Criminal and Civil Court Procedures (HSC SSCE Legal Studies): Revision Notes
Criminal and Civil Court Procedures
Introduction to criminal and civil court overlap
Both criminal and civil law can apply to the same situation. When a person causes harm to another through their actions, two separate legal processes may occur:
- Criminal proceedings: The state prosecutes the offender for breaking the law
- Civil proceedings: The victim seeks compensation for their injuries or losses
Real-World Scenario: Dual Proceedings
If you cause a car accident through reckless driving, you could face criminal charges from the state AND be sued by the other driver for damages in civil court. This demonstrates how the same action can trigger both criminal and civil legal processes simultaneously.
Both types of cases use the adversarial system of trial. This means representatives of each party present their side of the case to a judge (and sometimes a jury), who considers the evidence and makes a decision in favour of one party.
Jury: A group of people who listen to all of the evidence in a court case and decide on the verdict.
Key differences between criminal and civil court proceedings
Understanding the fundamental differences between criminal and civil cases is essential for legal studies students. These distinctions affect how cases are prosecuted, who brings them, and what standards must be met for a successful outcome.
Critical Distinctions Between Criminal and Civil Cases
The following table outlines the key differences that define how criminal and civil proceedings operate:
| Element | Criminal | Civil |
|---|---|---|
| Parties involved | A prosecutor and a defendant | A plaintiff and a defendant |
| Who brings the case | The state | An individual or organisation |
| Burden of proof | On the prosecutor | On the plaintiff |
| Standard of proof | Beyond reasonable doubt (higher standard) | Balance of probabilities (lower standard) |
Key terminology
Prosecutor: The person formally conducting legal proceedings against someone accused of a criminal offence. The prosecutor acts on behalf of the state or the Crown.
Defendant: The person who is accused of a crime or a civil wrong. In criminal cases, the defendant is also called the accused.
Standard of proof: The degree or level of proof required for the plaintiff (civil) or prosecution (criminal) to prove their case.
Beyond reasonable doubt: The standard of proof in criminal cases. The prosecution must convince the court that no reasonable person could doubt the accused committed the offence.
Balance of probabilities: The standard of proof in civil cases. The plaintiff must show it was more likely than not that their claim is correct.
Onus: The burden or duty of proving the case to the court.
Criminal procedure
Criminal law proceedings involve the legal processes where a person accused of a crime is prosecuted. If found guilty, the accused receives a conviction and punishment such as a fine or imprisonment.
Types of criminal offences
Criminal offences are classified into two categories based on their seriousness:
Summary offences are relatively minor offences including:
- Certain traffic offences
- Offensive behaviour
- Minor property crimes
Summary offences are heard by a magistrate or judge without a jury in the Local Court (NSW) or Magistrates' Court (ACT). This allows for quicker and more efficient processing of minor criminal matters.
Indictable offences are serious criminal offences including:
- Murder
- Sexual assault
- Malicious wounding
- Serious fraud
These offences may be heard by a judge and jury in the District Court or Supreme Court. However, legislation allows some indictable offences to be prosecuted summarily in the Local or Magistrates' Court, depending on the circumstances and severity.
Who prosecutes criminal cases
The prosecution process differs depending on the seriousness of the offence:
Summary matters in NSW: Police may prosecute the case themselves in the Local Court. A specially trained police prosecutor represents the state in court.
Serious crimes: The Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) prosecutes these cases.
Australian Capital Territory: The DPP prosecutes all criminal matters in both the Magistrates' Court and Supreme Court.
The accused (defendant) usually employs a lawyer to represent them, though some may choose self-representation depending on the charges' seriousness. The accused's case is called 'the defence'.
Committal hearings
Before an accused person can be tried for an indictable offence, a committal hearing must occur. The prosecutor must convince the magistrate there is a sufficiently strong case—a prima facie case—that the accused committed the offence. Only then can the matter proceed to trial before a jury.
Prima facie: (Latin) 'On the face'; at first sight. Refers to having sufficient evidence against a defendant to warrant a trial in a higher court. This is a threshold test, not a determination of guilt.
Criminal trial process
Trials of indictable matters take place in:
- NSW: District Court or Supreme Court (depending on seriousness)
- ACT: Supreme Court
Criminal trials are heard before a jury of people, unless the accused elects to have their case heard before a judge alone.
The jury's role: Consider whether there is enough evidence to convict the accused. The jury decides on issues of fact based on evidence presented.
The judge's role: Advises the jury and deals with questions of law.
Jury verdict requirements
Unanimous Verdict Requirements
In both NSW and the ACT, the jury must reach a unanimous verdict—all jurors must agree. However, NSW legislation from 2006 allows:
- If there are jurors and after at least hours they cannot agree, jurors can decide the verdict
- If there are jurors and after at least hours they cannot agree, jurors can decide the verdict
This provision prevents hung juries while still maintaining a high threshold for conviction.
Steps in a criminal trial
1. The indictment: At trial start, the indictment is read to the accused, who pleads guilty or not guilty.
2. Opening address: The prosecution sets out the facts and evidence that will prove the defendant's guilt.
3. Examination in chief: Each side calls witnesses and questions them to establish facts (prosecution) or disprove the prosecution's case (defence).
Examination in chief: Questioning of a witness by the barrister who called that witness. This is an opportunity to present evidence that supports your case.
4. Cross-examination: Each side examines the opponent's witnesses to challenge their version of facts or question their credibility.
Cross-examination: Questioning of a witness called by the other side to produce information relevant to one's case or to call the witness's credibility into question.
Credibility: Trustworthiness, reliability, believability.
5. Closing addresses: Each side gives a final speech to the jury, drawing together evidence and providing arguments for their position.
6. Judge's summing up: The judge instructs the jury on how to reach a verdict.
7. Jury deliberation: The jury goes to another room to deliberate until reaching a verdict.
8. Sentencing: If the jury returns a guilty verdict, sentencing occurs either immediately or at a later date.
Burden and standard of proof in criminal cases
Fundamental Principle: Presumption of Innocence
A fundamental principle in criminal law is that the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty. This places specific requirements on the prosecution:
Burden of proof: Rests entirely on the prosecution. The onus is on the prosecution to prove the accused committed the offence.
Standard of proof: The prosecution must prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. This means:
- No jury member can have any doubt the crime was committed by the accused
- The evidence must be so convincing that no reasonable person could question the defendant's guilt
- This is a higher standard than required in civil cases
The defence's job is to disprove the prosecution's case and provide evidence showing their client's innocence. The defence does not need to prove innocence—they only need to create reasonable doubt.
Courts handling criminal cases
Local and Magistrates' Courts:
- Handle most criminal cases
- No juries or judges—a magistrate makes the decision
- Matters handled quickly, efficiently, and cost-effectively
- Less formal proceedings than higher courts
- Lawyers and magistrates do not wear traditional robes
- Solicitors carry out most legal work
- Many defendants represent themselves
Coronial inquests:
Occur when there is an unnatural death or unexplained fire/explosion. These are more inquisitorial than adversarial—the coroner's office gathers all evidence. If evidence shows a serious crime was committed, the coroner recommends an indictment and the accused is tried in the usual way.
Children's Court hearings:
Children under years are treated differently by the court system, reflecting the principle that immature persons have a different degree of responsibility.
Special Provisions for Young Offenders
- Cases heard before a magistrate specialising in children's cases
- Magistrate takes measures to ensure the child understands proceedings
- Case heard in a closed court—public not allowed to attend
- Journalists cannot publish the identity of the offender
- In NSW, if the child is under years, no conviction is recorded
- Conviction by Children's Court has less severe consequences than adult criminal court
Civil procedure
Civil proceedings are court actions arising from disputes between individuals. They are initiated by individuals or organisations, not the state. Civil proceedings manage matters such as:
- Breach of contract
- Property disputes
- Negligence
- Other civil wrongs (torts)
The parties in civil cases
Plaintiff: The person who brings the civil action against someone else. The plaintiff issues a statement of claim or summons to begin proceedings.
Defendant: The individual or organisation who must defend their actions—the person alleged to have committed the breach or wrong.
The process in a civil claim
The civil claim process follows a structured series of steps that allow both parties to present their case and attempt resolution before trial.
1. Statement of claim:
- Outlines the facts of the dispute and the parties involved
- Must be 'served' on the defendant following strict rules
- The court with jurisdiction depends on the type of claim and monetary amount involved
2. Pleadings:
Pleadings: Written statements of the parties to a civil dispute that set out the issues to be decided by the court.
The statement of claim is the first pleading. There may be many pleadings alternating between parties over the course of the case. This exchange helps clarify the issues in dispute.
