Good Neighbor' Policy and Neutrality Policy (AQA A-Level History): Revision Notes
Good Neighbor' Policy and Neutrality Policy
The 'Good Neighbor' policy
When Roosevelt took office in 1933, most members of Congress held isolationist views. Roosevelt himself had no intention of involving the USA in European affairs. Instead, he wanted the USA to adopt a policy of friendship toward other countries, particularly Latin American nations. Roosevelt believed the USA could serve as a 'moral force' for good in the world, especially within the western hemisphere.
Introduction and aims of the policy
Roosevelt's primary focus was addressing the USA's economic crisis. However, he also sought to encourage economic recovery and foster diplomatic cooperation through the Good Neighbor policy, which represented a foreign policy approach aimed at mending and improving relations with Latin America.
This policy continued Hoover's earlier policies of persuasion and economic pressure to exert influence over Latin America, but Roosevelt presented it as transforming the Monroe Doctrine into arrangements for mutual hemispheric action against aggressors.
The term hemispheric relates to the western or eastern or northern or southern part of the world; in this context, it refers to North and South America.
In his inaugural speech on 4 March 1933, Roosevelt articulated the principles underpinning this approach. He declared his dedication to "the policy of the good neighbor, the neighbor who resolutely respects himself and, because he does so, respects the rights of others – the neighbor who respects his obligations and respects the sanctity of his agreements in and with a world of neighbors."
Core Principles of the Good Neighbor Policy
This statement emphasised three foundational elements:
- Mutual respect between nations and their sovereignty
- Adherence to obligations in international relations
- Honoring agreements between neighboring countries
Implementation in Latin America
The Good Neighbor policy produced concrete changes in US relations with Latin American countries. In accordance with this new approach, US troops withdrew from Haiti, the Dominican Republic and Nicaragua. In 1934, Congress signed a treaty with Cuba that nullified the Platt Amendment, which had previously authorised US occupation of Cuba. The USA retained one naval base at Guantánamo Bay. By 1938, the Good Neighbor policy had resulted in ten treaties with Latin American countries, leading to substantial trade increases for the USA.
Hull's policies of low tariffs improved the economies of Latin American countries, particularly Cuba. The tariff on Cuban sugar was reduced, and trade increased accordingly. To demonstrate continued goodwill to neighboring countries, Roosevelt passed the Reciprocal Trade Agreement Act in 1934. This Act repealed several 1920s isolationist trade policies, enabling the USA to compete more effectively in foreign trade.
Historic Policy Shift
The 1934 Act initiated a historic shift toward lower trade barriers and greater global engagement, marking a significant departure from previous isolationist economic policies. This represented not just a change in foreign relations, but a fundamental transformation in America's approach to international trade.
The USA's policy of neutrality
The widespread belief that involvement in the First World War had been a mistake persisted throughout the 1930s in the USA. Congress passed a series of Neutrality Acts designed to keep the USA out of future wars. Many Americans felt the USA had unnecessarily lost men and military equipment, and that Europe was drifting toward further conflict as a result of the growth of totalitarianism – political regimes that suppress political opposition and control all aspects of people's lives.
The Neutrality Acts
The series of Neutrality Acts represented Congress's attempt to legislate American isolation from foreign conflicts. Each successive act refined and expanded restrictions on American involvement in foreign wars.
Worked Example: The First Neutrality Act of 1935
This Act gave the president the power to:
- Prohibit US ships from carrying US-made munitions to countries at war
- Prevent US citizens from travelling on ships of countries at war except at their own risk
Purpose: To avoid situations like the Lusitania incident of 1915, in which American lives were lost when a German submarine sank a British passenger liner carrying Americans.
The Second Neutrality Act of 1936 banned loans or credits to countries at war. The Act set no limits on trade in materials useful for war, and US companies such as Texaco, Standard Oil and Ford were able to sell such items on credit to General Franco in the Spanish Civil War.
The Third Neutrality Act of 1937 forbade the export of munitions for use by either of the opposing forces in Spain. It did permit nations involved in a war to buy goods other than munitions from the USA, provided they paid cash and used their own ships. This became known as 'cash and carry'.
The Fourth Neutrality Act of the same year authorised the US president to determine what could and could not be bought, other than munitions, to be paid for on delivery, and made travel on ships of countries at war unlawful.
The USA made further amendments to the Neutrality Act in November 1939. The Fifth Neutrality Act meant that the president could authorise the 'cash and carry' export of arms and munitions to countries at war, but they had to be transported in the countries' own ships. In addition, the president could specify which areas were theatres of war in time of conflict, through which US citizens and ships were forbidden to travel.
The president proclaimed the North Atlantic a combat zone, reflecting the fact that German U-boats were attacking British ships and bringing the war close to the USA. Roosevelt ordered the US Navy to patrol the western Atlantic and reveal the location of German submarines to the British.
