Elizabeths authority in later years (AQA GCSE History): Revision Notes
Elizabeth's authority in later years
The changing nature of Elizabeth's power in the 1590s
As Elizabeth entered the 1590s, she remained a powerful monarch but faced new challenges to her authority. By this time, she was ageing and encountered growing opposition both within her court and across the country. Economic difficulties, including poor harvests, created social tensions that threatened stability. Despite these pressures, Elizabeth maintained her position as queen, though there were clear signs that her authority was no longer as absolute as it had been in earlier decades.
This period marks a crucial transition in Elizabeth's reign. While she had successfully navigated the challenges of her early and middle years, the 1590s brought a new set of difficulties that would test her political skills and resilience in different ways.
Elizabeth's continuing strengths (1590-1603)
Military and political successes
Elizabeth demonstrated that she could still assert royal authority when necessary. The most significant example was her decisive handling of Essex's rebellion in 1601. When Robert Devereux, the Earl of Essex, attempted to challenge her authority, Elizabeth quickly defeated the uprising, showing that she remained firmly in control. This rebellion was ultimately unsuccessful and served to reinforce her position rather than weaken it.
Case Study: Essex's Rebellion (1601)
When the Earl of Essex attempted to raise London against Elizabeth, the queen's response was swift and decisive:
- Essex gathered only 300 supporters instead of the thousands he expected
- Elizabeth immediately declared him a traitor
- The rebellion collapsed within hours
- Essex was executed, demonstrating that challenges to royal authority would not be tolerated
The queen also maintained England's military reputation through successful overseas ventures, particularly the expedition to Cadiz in 1596. This naval victory demonstrated that England remained a formidable European power under her leadership.
Personal resilience and political stability
Elizabeth's physical health remained relatively good until late in her reign, allowing her to continue the demanding work of monarchy. Her longevity itself became a source of stability, as the country had known no other ruler for decades.
The death of Mary Queen of Scots had also removed the most serious dynastic threat to Elizabeth's throne. With no immediate rival claimant actively challenging her right to rule, Elizabeth's position was more secure than it had been in earlier years.
Growing challenges to royal authority
Personal factors and ageing
The French ambassador observed that Elizabeth had become "impatient" by the 1590s, and she displayed a less controlled temper than in her younger years. A notable incident occurred in 1597 when she lost her composure in front of the Polish ambassador, suggesting that age was affecting her legendary self-control and diplomatic skills.
This loss of composure was particularly significant because Elizabeth's reputation had been built on her ability to maintain control in all situations. The incident with the Polish ambassador marked a clear departure from her earlier diplomatic style.
Loss of trusted advisors
Elizabeth's government was severely weakened by the deaths of her most experienced and loyal advisors. Francis Walsingham, her spymaster and secretary, died in 1590. Francis Knollys, a long-serving councillor, died in 1596, followed by William Cecil (Lord Burghley) in 1598. These men had provided decades of loyal service and political expertise. Their loss meant Elizabeth had to rely increasingly on newer, less experienced advisors who did not command the same level of trust or competence.
The deaths of these three key advisors within eight years created a crisis of experience in Elizabeth's government. Walsingham's intelligence network, Knollys' parliamentary expertise, and Cecil's administrative skills were irreplaceable, fundamentally weakening the effectiveness of royal government.
Court factionalism and "new men"
The royal court became increasingly factional, with ambitious courtiers competing for the queen's favour. Robert Devereux, the Earl of Essex, emerged as a particularly influential figure, along with others such as Robert Cecil (Lord Salisbury, son of William Burghley). These "new men" brought different approaches and often conflicting interests, which weakened the unity of Elizabeth's government and made decision-making more difficult.
The patronage system, which had previously strengthened royal authority by creating loyalty, now became a source of tension as different factions competed for positions and rewards.
Financial pressures and parliamentary relations
Elizabeth faced serious financial difficulties that forced her to call Parliament more frequently. She summoned Parliament in 1593 and again in 1601 specifically to request taxation. This increased dependence on parliamentary grants reduced her financial independence and gave MPs more opportunities to voice concerns about royal policy.
This marked a significant shift in the balance of power between crown and Parliament. Elizabeth's earlier reign had been characterised by her ability to govern with minimal parliamentary interference, but financial pressures now forced her into more frequent negotiations with MPs.
The costs of military expeditions, including the ongoing war with Spain and the expensive campaign in Ireland, strained the royal treasury and made these parliamentary requests increasingly necessary.
Economic problems and social unrest
The 1590s were marked by particularly severe economic difficulties. Poor harvests led to food shortages and social discontent across the country. The situation became so serious that there was an uprising in Oxfordshire in 1596. Even more concerning for royal authority, there were reports of people openly expressing dissatisfaction with Elizabeth's rule. In Kent in 1601, someone was recorded saying "it will never be a merry world until the queen is dead," indicating that economic hardship was translating into criticism of the monarch herself.
This direct criticism of Elizabeth personally represented a dramatic shift in public opinion. Throughout most of her reign, even when people disagreed with policies, they rarely criticised the queen herself. Economic hardship was now undermining the personal loyalty that had been one of Elizabeth's greatest strengths.
These economic pressures made the population more receptive to potential rebellion and reduced the automatic loyalty that Elizabeth had previously enjoyed.
Timeline of key events
- 1590: Francis Walsingham dies, weakening Elizabeth's intelligence network
- 1593: Parliament called to grant taxation due to financial pressures
- 1596: Cadiz expedition demonstrates continuing military strength; Francis Knollys dies; Oxfordshire uprising occurs
- 1597: Elizabeth loses temper with Polish ambassador, showing signs of ageing
- 1598: William Cecil (Lord Burghley) dies, removing Elizabeth's most trusted advisor
- 1601: Essex's rebellion is defeated; Parliament called again for taxation; reports of anti-royal sentiment in Kent
The significance of Elizabeth's later years
Elizabeth's authority in her final years represents a complex period of transition. While she successfully maintained her throne and defeated direct challenges like Essex's rebellion, the foundations of royal power were clearly shifting. The combination of personal ageing, the loss of experienced advisors, financial pressures, and economic difficulties created new constraints on royal authority that had not existed earlier in her reign.
These changes foreshadowed some of the challenges that would face her successors, particularly regarding the relationship between crown and Parliament and the ongoing costs of military commitments. However, Elizabeth's ability to navigate these difficulties while maintaining essential royal authority demonstrated the political skills that had sustained her through four decades of rule.
Elizabeth's later years provide important insights into the limitations of personal monarchy. Even the most successful rulers eventually face the constraints of ageing, changing circumstances, and evolving political relationships. Her experience illustrates both the strengths and vulnerabilities of the Tudor system of government.
Key Points to Remember:
- Elizabeth remained powerful until her death in 1603, but faced growing challenges to her authority in the 1590s
- The deaths of key advisors (Walsingham 1590, Knollys 1596, Cecil 1598) seriously weakened her government's effectiveness
- Financial pressures forced Elizabeth to call Parliament more frequently (1593, 1601), reducing her independence
- Economic problems, including poor harvests and food shortages, led to social unrest and criticism of royal rule
- Despite these challenges, Elizabeth successfully defeated Essex's rebellion in 1601, proving she could still assert royal authority when necessary