Meritocracy (AQA A-Level Sociology): Revision Notes
Meritocracy
What is meritocracy?
Meritocracy refers to a social system where positions, rewards and opportunities are distributed based on individual talent, effort and achievement rather than inherited advantages or social connections. In a truly meritocratic society, people would succeed or fail based purely on their abilities and hard work.
The debate around whether the UK operates as a meritocracy is central to understanding social inequality and the organisation of labour. This question requires examining both theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence about social mobility and opportunity structures.
Meritocracy and social mobility
Social mobility is the movement of individuals or groups up or down the social class structure between generations or within their lifetime. It serves as a key indicator of how meritocratic a society truly is.
In a genuinely open society, social mobility would be high, with individuals able to move freely between social positions based on their efforts and abilities. However, if society is 'closed' to mobility, people tend to remain in the same social class position as their parents, reproducing inequalities across generations.
As industrial societies developed under capitalism, the division of labour became increasingly complex and hierarchical. Modern workplaces feature distinct layers of status and material rewards, creating a stratified system that requires justification.
Sociological perspectives on meritocracy
Functionalist and neo-liberal view
Functionalists and neo-liberals support meritocracy as both fair and functional. They argue that:
- Inequality motivates people to work harder and develop their talents
- Competition drives individuals to acquire qualifications and demonstrate previously hidden abilities
- The system rewards merit, making society more efficient overall
- Those who succeed deserve their position because they have earned it through effort
Marxist and feminist critique
Marxist and feminist scholars challenge the meritocracy ideal by highlighting structural barriers:
- The wealthy are born into privilege, gaining automatic advantages throughout life
- Working-class individuals and women face systematic oppression and disadvantage from birth
- Cultural capital and social connections matter more than pure ability
- The system reproduces existing power structures rather than rewarding merit
Postmodernist perspective
Postmodernists argue that traditional class distinctions have become blurred in contemporary society:
- The boundary between blue-collar (manual) and white-collar (professional/clerical) work has become less clear
- Some skilled manual workers now earn more than traditional professionals like teachers
- Class categories are less predictive of life outcomes than previously assumed
Evidence against UK meritocracy
Despite meritocratic ideals, substantial evidence suggests the UK is not truly meritocratic:
Inherited disadvantage
Those born into poverty face multiple cumulative disadvantages that undermine meritocratic principles, making success based purely on individual merit extremely difficult to achieve.
These disadvantages include:
- Inadequate housing and family instability
- Poor quality schooling and limited educational resources
- Higher health risks and reduced life chances
- Limited social networks and cultural capital
Limited social mobility
While 'rags to riches' examples exist (such as Alan Sugar, David Beckham and Katie Price), these represent exceptional cases rather than typical patterns. Most people born into disadvantaged circumstances remain disadvantaged throughout their lives.
Elite reproduction
The wealthy maintain their position through:
- Access to private education providing superior opportunities
- Social networks that open doors to prestigious careers
- Cultural knowledge and confidence that advantage them in elite settings
- Glass ceiling effects that limit advancement for women and ethnic minorities
Key sociological theories
Max Weber on skills and rewards
Max Weber viewed individual skills and market value as the primary determinant of workplace rewards. He identified how the middle class encompassed professional and managerial workers alongside small business owners, while the working class consisted mainly of manual workers in manufacturing and service industries.
New international division of labour
Frobel et al (1981) developed the concept of new international division of labour to explain how globalisation has transformed work patterns. Transnational corporations now seek the cheapest labour globally, leading to job outsourcing and increased competition between workers across different countries.
Secondary labour market
Michael J. Priore (1995) identified the emergence of a secondary labour market characterised by:
- Low wages and poor working conditions
- Limited job security and few promotion prospects
- Minimal skill requirements
- Temporary or part-time employment patterns
This connects to Marx's concept of the reserve army of labour - a pool of unemployed or underemployed workers that helps keep wages low and workers compliant.
Contemporary challenges to meritocracy
Decline of permanent employment
The UK has experienced a significant shift towards more precarious employment that challenges traditional ideas about career progression and meritocratic advancement through stable work.
Key changes include:
- Growth in zero-hours contracts offering no guaranteed work
- Increase in temporary, part-time and seasonal employment
- Decline in traditional permanent full-time positions
- Rise of post-Fordist production methods emphasising flexibility over security
Despite achieving record employment levels of 30.6 million in 2014, much of this growth consisted of insecure, low-paid work rather than stable career opportunities.
Educational inequality
Private education continues to provide substantial advantages to upper and middle-class families, undermining meritocratic principles. Elite universities and prestigious careers remain dominated by those from privileged backgrounds, creating barriers for talented individuals from working-class families.
Government policy responses
The government's social mobility strategy "Opening Doors, Breaking Barriers: A Strategy for Social Mobility" (2011) acknowledged these challenges. The policy framework focuses on a life cycle approach to address barriers at each stage where social mobility can be enhanced or constrained.
The framework addresses:
- Early years development and school readiness
- GCSE attainment and post-16 educational choices
- University access and apprenticeship opportunities
- Labour market entry and career progression
Key Points to Remember:
-
Meritocracy is an ideal where rewards are based on talent and effort, but the UK shows significant deviations from this principle
-
Social mobility remains limited - most people stay in similar class positions to their parents, indicating structural barriers rather than pure merit-based outcomes
-
Different sociological perspectives offer competing explanations: functionalists support meritocracy as motivating, while Marxists highlight structural inequalities that prevent true merit-based advancement
-
Contemporary labour markets have become more precarious through globalisation, zero-hours contracts and post-Fordist production methods, potentially reducing opportunities for advancement
-
Government policies recognise the problem and attempt to increase social mobility through education and early intervention, though structural inequalities persist