Social Class and Identity (AQA A-Level Sociology): Revision Notes
Social Class and Identity
Social class represents one of the most influential factors shaping individual and collective identity in modern society. Understanding how class structures affect identity formation requires examining both traditional Marxist perspectives and contemporary sociological debates about the continued relevance of class divisions.
Understanding social class
Social class refers to a group of people with similar levels of wealth, influence and status. This economic category typically reflects the amount of economic power and material wealth an individual possesses. Class serves as one method of organising society into different groups, with its theoretical foundations rooted in Marxist sociology.
Karl Marx's original theory proposed a binary class system, but modern society requires more complex classification systems to reflect contemporary social diversity.
Karl Marx argued that capitalist society would ultimately consist of two main classes: the bourgeoisie (those who owned the means of production) and the proletariat (those who sell their labour to the bourgeoisie). However, contemporary postmodern society requires more complex classification systems to accommodate the diverse range of social positions that exist beyond this binary division.
Methods of measuring social class
Sociologists employ two primary approaches to classify individuals into social classes:
Objective measurement
This approach places people within social classes using scales and measurement devices. The government utilises the National Statistics Socio-Economic Classification, which creates eight different classes based on occupation type and income levels. The NE-SEC scale ranges from higher managerial and professional occupations at the top to those who have never worked or are long-term unemployed at the bottom.
Subjective measurement
This method relies on individuals' own perceptions of their class position. Factors influencing self-assessment include occupation, housing quality, health status, education level, consumption patterns, and leisure activities.
Mackintosh and Mooney (2000) highlight how occupation connects to identity through social class. Our judgements about our own jobs and those of others influence classification processes. As they observe, social class provides "a sense of belonging; it can tell us who 'we' are and who 'they' are and, hence, how to relate to the world around us."
Class and life chances
Social class demonstrates a strong correlation with life chances - defined by Max Weber as your opportunities to enjoy society's benefits whilst avoiding its disadvantages. Higher parental class positions typically increase children's likelihood of achieving educational qualifications and securing well-paid, high-status employment.
Research Example: Middle-Class Educational Advantage
Reay (1998) conducted research comparing how different classes influence children's primary schooling:
Finding: Middle-class mothers can influence their children's primary schooling more effectively than working-class mothers.
Explanation: Working-class mothers face greater time constraints due to employment demands, reducing opportunities for crucial socialisation with their children.
Implication: This demonstrates how class position directly affects educational outcomes and future life chances.
Contemporary debates about class relevance
Declining importance perspective
Pete Saunders (1990) argues that traditional work-based class divisions are becoming less relevant. He proposes that consumption patterns now matter more than production relationships. Saunders suggests society is characterised by a major consumption cleavage - divisions based on how people spend their money rather than how they earn it. Home ownership has encouraged working-class individuals to focus on family life rather than broader class solidarity, weakening traditional class identities.
Postmodernist viewpoint
Postmodernists contend that class no longer significantly influences identity or culture. Instead, consumption dictates lifestyle choices rather than class position. Media representations of lifestyle options and accessible designer goods through high-street retailers have enabled individuals to construct identities around leisure and consumption preferences rather than class background.
Critical Debate: While some argue class is declining in importance, substantial evidence continues to show class-based differences in education, health, and employment outcomes, suggesting class remains highly relevant.
Bourdieu's theory of capital
Pierre Bourdieu (1979) emphasises cultural aspects of class alongside economic factors. He identifies four main types of capital in society:
-
Economic capital - Material goods including wealth, property, shares, and employment income. This can be transferred relatively easily through gifts or inheritance.
-
Cultural capital - Educational qualifications and knowledge of creative and artistic culture, including music, drama, art and cinema. Bourdieu distinguishes different levels of cultural engagement and appreciation.
-
Social capital - Social connections, networks, and relationships that provide access to help, opportunities, or favours.
-
Symbolic capital - Reputation for competence and respectability, similar to status concepts.
These capital types interconnect significantly. Accumulating economic capital often requires possessing cultural, social, or symbolic capital. Without appropriate educational qualifications, cultural knowledge, social contacts, or reputation for competence, securing well-paid employment becomes challenging.