3. Statement of defence:
- The defendant responds to the plaintiff's claim
- May deny or challenge the plaintiff's allegations
- May admit allegations but plead additional facts to counter them
- Defendant may also file a counterclaim against the plaintiff
4. Discovery:
During the discovery phase, parties obtain more information about each other's arguments:
- Interrogatories: Written questions submitted to the other party, which must be answered
- Questions must be relevant to a matter in question
- Many civil disputes are resolved at this stage through settlement
Legal practitioners usually prepare these documents as they understand the processes and can provide appropriate, timely legal advice. This professional guidance is crucial for navigating the complex procedural requirements.
5. Trial:
If the dispute cannot be settled, the matter proceeds to trial. During trial:
- Each side has the right to produce evidence
- Both sides call witnesses
- Both sides conduct cross-examinations
- When both sides have presented all evidence, the judge makes a ruling
6. Judgment:
If the plaintiff succeeds, the judge decides the amount of relief (compensation) the defendant must give the plaintiff. This usually takes the form of:
- Damages: Monetary compensation
- Injunction: A court order prohibiting specified activities
- Specific performance: Completion of a required action (e.g., transfer of disputed property)
Burden and standard of proof in civil cases
Burden of proof: Rests on the injured party (the plaintiff) to prove their allegations. The rules of civil procedure give the defendant the chance to provide evidence that rebuts the plaintiff's case.
Rebuttal: To disprove a statement or evidence presented by another party.
Standard of proof: In civil cases, the standard is 'on the balance of probabilities'. This means:
- The plaintiff must prove it was more probable than not that they suffered injury or loss as a result of the defendant's actions
- The plaintiff must show their claim is more likely correct than incorrect
- This is a lower standard than the criminal standard of beyond reasonable doubt
- If the evidence shows a greater than likelihood the plaintiff's claim is correct, the standard is met
Key Difference in Standards
The civil standard of balance of probabilities ( likelihood) is significantly lower than the criminal standard of beyond reasonable doubt. This reflects the different consequences: civil cases typically result in monetary compensation, while criminal cases can result in imprisonment and loss of liberty.
Personnel in court cases
Court cases involve numerous participants with official and unofficial roles. Understanding these roles is essential for comprehending court procedures and the administration of justice.
Judges and magistrates
Judges:
- Preside over intermediate and superior courts (District and Supreme Courts)
- Make decisions about points of law
- Give instructions to the jury to ensure they understand proceedings and evidence
- Hand down sentences in criminal cases and rulings in civil cases
- In civil cases without a jury, the judge is responsible for the final decision
- Must be legally qualified professionals with extensive experience in law
Magistrates:
- In charge of lower courts (Local or Magistrates' Courts)
- After hearing both sides, decide whether a person is guilty or innocent
- Decide on punishment in criminal cases
- Determine the amount of money awarded in civil cases
- Refer very serious criminal offences to District Court (NSW) or Supreme Court (ACT)
- Hear some indictable matters in committal hearings to determine if they should proceed to trial
- If there is enough evidence to establish a prima facie case, the matter is referred to a higher court
Judge's associate
- Acts as confidential secretary to the judge
- Performs clerical duties for the court
- Generally has a law degree
- Provides administrative support to the judge
Tipstaff
- Supports the judge in matters of procedure and organisation when court is in session
- Provides research and administrative support when court is not in session
- Assists with the smooth running of court proceedings
Barristers and solicitors
The legal profession is divided into two branches, each with distinct roles and responsibilities:
Solicitors:
- First point of contact for people seeking legal advice
- Give legal advice on a wide range of legal issues
- Must have completed a recognised law course and relevant work experience
- Work in various practice areas including:
- Family law
- Conveyancing for real estate transactions
- Preparation of wills and contracts
- Traditionally prepare briefs for barristers when cases go to court
- Do research and provide legal advice
- In Local or Magistrates' Courts, commonly appear on behalf of clients
- In NSW, issued different practising certificates from barristers
Barristers:
- Traditionally the only legal professionals who can represent parties in higher courts
- Often specialise in one area of law (e.g., family law)
- Develop depth of knowledge and expertise in their specialisation
- Solicitors approach barristers on behalf of their clients
Two main roles of barristers:
- Provide legal advice on the likely outcome of a court case based on facts provided by their client, allowing the client to decide the best course of action
- Present their client's case in court proceedings (both criminal and civil)
Witness
- Gives evidence regarding the case in court
- Both parties can call witnesses to support their claims
- Cannot enter the courtroom until their name is called
- Once called, must take the stand and either:
- Swear an oath, or
- Make an affirmation to tell the truth
- Subject to examination in chief and cross-examination
Court officer
The court officer has multiple responsibilities that ensure the smooth operation of court proceedings:
- Manages court lists
- Calls witnesses into the courtroom
- Administers oaths or affirmations
- Ensures the public are seated in appropriate areas
- Announces the arrival and departure of the judge
- Communicates questions from jurors to the judge
- Passes documents from the bar table to the associate, who gives them to the judge, jury, or witnesses
- Advises the judge's associate when the jury is ready to return a verdict
- Operates audio-visual equipment where necessary
- Gives instructions to the jury and answers questions from jurors
- Manages the jury room and ensures jurors' comfort
Court reporter
- All court proceedings must be recorded
- Recording may be written (shorthand or shorthand machine) or audio/visual
- Must produce an accurate written transcript of what has been said in the courtroom
- Transcript serves as the official record of proceedings
Corrective services officer
- In criminal cases, guards the accused
- Escorts the accused to and from the courtroom
- Ensures security during proceedings
Jury
A jury is a panel of citizens who consider the evidence and decide on questions raised in the case. Their job is 'fact-finding', and their decision is called a verdict.
