The Nature and Sources of the British Constitution (AQA A-Level Politics): Revision Notes
The Nature and Sources of the British Constitution
Introduction
Understanding a constitution is like understanding the rules of a sport. Just as footballers must follow the offside rule and play with a set number of players, politicians must operate within constitutional rules. The constitution provides the framework for how politics is conducted. As the nineteenth-century political journalist Walter Bagehot observed: "On all great subjects ... much remains to be said and of none is this more true than of the English Constitution."
Evaluating a constitution
Not all constitutions reflect the reality of politics in their countries. In authoritarian states, constitutional promises may be meaningless.
Historical Example: USSR Constitutional Contradictions
Article 125 of the 1936 USSR Constitution promised "freedom of religious worship", yet Stalin's regime brutally persecuted all religions. This demonstrates how constitutional promises can be meaningless without proper enforcement mechanisms and genuine commitment to constitutional principles.
A well-functioning constitution in a Western liberal democracy should demonstrate the following characteristics:
- Free and fair elections that are genuinely democratic
- Protection of human rights and individual freedoms, with respect for personal conscience and tolerance
- Balance between individual and collective rights ensuring both are protected
- Clear distribution of power showing where decision-making authority lies and establishing the location of sovereignty (final power and authority)
- Mechanisms for resolving conflicts when normal decision-making breaks down, such as during the Brexit crises of 2016 and 2019
- Accessibility and clarity that encourages citizen participation in the political process
- Flexibility and adaptability to changing circumstances whilst maintaining core values and national identity
- Rule of law upheld through an independent judiciary that treats everyone equally regardless of position, privilege or wealth
A strong constitution promotes political stability and shared prosperity across society.
The nature of the British Constitution
Unlike the US Constitution, which visitors can view in the National Archives in Washington DC, the British Constitution cannot be seen in one place. When journalist Woodrow Wyatt asked Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher for a copy of the British Constitution, the question was ironic. The British Constitution exists in multiple places and various forms.
Key characteristics
Uncodified
The British Constitution is uncodified, meaning it is not contained in one single document or place. This makes it fundamentally different from most modern constitutions, such as the American Constitution, which are written down in a single authoritative document.
What "Uncodified" Really Means
An uncodified constitution does not mean "unwritten". Much of the British Constitution is actually written down in statutes, legal documents, and authoritative texts. However, these sources are spread across multiple locations rather than being consolidated into a single, supreme constitutional document.
Unitary
The British Constitution is unitary, meaning most power lies with the centre at Westminster Parliament. This contrasts with federal systems like the USA and Germany, where considerable power lies with individual regions or states. The Tenth Amendment of the US Constitution explicitly reserves powers not delegated to the federal government to individual states.
The Quasi-Federal Debate
However, the development of devolved assemblies in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland has weakened this unitary aspect. Some political commentators now describe the current Constitution as "quasi-federal" because significant powers have been transferred to regional assemblies.
Parliamentary sovereignty
Parliament has the final say on what the Constitution contains. This principle is sometimes expressed as "No parliament can bind its successor", meaning any law passed by one elected parliament can be changed or repealed by a later parliament.
Worked Example: Parliamentary Sovereignty in Action
A clear example is UK membership of the European Union:
Step 1: Parliament voted to join the EEC through the European Communities Act 1972
Step 2: Decades later, this Act was repealed by:
- The European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018
- The European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Act 2020
Result: These new Acts enabled Brexit, demonstrating that no parliament can bind its successor. The 1972 parliament could not prevent future parliaments from reversing its decision.
Rule of law
The British Constitution operates under the rule of law, meaning the law applies equally to everyone, including those who make the law. Prime ministers and ministers must not exceed their lawful powers. If they do, their actions can be challenged in the courts and they can be found guilty of acting ultra vires (beyond the law).
The Twin Pillars of the British Constitution
The nineteenth-century political writer A.V. Dicey described parliamentary sovereignty and the rule of law as the "twin pillars" of the British Constitution. These two principles work together to ensure both democratic governance and legal accountability.

Comparison with the US Constitution
Parliamentary sovereignty makes the British Constitution flexible and adaptable. It can be changed simply by an Act of Parliament. By contrast, the US Constitution is sovereign, meaning all laws passed by Congress must comply with it. Formal amendment of the US Constitution requires complex procedures, making changes rare and difficult.
The main sources of the British Constitution
The British Constitution is derived from six main sources, each contributing different elements to the overall constitutional framework.
Statute law
Statute law comprises Acts of Parliament that have been passed by both houses of parliament and received royal assent. This forms the most important source of the British Constitution.
