The 13 Days of the Missile Crisis (AQA A-Level History): Revision Notes
The 13 Days of the Missile Crisis
Discovery of the missiles
The Soviet deployment of nuclear weapons to Cuba had proceeded in secret throughout late summer and early autumn 1962, with the United States initially unaware of the scale or nature of the military build-up. This secrecy ended abruptly on 14 October 1962 when a U-2 spy plane flight captured unmistakable photographic evidence of an R-12 medium-range ballistic missile site at San Cristobal in western Cuba. The photographs confirmed what American intelligence had feared: the Soviet Union was installing offensive nuclear weapons capable of striking targets across much of the United States within minutes.
The U-2 spy plane played a crucial role throughout the crisis, providing vital intelligence about Soviet military capabilities in Cuba. These high-altitude reconnaissance aircraft could photograph missile sites from heights that made them difficult to detect and intercept.
Formation of ExComm
On 16 October, Kennedy's National Security Adviser, McGeorge Bundy, informed the president of the presence of Soviet nuclear missiles on Cuba. Kennedy immediately convened an advisory committee formally known as the Executive Committee of the National Security Council, commonly referred to as ExComm. ExComm's main role was to consider policy options and assess their consequences. The group's composition reflected the seriousness of the situation:
- President John F. Kennedy (chair)
- Secretary of State Dean Rusk
- Defence Secretary Robert McNamara
- Attorney General Robert Kennedy
- Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Maxwell Taylor
ExComm met continuously during the crisis, often multiple times per day. The group's deliberations were secretly recorded by Kennedy, providing historians with unprecedented insight into Cold War decision-making at the highest level.
The policy debate: hawks versus doves
ExComm quickly divided into two camps with sharply contrasting views on how to respond to the Soviet deployment. Hawks advocated for direct US military action to eliminate the threat, whilst doves favoured pursuing a diplomatic solution. The Treasury Secretary, Douglas Dillon, articulated the hawks' position at an early ExComm meeting in October 1962, arguing that the Soviet Union had "deliberately initiated a public test of our intentions" that would "determine the future course of world events for many years to come". Dillon warned that allowing the offensive capabilities in Cuba to remain would convince observers that "sooner or later we will lose all of Latin America to communism because all credibility of our willingness to effectively resist Soviet military power will have been removed".
The Hawks vs Doves Divide:
Hawks (military action advocates) argued that:
- Immediate air strikes would eliminate the threat before missiles became operational
- Diplomatic approaches would appear weak and embolden Soviet aggression
- The window for effective military action was rapidly closing
Doves (diplomatic solution advocates) contended that:
- Military action risked Soviet retaliation in Berlin or elsewhere
- A diplomatic solution could preserve global stability
- Negotiations offered a way out without nuclear escalation
The real dilemma facing Kennedy was how the missiles could be removed without actions that might fracture the NATO alliance or trigger Soviet retaliation. The USA could not take unilateral action that appeared to ignore European interests in favour of purely American policy concerns. Any response that remotely exposed Europe to Soviet nuclear retaliation would prove unacceptable to both European governments and the United States. Given the increasing volume of intelligence from U-2 spy plane photographs, it became apparent that any air strike against the missile installations was unfeasible. As the potential scope of air strikes widened, the likelihood of military action being undertaken narrowed.
The quarantine decision
Kennedy ultimately rejected the hawks' preference for immediate air strikes and instead opted for a naval blockade of Cuba. This approach offered several advantages:
Strategic rationale:
- Buying time allowed Kennedy to focus on finding a diplomatic resolution to the escalating crisis
- It forced the Soviet Union to decide whether to recognise the quarantine or challenge it
- Doing so would weaken Khrushchev's position domestically
- Avoiding immediate military action prevented the USA from being forced to take more aggressive steps
Blockade vs Quarantine:
The blockade constituted an act of war under international law, so the USA formally referred to it as a quarantine to maintain its legal justification. This careful choice of terminology was deliberate – it allowed the USA to take decisive action whilst avoiding the legal implications of declaring war on Cuba or the Soviet Union.
The quarantine was not Kennedy's sole response. US military bases were placed on maximum alert in preparation for a possible strike against Cuba. Kennedy had not abandoned the possibility of Soviet retaliation against West Berlin. This was a clear example of brinkmanship – a high-risk strategy in international relations that could only succeed if both sides recognised that any form of military confrontation in a nuclear age would be the least desirable approach.