Jury composition and selection:
- Members are ordinary people randomly selected from the electoral roll
- Criminal trials involve jurors
- Civil cases in NSW may have jurors (or judge alone)
- Before a case begins, jury members are sworn in
Challenges to jury selection:
In criminal trials, both prosecution and defence can challenge jury selection:
1. Challenges for cause: Must have a reason such as:
- Person not qualified to serve
- Person ineligible or disqualified
- Suspected bias
2. Peremptory challenges: A certain number of challenges without giving a reason
- Usually based only on name, age, gender, race, clothing, or physique
- No advance information about jurors except their names
Jury responsibilities:
- Consider evidence and decide on issues of fact
- Determine whether there is enough evidence to convict the accused
- Must reach a unanimous verdict (all jurors must agree)
- In NSW, after at least hours if unanimity cannot be reached:
- of jurors can decide (if jurors)
- of jurors can decide (if jurors)
Plaintiffs and defendants
In civil cases:
- Plaintiff: The person who brings a civil action against someone else
- Defendant: The person who must defend their actions
In criminal cases:
- Defendant: The person accused of the crime
- No plaintiff (the state prosecutes)
Media
- Often attend high-profile court cases to report on them
- Generally sit in the media gallery
- May wait outside court to interview people
- Subject to restrictions (e.g., cannot identify children in Children's Court cases)
- Play important role in informing public about legal proceedings
Exam guidance
Answering Exam Questions Effectively
When answering questions about criminal and civil court procedures:
For 'describe' questions:
- Provide a detailed account of the process or role
- Include key terminology with definitions
- Explain each step in logical order
- Give examples where appropriate
For 'distinguish' or 'compare' questions:
- Clearly identify similarities and differences
- Use comparative language (whereas, however, in contrast)
- Organise your answer in a logical structure (point-by-point or side-by-side)
- Reference the table of key differences between criminal and civil proceedings
For 'explain' questions:
- State the concept or process
- Describe how it works
- Explain why it works this way or why it is important
- Use legal terminology accurately
For 'evaluate' or 'assess' questions:
- Consider multiple perspectives
- Discuss strengths and weaknesses
- Use evidence and examples to support your points
- Reach a justified conclusion
Remember!
Key Points to Remember:
- Criminal cases are brought by the state and proven beyond reasonable doubt; civil cases are brought by individuals and proven on the balance of probabilities
- The adversarial system is used in both criminal and civil cases, where representatives of each party present their case to a judge (and sometimes jury)
- Summary offences are minor crimes heard by a magistrate alone; indictable offences are serious crimes that may be heard by a judge and jury
- Before an indictable offence goes to trial, a committal hearing determines if there is a prima facie case
- In criminal trials, the jury of people must reach a unanimous verdict, though NSW law allows of (or of ) after at least hours
- Burden of proof in criminal cases is on the prosecution; in civil cases it is on the plaintiff
- Court personnel include judges/magistrates, judge's associate, tipstaff, barristers, solicitors, witnesses, court officers, court reporters, and in criminal cases, corrective services officers
- Children under are treated differently by the court system, with cases heard in closed Children's Courts and, in NSW, no conviction recorded for those under
- Key legal terms: prosecutor, defendant, plaintiff, onus, beyond reasonable doubt, balance of probabilities, examination in chief, cross-examination, credibility, pleadings, prima facie, burden of proof