Poisson Hypothesis Testing (Edexcel A-Level Further Mathematics): Revision Notes
21.1.1 Poisson Hypothesis Testing
Introduction
Hypothesis testing for the mean of a Poisson distribution involves determining whether the observed data supports a specified value of the population mean (or equivalently , where ). This note focuses on:
- Setting up null and alternative hypotheses.
- Performing one-tailed and two-tailed tests.
- Using critical regions to make decisions about hypotheses.
The Poisson Distribution
For a random variable
where is the mean and variance of the distribution.
Hypotheses for Poisson Tests
In hypothesis testing, the hypotheses are expressed in terms of (the mean of the Poisson distribution):
Null Hypothesis ():
Assumes a specific value for , e.g.
Alternative Hypothesis ():
Specifies a different value or range for , depending on the test:
- One-tailed (e.g., or )
- Two-tailed (e.g., ).
Test Statistic
The test statistic is the observed value of , which follows .
The test compares to the critical region determined by .
Significance Level and Critical Region
The significance level () is the probability of rejecting when is true.
The critical region is the range of values that lead to rejecting . It is determined by ensuring that:
Worked Examples
Example 1: One-Tailed Test
Problem
A shop receives an average of 55 complaints per day. A new policy is introduced, and the manager believes that complaints have decreased. A random sample shows 22 complaints on a given day.
Test, at the 5% significance level, whether the mean number of complaints has decreased.
Step 1: Define Hypotheses
- (mean complaints per day remain the same),
- (mean complaints per day have decreased).
Step 2: Identify Test Statistic and Distribution
Under
Step 3: Determine the Critical Region
The test is one-tailed, so the critical region is for low values of .
Find such that:
Using Poisson probabilities:
At , so the critical region is X ≤ 1
Step 4: Compare Test Statistic to Critical Region
The observed value is .
Since is not in the critical region.
Step 5: Conclusion
There is insufficient evidence to reject at the significance level.
The mean number of complaints has not significantly decreased.
Example 2: Two-Tailed Test
Problem
A factory produces items with an average of 88 defects per day. After equipment changes, 55 defects are observed on a given day.
Test, at the 10% significance level, whether the mean number of defects has changed.
Step 1: Define Hypotheses
- (mean number of defects remains the same),
- (mean number of defects has changed).
Step 2: Identify Test Statistic and Distribution
Under
Step 3: Determine the Critical Region
The test is two-tailed.
Split the significance level into two tails: , so each tail has α/2 = 0.05
Find and such that:
Left Tail:
Using cumulative probabilities for
Critical value:
Right Tail:
Using complementary probabilities:
Critical value:
Critical region: X ≤ 4 or X ≥ 12
Step 4: Compare Test Statistic to Critical Region
The observed value is .
Since is not in the critical region
Step 5: Conclusion
There is insufficient evidence to reject at the significance level.
The mean number of defects has not significantly changed.
Note Summary
Common Mistakes
- Misinterpreting hypotheses: Always frame and in terms of , the mean of the Poisson distribution.
- Incorrect critical region: Ensure cumulative probabilities correspond to the correct tail(s) for one-tailed or two-tailed tests.
- Using the wrong distribution: Verify that the test statistic follows a Poisson distribution under
Key Formulas
- Poisson Probability:
- Critical Region:
- One-tailed: or
- Two-tailed: Split between the two tails.
- Mean and Variance of Poisson: