Social Policies in Education (AQA A-Level Sociology): Revision Notes
Social Policies in Education
Social policies in education encompass both policies directly targeting educational institutions and broader social policies that affect educational outcomes. These policies have evolved significantly across different political eras, each with distinct approaches to addressing educational inequality and social mobility.
Understanding social policies in education requires examining both direct educational interventions and broader social policies that influence educational outcomes. The relationship between politics, ideology, and educational provision has created complex patterns of advantage and disadvantage for different social groups.
Educational policies across political eras
Conservative government (1979-1997)
The Conservative era introduced marketisation policies that fundamentally changed how schools operate. Marketisation involves running schools more like businesses, introducing competition and choice into the education system.
Understanding Marketisation
Marketisation in education means applying business principles to schools - creating competition between institutions, increasing parental choice, and linking funding to performance. This fundamental shift moved away from the traditional model of state-controlled education towards a market-driven system.
Impact on social class: The introduction of marketisation created wider inequalities between social classes. The national curriculum established standardised learning, but it placed emphasis on vocational education through a 'one-size-fits-all' approach. Competition between schools led middle-class parents to move to areas with better-performing schools, creating polarisation between high-performing and struggling institutions. Better-performing schools received increased funding, widening existing gaps.
Impact on gender: The 1988 Education Reform Act brought notable changes for gender equality. Girls' academic performance improved partly due to the national curriculum, which prevented schools from excluding girls from subjects like mathematics and science. The introduction of coursework benefited girls, who typically performed well in this assessment method, helping to improve their overall results. Specific policies were also designed to encourage girls into science and technology subjects through initiatives like GIST and WISE programmes.
Impact on ethnicity: The marketisation policies increased disadvantages for some ethnic minority groups who lacked the cultural and financial resources to effectively navigate the new choice-based system.
The 1988 Education Reform Act was pivotal in reshaping British education. It introduced the National Curriculum, Standard Assessment Tests (SATs), and Local Management of Schools, fundamentally changing how education was delivered and assessed across the country.
New Labour (1997-2010)
New Labour continued marketisation while introducing compensatory educational policies to address material and cultural disadvantages.
Impact on social class: The government maintained school choice and competition whilst introducing policies like the Educational Maintenance Allowance (EMA) and Sure Start programmes. These aimed to tackle material deprivation and support working-class families. There was a focus on raising working-class boys' aspirations through targeted interventions.
Impact on gender: New Labour continued using coursework assessment, which maintained girls' performance advantages. Compensatory policies were introduced specifically to encourage boys to improve their literacy skills and educational engagement.
Impact on ethnicity: The government established Education Action Zones in inner cities with high proportions of ethnic minorities. They introduced academies to raise standards in failing schools in disadvantaged areas, often serving diverse communities.
New Labour's approach represented a "Third Way" in education policy - maintaining market mechanisms while introducing targeted support for disadvantaged groups. This dual approach aimed to combine efficiency with equity in educational provision.
Coalition and Conservative governments (2010-2015)
The Coalition government intensified marketisation policies while implementing austerity measures that affected educational funding.
Impact on social class: The government focused on raising standards through continued marketisation, which resulted in further inequalities between working-class and middle-class students. The Education Maintenance Allowance was abolished, removing financial support that helped disadvantaged students remain in education. University fees were raised significantly, making higher education less accessible for some students. The curriculum emphasis shifted towards more traditional subjects, which typically favour middle-class students.
Impact on gender: There was a reduction in coursework assessment and greater emphasis on written examinations. This change has been shown to disadvantage girls' preferred learning and assessment styles. Policies focusing on compensatory education for boys were reduced.
Impact on ethnicity: The government placed greater emphasis on marketisation, which continued to disadvantage some ethnic minority groups who had fewer resources to make effective school choices. Funding for compensatory education programmes was reduced, affecting support for minority students.
Ethnicity and education policy
Development of multicultural education
Since the 1960s, there has been growing recognition of different ethnic groups within UK society. This led to the development of multicultural education, which represents a reform process that challenges racism and discrimination in schools while celebrating diversity.
