Sociology and Social Policy (AQA A-Level Sociology): Revision Notes
Sociology and Social Policy
Defining social problems and sociological problems
Understanding the relationship between sociology and social policy begins with distinguishing between different types of problems that concern sociologists and policymakers.
Social problems are patterns of social behaviour, such as juvenile delinquency, that cause public and private suffering and require a collective response from society. These issues demand intervention through social policies and programmes.
Sociological problems are any patterns of behaviour that require explanation and understanding, regardless of whether they cause harm. These could include social problems but also include 'normal' behaviours like law-abiding conduct that sociologists seek to explain.
Social policies are government initiatives designed to address social problems, including issues like educational underachievement and crime. These policies have been shaped by sociological perspectives and research in various ways throughout history.
The distinction between social and sociological problems is crucial for understanding how sociology contributes to policy development. While social problems require immediate intervention, sociological problems focus on understanding human behaviour in all its forms.
How sociological perspectives influence social policy
Positivist and functionalist approaches
Positivist sociologists like Comte and Durkheim believed that sociological research could play a vital role in addressing social problems and improving society through rational, scientific understanding. This approach aligns with the Enlightenment belief in progress through knowledge.
Functionalists support this view, arguing that sociologists should provide governments with objective research findings based on scientific methodology. They contend that this research, such as studies on educational achievement, can inform social policies that benefit society as a whole. This perspective sees sociology as a tool for social improvement through evidence-based policymaking.
The positivist approach assumes that sociology can be truly objective and value-free, a view that has been challenged by other sociological perspectives who argue that all research is influenced by the researcher's values and social position.
Social democratic perspective
The social democratic viewpoint had considerable influence on the development of the welfare state following the Second World War. This perspective advocates for state intervention to redistribute wealth and income, arguing that the government should take an active role in addressing social inequalities.
Research Impact: Townsend's Poverty Study
Townsend's research "Poverty in the United Kingdom" (1979) provided evidence for government policy changes. His work demonstrated inadequacies in the benefits system and led to recommendations for reform, showing how sociological research can directly inform policy development.
Social democrats believe the state should redistribute resources to ensure a fairer society, with social policy serving as a mechanism for reducing inequality and providing support for those in need.
New Right perspective
The New Right approach takes a contrasting view, arguing that state intervention should be minimal and that social policy can actually create social problems rather than solve them. This perspective gained influence during the 1980s and beyond.
New Right theorists argue that excessive welfare provision creates a dependency culture, where individuals become reliant on state support rather than taking personal responsibility. Researchers like Marsland influenced Conservative governments to reduce welfare provision, arguing that generous benefits discourage self-reliance and work motivation.
The New Right perspective directly challenges social democratic assumptions about the role of the state, arguing that well-intentioned policies can have unintended negative consequences by reducing individual motivation and responsibility.
This perspective sees many social policies as counterproductive, creating the very problems they aim to solve through fostering dependency and reducing individual initiative.
Feminist perspectives on social policy
Feminist theory has influenced various government policies addressing gender inequality, though different feminist approaches have varying views on the effectiveness of these interventions.
Liberal feminists view policies like the GIST (Girls into Science and Technology) project and Equal Pay Act as positive steps that have improved women's status in society. They see gradual reform through policy change as an effective way to address gender inequalities.
Radical feminists are more sceptical, arguing that such policies have had limited impact. They contend that until patriarchal structures are fundamentally challenged, inequalities like the gender pay gap will persist regardless of policy interventions.
Marxist feminists are critical of many social policies, arguing that they oppress women by undervaluing their labour both in the workplace and the home. They see social policy as serving capitalist interests rather than genuinely addressing women's liberation.
The diversity of feminist perspectives demonstrates that there is no single 'feminist' view on social policy. Each approach offers different insights into how gender inequality can be addressed through policy interventions.
Marxist perspectives on social policy
Many Marxists are highly critical of government social policies, arguing that they serve to maintain the capitalist system rather than address fundamental inequalities. From this perspective, social policies can be used by the capitalist class to manage and justify inequality.
For example, Marxists argue that minimum wage legislation legitimises exploitation in the labour market by giving the impression that government is protecting workers' interests, while actually maintaining low pay structures that benefit employers.
However, some Marxists acknowledge that certain social policies have benefited the working class. They see the role of sociological research as highlighting the inequalities of capitalism rather than simply informing policy development within the existing system.
Factors limiting sociological influence on policy
Despite the potential for sociological research to inform policy, several factors may prevent this influence from being realised.
Governments may choose not to use research findings for various reasons, particularly if the research is costly to implement or contradicts their political standpoint or electoral popularity. Political priorities often override research evidence when policy decisions are made.
Government social policies are also influenced by pressure groups such as the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) and international bodies like the EU, which may have different interests from those suggested by sociological research.
Additionally, researchers' own career interests may influence their choice of study topics, potentially selecting popular or fundable areas rather than those most needed for policy development.
The gap between sociological research and policy implementation highlights that policy-making is ultimately a political process, not just a scientific one. Evidence is just one factor among many that influence government decisions.
Key Points to Remember:
-
Social problems require collective responses, while sociological problems require explanation - both can inform policy development
-
Positivists and functionalists see sociology as providing objective evidence for policy, while New Right theorists prefer minimal state intervention
-
Social democrats support welfare state expansion and redistribution, contrasting with New Right emphasis on individual responsibility
-
Feminist perspectives vary from optimistic (liberal) to highly critical (radical and Marxist) regarding policy effectiveness in addressing gender inequality
-
Marxists view social policy as maintaining capitalism rather than addressing fundamental inequalities, though some policies may benefit workers