The Rule of the ‘Leper King’ Baldwin IV (Edexcel A-Level History): Revision Notes
The Rule of the 'Leper King' Baldwin IV
Context: Amalric I's death and factional divisions
When King Amalric I died on 11 July 1174, the kingdom of Jerusalem faced serious internal divisions. The government was split by factionalism – bitter rivalry between competing groups of nobles. This division stemmed directly from Amalric's two marriages, with each wife's supporters forming separate political factions that competed for power and influence.
The rivalry between these factions would dominate Baldwin IV's entire reign, weakening the kingdom at a time when strong, unified leadership was desperately needed to face the growing threat from Saladin.
The two competing factions
Baldwin IV's government was divided between two main factions, each built around one of his father's marriages.
Baldwin's paternal faction
This faction gathered around Amalric's second wife, Maria Comnena, and included nobles who had been popular with Amalric in his later years. Key members included:
- Count Raymond III of Tripoli – Baldwin's cousin and the most powerful figure in this faction
- Prince Bohemond III of Antioch – Baldwin's cousin
- Balian of Ibelin – influential noble from the important Ibelin family (other Ibelin family members also supported this faction)
- Isabel – daughter of Maria Comnena and Amalric's second wife
- Humphrey of Toron – married to Isabel, also stepson to Reynald of Châtillon
This faction generally represented established nobles who favoured traditional power structures and were wary of newcomers.
Baldwin's maternal faction
This faction formed around Amalric's first wife, Agnes of Courtenay, and her children. Important members included:
- Agnes of Courtenay – Baldwin IV's mother, who played an active role as queen mother
- Sibyl – Baldwin's sister and daughter of Agnes of Courtenay
- Guy of Lusignan – Sibyl's second husband (married 1180)
- Baldwin V – Sibyl's son by her first husband, William Longsword
- Count Joscelin III of Courtenay – Sibyl's uncle
- Patriarch Heraclius – head of the Catholic Church in Outremer
- Gerard of Ridefort – Master of the Templars
This faction was more open to new arrivals from Europe and focused heavily on ensuring the succession through Sibyl's line.
Baldwin IV's accession and early regency
Baldwin IV was only thirteen years old when he took the crown on 15 July 1174. Because he was too young to govern effectively, Miles of Plancy (one of Amalric's most trusted advisors) was appointed as regent to rule on his behalf. However, Miles was murdered towards the end of 1174, creating a power vacuum.
This murder allowed Raymond III of Tripoli to seize control as regent and begin establishing his faction's dominance. Raymond's regency marked the beginning of twelve years of factional disputes that frequently paralysed the government and prevented effective action against external threats.
The impact of Baldwin's leprosy
Baldwin IV suffered from leprosy, a disease that:
- Affected the skin, nervous system, nose, throat and eyes
- Caused his hands and feet to become disfigured
- Led to loss of sensation in his extremities
- Eventually caused blindness
- Made him unable to walk or ride, requiring servants to carry him
However, the most politically significant consequence of Baldwin's leprosy was his inability to have children. This had two major effects on his reign:
Critical Political Consequences:
-
Succession became the dominant political issue – Baldwin desperately needed his sister Sibyl to produce a male heir to secure the royal line and prevent a succession crisis.
-
Agnes of Courtenay gained political influence – As queen mother, Agnes played an active role in government because Baldwin remained unmarried and had no wife to fulfil the traditional queenly duties.
Baldwin's illness also meant frequent bouts of severe sickness that left him incapable of ruling, creating opportunities for the factions to fight for control during periods of regency.
Factions in action, 1174–85
Sibyl's first marriage and succession planning
Before Raymond III's regency ended in 1176, an important development occurred for the succession. Sibyl was married to William Longsword of Montferrat in 1176, and they had a son called Baldwin (later Baldwin V). Tragically, William died before his son was born, creating fresh succession complications.
When Baldwin IV assumed direct control of government in 1776, his first priority was finding a new husband for Sibyl. This was crucial because Baldwin knew his leprosy would kill him at a young age – he needed to find a capable man who could:
- Rule as king alongside Sibyl
- Act as regent for young Baldwin V until he came of age
- Provide strong leadership for the kingdom
Raymond III's attempted power grab (1180)
Raymond III feared that Sibyl's new husband would reduce his power and influence further. When he learned that Baldwin IV's chosen candidate was Duke Hugh III of Burgundy, Raymond decided to act before Hugh could reach Jerusalem.
A Shocking Act of Rebellion:
In 1180, Raymond III and Bohemond III of Antioch launched an invasion of the kingdom – a shocking act of rebellion against their own king. Their plan was to:
- Force Sibyl to marry someone they could control
- Maintain their faction's dominance
- Choose Balian of Ibelin as their 'puppet' husband for Sibyl
Guy of Lusignan's marriage to Sibyl
To prevent Raymond's scheme, Baldwin IV acted quickly on his mother Agnes's advice. He encouraged Sibyl to marry Guy of Lusignan in 1180.
Guy was the son of Hugh VIII of Lusignan, making him part of a noble French family. His brothers Geoffrey and Amalric had called him to Outremer and suggested him as a potential husband for Sibyl. Despite the political nature of the marriage, Sibyl appears to have genuinely liked Guy – they had four children together and she consistently refused later attempts to make her divorce him.
This marriage was a severe blow to Raymond III, whose attempted coup had been completely undermined.
