The term "human rights" represents a relatively recent historical development. The recognition that certain rights apply universally to all people—regardless of country or legal system—has taken centuries to achieve. While the concept seems natural today, it required extensive historical struggles and movements to gain acceptance.
Human rights theories draw from a rich tapestry of historical sources spanning thousands of years and multiple civilizations. Understanding these diverse origins helps explain why different cultures have approached human rights from varying perspectives.
Human rights theories draw from various historical sources, including:
- Ancient civilisations (Mesopotamia, Rome, India)
- Religious scholars and teachings
- Philosophers from Ancient China and Greece through to modern times
- Historical events (e.g. US Declaration of Independence)
- Major conflicts, particularly World Wars I and II
Historically, theories of universal laws relied on different reasoning:
- Divine will: rights based on religious authority
- Natural law: rights based on a higher moral order or shared human dignity
- Positivism: rights exist because they have been enacted by appropriate authorities
Individual rights developed through independent historical movements rather than as a coordinated effort. Each right has its own unique development story.
The abolition of slavery
Historical context of slavery
Slavery is a form of forced labour where a person becomes the legal property of another. For most of human history, slavery was accepted as integral to society and the economy.
Key characteristics:
- Slavery predates recorded history
- Common in antiquity and throughout the Middle Ages
- Practised legally in many regions until the century
- Laws generally treated slaves as objects rather than legal subjects
Forms of ancient slavery
In the ancient Mediterranean world, common forms included:
- Debt slavery: forced labour to repay loans rather than monetary payment
- Punishment for crime
- Prisoners of war enslaved
- Children born into slavery (potentially paying debts incurred generations earlier)
Slavery varied globally but generally served to fill societal roles at minimal cost without paying wages. While some slaves were well-educated and valued (occasionally gaining freedom as "freedmen"), many suffered mistreatment and brutalisation with no legal rights or means of escape.
The transatlantic slave trade
As European empires expanded into the "New World," demand for labour increased dramatically. The transatlantic slave trade operated from the to early centuries.
The trade cycle:
- European ships traded products for slaves in West Africa
- Slaves were transported to New World colonies
- Slaves worked to grow and manufacture cash crops (e.g. sugar)
- Profits returned to European powers
Impact: An estimated 12 million Africans were shipped from Africa to the Americas during this period, often into appalling conditions. This represents one of the largest forced migrations in human history and had devastating effects on African societies, families, and cultures.
Early moves to abolish slavery:
- Some European cities abolished slavery as early as the century (Iceland: )
- However, European empires supported slavery in overseas territories
- The Roman Catholic Church prohibited export of Christian slaves but legitimised use of non-Christian slaves
The abolitionist movement
Abolitionism was a worldwide political movement seeking to abolish slavery. Beginning in the century, it gradually gained momentum as:
- Rationalist thinkers criticised slavery as violating "the rights of man"
- Evangelical religions condemned it as "unchristian"
Key legal developments in Britain
Case Study: R v Knowles; ex parte Somersett (1772)
In this landmark case, Lord Mansfield ruled that slavery was illegal under English common law. James Somersett, an enslaved African, had been brought to England by his owner. When Somersett escaped, he was recaptured and destined to be sent to Jamaica for sale.
Outcome: The court ordered Somersett's release, establishing that slavery had no basis in English law. However, this decision did not affect slavery in the British Empire's overseas territories, where the practice continued for decades.
Slave Trade Act 1807 (UK): Following campaigns led by William Wilberforce, Britain officially ended the importation of slaves to its colonies. The United States followed in .
Slavery Abolition Act 1833 (UK): Abolished slavery itself throughout the British Empire. All remaining slaves were freed in .
Abolition in the United States
The US Declaration of Independence () stated "all men are created equal," yet slavery continued in southern states where it was a powerful social and economic institution.
The American Civil War (1861–1865): Slavery became one of the main causes of conflict. President Abraham Lincoln, an abolitionist, was seen as threatening the southern way of life.
Thirteenth Amendment (): Abolished slavery throughout the United States following the Civil War, freeing over 4 million slaves.
Case Study: The Amistad Case (1841)
This case involved enslaved Africans who mutinied against slave-traders during transport. After the ship arrived in American waters, the case reached the US Supreme Court.
