Van Ijzendoorn & Kroonenberg (1988) Cross-Cultural Patterns of Attachment (Edexcel A-Level Psychology): Flashcards
📚Flashcards
Practise the cards
10 cards from this deck
ShowHide
Practise the cards
10 cards from this deck
Research method used by Van Ijzendoorn & Kroonenberg (1988)
Research method used by Van Ijzendoorn & Kroonenberg (1988)
Meta-analysis
Three attachment types identified by Ainsworth
Three attachment types identified by Ainsworth
Secure (Type B), anxious-avoidant (A), anxious-resistant (C)
Aim of Van Ijzendoorn & Kroonenberg study
Aim of Van Ijzendoorn & Kroonenberg study
Investigate similarities & differences in attachment ratios
Sample in Van Ijzendoorn & Kroonenberg meta-analysis
Sample in Van Ijzendoorn & Kroonenberg meta-analysis
32 studies, 8 countries, 1990 classifications
Most common attachment type across all eight countries
Most common attachment type across all eight countries
Secure attachment (Type B)
Attachment pattern found in Germany
Attachment pattern found in Germany
High proportion of anxious-avoidant attachment
Attachment pattern found in Japan
Attachment pattern found in Japan
High level of resistant attachment
Intra-cultural vs between-cultural variation ratio
Intra-cultural vs between-cultural variation ratio
1.5 times greater within cultures than between cultures
Main weakness of Strange Situation cross-culturally
Main weakness of Strange Situation cross-culturally
Ethnocentric bias - developed using American norms
Sampling limitation in the study
Sampling limitation in the study
Most data from individualistic cultures (18 USA vs 1 China)