Relations with China (AQA A-Level History): Revision Notes
Relations with China
The collapse of the Sino-Soviet alliance
The Sino-Soviet alliance, established in 1950, represented global communist unity. However, by 1962 this alliance had collapsed. Between 1958 and 1962, tensions escalated sharply between Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev and Chinese Chairman Mao Zedong. These tensions had both personal and ideological dimensions that would reshape Cold War dynamics.
Mao believed his position as senior communist statesman was not adequately respected by the Soviets. He considered that, as leader of the first communist state, China should lead the communist world rather than the USSR. More fundamentally, Mao accused Khrushchev of revisionism—a disparaging term used against governments or individuals who were seen as deviating from the revolutionary path of socialism, usually towards the adaptation of capitalist policies. This accusation centred particularly on Khrushchev's policy of peaceful coexistence with the West.
The term "revisionism" became a powerful ideological weapon during the Cold War. Communist states used it to delegitimize rivals by accusing them of betraying true socialist principles. For Mao, labeling Khrushchev as a revisionist was not merely an insult—it was a fundamental challenge to Soviet legitimacy as leader of the communist world.
Conflicting actions and policies
The divergence between the two communist powers manifested in concrete policy disagreements throughout the late 1950s and early 1960s.
Khrushchev's approach
The Soviet leader took several actions that antagonised China:
- In 1959, Khrushchev indirectly supported India in its border dispute with China, effectively siding against a fellow communist state.
- In 1960, he withdrew technological aid from China by removing Soviet experts, severely hampering Chinese development programmes.
- He refused to fulfil his agreement to provide China with a prototype atomic bomb, simultaneously undermining China's embryonic nuclear weapons programme.
- In 1962, Khrushchev failed to notify China of his decision to place nuclear missiles on Cuba, demonstrating a lack of consultation between the two powers.
Critical Mistake to Avoid: Students often assume the Sino-Soviet split was purely ideological. However, as these actions demonstrate, the collapse involved very concrete policy failures and breaches of trust—including the withdrawal of technological support and failure to consult on major decisions like the Cuban Missile Crisis.
Mao's response
The Chinese leader adopted an increasingly confrontational stance:
- In 1958, Mao provoked the United States through bombing the Taiwanese-held islands of Quemoy and Matsu, escalating regional tensions without Soviet coordination.
- He criticised Khrushchev for being unwilling to use nuclear weapons against the West, viewing this as weakness.
- He condemned Khrushchev for removing the missiles from Cuba, characterising this as a betrayal of the Cuban revolution.
According to the Chinese perspective, Khrushchev had abandoned the struggle against capitalist imperialism and moved towards peaceful coexistence with the West. By July 1963, talks between China and the USSR broke down completely.
The debate over communist unity
In January 1963, the official newspaper of the Chinese Communist Party, People's Daily, published an editorial addressing tensions within international communism. The newspaper acknowledged that different communist parties might develop "different views among fraternal Parties on one question or another" due to complicated and rapidly changing international circumstances. However, it argued that such differences should be resolved through inter-party consultation based on equality, not through public attacks or propaganda.
Historical Document: The People's Daily Editorial (January 1963)
The editorial emphasised that open attacks between fraternal parties would undermine the unity of the international communist movement. It warned that continuing to make attacks whilst claiming a desire to halt them "is not the attitude an honest communist should take."
Significance: This source reveals Chinese concerns about maintaining communist unity even as relations deteriorated, though it also subtly criticised Soviet behaviour. The emphasis on "equality" was particularly pointed—China was demanding recognition as an equal partner, not a subordinate state.
Brezhnev and the deepening division
When Khrushchev resigned in October 1964, the situation presented an opportunity for improvement. China demanded the return of territory that it claimed the USSR had occupied historically, particularly parts of Siberia. Khrushchev rejected this demand outright.
His successor, Leonid Brezhnev, initially advocated restoring positive relations with China. This was motivated partly by the USA's growing involvement in the Vietnam conflict. Brezhnev believed that the USSR and China needed to settle their differences and support North Vietnam in opposition to US imperialism. A representative was sent to China to meet with Mao, seeking to establish some degree of unity. However, the attempt failed, and relations were further strained by the Malinovsky incident.
The Malinovsky incident
The Malinovsky Incident (Late 1964)
At Sino-Soviet talks held in Moscow in late 1964, Soviet Defence Minister Rodion Malinovsky suggested to a Chinese delegate, Marshal He Long, that the Chinese should remove Mao just as the USSR had removed Khrushchev. The talks immediately collapsed despite Soviet apologies.
Impact: This incident widened the rift between the two sides, demonstrating Soviet contempt for Chinese leadership. The suggestion that China should overthrow its own leader was interpreted as direct interference in Chinese sovereignty and revealed the depth of Soviet disdain for Mao's authority.
The Vietnam War dispute
The Chinese accusation that the USSR was moving towards revisionism was challenged by the Soviet government's new proposals regarding Vietnam. In April 1965, the USSR requested a meeting with both China and North Vietnam to develop a collective response to the USA's escalation of the war in Vietnam. This proposal met with firm resistance from China, and the meeting never took place. Mao wanted North Vietnam to remain dependent on China and did not want to facilitate greater Soviet involvement in the Vietnam War.
The USSR also proposed establishing a Soviet air force base in southern China at Kunming. The purpose was to station twelve MiG-21 fighter planes to protect the Sino-Vietnamese border against possible US aggression. China viewed the proposal as a Soviet military intrusion on its territory. Mao remained obsessed with the idea that the USSR posed a military threat to China and to his regime. He believed the USSR was a revisionist state that had attempted to reconcile its ideological differences with the USA. For Mao, the USSR had become an imperialist state, and Chinese territory formed part of its imperialist targeting.