Roosevelt and neutrality
In the 1930s, the totalitarian and militaristic states of Germany, Italy and Japan openly built up large armed forces. Roosevelt despised the spread of totalitarianism in Germany and Italy and, by 1937, began to see that the USA might need to become involved in European affairs. His views differed from those of Congress and, more importantly, the majority of the American people.
Public Opposition to War
A 1937 Gallup Poll revealed overwhelming isolationist sentiment among Americans:
- Almost 70 per cent thought that US involvement in the First World War had been a mistake
- 95 per cent opposed any future involvement in war
For some, the idea of US involvement in others' problems was completely abhorrent. For others, going to war would end the reforms of the New Deal.
Although Roosevelt was aware of public opinion, in October 1937 he delivered a speech in Chicago, warning the people of the USA about the situation in Europe and the Far East and the dangers of war. It became known as the 'Quarantine Speech'. He had been appalled by the Nationalist bombing of civilians in Spain and the aggressive nature of Japan in declaring war on China in 1937. He had to tread a delicate path, and his speech warned the USA not only of the horrors of war but also of the problems with neutrality.
Worked Example: Roosevelt's Quarantine Speech - Key Rhetoric
Roosevelt suggested a quarantine of the aggressors but was careful not to mention specific countries. His speech employed powerful imagery and warnings:
Disease Metaphor: He described the "epidemic of world lawlessness" spreading across the globe, with innocent peoples and nations being "cruelly sacrificed to a greed for power and supremacy which is devoid of all sense of justice and humane considerations."
Contagion Warning: He characterized war as "a contagion, whether it be declared or undeclared," capable of engulfing states and peoples remote from the original scene of hostilities.
Reality Check: While expressing determination to keep out of war, Roosevelt acknowledged that "we cannot insure ourselves against the disastrous effects of war and the dangers of involvement." He stated that the USA was adopting measures to minimize the risk of involvement, but noted that "we cannot have complete protection in a world of disorder in which confidence and security have broken down."
The response to Roosevelt's speech revealed divided public opinion. The Boston Herald editorial of 6 October 1937 invoked the memory of Woodrow Wilson, suggesting that Roosevelt's foundations of civilization were seriously threatened. The editorial warned, "Mr. President, Americans will not be stampeded into going 3,000 miles [5,000 km] across water to save them. Crusade, if you must, but for the sake of several millions of American mothers, confine your crusading to the continental limits of America!"
The US response to the European War, 1939–41
Roosevelt began to express his strong support for the Western democratic states. After the Munich Agreement – signed in September 1938 by Britain, France, Germany and Italy, which allowed Germany to annex part of Czechoslovakia – Hitler announced further rearmament plans. Roosevelt responded with a further $300 million granted to the defence budget.
In October 1938, Roosevelt opened secret talks with the French on how to bypass US neutrality laws and allow the French to buy US aircraft. After tortuous negotiations in 1939, the French government placed large orders with the US aircraft industry.
The USA censured Germany in March 1939 and recalled its ambassador for breaking the Munich Agreement and seizing parts of Czechoslovakia. As tensions heightened in Europe, Roosevelt called on Germany and Italy to give assurances that they would not attack any European country over a period of ten years. This diplomatic pressure demonstrated Roosevelt's growing concern about European stability, though it produced no concrete results from the Axis powers.
Gradual Shift Away from Neutrality
These actions marked the beginning of a gradual shift away from strict neutrality. Roosevelt increasingly recognized that supporting democratic nations served American interests, even while public opinion remained largely isolationist.
The administration sought ways to aid Britain and France while technically remaining within the boundaries of neutrality legislation, preparing the ground for more direct involvement that would develop through 1940 and 1941.
| Year | Policy development |
|---|---|
| 1936 | First Neutrality Act |
| 1937 | Second Neutrality Act; Third and Fourth Neutrality Acts; Roosevelt's Quarantine Speech |
| 1938 | Munich Agreement; Roosevelt opens secret talks with France |
| 1939 | Fifth Neutrality Act; USA censures Germany over Czechoslovakia |
Key Points to Remember:
-
Roosevelt's Good Neighbor policy aimed to improve relations with Latin America through economic cooperation and mutual respect, moving away from military intervention and resulting in troop withdrawals and increased trade agreements by 1938.
-
The Neutrality Acts (1935-1939) reflected widespread American belief that involvement in the First World War had been a mistake, with Congress passing legislation to prohibit arms sales, loans to warring nations, and travel on belligerent ships.
-
Roosevelt's views on neutrality evolved from 1937 onwards as totalitarian threats grew in Europe and Asia, leading to his 'Quarantine Speech' warning Americans about the dangers of both war and isolation.
-
Public opinion remained strongly isolationist, with a 1937 Gallup Poll showing 70 per cent of Americans believed WWI involvement had been a mistake and 95 per cent opposed future wars.
-
By 1939-41, Roosevelt began moving away from strict neutrality through secret talks with France, increased defense spending, diplomatic pressure on Germany, and amendments to neutrality laws that allowed 'cash and carry' arms sales to democracies.