The cosmological argument (Edexcel GCSE Religious Studies B): Revision Notes
The cosmological argument
What is the cosmological argument?
The cosmological argument attempts to demonstrate God's existence by showing that everything occurs for a specific reason. This argument relies on the principle of cause and effect - for example, when a sculptor creates a sculpture, they are the cause that brings the sculpture into existence. Christians view this argument as supporting their belief that God is the creator of the universe.
The cosmological argument is one of the classical arguments for God's existence, alongside the ontological argument and the teleological (design) argument. It focuses specifically on the relationship between causes and effects in the natural world.
The basic logic of the cosmological argument
The argument follows a clear logical sequence:
Starting point: Nothing happens by itself - everything that happens must be caused by something else.
Key premise: A powerful cause was necessary to cause the universe, since the universe cannot have happened by itself.
Conclusion: This cause has to be God, therefore God exists.
This reasoning suggests that because we can observe cause and effect relationships throughout the natural world, there must be an ultimate first cause behind everything - and this first cause is what we understand as God.
St Thomas Aquinas' first three ways
The Catholic priest Thomas Aquinas (1225-74) developed a version of the cosmological argument, which he summarised in the first three of his famous "Five Ways":
1. The argument from motion
This argument focuses on movement and change in the universe. Aquinas reasoned that:
- Everything that moves is put in motion by something else
- You cannot have an infinite chain of movers - there must be a starting point
- Therefore, there must be a first mover, which is God
When Aquinas refers to "motion," he means any kind of change or transformation, not just physical movement from one place to another. This includes changes in temperature, colour, or any other property.
2. The argument from cause
This argument examines the relationship between cause and effect:
- Every effect has a cause that brought it about
- You cannot have an infinite chain of causes stretching back forever
- Therefore, there must be a first cause, which is God
3. The argument from contingency
This argument considers what is necessary versus what is contingent (dependent):
- Everything that is contingent relies on something else to exist
- All things must have been brought into existence by a necessary being
- This necessary being doesn't rely on anything else for its existence, so must be God
The key difference between contingent and necessary beings is that contingent beings depend on other things for their existence, while a necessary being exists independently and cannot fail to exist.
Christian understandings of God through this argument
Christians believe the cosmological argument reveals important aspects of God's nature:
Omnipotent - God possesses unlimited power, as demonstrated by his creation of the entire universe
Benevolent - God created the universe with love and care, showing his good nature
Unknowable in some ways - Because God transcends human understanding and is too great for humanity to fully comprehend, there are aspects of his nature that remain mysterious to us
These three attributes - omnipotence, benevolence, and partial unknowability - form part of the traditional Christian understanding of God's nature, though they are not the only qualities attributed to God in Christian theology.
Challenges from non-religious perspectives
Several arguments have been raised against the cosmological argument:
-
Alternative scientific explanations: We cannot definitively 'prove' that God caused the universe when alternative scientific explanations exist, such as the Big Bang theory providing a natural explanation for the universe's creation.
-
The problem of infinite regress: Even if we accept that everything within the universe has a cause, this doesn't necessarily mean that the universe itself has a cause.
-
The question of God's cause: If everything requires a cause, what caused God to exist?
-
The problem of suffering: If God created the universe, why did he create harmful things such as natural disasters and suffering?
The challenge about God's own cause is particularly significant because it seems to contradict the argument's own logic. If everything needs a cause, then logically God should also need a cause.
Christian responses to these challenges
Many Christians respond to non-religious criticisms by arguing that science and religion can work together harmoniously to explain how the universe came to exist. They suggest that there is no fundamental conflict between scientific and religious explanations, claiming that God created the Big Bang, which in turn created the universe as we know it.
Christians also emphasise the importance of faith in understanding God's nature and actions, recognising that not every aspect of divine creation can be fully explained through human reasoning alone.
This approach, where religious and scientific explanations complement each other, is sometimes called "theistic evolution" or "evolutionary creationism" among Christians who accept scientific theories about the universe's origins.
Key Points to Remember:
- The cosmological argument tries to prove God's existence through cause and effect relationships
- Aquinas' three ways focus on motion (first mover), cause (first cause), and contingency (necessary being)
- Christians see this argument as revealing God's omnipotent, benevolent, and partially unknowable nature
- Non-religious critics offer alternative explanations like the Big Bang theory and question the logic of infinite regress
- Christians often respond by arguing that science and religion can complement each other in explaining the universe's origins