Evaluation (OCR A-Level Law): Flashcards
📚Flashcards
Practise the cards
10 cards from this deck
ShowHide
Practise the cards
10 cards from this deck
Majewski recklessness vs Cunningham recklessness difference
Majewski recklessness vs Cunningham recklessness difference
Majewski: no foresight needed; Cunningham: foresight of risk
Law Commission 2009 intoxication reform main recommendation
Law Commission 2009 intoxication reform main recommendation
Abolish basic/specific intent distinction
Contemporaneity problem in intoxication defence
Contemporaneity problem in intoxication defence
Mens rea formed hours before actus reus occurs
Statute governing self-defence
Statute governing self-defence
s 76 Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008
s 43 Crime and Courts Act 2013 permits
s 43 Crime and Courts Act 2013 permits
Householders to use disproportionate force v intruders
Personal characteristics in self-defence assessment
Personal characteristics in self-defence assessment
Not relevant when determining reasonable force
Brown (1993) principle on consent
Brown (1993) principle on consent
ABH or worse requires 'good reason' to consent
Consent inconsistency: boxing vs football
Consent inconsistency: boxing vs football
Serious injury allowed in boxing but criminalised in football
Consent as defence to intentional killing (euthanasia)
Consent as defence to intentional killing (euthanasia)
Consent is no defence to intentional killing
Law Commission 1995 consent reform proposal
Law Commission 1995 consent reform proposal
Only 'seriously disabling' injury criminal even with consent
