William establishes control (AQA GCSE History): Revision Notes
William establishes control
After his victory at the Battle of Hastings in October 1066, William faced a crucial challenge: winning the battle did not automatically make him king of England. He needed to establish legitimate control over the entire kingdom and demonstrate his authority to both English nobles and his Norman followers.
Critical Concept: Mediaeval conquest required more than military victory - it demanded political legitimacy, economic control, and ongoing demonstration of authority to maintain power.
William's march south and coronation
Following his triumph at Hastings, William adopted a strategic approach to securing southern England. Rather than rushing directly to London, he took a methodical route designed to demonstrate his power and encourage submission.
William's campaign began with hopes that the English would surrender voluntarily after their defeat at Hastings. However, when the Witan (Anglo-Saxon council) chose Edgar Ætheling as their king instead, William knew he had to take decisive action to claim his throne.
The Witan was the traditional Anglo-Saxon council of nobles and clergy who advised the king and had the authority to choose successors. Their selection of Edgar Ætheling represented a direct challenge to William's claim to the throne.
The Norman duke first secured the royal treasury at Winchester, gaining control of England's wealth and financial resources. This gave him the means to fund his ongoing conquest and reward his followers. He then established a base at Berkhampsted before setting up camp outside London at Dorking, applying psychological pressure on the capital.
His march through Kent involved systematic looting and terrorising of the local population, combined with castle-building to establish permanent Norman presence. This dual approach of intimidation and fortification proved highly effective. When William took Dover and secured the coastal route back to the continent, he demonstrated both his military strength and his strategic thinking.
The pressure campaign worked successfully. In December 1066, Edgar Ætheling came to William to surrender the kingdom, paving the way for William's coronation at Westminster Abbey on Christmas Day, 1066. This ceremony was crucial for establishing legitimacy, as it followed English traditions while asserting Norman authority.
William's coronation at Westminster Abbey was carefully planned to combine Norman authority with English tradition, helping to legitimise his rule in the eyes of his new subjects while maintaining continuity with previous English kings.
Dealing with the English nobles
William understood that controlling England required managing the existing English nobility effectively. He developed a sophisticated approach that combined rewards for cooperation with harsh punishment for resistance, always emphasising his position as the legitimate ruler continuing Edward the Confessor's reign.
To demonstrate continuity and legitimacy, William claimed ownership of all English land and property, arguing that those who had fought against him at Hastings had forfeited their rights. However, he offered a path back to favour for those willing to submit to his authority.
Balancing Act: William's success depended on finding the right balance between punishment and reward - harsh enough to discourage resistance, but generous enough to encourage cooperation from English nobles.
William's strategy included allowing English earls and nobles who had fought at Hastings to buy back their confiscated lands, generating revenue while testing their loyalty. Those who submitted to his rule could keep their positions and maintain their status, providing an incentive for cooperation rather than continued resistance.
For his closest supporters, William took a different approach. He placed trusted Norman allies like Edgar Ætheling, Edwin, and Morcar in charge of important regions in the south, ensuring loyal control of key areas. Rather than executing potential threats, he often kept English nobles comfortable but under close supervision, reducing the risk of martyrdom while maintaining control.
This careful balance between punishment and reward helped William avoid widespread rebellion in the immediate aftermath of conquest, though his precautions would prove insufficient to prevent future uprisings.
Controlling the borderlands
Recognising that England's borders, particularly with Wales, posed ongoing security challenges, William created an innovative system of frontier control through the establishment of three new powerful earldoms along the Welsh border.
The Marcher earldoms of Hereford, Shrewsbury, and Chester were granted to three of William's most trusted followers: William FitzOsbern, Roger de Montgomery, and Hugh d'Avranches respectively. These men had supported William during his invasion and proved their loyalty through their service.
The term "Marcher" comes from the word "march," meaning border or frontier. These earldoms were specifically designed to control and defend England's western frontier against Welsh raids and incursions.
The Marcher earls received extraordinary powers that distinguished them from other English nobles. They could establish new towns to promote Norman settlement in the border regions, bringing in loyal colonists to strengthen their control. Their sheriffs reported directly to them rather than to the king, giving them unprecedented local authority.
Perhaps most significantly, the Marcher earls were exempt from paying taxes on their lands, allowing them to invest their resources in defence rather than royal tribute. This financial independence enabled them to build substantial castle networks and maintain large military forces necessary for border defence.
The earls also possessed the right to construct castles wherever they deemed necessary, creating a fortified frontier that could resist Welsh raids and serve as launching points for further expansion into Wales. This system proved highly effective in securing England's western border while extending Norman influence into Welsh territory.
Strategic Example: The Marcher System in Action
The Marcher earldoms worked by giving trusted nobles exceptional powers:
- Financial: Tax exemption allowed resources to go to defence
- Military: Right to build castles and maintain armies
- Administrative: Direct control over local sheriffs
- Settlement: Authority to establish new Norman towns
This created a self-sustaining frontier defence system that required minimal royal intervention while effectively securing the border.
Securing the throne in Normandy
Understanding that his extended absence from Normandy created vulnerabilities, William took careful precautions to maintain control of his homeland while establishing his English kingdom. In March 1067, he returned to Normandy, but not before implementing security measures.
William appointed William FitzOsbern, his closest friend and ally, to govern East Anglia during his absence. This region was particularly important due to its strategic location and potential for rebellion. Simultaneously, he placed his half-brother Odo of Bayeux in control of the southeast, ensuring that both vulnerable areas remained under trusted Norman leadership.
To further secure his position, William took several key English nobles with him to Normandy, including Edgar Ætheling and other potential troublemakers. This served multiple purposes: it prevented them from organising resistance in his absence while demonstrating his success to Norman audiences.
Taking English nobles to Normandy was a clever strategy that served as both a security measure and a propaganda tool, showing Norman audiences the success of the conquest while preventing potential rebellions in England.
William also instructed his governors to continue building castles throughout England, maintaining the momentum of Norman fortification even while he was away. This showed his commitment to permanent occupation rather than temporary conquest.
However, these precautions proved insufficient. William's absence encouraged rebellions to break out across England, forcing him to return sooner than planned to deal with multiple uprisings that threatened to undo his careful work of establishing control.
Lesson in Mediaeval Kingship: The challenge of ruling multiple territories simultaneously created significant problems for William, as his physical absence from England encouraged rebellions that undermined his careful control strategies.
Timeline of major events
- October 1066: Battle of Hastings - William defeats Harold Godwinson
- October-November 1066: William secures royal treasury at Winchester and marches towards London
- December 1066: Edgar Ætheling surrenders to William at Berkhamsted
- Christmas Day 1066: William crowned King of England at Westminster Abbey
- 1067: Creation of Marcher earldoms to control Welsh border
- March 1067: William returns to Normandy, leaving trusted deputies in charge
- 1067-1068: Rebellions break out in William's absence, forcing his return
Key Points to Remember:
-
William's control strategy combined military pressure with political legitimacy, using both force and legal claims to establish his authority
-
The systematic march south demonstrated Norman power while allowing opportunities for English submission, showing William's strategic thinking
-
Managing English nobles required balancing punishment and reward - harsh enough to discourage resistance, generous enough to encourage cooperation
-
The Marcher earldoms created an innovative border defence system that gave trusted allies extraordinary powers to secure England's frontiers
-
William's attempt to govern both England and Normandy simultaneously created challenges that led to rebellions and forced adaptations in his control methods