Multicultural Education Definition
Multicultural education is "a process of reform which challenges and rejects racism and other forms of discrimination in schools and society, and accepts and affirms the pluralism (ethnic, racial, linguistic, religious, economic and gender, among others) that students, their communities and teachers represent."
This encompasses curriculum content, teaching strategies, and interactions between teachers, students, and parents across all dimensions of diversity.
Debates around cultural focus
There has been increased recognition of ethnic minorities' positive contributions to British society since the 1960s. However, critics argue that the national curriculum maintains focus on white history, culture, and general ethnocentrism.
Former education minister Michael Gove faced criticism for arguing that the education system should prioritise British history and British culture. This debate reflects broader tensions between different ethnic groups and concerns about immigration levels.
New Right perspectives
New Right thinkers advocate for education policies that emphasise raising educational standards rather than reducing inequalities. They argue that education should focus on traditional subjects including mathematics, English, sciences, history, and geography - areas where middle-class students traditionally perform better.
New Right ideology suggests that education should not encourage universal university participation for all students. This approach may limit social mobility opportunities for working-class students, potentially increasing inequalities within education and wider society.
New Right educational philosophy emphasises meritocracy, traditional knowledge, and academic rigour. This approach contrasts with progressive educational philosophies that prioritise social justice, student-centered learning, and addressing educational inequalities.
Impact of marketisation on different social groups
Marketisation policies have created differential effects across various social groups:
Class impact: Increased parental choice benefits middle-class families who possess greater cultural and economic resources to research schools and relocate to desirable areas. This advantage allows them to access better-performing schools more easily than working-class families.
Gender impact: Some girls respond positively to performance pressures within competitive school environments, which may contribute to widening gender achievement gaps. However, girls are often perceived as high achievers, making them attractive candidates for selective schools.
Ethnicity impact: Some ethnic minority families have fewer cultural and material advantages, limiting their ability to utilise school choice effectively. This can perpetuate educational disadvantages for certain ethnic groups.
Key Impacts of Marketisation:
- Class: Middle-class families better equipped to navigate school choice systems
- Gender: Mixed effects - competitive environments may benefit some girls but assessment changes can disadvantage others
- Ethnicity: Limited resources may prevent effective utilisation of school choice for some minority groups
- Overall: Market mechanisms tend to amplify existing social advantages rather than reduce inequalities
Contemporary developments
Free schools
Free schools represent a recent development in education policy, introduced by the Coalition government between 2010-2015.
Free Schools Definition
Free schools are "non-profit-making, independent, state-funded schools that are free to attend but which are not controlled by a Local Authority."
These institutions operate as academies and can be established by teachers, charities, education experts, and parents. They represent increased autonomy from traditional local authority control while remaining publicly funded.
Free schools can be established by teachers, charities, education experts, and parents. The Conservative government elected in 2015 planned to expand the free schools programme further. This development reflects continuing trends towards increased individualisation in education and connects with postmodern approaches to educational provision.
Policy considerations and gaps
When examining social policies in education, it's important to consider not only implemented policies but also policy absences. For example, despite ongoing gender achievement gaps, there remains a lack of specific policies addressing girls' limited participation in traditionally masculine subjects under recent Conservative governments.
The increased choice in school types and enhanced parental choice reflect greater individualism in education policy, moving away from collective approaches towards more personalised educational provision.
Policy gaps can be as significant as policy implementations. The absence of specific interventions for certain groups or issues often reflects underlying political priorities and ideological assumptions about the role of education in society.
Key Points to Remember:
-
Marketisation has been a consistent theme across different political eras, but its implementation and accompanying policies have varied significantly
-
Different social groups (class, gender, ethnicity) experience varying impacts from the same education policies
-
Political ideology shapes education policy - Conservative governments favour market-based solutions while Labour governments typically include more compensatory measures
-
Multicultural education development since the 1960s reflects changing demographics but remains contested
-
Free schools represent the latest development in increasing school choice and parental control over education