Selman's Levels of Perspective-taking (AQA A-Level Psychology): Revision Notes
Selman's Levels of Perspective-taking
Introduction
Social cognition refers to the mental processes we use when engaged in social interaction. We make decisions about how to behave based on our understanding of social situations, and both this understanding and decision-making involve cognitive processes.
Perspective-taking is our ability to appreciate a social situation from another person's point of view. This cognitive ability forms the foundation of much of our normal social interaction.
Robert Selman studied how perspective-taking develops in children and its role in prosocial reasoning. Unlike Piaget, who believed perspective-taking developed alongside other cognitive abilities, Selman proposed that social perspective-taking is a separate, domain-specific process.
Key Theoretical Difference
Selman's approach differed significantly from Piaget's theory. While Piaget viewed perspective-taking as developing alongside general cognitive abilities, Selman argued that social perspective-taking is a domain-specific process that develops independently of other cognitive skills.
Selman's research study
Background and procedure
Selman (1971) investigated age-related changes in children's responses to scenarios where they had to take different people's roles in social situations.
Research Design: The Holly Dilemma
Participants: 60 children (30 boys, 30 girls) - 20 four-year-olds, 20 five-year-olds, and 20 six-year-olds
Procedure: Each child was individually given a task measuring role-taking ability. One scenario featured Holly, a child who promised her father she would no longer climb trees, but then came across her friend whose kitten was stuck up a tree. Children were asked to describe and explain how each person would feel if Holly did or did not climb the tree to rescue the kitten.
Findings
Selman's research revealed clear developmental patterns in children's responses to social dilemmas.
Key Research Findings
Selman identified several distinct levels of role-taking that correlated with age, suggesting a clear developmental sequence. This led him to propose five stages of social cognitive development, each representing increasingly sophisticated perspective-taking abilities.
The five stages of perspective-taking development
Based on children's typical responses at different ages, Selman (1976) identified five stages that show how perspective-taking abilities develop systematically:
Stage 0 (3-6 years): Socially egocentric
Children at this stage struggle to differentiate reliably between their own emotions and those of others. They can generally identify emotional states in other people but do not understand what social behaviour might have caused these emotions.
Stage 1 (6-8 years): Social information role-taking
Children can now distinguish between their own viewpoint and that of others, but they usually focus on only one person's perspective at a time rather than considering multiple viewpoints simultaneously.
Stage 2 (8-10 years): Self-reflective role-taking
At this stage, children can put themselves in another person's position and fully appreciate their perspective. However, they can only consider one point of view at a time.
Stage 3 (10-12 years): Mutual role-taking
Children become able to look at a situation from their own and another person's point of view simultaneously.
Stage 4 (12+ years): Social and conventional system role-taking
Young people develop the understanding that sometimes knowing others' viewpoints is not enough to allow people to reach agreement. They recognise why social conventions are needed to maintain social order.
Developmental Progression
Selman believed that progression through these stages depends on both maturity and experience. This suggests that while cognitive development is important, social experiences also play a crucial role in developing perspective-taking abilities.
Later developments to Selman's theory
Selman recognised that his original descriptions of cognitive reasoning did not fully explain social development. As his understanding evolved, he expanded his theory to include additional components.
Schultz, Selman and La Russo (2003) identified three additional aspects to social development:
1. Interpersonal understanding
This is what Selman measured in his earlier role-taking research. If we can take different roles, this demonstrates our ability to understand social situations.
2. Interpersonal negotiation strategies
Beyond understanding what others think in social situations, we must develop skills for how to respond to them. This helps us develop social skills such as asserting our position and managing conflict.
3. Awareness of personal meaning of relationships
Social development also requires the ability to reflect on social behaviour within the context of life history and the full range of relationships. For example, a violent gang member may have advanced social understanding and good social skills, but choose a simple approach to conflict (violence) because of their role in the gang.
Evaluation
The evaluation of Selman's theory reveals both strengths and limitations, with research providing mixed support for different aspects of his approach.
Evidence that perspective-taking improves with age
Strong Research Support for Age-Related Development
Selman provided solid evidence that perspective-taking ability improves with age, supporting his theory. In one study, Selman (1971) gave perspective-taking tasks to 60 children aged 4-6 years, finding positive correlations between age and ability to take different perspectives in scenarios like Holly and the kitten.
Longitudinal follow-up studies (e.g., Gurucharri and Selman 1982) have shown that perspective-taking develops with age in individual children. This demonstrates that his earlier cross-sectional research was not simply the result of individual differences in social-cognitive ability between different age groups.
This strengthens Selman's ideas as they are based on solid research and supported by multiple studies.
Mixed evidence for the importance of perspective-taking
Strong evidence supports Selman's idea that children's ability to take others' perspectives develops throughout childhood. However, evidence is more mixed regarding how important this cognitive ability is for understanding children's social development.
Supporting Evidence: Prosocial Behaviour
Moniek Buijzen and Patti Valkenburg (2008) observed child-parent interaction in toyshops and supermarkets, finding a negative correlation between age, perspective-taking and coercive behaviour (trying to force parents to buy things). This suggests that perspective-taking is important in developing prosocial behaviour as alternatives to coercion.
However, contradictory evidence challenges this relationship.
Challenging Evidence: Bullying Research
Luciano Gasser and Monika Keller (2009) found that bullies displayed no difficulties in perspective-taking. This creates problems for Selman's approach as it suggests perspective-taking may not be an important factor in the development of socially desirable behaviour.
Applications in understanding atypical development
The development of perspective-taking ability appears important in atypical development, providing practical applications for Selman's theory.
Practical Applications in Atypical Development
Research has shown that children with ADHD and those on the autism spectrum have problems with perspective-taking.
Marton et al. (2009) compared 50 8-12-year-old children with ADHD diagnosis with a control group on performance in perspective-taking tasks like those used by Selman. Those with ADHD performed worse at understanding the scenarios, identifying the feelings of each person involved and evaluating the consequences of different actions.
This strengthens Selman's work because it shows it is helpful in understanding atypical development.
Limitations: Overly cognitive approach
Major Theoretical Limitation
A limitation of Selman's approach is that it focuses entirely on cognitive understanding. Perspective-taking is a cognitive ability, but there is more to children's social development than their developing cognitive abilities.
Selman's approach does not account for other factors that impact a child's social development. Internal factors include the development of empathy and emotional self-regulation, whilst external factors include family climate and opportunities to learn from peer interaction.
Cultural differences in perspective-taking
Selman's methods have allowed researchers to compare different groups on their perspective-taking ability, but this has revealed important limitations.
Cross-Cultural Research Findings
Shali Wu and Boaz Keysar (2007) found that young adult Chinese participants performed better in perspective-taking than matched Americans.
This shows there is more to perspective-taking development than just cognitive maturity because the differences must be due to different cultural inputs.
Theoretical Challenge: Cultural Bias
This poses a problem for Selman's approach because his theory is derived from a Western perspective, and his research used mainly Western participants, so it may be inappropriate to generalise his findings to other cultures.
Summary
Key Points to Remember:
-
Social cognition involves the mental processes we use in social interaction, including understanding situations and making behavioural decisions.
-
Selman identified five stages of perspective-taking development from ages 3-12+, progressing from egocentric thinking to understanding complex social systems.
-
Strong research support exists for age-related improvements in perspective-taking, confirmed by both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies.
-
Mixed evidence exists for how important perspective-taking is in social development - it may help prosocial behaviour but doesn't prevent antisocial behaviour like bullying.
-
The theory has practical applications in understanding atypical development, particularly in ADHD and autism spectrum conditions, but may be overly cognitive and not account for cultural differences.