The disastrous campaign of 1183
The balance of power shifted again dramatically in August 1183. When Baldwin IV gathered his troops in Galilee to repel a major invasion by Saladin, disaster struck:
- Baldwin IV caught a fever before battle began and was unable to fight
- Guy was appointed regent to command the army in his place
- Guy failed to get the lords to obey his orders – a humiliating demonstration of weak leadership
- The army took no action against Saladin, allowing him to freely plunder Galilee
- Although the army's presence prevented territory being captured, Guy's incompetence was obvious
After this failure, Baldwin IV completely lost faith in Guy's abilities and took back direct control of the kingdom. This marked the beginning of a bitter personal breach between the king and his brother-in-law.
How factionalism weakened the government
The constant power struggles, led primarily by Raymond III against Agnes's faction, seriously weakened Jerusalem's ability to respond to external threats. Key moments when Saladin benefited from Baldwin's ineffective government include:
Four Critical Moments When Saladin Gained Advantage:
1174 – Saladin annexed Damascus with no opposition from Jerusalem, giving him a crucial power base.
1175 – Raymond III made peace with Saladin independently, allowing Saladin to focus his energies on uniting different Muslim groups rather than defending against crusader attacks.
1180 – Baldwin IV made a truce with Saladin lasting until 1182, during which Saladin could consolidate his position.
1183 – Saladin launched an invasion from Damascus into Galilee. The crusader army refused to engage him in battle due to Guy's weak leadership, allowing Saladin to plunder the region freely.
This pattern shows how internal divisions prevented coordinated, effective military action against the kingdom's greatest external threat.
Growing divisions: the succession crisis of 1185
By 1183, animosity between the two factions had reached dangerous levels. Both sides had tasted power, and both had experienced having it taken away. The rivalry was becoming increasingly bitter and personal.
Baldwin V's coronation and co-rulership
In November 1183, Baldwin IV took a fateful step that would trigger a major succession crisis. His illness had become more frequent and crippling, and he knew death was approaching. He had his infant heir, Baldwin V (Sibyl's son), crowned as co-ruler alongside him.
Baldwin IV hoped to spend his final years in Tyre and planned to exchange territories with Guy to make this possible. However, this plan collapsed because of the intense hostility between Baldwin and Guy following the 1183 campaign disaster.
The breach between Baldwin IV and Guy
Guy was furious about two things:
- The coronation of Baldwin V as co-ruler, which diminished his own status
- Baldwin's reaction to his poor performance in the 1183 campaign
When Baldwin tried to arrange a reconciliation, Guy refused him access to the port of Ascalon – a shocking insult to the king. The breach between them had become impossible to repair.
This situation benefited Raymond III, whose faction became popular with the king again. When Baldwin IV began to fade at the start of 1185, Raymond III was appointed regent once more. He continued as regent after Baldwin IV died in March 1185, now governing on behalf of the child-king Baldwin V.
Unfortunately for Raymond, Baldwin V's reign was tragically short. The boy king died in August 1186, triggering one final round of the succession dispute.
Raymond's fall from power
After Baldwin V's death, Joscelin III of Courtenay somehow convinced Raymond III to retreat to his lordship territory of Tiberias, removing him from the centre of power in Jerusalem. The two factions then gathered – one around Isabel, the other around Sibyl – to decide the kingdom's future.
Three possible outcomes
There were three potential solutions to the succession crisis:
-
Henry II of England could become regent until the succession issue was resolved. Baldwin IV had sent an embassy to Henry in 1184 with exactly this proposal in mind.
-
Raymond III's faction could maintain power through the coronation of Isabel and Humphrey as king and queen.
-
Sibyl and Guy could be crowned as rulers of Jerusalem, representing victory for Agnes's faction (although Agnes herself had died in 1185 and would not witness this outcome).
Sibyl's clever deception
Sibyl's faction moved first and acted decisively. The barons of Jerusalem agreed to make Sibyl queen, but only on condition that she divorce Guy. The barons wanted Sibyl as queen but saw Guy as unsuitable to be king.
A Brilliant Political Manoeuvre:
Sibyl agreed to their terms, was crowned queen, and then immediately chose Guy as her king – a brilliant political manoeuvre that deceived the nobles completely. They had been outplayed and were furious at being tricked, especially Reynald of Châtillon, who had abandoned his own stepson to support Sibyl.
This outcome represented a complete victory for the maternal faction and total defeat for Raymond III, who had lost all his power and influence.
Significance for the kingdom
Baldwin IV's reign demonstrates how internal political divisions can fatally weaken a state facing external threats. The constant factional warfare:
- Prevented coordinated military responses to Saladin
- Allowed Saladin to consolidate power in Syria
- Created periods when the kingdom took no decisive action
- Exhausted resources in internal conflicts rather than external defence
- Left the kingdom vulnerable at a critical moment in its history
The succession crisis of 1185–86 set the stage for future disasters, as Guy of Lusignan's weak leadership (already demonstrated in 1183) would soon be tested again with catastrophic consequences for the crusader states.
Key Points to Remember:
-
Factionalism dominated Baldwin IV's reign – two rival groups based on Amalric I's two marriages fought constantly for power and influence
-
Baldwin's leprosy created a succession crisis – unable to have children, the kingdom's future depended entirely on his sister Sibyl producing an heir
-
Raymond III and Agnes of Courtenay led the rival factions – their power struggles repeatedly paralysed government and prevented effective action against Saladin
-
Guy of Lusignan's incompetence was demonstrated in 1183 – yet Sibyl's political manoeuvre in 1186 still made him king, despite the nobles' objections
-
Internal divisions weakened the kingdom – at four key moments (1174, 1175, 1180, 1183) Saladin benefited directly from Jerusalem's inability to take decisive action due to factional disputes