Concepts of Culture (AQA A-Level Sociology): Revision Notes
Different Perspectives on Culture
Understanding culture requires examining it through various theoretical lenses, each offering unique insights into how culture operates in society. A central debate running through these perspectives concerns agency versus structure - whether individuals have the power to shape culture and society, or whether social structures and cultural forces primarily determine human behaviour.
The agency versus structure debate is fundamental to understanding cultural theory. Agency refers to free will and the capacity to make independent choices about cultural participation, while structure refers to the social forces and institutions that shape and constrain human behaviour.
The concept of agency refers to free will and the capacity to make independent choices about cultural participation. This connects to reflexivity - our ability as humans to think critically about ourselves and our surroundings. While culture provides frameworks for action, we maintain responsibility for our choices through our agency.
Functionalist perspective (consensus theory)
Functionalists examine culture primarily through the lens of social order and stability. They emphasise how shared consensus around core values helps regulate social behaviour and ensures orderly social change. According to Émile Durkheim, culture serves as the binding force that connects individuals to broader social groups through socialisation.
From this viewpoint, culture performs essential functions for society by establishing and maintaining social order. The emphasis lies on how common cultural understandings create social cohesion and prevent chaos.
Criticisms: Interactionist sociologists argue that functionalists treat humans as passive recipients of culture, overlooking individuals' active role in creating and modifying culture through meaningful social interaction.
Marxist perspective (conflict theory)
Karl Marx introduced the concept of commodification of culture under capitalism, where cultural products become valued for their monetary worth rather than their intrinsic meaning or enjoyment. Marx argued that when societies become overly focused on purchasing cultural goods, people begin to worship material possessions and their associated status symbols, manipulated through advertising and media.
According to Marx, culture represents ruling-class ideology that dominant groups produce to justify and maintain their power over subordinate classes. Culture functions as a constraint on individuals, creating social order that benefits those in power. This dominant culture (reflecting capitalist values rather than genuine consensus) socialises people into accepting existing power structures.
Criticisms: Critics suggest Marxists oversimplify society into two opposing groups and underestimate individual agency in cultural creation and resistance.
Neo-Marxist perspective
Neo-Marxist theory shifts focus from economic foundations to superstructure issues of ideology and culture, particularly examining mass media's influence in preventing social change. Antonio Gramsci developed the concept of hegemony - the process by which dominant groups secure leadership through cultural and ideological means rather than just economic control.
Gramsci's concept of hegemony is crucial for understanding how power operates in modern society. Unlike direct coercion, hegemony works through cultural and ideological influence, making dominant ideas appear as "common sense" rather than the interests of a particular group.
Gramsci argued that working-class intellectuals and organisations should counter capitalist ideas with alternative perspectives. He identified ongoing cultural struggles within institutions where dominant classes attempt to establish their viewpoints as common sense, while subordinate classes may resist these influences.
Contemporary application: In Western societies, internet access has become culturally essential. Multinational corporations use media to spread their messages, with companies like Nike adopting recognisable symbols to achieve instant product recognition. Consumer culture spreads through these mechanisms.
Interactionist perspective (symbolic interactionism)
Interactionists view culture as maintained through interaction based on communication of signs and symbols. Meaning develops symbolically through ongoing social interaction processes. They conceptualise identity as emerging from continuous interaction between self and culture.
George Herbert Mead distinguished between two aspects of the self: the 'I' (active, decision-making aspect) and the 'me' (socialised aspect). This framework suggests humans possess agency to think and act while being shaped by social structures.
Max Weber portrayed individuals as social actors who actively seek meaning and self-development. Therefore, people need not be viewed as passive products of their culture; instead, they possess consciousness and can critically evaluate the cultures they encounter, potentially accepting or rejecting various cultural elements. For instance, someone raised in a Christian environment might choose to convert to Islam.
Feminist perspective
Feminist theories share the view that culture has been instrumental in women's subordination to male interests. Sue Sharpe demonstrated how differences in childhood socialisation create masculine and feminine cultural identities. Secondary socialisation agents, including media and peer groups, reinforce gender identities established during primary family socialisation.
Many teenage magazines targeting female audiences promote ideologies emphasising beauty, marriage, domesticity and subordination. These messages strengthen femininity concepts that families instil in female members. This gendered socialisation explains why females have traditionally gravitated towards subjects like home economics and arts (perceived as feminine) rather than technology and science (packaged in masculine ways).
Ann Oakley's research in Sex, Gender and Society (1972) revealed that girls receive different treatment from boys from birth. Fiona Norman's studies showed girls are expected to play with particular toys that develop different aptitudes, potentially influencing children's future aspirations.
Gender socialisation begins from birth and continues throughout life, with different expectations and treatments for boys and girls that can significantly impact their future opportunities and life choices.
Sex role theorists like Byrne (1978) argued that discrimination cycles begin with parents and continue through teachers reinforcing sex stereotypes, which become foundations for discriminatory practices.
Postmodernist perspective
Structuralist approaches typically present identity as singular and relatively fixed, assuming one predominant identity dominates a person's experience. However, postmodernists emphasise that individuals can possess multiple identities - someone can simultaneously be a mother, daughter, student, footballer and cook, acting and feeling differently in each role.
Postmodernists view identities as less fixed or structured, instead being fluid and open to change. People experience various cultural flows through media exposure. Angela McRobbie uses the phrase "no real me" to indicate that individuals lack one essential identity in postmodern society.
Structuralist theories often categorise people as working class or middle class, treating other life aspects as secondary to this identity. Postmodernists challenge this view, arguing for recognition of identity complexity and fluidity.
Contemporary case study: Consumer culture and social unrest
Case Study: The 2011 English Riots and Consumer Culture
The 2011 English riots provide insight into how consumer culture operates in contemporary society. David Moxon (2011) analysed these events as manifestations of increasingly consumerist social orientation. The riots demonstrated conformity to consumer culture values rather than rejection of them.
Key observations:
- Looting behaviour targeted electrical stores, sports shops, and clothing retailers
- Participants took mundane items like bottled water and doughnuts
- Others posed for photographs with stolen televisions and trainers
- This behaviour reflected consumer culture's central role in modern social identity and status
Analysis: The riots represented both disruption to social order and demonstration of consumer culture's strength and vitality in contemporary British society.
Key Points to Remember:
-
Agency versus structure remains a central debate - do individuals shape culture or does culture shape individuals?
-
Functionalists see culture as creating social consensus and order through shared values
-
Marxists view culture as a tool used by dominant groups to maintain power and control over subordinate classes
-
Neo-Marxists focus on hegemony and how dominant groups maintain control through cultural and ideological means
-
Interactionists emphasise how culture emerges through meaningful social interaction and symbolic communication
-
Feminists focus on how culture perpetuates gender inequalities through differential socialisation processes
-
Postmodernists argue that identities are multiple and fluid rather than fixed, challenging traditional structural approaches