The Crisis in Czechoslovakia, 1968 (AQA A-Level History): Revision Notes
The Crisis in Czechoslovakia, 1968
Context: Brezhnev's leadership and Eastern Europe
When Leonid Brezhnev became General Secretary of the Communist Party in October 1964, following Nikita Khrushchev's removal, he aimed to stabilise the Soviet Union and its sphere of influence. The Brezhnev regime refers to the period of Soviet leadership characterised by attempts to consolidate power both domestically and internationally, though it became associated with economic stagnation and political corruption. Brezhnev's approach to Eastern Europe differed from his predecessor's more unpredictable style.
Brezhnev believed that material improvements and economic progress would reduce protest and maintain stability across the Eastern Bloc countries. This represented a shift from Khrushchev's more erratic and ideologically driven approach to managing satellite states.
The late 1950s and early 1960s had witnessed various movements for reform across Eastern Europe, particularly in Poland, Hungary and East Germany. The Warsaw Pact, the military alliance binding these countries to the Soviet Union, had helped maintain them as single-party states loyal to Moscow. However, economic difficulties and political repression continued to generate discontent, particularly as the gap in living standards between Eastern and Western Europe became increasingly apparent.
Background: Economic decline in Czechoslovakia
Czechoslovakia had historically been one of the more prosperous members of the Eastern Bloc. However, in 1963 the country recorded negative economic growth for the first time. This downturn prompted many Czechoslovaks to reconsider their relationship with socialism and question the Communist Party's role, which had become a source of inefficiency and corruption. From Moscow's perspective, the Czechoslovak government had been a reliable satellite state that consistently supported Party officials. The prospect of revolt against them created anxiety in the Kremlin.
Calls for economic reform began in the mid-1960s. Professor Ota Sik, an influential Czechoslovak economist, proposed substantial changes to the planned, command economy.
Ota Sik's Revolutionary Proposals
Sik's reform package challenged the fundamental structure of Soviet-style communism. His proposals included:
- Ending centrally planned economic targets for the entire country
- Allowing individual enterprises to operate independently
- Making the Communist Party responsive to public opinion
- Establishing consumer rights
- Granting workers more power (for example, enabling them to replace factory managers)
Most significantly, in 1966, Sik argued that political reform was the only route to economic improvement. This was a direct challenge to the notion that economic problems could be solved within the existing political framework.
His arguments gained support first among intellectuals and students, then spread to the wider public. The Soviet Union recognised that changes in Czechoslovak leadership would be necessary to maintain communist control.
Dubček's appointment and the Prague Spring
In January 1968, Party leader Antonín Novotný was pressured by the USSR to resign. He was replaced by Alexander Dubček, a Slovak Communist Party official whom Brezhnev trusted to manage limited reform whilst stabilising Czechoslovakia. Dubček initially appeared to be a typical Party bureaucrat, and the Soviets hoped his Slovak nationality would appeal to that minority within Czechoslovakia and prevent protest.
Dubček, however, proved to be a charismatic advocate of political reform. Upon his appointment as leader of the Czechoslovak Communist Party, he called for a 'true invigoration and unification of all constructive and progressive forces in our Republic' and stated there must be a 'new start to socialism'. This was not the message Moscow wanted to hear. Dubček quickly began replacing key officials with those who supported reform, though he did not consult the Soviets beforehand. The Kremlin watched developments in Czechoslovakia with growing concern.
The Action Programme
In April 1968, Dubček announced the Action Programme, which outlined the Communist Party's determination to achieve socialism according to a distinct Czechoslovak path. The programme required allowing several freedoms and rights that did not exist elsewhere in the Eastern Bloc:
- Basic freedoms of speech, press and movement, including permission to travel to Western countries
- Formal recognition of the state of Israel
- Freedom for economic enterprises to make decisions based on consumer demand rather than government targets
- Increased rights of autonomy for the politically repressed Slovak minority
The Communist Party would retain its 'leading role' but would acknowledge the legitimacy of non-party institutions such as trade unions. New associations emerged, including the Club of Non-Committed Party Members (KAN) and Club K-231 (an organisation composed of former political prisoners). To reassure Moscow, Dubček affirmed that Czechoslovakia would remain loyal to the Warsaw Pact.
The Action Programme also called for shifting economic priorities away from heavy industry towards consumer goods.
This period of political liberalisation became known as the Prague Spring, both because of the timing of the reforms and the sense of renewal and hope they generated in Czechoslovakia. The recognition of civil liberties and personal freedom was particularly striking, as these were characteristics of non-communist states rather than socialist systems.
Escalating reforms and Soviet concerns
Most countries in Eastern Europe viewed these developments with alarm, but the Soviets initially watched Czechoslovakia with interest to observe how far the reforms would proceed. When no clear opposition to the Action Programme emerged within the Czechoslovak Communist Party, reformers pushed even further. They ended all press censorship, planned to open borders with the West, and began discussions regarding a trade agreement with West Germany.
The Threat of 'Democratic Infection'
Dubček's actions coincided with growing student discontent in Poland, where the phrase 'Poland awaits her own Dubček' circulated. Hardline communists across Eastern Europe, such as Eric Honnecker in East Germany and János Kádár in Hungary, feared that Eastern Europe was being exposed to the possibility of 'democratic infection'.
This represented a fundamental challenge to Soviet control: if reform succeeded in Czechoslovakia, it could inspire similar movements throughout the Warsaw Pact countries.
Throughout these developments, Dubček and his supporters maintained that Czechoslovakia remained a loyal member of the socialist order and only wanted to implement liberalisation within the existing Communist Party framework. However, the reforms appeared to undermine the fundamental principles of Soviet-style communism.
