Lack of Support for the States from Byzantium and Europe (Edexcel A-Level History): Revision Notes
Lack of Support for the States from Byzantium and Europe
The crusader states in Outremer relied heavily on external support for survival, but this support was often inconsistent and insufficient. The relationships with both the Byzantine Empire and western Europe fluctuated dramatically throughout the 12th century, with serious consequences for the defence of the Christian territories.
External support was absolutely critical to the survival of the crusader states. Without consistent backing from either Byzantium or Europe, these territories faced enormous challenges in defending themselves against Muslim forces.
Byzantine support, 1099–1144
The Antioch dispute
The relationship between the crusader states and the Byzantine Empire was strained from the very beginning, primarily due to disagreements over the principality of Antioch. Both Emperor Alexius Comnenus and his successor, John Comnenus, believed they had authority over the prince of Antioch as overlords.
In 1108, Alexius forced Bohemond I of Antioch to acknowledge Byzantine overlordship through the Treaty of Devol. However, the Frankish rulers of Antioch frequently ignored their supposed loyalty to the Byzantine emperor, creating ongoing tension.
The dispute over Antioch was a constant source of friction between the Franks and Byzantines throughout the entire period. This unresolved conflict undermined potential cooperation against their common Muslim enemies.
Military conflicts
Between 1099 and 1144, the Byzantine Empire launched six invasion attempts into Antioch through Cilicia. One notable example occurred in 1137, when John Comnenus attacked Antioch because he had been excluded from discussions about who would marry Princess Constance. This aggressive approach demonstrated the poor state of Franco-Byzantine relations during this period.
Temporary cooperation
Despite these tensions, both the Byzantines and Franks shared a common enemy: the Turks. This mutual concern led to an alliance of convenience in 1137 between Raymond of Poitiers (Prince of Antioch) and John Comnenus.
Military Cooperation Against the Turks (1138)
The alliance produced tangible military results:
- In 1138, Raymond, John and Joscelin II (Count of Edessa) launched a joint attack on the Turks
- They successfully reoccupied Cerep and Kafr Tab
- They nearly captured Shaizar
This demonstrated that when Byzantines and Franks worked together, they could achieve significant military success against Muslim forces.
End of the alliance
This cooperation came to an abrupt end in 1143 when John Comnenus died and was replaced by Manuel Comnenus. Manuel was angry about the Frankish occupation of fortresses in Cilicia, which soured relations once again.
Improving relations with Byzantium, 1158–80
After 1158, relations between the Byzantine Empire and the crusader states improved significantly. This warming of relations was marked by several important developments.
Territorial agreements
Baldwin III, King of Jerusalem, sold the remaining fortresses in Edessa to the Byzantines in the late 1150s. This gesture helped to ease tensions and demonstrated a willingness to cooperate.
Marriage alliances
A series of strategic marriage alliances cemented the improved relationship:
Strategic Marriages Between Byzantine and Frankish Nobility
These carefully arranged marriages created lasting family bonds:
- 1158: King Baldwin III married Theodora, Emperor Manuel I's niece
- 1161: Emperor Manuel himself married Maria of Antioch, a Frankish bride
- 1167: King Amalric (Baldwin III's successor) married Maria Comnena, another member of Manuel's family
These marriages created family bonds between the Byzantine imperial family and the Frankish nobility, strengthening political ties and demonstrating a genuine commitment to cooperation.
Military cooperation
The improved relationship led to practical military support from the Byzantines for campaigns that did not directly benefit Byzantine territorial interests:
Egyptian Campaign of 1169
- On 25 October 1169, combined Frankish and Byzantine forces met for a joint campaign against Egypt
- They reached Damietta on 27 October and began a siege
- The siege was abandoned in December 1169
Egyptian Campaign of 1177
- A Byzantine fleet arrived to assist with another Egyptian campaign
- The campaign failed due to lack of support from European contingents
This cooperation recalled the spirit of the First Crusade, when Byzantines and western Europeans had worked together more effectively. The period 1158–80 represented the high point of Franco-Byzantine relations in the crusader period.
Reversal of relations, 1180–92
Abrupt change in policy
The good relationship between the Byzantine Empire and the crusader states ended suddenly when Emperor Manuel died in 1180. He was replaced by Emperor Andronicus I in 1182.
Dramatic Shift in Byzantine Policy
The change in emperor brought an immediate and complete reversal in Byzantine support for the crusader states. This sudden shift demonstrates how dependent the Franks were on the personal policies of individual Byzantine rulers.
Andronicus's priorities
Andronicus had no interest in maintaining relations with the Franks for several reasons:
- His empire faced serious internal problems, including riots and dissent
- There had been a disruptive period of regency before his accession
- He needed to focus on consolidating his own position and power
Alliance with Saladin
At some point in the mid-1180s, Andronicus entered into an alliance with Saladin, the Muslim leader. This was a dramatic shift that had severe consequences for the crusader states.
