The Defeat of Millenarianism (AQA A-Level History): Revision Notes
The Defeat of Millenarianism
What was millenarianism?
Millenarianism was a belief system among religious radicals during the 1640s and 1650s that England was experiencing the fulfillment of biblical prophecies. Adherents interpreted contemporary events as signs that the end times and Christ's return were imminent.
The Fifth Monarchy Men exemplified this thinking. They believed England was living through the final prophetic period before God's kingdom on Earth. Millenarian sentiment was not confined to fringe groups - Oliver Cromwell himself held such beliefs when he established the Nominated Assembly in 1653, viewing it as a step toward fulfilling divine prophecy. The trial and execution of Charles I in 1649 had similarly stirred millenarian expectations among those who saw these events as divinely ordained.
The term "millenarianism" derives from the Latin millennium (thousand years), referring to the biblical prophecy of Christ's thousand-year reign on Earth. This belief system made religious radicals see political events through an apocalyptic lens, interpreting struggles and upheavals as signs of imminent divine intervention.
Resistance to the Restoration
When Charles II returned to the throne in 1660, millenarian believers viewed the restoration of monarchy as contrary to God's plan. This conviction motivated various individuals and groups to resist the new regime.
The most notable instance of millenarian resistance was Venner's Rising in January 1661. Thomas Venner, a Fifth Monarchy Man, led approximately 150 followers in an armed uprising in London. Although the authorities quickly suppressed this rebellion, it had lasting consequences.
Venner's Rising, though small in scale (only about 150 participants), had a disproportionate impact on government policy. The uprising provided concrete evidence that appeared to confirm widespread fears: religious nonconformists who rejected the established church posed a genuine threat to political stability and could provoke sedition. This fear would shape religious policy throughout the Restoration period.
Historical records reveal substantial public hostility toward millenarian ideas both before and during the Restoration period. The association between religious radicalism and political disorder became firmly established in the public consciousness.
Understanding nonconformists and dissenters
Nonconformists and Dissenters were individuals unable or unwilling to attend Church of England services regularly or take Anglican Communion. Instead, they worshipped separately, often in private gatherings. These terms encompassed various Protestant denominations and groups but excluded Catholics, who also refused to attend Anglican services yet were categorized differently.
Criticisms of the Restoration Settlement (1660-64)
The Restoration Settlement refers to the series of political, religious, financial and constitutional arrangements made between 1660 and 1664. Historians have subjected this settlement to extensive criticism for failing to resolve the fundamental issues that had divided the kingdom during the 1640s and 1650s.
Financial problems
The financial arrangements between Crown and Parliament remained unworkable. Parliament granted Charles II insufficient funds to govern effectively, ensuring that financial tensions would persist throughout his reign.
Religious settlement
The religious settlement faced condemnation as vindictive rather than conciliatory. Presbyterians discovered themselves bitterly disappointed when the Restoration established a narrow High Church Anglicanism that excluded them from the state church. Despite having fought against Cromwell to prevent the persecution of other Protestant groups, Presbyterians found themselves on the outside of the new religious establishment.
The restored Church of England in the 1660s essentially replicated the Elizabethan Church structure. This reveals an irony in the religious conflicts of the early seventeenth century: Puritans had claimed to oppose innovations in religion, yet the Restoration showed little tolerance for Protestant diversity. Religious nonconformity had become too closely associated with sedition in the minds of the political elite for broad toleration to succeed.
Land settlement
The land settlement proved unfair to Royalists who had suffered financial losses during the Civil Wars and Interregnum while supporting the King's cause.
Constitutional issues
The constitutional settlement failed to resolve ongoing tensions between Crown and Parliament regarding their respective powers and authority. These unresolved issues would plague Charles II's entire reign.
Explanations for failure
Historians have attributed these failures to several factors:
- Disunity among Members of Parliament
- The vindictive unity of the Cavalier Parliament elected in 1661
- The pervasive fear of Quakerism and other radical religious movements that influenced the Restoration process
Reassessing the "settlement"
Some historians argue that the term "Restoration settlement" fundamentally misunderstands the period's nature and the political elite's intentions. The nation's primary objective in the early 1660s was not to construct a permanent constitutional and religious framework but simply to restore monarchy and terminate the political chaos of the previous decade.
The English Revolution itself had vindicated Charles I's position. Charles had argued during the debates preceding the Self-Denying Ordinance that monarchy represented the only viable form of government. The Earl of Manchester had expressed similar views. The experience of the 1640s and 1650s appeared to confirm their judgment that no alternative to monarchy existed.
Rather than viewing the Restoration as an attempt to establish permanent arrangements, it may be more accurate to see it as a pragmatic decision born from despair at the instability of the 1650s. The political nation chose monarchy because the alternatives had demonstrably failed, not because they had developed a comprehensive plan for the kingdom's future governance.
The Restoration in broader historical context
Examining the Restoration from a wider chronological perspective reveals that the process of restoring monarchy began long before 1660. As early as 1649, following Charles I's execution, Cromwell and the army commanders moved to reassure the gentry that the Revolution remained political in nature, not social. They sought to prevent alarm among property owners about threats to the social order.
By 1657, Cromwell had become "King in all but name" after Parliament offered him the Crown. Though he declined the title, the substance of monarchical power had effectively returned.
Looking forward from 1660, the settlement of 1689 following the Glorious Revolution still left the Crown deliberately short of funds, demonstrating that financial tensions between monarch and Parliament continued. The supposed failures of the Restoration Settlement must therefore be assessed by examining events throughout the later seventeenth century, not merely the 1660s.
Within this longer timeframe, the period 1660-64 appears less as a failed settlement and more as an unavoidable stage in an evolutionary process. The political nation rejected violent revolutionary change and chose instead a gradual return to constitutional monarchy, accepting that this would involve ongoing negotiation and adjustment rather than immediate resolution of all outstanding issues.
Key dates: The Restoration Settlement
1660
- October: Worcester House Conference on religion
1661
- January: Bodies of Cromwell, Bradshaw and Ireton exhumed and hanged
- May: First session of Cavalier Parliament; Militia Act; Corporation Act; Act against tumultuous petitioning; Act condemning Parliament's former claim to legislate without royal approval
- November: Quaker Act; press censorship imposed
1662
- April: Prayer Book accepted by parliament
- May: Act of Uniformity; Hearth Tax
- December: Declaration of Indulgence
1663
- April: Declaration of Indulgence withdrawn
1664
- November: Triennial Act; Conventicle Act
Remember!
Key Takeaways:
-
Millenarianism was a powerful religious force in the 1640s-50s, with believers viewing events as fulfillment of biblical prophecy and expecting Christ's imminent return.
-
Venner's Rising (January 1661) provided evidence that confirmed fears about religious nonconformists threatening political stability, though it involved only about 150 people and was quickly suppressed.
-
The Restoration Settlement (1660-64) faced criticism for failing to resolve financial, religious, land and constitutional issues, with the religious settlement proving particularly divisive by excluding Presbyterians through narrow High Church Anglicanism.
-
The term "settlement" may misrepresent the period - restoration of monarchy was driven by pragmatic despair at the 1650s' instability rather than an attempt to create permanent arrangements for all outstanding issues.
-
The Restoration process should be viewed across a longer timeframe, arguably beginning as early as 1649 and continuing beyond 1660, representing an evolutionary stage that rejected violent revolutionary change in favour of gradual constitutional development.