Kennedy's public address (22 October)
Kennedy broadcast a televised address to the American people on 22 October, making the crisis public for the first time. In his speech, he declared that neither the United States nor the international community could "tolerate deliberate deception and offensive threats" from any nation. He announced that if offensive military preparations continued and the threat to the western hemisphere increased, "further action will be justified".
Key Excerpts from Kennedy's Address:
Kennedy established a clear policy position: any nuclear missile launched from Cuba against any nation in the western hemisphere would be regarded "as an attack by the Soviet Union on the United States, requiring a full retaliatory response upon the Soviet Union".
He called upon Khrushchev to halt and reverse "this clandestine, reckless and provocative threat to world peace and to stable relations between our two nations", urging him to "abandon this course of world domination, and to join in an historic effort to end the perilous arms race and to transform the history of man".
Response at the United Nations
The day after Kennedy's address, the UN Security Council convened to discuss the crisis. The US ambassador to the United Nations, Adlai Stevenson, condemned the Soviet deployment and characterised Cuba as "an accomplice in the communist enterprise of world domination".
A Remarkable Detail:
Neither the Soviet ambassador to the UN, Valerian Zorin, nor the Soviet ambassador to the USA, Anatoly Dobrynin, had been informed of the missile deployment by Moscow prior to the crisis becoming public. This lack of communication would prove significant in the diplomatic negotiations that followed.
Khrushchev denounced the blockade as "an act of aggression ... pushing mankind toward the abyss of a world nuclear-missile war".
The blockade had an immediate impact. By 24 October, the first Soviet ships approaching the quarantine line either stopped in the water or turned around, choosing not to test the American resolve.
The path to resolution
Despite the efforts made to avoid direct military confrontation, neither Kennedy nor Khrushchev had presented any substantial offer to serve as the basis for a diplomatic settlement by late October. Khrushchev began to reconsider his position. His stated aim had been to protect Castro's regime from US aggression by deploying nuclear missiles, yet he had clearly not succeeded. Cuba appeared to be in greater danger of US invasion than before.
The Secret Bargaining Chip:
What was less publicly known at the time was that Kennedy had been willing to negotiate regarding the presence of US nuclear missiles in Turkey. The Jupiter missiles in Turkey posed the same threat to the USSR as the nuclear weapons in Cuba posed to the USA, making them an appropriate element for a trade-off arrangement. This would become the key to resolving the crisis.
Khrushchev's proposals (26-27 October)
On Friday 26 October, Khrushchev sent an extended telegram to Kennedy. In essence, Khrushchev was seeking a way out of the crisis. His basic proposal suggested that if the USA made a non-invasion pledge regarding Cuba, then the Soviet Union would remove its military presence from the island. From the US perspective, this appeared to be an ideal scenario. The blockade was having minimal impact on weapons systems already deployed on Cuba, and the nuclear threat remained real and operational.
However, on Saturday 27 October, Khrushchev sent a second statement attempting to redefine the conditions under which the USSR would consider removing the missiles from Cuba. In this communication, Khrushchev raised the issue of linkage between the situations in Cuba and Turkey.
Khrushchev's Second Letter:
He wrote: "You are disturbed over Cuba. You say that this disturbs you because it is 90 miles by sea from the coast of the United States of America. But Turkey adjoins us; our sentries patrol back and forth and see each other. Do you consider, then, that you have the right to demand security for your own country and the removal of the weapons you call offensive, but do not accord the same right to us? You have placed destructive missile weapons, which you have called offensive, in Turkey, literally next to us. How then can recognition of our equal military capabilities be reconciled with such unequal relations between our great states? This is irreconcilable".
This linkage had the potential to undermine any progress towards a mutual compromise agreement. ExComm vehemently opposed the trade-off.
Crisis point (27 October)
The situation deteriorated further on 27 October when news arrived at ExComm that a U-2 spy plane had been shot down over Cuba and the pilot, Major Rudolf Anderson, had been killed. Kennedy and ExComm had already committed themselves to responding to such attacks with US air strikes against Soviet S-75 anti-aircraft emplacements on Cuba. Castro had ordered Cuban anti-aircraft forces to begin firing on low-level reconnaissance planes on 26 October. The crisis appeared to be escalating beyond control.