The habitus represents "a structured and structuring structure" encompassing subjective ways different classes understand and perceive the world, including their tastes and preferences. This produces specific lifestyles influencing leisure activities, social mixing, media consumption, educational values, and dietary choices.
Four main social classes in the UK
The upper class
A small group comprising society's primary wealth owners, including wealthy industrialists, landowners, and traditional aristocracy. Many possess sufficient assets that work becomes unnecessary for survival.
The middle class
A large class encompassing non-manual workers in office environments involving paperwork and information technology, such as secretaries and teachers. Some debate exists about whether lower-level non-manual positions should be classified as working class due to similar pay and conditions to manual work.
The working class
One of the largest social classes, including skilled, semi-skilled, and unskilled manual workers in factories and labouring roles. This class generally experiences fewer privileges and life chances compared to the middle class.
The under class
A small group positioned at the bottom of the class structure, characterised as work-shy and reliant on crime and welfare benefits. Murray (1994) describes them as a "new rabble" with distinct cultural practices, representing a culture of dependency where families rely on welfare rather than self-sufficiency.
Theoretical perspectives on class
Marxist perspective
Marx viewed cultural aspects as shaped by economic infrastructure. In his theory, all societies contain ruling and subject classes, with the ruling class owning production means and exploiting the subject class. The ruling class uses superstructure elements (legal, political, educational systems) to legitimise their position and prevent subject class protests through false consciousness.
Functionalist perspective
Functionalists argue that class systems help society operate smoothly as a meritocracy where the most capable individuals reach top positions. They believe high status, power, and income reward conformity to societal values, with most people accepting this system as legitimate.
Contemporary evidence
Recent BBC research involving over 160,000 people suggests Britain now contains seven distinct social classes rather than the traditional three. This includes a privileged elite (6% of population) with high levels of economic, cultural, and social capital, and a precariat (15% of population) - the most deprived group with low levels of all capital types.
Key research studies
Study 1: Charlesworth - A phenomenology of working-class experience (1999)
Participants: Residents of Rotherham, Yorkshire
Aim: To understand working-class identity in post-industrial communities
Procedure: Interviews with residents in a town affected by mining and steel industry decline
Findings: Working-class communities develop distinctive habitus based on their living conditions. Friday and Saturday nights involve pub culture focused on appearance and being seen rather than meaningful conversation.
Evaluation strengths: Provides detailed insight into how class affects daily experience and identity formation
Evaluation weaknesses: Limited to specific geographical area; may not represent all working-class experiences
Study 2: Carter and Coleman - Teenage pregnancy research (2006)
Participants: 41 teenage mothers from different class backgrounds
Aim: To examine class influences on teenage pregnancy decisions
Procedure: Interviews exploring family background and decision-making processes
Findings: Girls from unskilled backgrounds were almost ten times more likely to become teenage mothers compared to professional backgrounds. Many viewed motherhood as providing new identity and purpose.
Evaluation strengths: Demonstrates clear class-based patterns in life choices
Evaluation weaknesses: Small sample size; focuses only on those who became mothers
Contemporary developments
Modern identity formation increasingly reflects diversity, choice, globalisation, and consumption patterns. Some sociologists argue these factors have made traditional class analysis less relevant for understanding contemporary social relationships and identity construction.
However, research continues to demonstrate substantial class-based differences in educational achievement, health outcomes, employment prospects, and cultural practices, suggesting class remains an important influence on identity formation in twenty-first century Britain.
Key Points to Remember:
-
Social class is defined by similar levels of wealth, influence, and status, measured through both objective scales and subjective self-assessment
-
Bourdieu's four capitals (economic, cultural, social, symbolic) work together to determine class position and lifestyle choices
-
Life chances vary significantly between classes, affecting educational outcomes, employment opportunities, and health prospects
-
Contemporary debates question whether traditional class divisions remain relevant in postmodern consumer society
-
Research evidence continues to demonstrate strong connections between class background and identity formation, despite claims about declining class significance