Key question: Should the Africans be freed or returned to slavery?
Defence: Former President John Quincy Adams argued for their freedom, contending they had been illegally enslaved.
Outcome: The Supreme Court ruled in favour of the Africans, declaring them free individuals who had been kidnapped, not property.
International abolition efforts
General Act of Brussels (): The first major international collaboration to abolish slavery, primarily targeting the slave trade in European protectorates in Africa.
League of Nations Slavery Convention (): A comprehensive international treaty on abolishing slavery worldwide, passed after World War I.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (): Article 4 clearly prohibited slavery.
Last legal abolition: Mauritania (West Africa) officially abolished slavery in .
Contemporary slavery issues
Despite centuries of anti-slavery efforts, illegal slavery persists today. This demonstrates that legal abolition alone is insufficient without effective enforcement and addressing underlying economic and social factors.
Current challenges include:
- Estimated 27 million people enslaved worldwide
- Human trafficking: illegal movement of people across borders by force, coercion or deception
- Child labour, sexual slavery, and forced labour remain serious global issues
Trade unionism and labour rights
Historical context of employment
As slavery became illegal, conventional labour became the only legal means of securing workers. However, employment law as we understand it today is relatively recent.
Rights now taken for granted—such as minimum wages, safe working conditions, or paid holidays—were not recognised in older legal systems. Workers in the and centuries had virtually no legal protections against exploitation.
Pre-industrial labour
- Ancient Egypt: Evidence suggests pyramids were built by paid craftsmen and farm hands, not slaves
- Ancient Rome: Both slave and hired labour existed
- Medieval Europe: Labour regulation based on status
- Craft guilds: Associations of labourers and craftsmen based on their trades
- Serfs: Agricultural labourers tied to the land, resembling slaves in many ways
The Industrial Revolution
The Industrial Revolution (– centuries) began in the UK and spread globally, bringing:
- Mechanised manufacture
- Major changes in agriculture and transport
- New industrial cities with factories
These changes created appalling conditions for workers:
- Lack of safety
- Low wages
- Long working hours
- No job security
Workers, including women and children, often laboured in dangerous conditions for 12-16 hours per day with no protections against injury, dismissal, or exploitation.
Development of trade unions
Trade unions are organised associations of workers formed to protect and further their rights and interests.
Why unions emerged
Workers realised that:
- Individual employees had no power against employers
- Collective action (e.g. strikes) could force employers to improve conditions
- If all workers struck, employers couldn't simply replace their entire workforce
Employers therefore sought to deny employees any right to organised labour.
Early struggles
Early trade unionists faced criminalisation and severe penalties.
Case Study: The Tolpuddle Martyrs (1834)
Six farm labourers in Tolpuddle, England, formed a friendly society to campaign for higher wages. At the time, they were earning just 7 shillings per week, which was barely enough to feed their families.
Charges: The men were arrested and charged under an obscure law against taking secret oaths.
Sentence: They were sentenced to 7 years' transportation to Australia, a harsh punishment designed to deter union activity.
Outcome: Massive public protests eventually led to pardons for all six men, and they became symbols of the early labour movement. Their case demonstrated the power of public opinion and collective action.
Legal recognition
First Trades Union Congress (): By , 40 representatives represented over 250,000 workers in the UK.
Trade Unions Act 1871 (UK): Secured the legal status of trade unions after parliamentary pressure.
Australia: Due to harsh tactics against strikes in the s, Australian unions formed their own political party—the Australian Labor Party (ALP).
Labour rights achievements
Through union action, workers achieved many rights now taken for granted:
- Minimum wages and working conditions
- Equal pay
- Long service leave
- Paid public holidays
- Maternity leave
- Annual leave
- Occupational health and safety laws
- Workers' compensation
Late century legislation improved safety and conditions in key industries like mining and textiles.
International labour rights
First International (1864–1876) and Second International (1889–1916): Periodic gatherings of union representatives and political parties from around the world to promote improved workers' conditions.
International Labour Organization (ILO) (): Created following World War I as an agency of the League of Nations, based in Geneva. Its aims:
- Improve conditions for workers worldwide
- Develop conventions on working conditions and rights
- Became a UN agency after the League of Nations disbanded
- Continues its work today
Labour rights in international law
Universal Declaration of Human Rights:
- Article 23: Right to work, free choice of employment, just and favourable conditions, protection against unemployment, equal pay for equal work, just remuneration, and the right to form and join trade unions
- Article 24: Right to rest and leisure, reasonable working hours, and periodic paid holidays
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) (): Further defined and sought to implement labour rights globally.
Key Takeaways on Labour Rights:
- The Industrial Revolution created exploitative working conditions that spurred the labour movement
- Trade unions emerged as a means of collective action to balance power between workers and employers
- Early unionists faced severe legal penalties and persecution
- Gradual legal recognition led to the rights workers enjoy today
- International organisations like the ILO continue to promote labour standards globally
Universal suffrage
Definition and importance
Suffrage is the legal right to vote in democratic elections. Universal suffrage means this right extends to all citizens regardless of status, gender, race or creed.
While democracy traces back to ancient times, the right to vote was historically restricted to certain classes. The concept of universal suffrage is a recent development but is now considered an essential human right.
Historical development of democracy
Democracy requires:
- Authority of government based on the will of the people
- Genuine periodic elections
- Constant checks and balances to remain free and healthy
Where democracy exists today, it has often been achieved through:
- Prolonged or bloody civil wars
- International intervention or assistance
- Independence from countries that themselves achieved democracy through such processes
Extension of male suffrage
Early democracies restricted voting to:
- Men only
- Those with higher status
- Property owners
- Certain backgrounds
This reflected mistrust of the general population or assumptions they couldn't understand government affairs. The gradual extension of male suffrage demonstrated growing recognition that political participation should not depend on wealth or status.
United Kingdom progression
- : Vote extended to males renting land of certain value
- : All male householders
- : Males in the countryside (still only approximately of adult males)
- Representation of the People Act 1918 (UK): Extended vote to whole adult male population
Women's suffrage
Suffragettes were campaigners for women's right to vote, waging a long and difficult campaign in male-dominated democracies. The right to vote symbolised women's broader struggle for equality.
International timeline
- : New Zealand—first country to permit women equal voting rights
- : South Australia
- : Australian Commonwealth
- : UK—limited women's voting rights (after World War I)
- : US— Amendment
- : UK—women's rights made equal with men's
Racial barriers to suffrage
Race represented another barrier to voting rights, particularly in the Americas where social stigma attached to Native Americans and African-Americans.
United States
Amendment (): Following the American Civil War, extended voting rights to all adult males regardless of race, colour, or previous servitude.
New Zealand
Initially, property ownership requirements effectively excluded Māori voters. In , this requirement was removed, extending the vote across the male population and establishing Māori representation in parliament's lower house.
Australia
- Federation (): Indigenous peoples could vote if their state granted that right
- Some South Australian Aboriginal men and women voted for the first Commonwealth Parliament
- Later government interpretations and discriminatory state measures effectively denied Indigenous peoples the vote until
- : Commonwealth legislation ensured Indigenous peoples had the right to vote regardless of state laws (though not compulsory unlike other Australians)
- Constitutional referendum (): Gave Indigenous Australians equal status as citizens, including being counted in the census
The referendum became a symbol of public recognition of Indigenous Australian rights, with over of Australians voting in favour. It remains one of the most successful referendums in Australian history.
Democracy in the modern world
Universal Declaration of Human Rights—Article 21: Recognises the right to vote as a universal human right, stating:
- Everyone has the right to participate in government
- The will of the people shall be the basis of government authority
- Elections must be periodic, genuine, universal, equal, and by secret vote
Growth of democracy
- : 10 democracies worldwide
- : 20 democracies
- : Declined to 12 (due to Nazism and fascism: authoritarian systems opposed to democracy)
- : 25 democracies
- : 30 democracies
- : 60 democracies
- : 75 democracies
- : 89 countries ( of world population) classified as freely democratic; 47 countries ( of population) still "not free"
Key Points on Universal Suffrage:
- Suffrage rights were gradually extended over centuries, first to all men, then to women, and finally without racial restrictions
- The struggle for voting rights was often intertwined with broader movements for equality and human rights
- New Zealand pioneered women's suffrage in , with other nations following over subsequent decades
- Democracy has grown significantly since , though many countries still lack free democratic systems
- The right to vote is now recognised as a fundamental human right in international law
Universal education
Historical context
Universal education means all human beings have a right to education. This concept only achieved wide acceptance relatively recently.