The Most Dangerous Moment:
The shooting down of Major Rudolf Anderson's U-2 aircraft represented the crisis's most perilous moment. Kennedy had previously stated that any such attack would trigger immediate US military retaliation. The world stood on the brink of nuclear war as ExComm debated how to respond to this escalation.
The diplomatic breakthrough (28 October)
Kennedy's strategy to recover control was to ignore Khrushchev's second letter and simply reply to the first. Kennedy needed to ensure that Khrushchev would accept this response. A meeting was arranged with the Soviet ambassador, Dobrynin, during which Robert Kennedy was authorised to inform Dobrynin that the president was willing to remove the US missiles in Turkey – but not immediately.
The Secret Agreement:
Such a concession could not be incorporated into any formal, public settlement of the crisis. Kennedy recognised the reasonableness of such a trade-off but could not allow the USA's NATO allies to perceive it as a concession to Soviet pressure. NATO was explicitly told that no secret agreement had been reached regarding the Turkey missiles.
The diplomacy succeeded. On Sunday morning, 28 October, Khrushchev agreed to remove the missiles. Kennedy praised Khrushchev's "statesmanlike decision". The immediate crisis was over. Castro was furious at what he perceived as a humiliating betrayal by Khrushchev, who refused to allow inspections of the missile sites once they had been dismantled. Such inspections were an essential element of the US–Soviet agreement and were only fulfilled as Soviet ships removing the missiles revealed the contents of their cargoes to US inspectors at sea.
Understanding the resolution
As late as 26 October, Kennedy maintained his options, stating: "We will get the strategic missiles out of Cuba only by invading Cuba or by trading". Using force to overthrow Castro and remove the missiles remained an available policy option for Kennedy. A military solution was still a genuine possibility for the president. A peaceful resolution was complicated at this stage by Castro's actions, as Kennedy became convinced that an American attack was imminent.
A peaceful resolution was only made possible because the blockade was having negligible impact on the weapons systems already positioned on Cuba. The nuclear threat was real and already in place.
The significance of the crisis
The Cuban Missile Crisis brought the world closer to nuclear war than at any other moment during the Cold War. Despite the critical nature of the situation, there was limited evidence to suggest that either Khrushchev or Kennedy were taking irresponsible actions that could have led to a catastrophic loss of control.
What the crisis demonstrated was that international relations could not be conducted through crisis management methods alone. The crisis was quickly recognised as insufficient to serve as the model for crisis management, and therefore could not be viewed as a template for how any future crises might be managed.
The Moscow-Washington Hot Line:
The immediate institutional response to this reality was the creation in 1963 of a direct communication link between the Kremlin and the White House, commonly known as the hot line. The frequency with which this direct connection was subsequently used remains unclear. Some historians have argued that its symbolic value proved greater than its practical application, representing a commitment to improved communication rather than serving as a frequently utilised channel for crisis resolution.
The crisis also revealed the limitations of brinkmanship. Success required both sides to recognise that any form of military confrontation in a nuclear age would clearly be the least desirable outcome. The crisis had shown that even when both leaders acted with relative caution, events could spiral towards catastrophe through miscalculation, as demonstrated by the shooting down of the U-2 aircraft and Castro's independent actions.
Key Points to Remember:
-
The crisis was discovered on 14 October 1962 when U-2 spy planes photographed R-12 missile sites at San Cristobal, Cuba.
-
ExComm divided between hawks (favouring military action) and doves (favouring diplomacy), with Kennedy ultimately choosing a naval quarantine to buy time for diplomatic solutions.
-
The crisis was resolved on 28 October through secret negotiations involving a linkage deal: Soviet missiles removed from Cuba in exchange for a non-invasion pledge and secret agreement to remove US Jupiter missiles from Turkey.
-
The U-2 incident on 27 October, when Major Rudolf Anderson was shot down and killed, represented the crisis's most dangerous moment and nearly triggered US military retaliation.
-
The crisis led to the establishment of the Moscow-Washington hot line in 1963 and demonstrated both the effectiveness and limitations of brinkmanship as a Cold War strategy.