The Soviet invasion
To intimidate Dubček, the Warsaw Pact countries conducted military exercises in Czechoslovakia in late June 1968. On 14-15 July, a meeting of the leaders of the USSR, Bulgaria, East Germany, Hungary and Poland took place. They expressed their concerns about Czechoslovakia's reforms.
In the subsequent Warsaw Letter sent to Czechoslovak officials, they acknowledged Czechoslovakia's right to internal self-determination but argued that challenges to socialism within one country posed a threat to the entire socialist movement. Such challenges could not be tolerated as they might lead to a split in socialist unity, both internally and externally.
At the end of July, Brezhnev and Dubček held the last of six meetings regarding the situation. The Soviets were attempting to provoke a split within the Czechoslovak Communist Party, hoping that a pro-Soviet group would emerge and request Warsaw Pact military assistance to maintain order. This scenario did not materialise. Instead, Brezhnev pressured Dubček to repeal the reforms. Despite promises to do so, Dubček continued with his liberalising path. On 20-21 August 1968, Dubček was taken completely by surprise when Warsaw Pact forces invaded Czechoslovakia.
The Czechoslovak Response to Invasion
The invasion resulted in approximately 100 Czechoslovaks and Slovaks being killed and 500 wounded. On 21 August 1968, the Czechoslovak Communist Party Presidium issued a six-point statement demonstrating principled resistance:
The deputies of the National Assembly unanimously protested against the occupation by the five Warsaw Pact countries, describing it as:
- A violation of international law
- A violation of the provisions of the Warsaw Treaty
- A violation of the principles of equal relations among nations
They categorically demanded the immediate withdrawal of the armies and full respect for Czechoslovakia's sovereignty. The statement also called on the population not to commit violent actions against the occupation forces or allow themselves to be provoked by those seeking justification for the intervention.
International response and consequences
The Warsaw Pact invasion faced minimal international action. The loudest complaints came from within the communist camp itself, with some protests in China and Romania. NATO did not feel threatened by the invasion and took no action. However, the undeniable reality was that the USSR had violated the sovereignty and integrity of Czechoslovakia. The invasion appeared to eliminate any possibility that meaningful change could be achieved through party-led reform in the Eastern Bloc.
The Brezhnev Doctrine
In November 1968, Brezhnev delivered a speech to the Polish Party Congress justifying the action in Czechoslovakia and outlining the rationale for future Soviet interventions. This became known as the Brezhnev Doctrine.
The Doctrine of Limited Sovereignty
Brezhnev argued that whilst the peoples of socialist countries should have freedom to determine their own paths of development, none of their decisions should damage socialism in their own country or harm the interests of other socialist countries and the entire working class movement.
He asserted that each Communist Party was responsible not only to its own people but also to all socialist countries and the entire communist movement. Drawing on Lenin, he stated that the sovereignty of each socialist country could not be opposed to the interests of 'the world of socialism, of the world revolutionary movement'. Communist parties must fight against 'narrow-mindedness, seclusion and isolation' and subordinate the particular to the general interest.
With this statement, Brezhnev expanded the responsibility of communist states to intervene to protect the perceived good of the whole communist community. He also defined what deviation from communism would lead to, establishing a doctrine of limited sovereignty for socialist states.
Aftermath and long-term impact
Despite the Brezhnev Doctrine and the military occupation, thousands of Czechoslovaks continued to demonstrate on the streets of Prague in late 1968. The Soviets struggled to find members of the Czechoslovak Communist Party willing to assume control of the regime. Consequently, Dubček remained in power until April 1969. The new government was eventually led by Gustáv Husák, who conformed to the Soviet line.
Husák's regime remained in power until the collapse of communism in 1989, dependent on a continued Soviet military presence to maintain control. The Red Army remained stationed in Czechoslovakia until 1990, a stark reminder of the price paid for attempting reform.
The invasion had lasting effects on the international communist movement. It demonstrated the limits of reform within the Soviet sphere and reinforced the USSR's determination to maintain control over Eastern Europe through force if necessary. The episode also influenced Western perceptions of Soviet intentions and contributed to ongoing tensions during the Cold War.
Key figure: Alexander Dubček (1921-92)
Alexander Dubček was initially trusted by Brezhnev to manage limited reform and stabilise Czechoslovakia when he replaced Antonín Novotný as leader in January 1968. He was a Slovak, which the Soviets believed would help him appeal to that minority group and prevent protest. However, Dubček failed to fulfil Brezhnev's expectations. Instead of implementing carefully controlled reforms, he became a charismatic advocate for substantial political change.
He was removed from office in April 1969 following the Soviet invasion and the installation of Gustáv Husák's government. Dubček's political stance is perhaps best defined by his later recognition: he was awarded the Sakharov Prize for Freedom of Thought by the European Parliament in 1989, shortly before the collapse of communist rule in Czechoslovakia.
Key Points to Remember:
-
Brezhnev's leadership from 1964 aimed to stabilise the USSR and Eastern Europe through economic progress rather than Khrushchev's unpredictable approach.
-
Dubček's Action Programme (April 1968) introduced unprecedented freedoms in a Warsaw Pact country, including press freedom, travel rights, and recognition of non-party institutions.
-
The Prague Spring represented an attempt to create 'socialism with a human face', combining communist economics with civil liberties and political reform.
-
The Soviet invasion of 20-21 August 1968 involved approximately 100 deaths and 500 injuries, demonstrating Moscow's willingness to use force to maintain control over Eastern Europe.
-
The Brezhnev Doctrine (November 1968) established that socialist countries had limited sovereignty and that the USSR could intervene to protect the wider communist movement, setting a precedent that would influence Soviet foreign policy until the late 1980s.