Strategic Context: The Vietnam War dispute reveals how Cold War proxy conflicts complicated relations between communist powers. Rather than uniting against US imperialism, China and the USSR competed for influence over North Vietnam. Mao's refusal to cooperate demonstrated that China prioritized its own regional dominance over communist solidarity.
The Cultural Revolution and its impact
In 1966, Mao launched the Cultural Revolution as a reaction to what he perceived as a drift away from the ideological purity of the Chinese revolution he had led. The movement was designed to restore ideological correctness and identify ideological deviants. It enabled Mao to strengthen his own power by justifying the elimination of potential political rivals on the grounds that they were revisionists.
The Cultural Revolution, lasting until 1969 (with effects continuing until Mao's death in 1976), involved attacks against anything considered remotely Western, capitalistic, or dynastic. High-ranking communists were purged, anyone in a position of power was removed, and youth in society were empowered. Boys and girls, largely between the ages of 9 and 18, formed what were called the Red Guard. They justified their actions by citing quotations from Chairman Mao, colloquially referred to as the 'Little Red Book'.
The Cultural Revolution's Dual Purpose: While officially about ideological purity, the Cultural Revolution served two crucial functions: (1) it allowed Mao to eliminate domestic political rivals by labeling them as revisionists, and (2) it provided a mechanism to attack the USSR and justify the Sino-Soviet split to the Chinese population. The movement was simultaneously about internal power consolidation and external ideological warfare.
Soviet dimension
The Cultural Revolution had a pronounced anti-Soviet dimension. According to Chinese rhetoric, the USSR was led by revisionists and became a target for ideological attack. Mao used the frenzy displayed by his enthusiastic young followers in the Chinese Red Guard to intimidate the USSR.
The Beijing Embassy Siege (1966-1967)
This was illustrated most dramatically when the Soviet Union's embassy in Beijing was besieged by a Red Guard mob, led by a 16-year-old girl. The mob even threatened to burn the embassy down.
Significance: This incident demonstrated how Mao weaponized youth radicalism against the USSR. The fact that teenage revolutionaries could threaten a foreign embassy with impunity showed both the chaos of the Cultural Revolution and Mao's willingness to use it as a tool of foreign policy intimidation.
This Sino-Soviet split gathered momentum through the Cultural Revolution's anti-Soviet propaganda.
Border disputes and military confrontation
In the face of increasing hostility from China, the USSR decided to station military forces in Mongolia and eastern Kazakhstan in February 1967. Brezhnev summarised Soviet policy towards China at a Party meeting in June 1969: "we assume that the stronger the defence of our borders, the less danger there is of a really serious military confrontation on our eastern frontiers." This build-up of Soviet forces on the Sino-Soviet frontier alarmed the Chinese and reinforced their view that the USSR intended to attack.
China adopted a strategy termed 'active defence', based on limited aggression designed to deter any Soviet initial aggression. This Chinese strategy was activated on 2 March 1969, when a Soviet border patrol near Zhenbao Island in eastern USSR was ambushed by Chinese forces. This incident marked a dangerous escalation from ideological dispute to military confrontation.
Border Confrontations (1969)
March 1969 - Zhenbao Island Incident: A Soviet border patrol near Zhenbao Island in eastern USSR was ambushed by Chinese forces on 2 March 1969. This marked the first major military clash between the two communist powers.
August 1969 - Xinjiang Incident: A second incident occurred along the western frontier region of Xinjiang, demonstrating that tensions extended across the entire Sino-Soviet border.
Outcome: Although talks were held in Beijing in September to reassure both sides that neither country wanted war, Mao remained insecure. The border talks failed to bring about any substantial improvement in Sino-Soviet relations, which remained hostile by 1970.
Turning Point: These armed clashes represented a watershed moment in the Cold War. The possibility of war between two nuclear-armed communist powers alarmed both sides and the international community. Not surprisingly, at this point Mao began to move towards establishing a form of rapport with the USA—demonstrating how the Sino-Soviet split fundamentally reshaped Cold War alignments.
The failure of reconciliation
All efforts to reconcile the Sino-Soviet alliance in the 1970s failed. The shared ideological foundations of the two sides proved to be the underlying reason for their division: there existed a conflict between perceptions of Marxist orthodoxy and revisionism. China would always be the junior partner in the alliance and always resented this. The USSR accepted this as a perfectly acceptable norm and had no regard for China's position.
Deng Xiaoping, who led China between 1978 and 1992, later commented on the split: "It was not because of the ideological disputes; we do not think now that everything we said at that time was right. The basic problem was that the Chinese were not treated as equals and felt humiliated." China wanted to be a global superpower, and the Sino-Soviet alliance was not contributing to that end. The fundamental incompatibility between Chinese aspirations for equal status (or leadership) within world communism and Soviet determination to maintain dominance made the alliance ultimately unsustainable.
Key Points to Remember:
-
The Sino-Soviet alliance collapsed between 1958 and 1962 due to personal rivalry between Khrushchev and Mao, combined with ideological disputes over revisionism and peaceful coexistence.
-
Concrete policy disagreements emerged over India (1959), technology transfer (1960), nuclear weapons, and Cuba (1962), demonstrating the practical breakdown of cooperation.
-
Mao used the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976) to attack the USSR as revisionist, with Red Guards besieging the Soviet embassy in Beijing.
-
Border disputes escalated into military confrontation, with armed clashes at Zhenbao Island (March 1969) and Xinjiang (August 1969), prompting China to seek rapprochement with the USA.
-
The split was fundamentally about power and status within world communism—China refused to remain the junior partner whilst the USSR refused to treat China as an equal.