In early civilisations:
- Education was associated with wealth, power, or specific trades/religions
- Most people received informal education from families and communities
- Skills were learned through daily work or vocation
Development of writing and literacy
Writing systems allowed ideas and information to be passed across time and space, becoming associated with:
- Law
- Commerce
- Religion
- Civil administration
However, illiteracy remained the norm globally until recent times, with formal schooling available only to a select few. Even in developed nations, literacy rates were low until the and centuries.
Exception: Aztec Education System
One Aztec tribe (– centuries) had compulsory education for nearly all children regardless of gender or rank—one of the first such communities worldwide. This demonstrates that universal education concepts existed in some cultures long before European development of similar systems.
The church as educator
In Europe, the church initially took on the educational role, later superseded by the state.
Examples:
- Scotland (): Church of Scotland proposed a school teacher for every parish and free education for the poor
- Norway ( century): Cathedral schools became Latin schools, mandatory for every market town; by , reading training was compulsory for all children
- England ( century): Churches began "Sunday schools" providing free education in reading, writing, and arithmetic
State-provided education
By the mid-s in Europe, several factors drove government involvement in education:
- Increasing industrialisation demands
- Growing competition between countries
- Widening suffrage requiring literate populations
- Governments began funding and later administering schools
Key legislation
Britain:
- Education Act 1870 (UK): Established state involvement
- : Education made compulsory for children aged 5–10
- : Age raised to 12
France:
- : All children under 15 required to attend school, with free and secular public instruction
Australia:
- Public Instruction Act 1880 (NSW): Government took control of Church-run schools (except Catholic), making education free, secular, and compulsory
- First government school for Indigenous Australians created (fewer than 200 of 1500 eligible children attended initially)
- These schools later merged into the general public system
Current situation:
- Compulsory school attendance: ages 6–15 (varies by state)
- NSW (): School leaving age raised to 17
- Australian literacy rate:
International recognition
By the century and World War II's end, free and compulsory education had:
- Spread throughout developed nations
- Become regarded as a desirable goal for all governments
- Been recognised as a basic human right
United Nations priorities: Education became a major focus of UN economic and social development programs.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights—Article 26:
- Everyone has right to education
- Education shall be free, at least at elementary and fundamental stages
- Elementary education shall be compulsory
- Technical and professional education made generally available
- Higher education equally accessible based on merit
- Education directed to full development of human personality
- Parents have prior right to choose children's education
Millennium Development Goals
: All UN member states agreed to improve social and economic conditions in the world's poorest countries.
Goal 2: All children worldwide will have minimum education up to end of primary level by .
Despite free and compulsory education being available in almost all countries, many children still cannot access education for various reasons, including:
- Poverty and need to work
- Geographic isolation
- Conflict and displacement
- Gender discrimination
- Disability discrimination
- Cultural barriers
Key Takeaways on Universal Education:
- Education was historically a privilege of the wealthy and powerful
- Churches played a pioneering role in providing education before state involvement
- Industrialisation and democratic expansion drove demand for universal literacy
- By the late century, many countries had established free, compulsory education systems
- Education is now recognised as a fundamental human right under international law
- Significant gaps in access remain in many parts of the world
Self-determination
Defining collective rights
Unlike individual rights (e.g. joining a trade union, receiving education), self-determination is a collective right—a right belonging to a group or people rather than individuals.
Self-determination means people of a territory or national grouping have the right to determine their own political status—to choose how they will be governed without undue influence from another country.
This represents a fundamental shift from historical practices where powerful nations imposed their rule on weaker peoples without consent.
Historical struggles
Political self-determination has been fought for throughout history by peoples against various powers and regimes. It relates closely to democratic rights, involving consent of the people as the basis for sovereign states.