Consequences
The decline in Franco-Byzantine relations meant:
- No further military support was forthcoming from the Byzantine Empire
- Saladin could now pursue his campaign against Outremer with renewed energy and focus
- The crusader states lost a potential ally against Muslim expansion
European support between the crusades
Limited support
Europe was essential to the survival of the crusader states – after all, it was Europeans who had established Christian rule in the region during the First Crusade (1096-1102). However, support from Europe was very limited between the major crusades of 1096-1102, 1147-49 and 1189-92.
Despite being the original source of the crusader states' establishment, European powers provided remarkably little support between the major crusade expeditions. This left Outremer dangerously vulnerable to Muslim counter-attacks.
Campaigns that did receive support
Despite the general lack of support, some European contingents did assist Outremer between the major crusades:
1122-24 Campaign
- Pope Calixtus authorised a crusade
- In 1122, a Venetian fleet headed to Outremer via Corfu to help Baldwin II's consolidation programme
- Outcome: Tyre captured on 7 July 1124
1129 Campaign
- Launched without papal authorisation
- Count Fulk of Anjou led a force to Outremer
- Outcome: An unsuccessful siege of Damascus
1153 Campaign
- Pilgrims who arrived were offered money by Baldwin III to help attack Ascalon
- Outcome: Ascalon captured in August 1153 – the last Muslim port on the edge of Outremer
1157-58 Campaign
- Count Thierry of Flanders headed to the Holy Land with knights
- Outcome: Removed the blockade of Krak des Chevaliers, almost conquered Shaizar, took Harenc in February 1158, and defeated the Damascenes at Butaiha
1177-78 campaign:
- Count Philip of Flanders, the count of Champagne and Peter of Courtenay participated
- Outcome: Campaigns in Homs, Hama and Habis
1183 campaign:
- Duke of Brabant and Ralph of Mauléon arrived with a small force
- Outcome: Occupied and secured Tubania after Saladin had left and tried to retake it in October 1183
European deafness to appeals
Throughout the 12th century, there were numerous examples of European rulers ignoring appeals for help from the crusader states.
Failed Appeal After the Second Crusade
- The principality of Antioch faced the threat of an imminent Muslim invasion
- Reynald of Chatillon appealed for help to King Louis VII of France, but was ignored
- The resulting battle at Inab led to the death of Raymond of Poitiers, Prince of Antioch
- Several important strongholds were lost
Between 1157 and 1184:
- At least seven crusade letters were authorised by the pope
- European nobles and their knights ignored these appeals
- No Third Crusade was launched until 1189
Failed embassies
Even when rulers of Outremer sent personal embassies to appeal for help, they achieved little success.
1169 Embassy Attempt
- Archbishop Frederick of Tyre was sent to ask for help from Louis VII of France and Henry II of England
- He was even authorised to offer Louis the symbolic keys to the kingdom of Jerusalem
- The appeal failed when the murder of Thomas Becket led to political turmoil in England
Continued obstacles:
- In 1173, the rebellion of Henry II's family ended any hope that he would help the crusader states
- In 1171, King Amalric sent another embassy to the West, but it failed
- This led him to try establishing relations with the Assassins, a local Muslim group
Recognition of reality
The rulers of Outremer realised they would have to find ways to handle the Muslim threat themselves. It became clear that only dramatic events, like the capture of Jerusalem, would trigger large-scale European help.
Effects of limited support
The main consequence of inadequate European support was that the borders of the crusader states began to contract during the second half of the 12th century.
Territorial Contraction
Without substantial support from Europe or Byzantium, the crusader states could not maintain their defences. The result was a steady loss of territory to Muslim forces throughout the latter half of the 12th century.
Territorial losses
By the 1170s, the Christians had lost control of any land east of the River Orontes as a result of repeated Muslim invasions. Specific examples of losses include:
In Tripoli (1160s):
- The castles of Moinetre, Akkar (Gibelcar), Chastel Blanc and Aryma were lost to Nur ad-Din
- Count Raymond III was imprisoned in Aleppo
In 1174:
- While the king of Jerusalem was on campaign in Egypt, Nur ad-Din attacked and captured Banyas
In 1179:
- The Franks were defeated in the forest of Banyas and Marj Ayun
- Saladin destroyed the castle at Jacob's Ford
Insufficient military resources
These examples demonstrate that without substantial support from Europe, the rulers of Outremer simply did not have enough forces to maintain their defences.
The surviving feudal lists suggest that the crusader states could call up only around 2,000 knights to defend the whole of Outremer. This pales in comparison with the estimated 6,000 knights who set off on the First Crusade.
This combination of inadequate knightly resources, European unwillingness to help, and a deteriorating relationship with the Byzantines enabled Saladin to penetrate the defences of Outremer successfully in the 1180s.
Key Points to Remember:
- Relations with Byzantium fluctuated dramatically: poor (1099-1144), improved (1158-80), then collapsed (1180-92)
- The dispute over control of Antioch was a constant source of tension between the Franks and Byzantines
- Strategic marriage alliances in 1158, 1161 and 1167 temporarily strengthened Franco-Byzantine relations
- European support between major crusades was limited and inconsistent, with many appeals for help ignored
- The lack of support from both Byzantium and Europe led to territorial contraction and military weakness, enabling Saladin's successful campaigns in the 1180s