Course of the Second Boer War (AQA A-Level History): Revision Notes
Course of the Second Boer War
British and Boer military preparation
British readiness for war
British forces appeared well-prepared when war began in October 1899. The military had extensive experience from colonial campaigns across the empire, and mobilisation proceeded efficiently. The Royal Navy transported 450,000 troops and supplies over 6,000 miles without disruption. Despite this logistical achievement, the war quickly exposed flaws in British military planning and underestimation of Boer capabilities.
Boer military strength and limitations
The Boer republics faced enormous numerical disadvantages. The combined white population of Transvaal and Orange Free State totalled just 300,000 people, from which the Boers could field fewer than 60,000 combatants. The Boer army functioned as a civilian militia rather than a professional force. When threatened, adult male citizens in each district formed commando units, elected their own officers, and brought personal weapons and horses.
However, the Boers possessed substantial advantages that British commanders initially failed to appreciate:
Key Boer Advantages:
- Combat experience from the First Boer War (1880-81) demonstrated their effectiveness against British forces
- Superior horsemanship and hunting skills gave them mobility and fieldcraft
- Modern European rifles provided firepower matching British weaponry
- Intimate knowledge of the terrain allowed tactical advantages
- Strong morale sustained by belief they fought to preserve their independence and culture
- Support from Afrikaners (people of Dutch/Boer descent) in Cape Colony and Natal who sympathised with the republics
The opening phase, October-December 1899
Boer offensive and Black Week
Britain suffered humiliating defeats during the war's first months. Boer forces seized the initiative, laying siege to three strategically important towns: Ladysmith in Natal, Kimberley in Cape Colony, and Mafeking in Bechuanaland. This offensive trapped British garrisons and forced the British to abandon their planned invasion of the republics.
Black Week (10-15 December 1899) marked the nadir of British military fortunes. Attempts to relieve the besieged towns resulted in three separate defeats within five days. British commanders, accustomed to colonial warfare against less well-equipped opponents, found their tactics ineffective against disciplined Boer marksmen using modern weapons and defensive positions. These reversals shocked the British public and government, demonstrating the war would not conclude quickly as anticipated.
British recovery and conventional victory, 1900
Reinforcement and new leadership
The British government responded to early defeats by deploying massive reinforcements. Troop numbers increased to 450,000, drawing on forces from across the empire. More importantly, the government appointed new commanders: Lord Roberts assumed overall command whilst Lord Kitchener served as his chief of staff. This leadership change proved decisive.
By mid-1900, British forces had relieved all three besieged towns. The capture of Ladysmith, Kimberley, and Mafeking, combined with victories in the field, created an impression of imminent British triumph. Paul Kruger fled to Europe whilst Roberts returned to Britain, celebrated as a military hero. British control of the main Boer towns suggested the war had effectively ended.
The relief of Mafeking
News of Mafeking's relief on 17 May 1900 triggered extraordinary celebrations throughout Britain. The public response demonstrated genuine popular enthusiasm rather than manufactured propaganda. Streets filled with spontaneous celebrations that reflected widespread belief in imperial triumph and vindication of British military power.
Guerrilla warfare phase, 1900-1902
Boer tactical adaptation
Boer generals refused to accept defeat despite losing their major towns. They initiated a guerrilla campaign that extended the war for two additional years. Boer commandos returned to their home districts where local populations could provide intelligence and supplies. Their tactics aimed to make British occupation unsustainable:
- Rapid strikes against isolated British positions
- Ambushes of military columns moving between towns
- Destruction of railway lines to disrupt British logistics
- Avoidance of pitched battles that would favour British numerical superiority
The Boers hoped these tactics would achieve two objectives: provoke Afrikaners in Cape Colony to rebel against British rule, and exhaust British willingness to continue an increasingly costly war.
British counter-insurgency measures
Territorial control and blockhouses
Kitchener, now commanding British forces, implemented systematic measures to suppress the guerrilla campaign. The vast size of the republics made controlling territory exceptionally difficult. As soon as British troops left a district, Boer commandos would return and re-establish their authority.
Kitchener divided Boer territory into zones separated by barbed wire barriers, restricting commando movement between regions. To maintain control of these zones, the British constructed approximately 8,000 fortified blockhouses, each garrisoned by six to eight soldiers. This network of small fortifications allowed British forces to monitor and respond to Boer movements more effectively.
Scorched-earth policy
Kitchener continued and intensified Roberts's scorched-earth policy - a strategy involving systematic destruction of Boer resources. British troops burned farms, destroyed crops, slaughtered or confiscated livestock, and poisoned wells. This devastation aimed to eliminate the support network sustaining Boer commandos, making it impossible for them to obtain food, shelter, or fresh horses from the civilian population.
Concentration camps
Establishment and conditions
Approximately 50 concentration camps housed Boer families forcibly removed from their farms as part of the scorched-earth campaign. Conditions in these camps proved catastrophic. Inadequate food supplies, poor sanitation, lack of shelter, shortage of medical facilities, and severe overcrowding created a health disaster. Disease spread rapidly through the camps.
Devastating Mortality Rates:
Over 20,000 Boer women and children died in the camps - approximately one in four inmates. The mortality rate reflected incompetence rather than deliberate extermination policy, but the scale of death revealed the British military's failure to provide adequate care for civilian internees.
Black African concentration camps
Tens of thousands of black Africans were also forcibly removed from Boer-controlled areas and placed in separate camps. Conditions in these camps were worse than those housing Boers. Record-keeping was less thorough, but over 12,000 black inmates are known to have died. The high death rate across all camps resulted from British military authorities' inadequate planning and indifference to civilian welfare.
Public criticism and reform
In 1901, radical Liberals led by David Lloyd George publicly denounced the concentration camps. Liberal leader Henry Campbell-Bannerman initially hesitated to support criticism during wartime, fearing it would divide his party and appear unpatriotic. However, Emily Hobhouse's detailed description of camp conditions in June 1901 created domestic and international outcry.
Campbell-Bannerman now condemned 'the methods of barbarism' being employed in southern Africa. The government, facing intense public pressure, appointed an all-women commission headed by Millicent Fawcett to investigate. Between August and December 1901, the commission toured the camps and confirmed Hobhouse's findings.
In November 1901, Chamberlain ordered Milner to implement immediate reforms to reduce mortality. Civil authorities assumed responsibility for camp administration from the military. By early 1902, the death rate for white inmates had fallen to two per cent, lower than death rates in many British cities. The improved conditions came too late for the 20,000 Boers who had already perished.
Kitchener's December 1901 instruction forbidding commanders from bringing in more women and children when 'clearing' rural areas represented a calculated attempt to appease critics whilst handicapping guerrilla fighters who now had to care for their families independently.
The role of black Africans
'A white man's war'?
Both Boers and British initially feared the consequences of arming black Africans. Memories of the Anglo-Zulu War (1879) and other conflicts with African peoples remained fresh. An unwritten understanding existed that the war would remain a conflict between white combatants, with the winner subsequently managing relations with the black majority population.
However, as guerrilla warfare continued, the British increasingly employed armed black people as scouts and auxiliaries. By 1902, approximately 30,000 black people had served with British forces. Most black Africans supported Britain, viewing Boer defeat as potentially beneficial to their own interests. This involvement transformed what had been conceived as a 'white man's war' into a more complex racial conflict.
End of the war
The Treaty of Vereeniging
Kitchener's containment and harassment tactics eventually convinced even resistant Boer commanders that further fighting was futile. By early 1902, it became obvious to 'bitter-enders' that they could not achieve military victory. The Second Boer War officially concluded with the Treaty of Vereeniging in May 1902.
The peace terms reflected both British military victory and recognition that reconciliation required compromise:
- The Boers accepted British annexation of Transvaal and Orange Free State
- Britain promised to restore self-government 'at the earliest opportunity'
- Britain provided £3 million for reconstruction to help rebuild devastated farms and infrastructure
These terms aimed to transform defeated enemies into cooperative subjects of the British Empire.
Cost and casualties
The war's scale exceeded all initial expectations. Over 22,000 British soldiers died, though only approximately 8,000 fell in combat. Disease claimed the remainder, highlighting poor medical provision and sanitation in military camps. More than 7,000 Boer soldiers died in combat.
The Financial Burden:
The war required 450,000 British and colonial troops and cost the Treasury £217 million. By 1901, the expense had reached £140 to kill a single Boer combatant. These figures revealed the extraordinary resources needed to suppress a guerrilla insurgency, even when the enemy possessed minimal industrial capacity and no external support.
The civilian death toll, particularly among Boer women and children in concentration camps, created lasting bitterness. Over 20,000 Boer civilians died alongside more than 12,000 black Africans, casualties that resulted from British counter-insurgency methods rather than combat operations.
Remember!
Key Points to Remember:
-
Black Week (December 1899) saw Britain suffer three humiliating defeats whilst attempting to relieve besieged towns, demonstrating serious underestimation of Boer military capabilities.
-
After initially losing territory, Britain deployed 450,000 troops and captured major Boer towns by mid-1900, but Boer forces then shifted to guerrilla warfare that extended the conflict for two more years.
-
Kitchener's counter-insurgency strategy combined blockhouses for territorial control, scorched-earth tactics destroying Boer farms and resources, and concentration camps for displaced civilians.
-
Over 20,000 Boer women and children died in concentration camps (approximately one in four inmates), along with more than 12,000 black Africans, deaths resulting from incompetence rather than deliberate policy but causing domestic and international criticism.
-
The Treaty of Vereeniging (May 1902) ended the war with Britain annexing the republics but promising eventual self-government and £3 million for reconstruction, whilst the conflict cost Britain £217 million and over 22,000 military deaths.