Self-determination became particularly important after European colonisation, where:
- People worldwide were placed under direct imperial control
- Colonial powers rarely considered the interests of colonised peoples
- Bloody conflicts arose globally against colonial rule (Africa, Americas, Asia, Middle East, Oceania)
- Europe itself experienced constant conflicts between groups seeking self-determination against imperial powers
Key historical moments
Early movements
- US Declaration of Independence (): Against British colonial rule
- French Revolution (–): Fought for self-determination rights in Europe
- Latin American independence wars ( century onwards): Against European colonial rule
World Wars as catalysts
World Wars I and II pushed for international recognition of self-determination as a path to peace.
League of Nations (): Consolidated many new states following World War I but lacked US membership.
UN Charter (): Following World War II atrocities, established the first universal recognition of self-determination.
International legal recognition
UN Charter—Article : Calls for respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights—Article 15: Everyone has right to nationality; no one should be arbitrarily deprived of nationality or right to change it.
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (, in force )—Article : Includes self-determination as its primary right, stating all peoples have the right to freely determine their political status and pursue their economic, social, and cultural development.
Decolonisation
Self-determination was one condition the US imposed on Allied forces before entering World War II.
UN Charter—Chapter 13: Provided for a Trusteeship Council to provide international supervision for transition of "trust territories" to self-government.
- Last trust territory: Palau (achieved independence )
- –: 53 territories became self-governing independent states
- Most recent UN member: Montenegro ()
Colonial powers were encouraged to oversee independence in the best interests of peoples. Many groups worldwide still claim desire to self-govern, suggesting more independent territories will be recognised in future.
Indigenous peoples' self-determination
Over 5000 different indigenous peoples exist worldwide, comprising over 300 million people in more than 70 countries.
Indigenous peoples have often been:
- Excluded from democratic processes
- Forcefully assimilated
- Economically exploited
- Generally oppressed
Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (): After over 20 years of development, the UN adopted this non-binding declaration.
Case Study: Australia and Indigenous Rights
Initial Rejection: Four states initially rejected the Declaration (including Australia). The Howard Coalition Government's reason stated: "there should only be one law for all Australians."
Reversal: In April , the Rudd Labor Government formally endorsed the Declaration on Australia's behalf, recognising the importance of protecting indigenous rights while maintaining national unity.
Significance: This demonstrates the evolving nature of human rights recognition and the ongoing tension between universal rights and national sovereignty.
The Declaration is likely a significant stepping stone toward greater awareness and protection of the world's indigenous peoples, similar to how the UDHR became the foundation for international human rights law.
Environmental rights
Nature of environmental rights
Unlike individual or collective rights, environmental rights are argued to relate to many existing agreed rights. Supporters argue that rights to life, health, or property cannot be fully realised without the right to a healthy, safe, and adequate environment.
This right relates to:
- Current generations—protecting present populations from environmental harm
- Future generations—preserving the environment for those not yet born
This intergenerational aspect makes environmental rights unique in human rights discourse.
Regional recognition
African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights ()
Article 23: All peoples have the right to a satisfactory environment favourable to their development. Adopted by 53 African states.
American Convention on Human Rights
Second Protocol ()—Article 11: Includes explicit right to healthy environment and obligation on state parties to protect, preserve, and improve the environment.
International environmental treaties
While no universal recognition of environmental rights exists, numerous treaties attempt to deal universally with specific environmental threats:
- Stockholm Declaration ()
- Rio Declaration ()
- Kyoto Protocol ()
These represent attempts to address:
- Global warming
- Spread of epidemics
- Marine pollution
- Ozone layer depletion
- Atmospheric pollution
Challenges
A main problem in achieving progress is failure of all states to commit to measures for global benefit when they may seem disadvantageous to short-term national interest.
UN Climate Change Conference (Copenhagen, December ): Demonstrated difficulty in securing global agreement on environmental issues.
Failure to achieve global consensus could cause dramatic deterioration in rights and living standards of millions globally.
Peace rights
Historical context
For all human history until recently, war was generally seen as a legal and legitimate means of:
- Solving disputes
- Determining political control
- Determining economic control over territories and populations
League of Nations
Paris Peace Conference (): Following World War I, victorious countries met at Versailles, France.
Covenant of the League of Nations: First line stated purpose "to promote international co-operation and to achieve international peace and security."
