Defining Mental Illness (AQA A-Level Sociology): Revision Notes
Defining Mental Illness
Understanding the complexity of mental illness definition
Defining mental illness presents challenges because it involves understanding behaviour in relation to what society considers 'normal'. Two main approaches exist: the biomedical approach and the social constructionist approach. These perspectives offer contrasting views on whether mental illness is a genuine medical condition or a social label.
Mental illness affects approximately one in four people annually, making it more common than many realise. However, only 25% of those experiencing mental health problems receive treatment, highlighting significant gaps in healthcare provision.
This disparity between prevalence and treatment access represents one of the most significant challenges in modern healthcare, suggesting that mental health stigma and resource allocation continue to create barriers to care.
The biomedical approach to mental illness
Classification systems
The biomedical model categorises mental illness into two primary groups:
- Psychoses: Mental states involving distorted perception of reality (e.g., schizophrenia, bipolar disorder)
- Neuroses: Mental states without distorted reality perception (e.g., depression, anxiety disorders)
Medical model characteristics
This approach treats mental illness as a medical condition with several key features:
Core Principles of the Medical Model
The biomedical approach applies the same systematic methodology used in physical medicine to mental health conditions, emphasising scientific objectivity and evidence-based treatment.
- Objective diagnosis based on observable symptoms
- Biological causes linked to brain chemistry (such as serotonin imbalances in depression)
- Environmental factors including childhood experiences and family relationships
- Treatment through medical interventions
Treatment methods
The biomedical approach employs various treatment strategies:
- Drug therapy: Medication to address chemical imbalances
- Psychotherapy: Talking therapies to address psychological factors
- Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT): Electrical stimulation of the brain
- Psychosurgery: Surgical interventions in severe cases
Research Study: Rosenhan Study (1973)
Aim: To test the diagnostic accuracy of psychiatric professionals
Participants: Eight pseudo-patients (including Rosenhan himself)
Procedure: Pseudo-patients presented themselves at psychiatric hospitals claiming to hear voices, then acted normally once admitted
Findings: Seven out of eight were diagnosed with schizophrenia despite exhibiting no abnormal behaviour after admission. Hospital staff maintained their diagnoses even upon discharge, whilst ward patients often recognised the deception
Evaluation - Strengths:
- Highlighted potential diagnostic errors in psychiatric practice
- Demonstrated the influence of contextual bias in medical settings
- Raised important questions about psychiatric expertise
Evaluation - Weaknesses:
- Ethically questionable methodology
- Used deception which may not reflect genuine diagnostic situations
- Sample size was relatively small
- Critics argue it doesn't account for advances in diagnostic technology
Mental illness as a social construction
Questioning the concept
During the 1960s, sociologists began challenging the existence of mental illness as a genuine medical condition. Key figures included:
Thomas Szasz (1961) and Thomas Scheff (1966) argued that mental illness represents a label applied to disturbing or threatening behaviour rather than a genuine medical condition. They suggested mental illness provides a convenient method for resolving social problems whilst scapegoating individuals.
Labelling theory
Social constructionists emphasise how labelling creates mental illness rather than identifying it. This perspective highlights:
- Mental illness as behaviour that deviates from social norms
- The power dynamics involved in psychiatric diagnosis
- How labels can become self-fulfilling prophecies
Power and social class
Critical Concern: Diagnostic Bias
Szasz and Scheff noted that psychiatrists, typically white, male, and middle-class, hold significant power to label and judge others' behaviour as abnormal. This raises questions about whether higher rates of mental illness diagnoses among ethnic minorities, women, and working-class individuals reflect genuine medical conditions or social prejudice.
Marxist critique
Marxist sociologists criticise social constructionist approaches for ignoring structural inequalities. They argue that capitalism's effects - poverty, alienation, and unemployment - directly contribute to poor mental health, making mental illness a genuine consequence of social conditions rather than merely a label.
Historical perspectives
Michel Foucault (1971) traced modern concepts of mental illness to the 18th-century Enlightenment period. He argued that the emphasis on rationality required its opposite - irrationality - leading to asylums being used to isolate 'irrational' individuals from society whilst subjecting them to 'rational' treatments.
Contemporary challenges
Diagnostic advances
Modern diagnostic technology, including brain scans, can identify neurological abnormalities that may explain dysfunctional behaviour. Walter Gove (1982) challenged social constructionist views by arguing that most people receiving mental health treatment have genuine psychological problems.
Healthcare funding disparities
Despite mental illness comprising nearly half of all health problems for people under 65 in Britain and representing 23% of total disease burden, mental health receives only 13% of NHS expenditure. This disparity demonstrates ongoing stigmatisation of mental health conditions.
Media influence
Media Impact on Mental Health
Contemporary research highlights how media representations affect mental health. The Royal College of Psychiatrists has criticised media promotion of unrealistic body images, linking globalisation and Western media exposure to increased eating disorder rates in developing countries.
Current trends
Recent data shows increasing mental health problems among UK academics, attributed to:
- Job insecurity pressures
- Constant demand for high performance
- Market-driven educational environments
- Long working hours and heavy workloads
Studies indicate nearly half of academics display symptoms of psychological distress, with reported problems including depression, sleep difficulties, eating disorders, alcoholism, self-harm, and suicidal ideation.
Key Points to Remember:
-
Mental illness can be understood through biomedical approaches (focusing on biological causes and medical treatments) or social constructionist approaches (emphasising labelling and social factors)
-
The biomedical model distinguishes between psychoses (distorted reality perception) and neuroses (no reality distortion), offering medical treatments like drug therapy and psychotherapy
-
Social constructionists like Szasz and Scheff argue mental illness is a label applied to socially unacceptable behaviour rather than genuine medical conditions
-
Power dynamics affect mental health diagnoses, with concerns about higher rates among marginalised groups potentially reflecting social prejudice rather than actual illness prevalence
-
Modern challenges include healthcare funding disparities, media influence on conditions like eating disorders, and rising mental health problems in high-pressure environments like academia