Constitutional statute law includes laws that define fundamental aspects of governance and rights:
- Who can vote: The Representation of the People Act 1969 lowered the voting age from 21 to 18
- Human rights: The Human Rights Act 1998 incorporated the European Convention on Human Rights into UK law
- Institutional reform: The Constitutional Reform Act 2005 established the UK Supreme Court
- Devolution: The Wales Act 2017 devolved further powers to the Welsh Parliament/Senedd Cymru
Important Distinction: Not All Statute Law is Constitutional
Most statute law is not constitutional. Education acts or the annual Finance Act that passes the Chancellor's budget do not affect the Constitution. Only laws that alter governmental structures, powers, rights or procedures are constitutional statute law.
Before Brexit in January 2020, European law indirectly formed part of the British Constitution. European laws and treaties (such as the Lisbon Treaty 2007) automatically took precedence over Westminster laws and were binding on the UK government. This represented a clear, if ultimately temporary, limit on parliamentary sovereignty.
Common law
Common law comprises laws or rights passed down over the years through legal judgements in the courts, a process known as judicial precedence. It is sometimes called case law or judge-made law. Senior judges create legal precedents through their rulings, which then guide future decisions.
Examples of common law include:
- Freedom of expression
- The criminality of murder (though no single statute makes murder illegal, it has always been recognised as a crime by the courts)
The Relationship Between Common Law and Statute Law
Common law can be modified by statute law. For instance, whilst murder has always been considered a criminal offence under common law, various statute laws have dealt with punishments, such as the abolition of the death penalty in 1965.
Royal prerogative
The royal prerogative consists of residual powers exercised in the name of the Crown. In modern practice, these powers are exercised by the prime minister and government, not the monarch. The modern monarchy must remain above party politics and plays only a ceremonial role.
Royal prerogative powers range from high-profile to obscure:
High-profile powers:
- Seeking dissolution or prorogation (suspension) of parliament
- Appointing ministers
- Making international treaties
- Calling general elections
Less well-known powers:
- Issuing UK passports
Case Study: Boris Johnson's Prorogation Attempt (2019)
Background: In August 2019, Prime Minister Boris Johnson sought the Queen's permission to prorogue parliament for an unusually long period of 5 weeks. Critics viewed this as an attempt to avoid full scrutiny of the government's Brexit proposals, with the withdrawal date set for 31 October.
What Happened: Prorogation was granted, but the UK Supreme Court unanimously ruled it illegal in September 2019.
The Ruling: The 11-0 judgement declared the action unlawful.
Constitutional Significance: This case illustrates tensions between different constitutional principles. To Brexit supporters, the court's intervention seemed like a deliberate attempt to frustrate "getting Brexit done". To others, it demonstrated the judiciary properly upholding parliamentary sovereignty and restraining an excessive executive power grab.
The government guide on passport issuance states: "There is no statute law governing the grant, refusal of British passports, which are issued in the United Kingdom...passports are issued in the UK at the discretion of the Home Secretary. They are issued in exercise of the Royal Prerogative, which is an executive power that doesn't require legislation."
The royal prerogative significantly boosts the powers of the prime minister and the executive branch.
Conventions
Conventions are the "oil and grease" of the British Constitution whilst laws are the "nuts and bolts". Conventions are unwritten, generally agreed rules and procedures that enable politics and parliament to function efficiently and smoothly. They are not legally binding but are widely respected.
The Salisbury-Addison Convention (1945)
Context: Following Labour's landslide election victory in 1945, the Conservative-dominated House of Lords faced a dilemma about how to treat the new government's manifesto promises.
The Agreement: The Lords agreed not to delay any manifesto promises of Clement Attlee's new Labour government.
Outcome: This convention protected democratic mandates, allowing the government to establish the NHS and implement other manifesto commitments.
Forming a government after elections
After a general election, the monarch formally invites the leader of the largest single party to form a government. This is straightforward when one party wins an overall majority, as in 2019.
Hung Parliament Procedures
When there is a "hung parliament" (no single party has an overall majority), the leader of the party with the most seats is invited first. In 2010, David Cameron was invited despite not having a majority. Had he failed to secure a coalition agreement with the Liberal Democrats, the Queen would then have appointed Labour's leader Gordon Brown as prime minister.
Royal assent
Perhaps the most important legislative convention is that the monarch gives royal assent to all bills passed by both houses of parliament. The last time royal assent was withheld was in 1707, when Queen Anne refused to sign the Scottish Militia Bill. Denial of royal assent today would create a constitutional crisis.