The League ultimately failed, and World War II broke out, due largely to:
- Failure of the Treaty of Versailles
- Failure to achieve US membership
United Nations establishment
UN Charter (signed 26 June ): After World War II, with US leading Allied Forces, explicitly made peace the primary UN purpose.
First line: Purpose "to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, which twice in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankind."
Article : Makes maintenance of peace primary purpose and gives power to take measures to prevent and remove threats to peace.
These statements in possibly the most significant treaty in history effectively outlawed war, except in specific circumstances. They declare the right of every state and individuals within states to live in peace.
Up to the century, no such concept existed in international law.
Declaration on the Right of Peoples to Peace ()
The UN General Assembly adopted this non-binding declaration, proclaiming all "peoples of our planet have a sacred right to peace."
State obligations: Promoting and implementing the right to peace is fundamental, with government policies directed toward:
- Elimination of threat of war, particularly nuclear war
- Renunciation of use of force in international relations
- Settlement of international disputes by peaceful means based on UN Charter
Balance with self-defence
In international law, the right to peace is balanced against the right of self-defence.
UN Charter—Article 51: States have inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if armed attack occurs.
UN Charter—Article 39: UN Security Council can authorise actions to maintain or restore peace if necessary.
Many wars have been considered legal on this basis.
Example: The Iraq invasion by the US, UK, and allies was claimed legal under Security Council Resolution (under Article 39). However, the resolution's intention and the invasion's legality remain under dispute.
Continuing conflicts
Despite these advances, war has not been eliminated. Major wars since UN Charter signing include:
- Korean War ()
- Vietnam War (–)
- Iran–Iraq War (–)
- Persian Gulf War (–)
- Yugoslav Wars (–)
Ongoing conflicts (at publication time):
- Somali Civil War (since )
- War in Afghanistan (since )
- Iraq War (since )
Laws of war
Where states commence illegal wars, it's considered a breach of peace or "war of aggression." Where any war (legal or illegal) is conducted, all parties must comply with laws of war aiming to minimise effects on peace and community.
International Criminal Court (ICC, established ): Has jurisdiction to try individuals for:
- Wars of aggression
- War crimes
- Other crimes against the international community
Although states are still discussing the definition of war of aggression, many prosecutions have been made for various war crimes.
Key Points on Peace Rights:
- War was considered legal and legitimate for most of human history
- The League of Nations made the first attempt at international peace cooperation after World War I
- The UN Charter () effectively outlawed war except in specific circumstances
- The right to peace is balanced against the right to self-defence in international law
- Despite legal frameworks, armed conflicts continue worldwide
- The International Criminal Court prosecutes individuals for war crimes and aggression
Remember!
Key points:
- Human rights recognition developed gradually through centuries of struggle, not as a coordinated effort
- Each right (abolition of slavery, universal suffrage, labour rights, education, self-determination) has its own unique historical development
- Major conflicts, particularly World Wars I and II, catalysed formal international recognition of human rights
- The Universal Declaration of Human Rights () represents the culmination of these movements, establishing formal international recognition
- Environmental rights and peace rights represent more recent developments in human rights discourse
Key terms: Slavery, universal suffrage, trade union, labour rights, abolitionism, transatlantic slave trade, human trafficking, Industrial Revolution, suffragette, fascism, International Labour Organization (ILO), International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), self-determination, collective right, indigenous peoples
Critical dates: (Somersett case), (UK Slave Trade Act), (UK Slavery Abolition Act), (US Thirteenth Amendment), (UK Trade Unions Act), (ILO established), (NZ women's suffrage), (Australian women's suffrage), (Indigenous Australian voting rights), (Indigenous Australian citizenship referendum), (UN Charter), (UDHR), (Declaration on Rights of Indigenous Peoples)
Exam guidance: When analysing human rights development, always link historical movements to contemporary international instruments (UDHR, UN Covenants). Examiners value responses that demonstrate understanding of how historical struggles led to formal legal recognition. Use specific case examples (e.g. Somersett, Amistad, Tolpuddle Martyrs) to illustrate broader principles. For evaluation questions, consider ongoing challenges (e.g. modern slavery, gaps in democracy, environmental consensus difficulties).