When conventions are broken
Breaking conventions can lead to serious problems and deadlock. In March 2019, Speaker John Bercow cited a 1604 convention to prevent Prime Minister Theresa May from bringing her Brexit withdrawal deal before the Commons for a third time in that parliamentary session, causing significant parliamentary disruption.
Works of authority
Works of authority are arguably the least visible sources of the British Constitution. They comprise influential books and documents dealing with parliamentary procedures, governmental responsibilities and ministerial duties. These texts provide guidance and interpretation but have no formal legal status.
Walter Bagehot's The English Constitution (1867)
Bagehot distinguished between "dignified" and "efficient" aspects of the Constitution. The monarch represented the dignified part, having no real political power by the 1860s. The cabinet held most real power, emerging from the House of Commons, which Bagehot called "the ultimate authority in the English Constitution".
Bagehot's Famous Definition of the Cabinet
Bagehot memorably defined the cabinet as "A combining committee — a hyphen which joins, a buckle which fastens, the legislative part of the state to the executive part of the state."
This metaphor emphasizes how the cabinet bridges Parliament (legislative) and government (executive), a key feature distinguishing the British parliamentary system from presidential systems like the USA.
A.V. Dicey's Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (1885)
Dicey, an Oxford law professor, identified the main characteristics of the British Constitution, including his "twin pillars" of parliamentary sovereignty and the rule of law. He established conventions such as "The King must assent to, or (as it is inaccurately expressed) cannot 'veto' any bill passed by the two Houses of Parliament."
Dicey strongly asserted parliamentary sovereignty, stating that parliament was "an absolutely sovereign legislature" with "the right to make or unmake any law whatever". He reinforced this by quoting eighteenth-century Swiss political theorist Jean-Louis de Lolme: "parliament (in England) can do everything but make a woman a man and a man a woman."
Erskine May's Parliamentary Practice (first published 1844)
Often called "the Bible of parliamentary procedure", Erskine May (most recently updated in 2019) is regularly referenced by the Speaker of the Commons when making rulings about parliamentary business and debates. It includes standing orders of each chamber, historical precedents and key Speaker rulings.
The Continuing Relevance of Erskine May
Whilst this might seem technical, it gains public prominence during constitutional controversies. Speaker John Bercow's use of May to block Theresa May's third Brexit vote in March 2019 demonstrated its continuing relevance and practical importance in parliamentary decision-making.
The Cabinet Manual (2010)
Produced by the Cabinet Office at the start of the 2010 coalition government (the first in over 60 years), this 110-page guide explains how British government and parliament work. It covers ministerial conduct, cabinet composition and parliamentary scrutiny of government.
Prime Minister Gordon Brown initiated the project. David Cameron explained its purpose: "The Cabinet Manual sets out the internal rules and procedures under which the government operates. For the first time the conventions determining how the government operates are transparently set out in one place. Codifying and publishing these sheds welcome light on how the government interacts with the other parts of our democratic system."
The Cabinet Manual's Constitutional Status
Cabinet Secretary Sir Gus O'Donnell described it in 2011 as "A guide to laws, conventions and rules on the operation of government. It is to guide but not to direct. It will have no formal legal status and it is not meant to be legally binding...It is not intended to be a written constitution."
This distinction is crucial: even when conventions and procedures are written down, they do not become legally enforceable unless enacted as statute law.
Authoritative opinions and international agreements
Authoritative opinions are views and definitions regarded as the final word on an issue. However, they remain opinions without the same power as laws and can be easily overruled by parliamentary statute. They function similarly to conventions in this respect.
International agreements include treaties and protocols the UK has signed, such as the European Convention on Human Rights and climate change agreements. Whilst these remain in place, the government is obliged to abide by their terms or face legal challenges in the courts.
Remember!
Key Takeaways:
-
The British Constitution is uncodified (not written in one document), unitary (power concentrated at Westminster), and characterised by parliamentary sovereignty (Parliament has final say on constitutional matters)
-
The "twin pillars" of the Constitution are parliamentary sovereignty and the rule of law, ensuring democratic governance with legal accountability
-
The Constitution has six main sources: statute law, common law, royal prerogative, conventions, works of authority, and international agreements
-
Parliamentary sovereignty means "no parliament can bind its successor" – any law can be changed or repealed by a later parliament
-
Conventions are unwritten rules that enable smooth parliamentary functioning; breaking them can cause constitutional crises
-
Important works of authority include Bagehot's The English Constitution, Dicey's Law of the Constitution, Erskine May's Parliamentary Practice, and The Cabinet Manual