The Impact of Education Policies (AQA A-Level Sociology): Revision Notes
The Impact of Education Policies
Education has undergone substantial transformation through government policies across different political eras. These policies shape not only the structure of schooling but also reflect and transmit societal values to students. Understanding how successive governments have approached education reveals the ongoing tensions between equality, choice, and standards in the British education system.
Education policies serve as windows into society's values and priorities. As Whitty and Young (1976) noted: "Policies inform students of the prevailing values of society, which they then absorb." This makes understanding policy development crucial for grasping broader social change.
Educational policies before 1979
Several foundational policies established the framework for modern education, each building upon previous reforms while addressing contemporary social needs.
The 1870 Education Act marked the first national commitment to providing education, establishing the principle of state responsibility for schooling. This was expanded by the 1918 Education Act, which raised the compulsory school leaving age to 14, recognising the need for extended educational participation.
The 1944 Butler Act introduced more comprehensive changes, raising the leaving age to 15 and providing free secondary education. Most importantly, it established the tripartite system, which created three types of schools designed to serve different student populations:
- Grammar schools for academically able students
- Secondary technical schools for those suited to technical education
- Secondary modern schools for the majority of students
The tripartite system aimed to provide "parity of esteem" between school types, but in practice created significant inequalities. Grammar schools became dominated by middle-class students, while working-class children were disproportionately allocated to secondary modern schools, reinforcing rather than reducing social inequalities.
The 1965 expansion of comprehensive schools attempted to address these inequalities by creating non-selective schools open to all abilities. However, even comprehensive education faced challenges, as middle-class families often secured places in higher sets through various advantages, perpetuating internal differentiation within supposedly egalitarian institutions.
Political perspectives on education
Educational policy reflects broader political ideologies about society's organisation and the state's role. Two main approaches have dominated policy-making:
Left-wing perspective emphasises education's role in reducing social inequalities and providing equal opportunities for all students. This approach focuses particularly on supporting underachieving groups and ensuring comprehensive provision.
Right-wing perspective prioritises parental choice and diversity in educational provision. This approach advocates for different types of schools, allowing market mechanisms to drive improvement through competition.
These perspectives often overlap in practice, with governments frequently continuing policies initiated by their predecessors whilst adding their own ideological emphasis. This explains why educational change is often gradual rather than revolutionary.
Linking social policy and theoretical perspectives
Different sociological theories provide contrasting evaluations of education policies:
Theoretical Perspectives on Education Policy
Functionalism views educational policies as beneficial for both individuals and society, arguing they create a meritocratic system where success depends on ability and effort rather than social background. However, functionalists struggle to explain persistent inequalities between different social groups despite policy interventions.
New Right thinking supports marketisation in education through selective schooling, increased parental choice, and traditional teaching methods. Critics argue these policies create greater inequalities whilst primarily benefiting middle-class families.
Marxism contends that educational policies serve the interests of the ruling class by maintaining working-class underachievement and supporting capitalist ideology. However, Marxists acknowledge that some policies, such as compensatory education, can challenge their theoretical predictions.
Feminism offers divided perspectives: liberal feminists celebrate policy successes in improving girls' educational outcomes, whilst radical feminists argue that fundamental patriarchal structures remain unchanged. They note that despite women's educational success, pay gaps persist in employment.
Interpretivism focuses on understanding the meanings and processes created by policies within schools, examining how marketisation affects labelling and subcultural formation. This micro-level approach may overlook broader structural inequalities.
Postmodernism emphasises how policies reflect increased choice and individualisation in contemporary society, viewing education as part of lifelong learning in a global context. However, postmodernists offer limited explanations for persistent inequalities or alternative solutions.
Conservative government policies 1979-1997
The Conservative government fundamentally transformed education through marketisation, applying business principles to create competition between schools. The 1988 Education Reform Act introduced several key mechanisms:
League tables published schools' examination results, theoretically enabling parental choice based on performance data. However, this also led to polarisation, where high-performing schools attracted advantaged students whilst struggling schools entered decline cycles.
Key marketisation policies included:
- Ofsted inspections - systematic evaluation of educational standards
- Local management - schools could "opt out" of local authority control
- National curriculum - standardised learning content across state schools
- Enhanced parental choice - families could select schools beyond their locality
Unintended Consequences of Marketisation
While marketisation aimed to improve standards through competition, it created complex effects. Middle-class parents could "play the system" by moving to better school areas or paying transport costs, whilst working-class families often lacked these advantages. This led to greater polarisation between high-performing and struggling schools rather than overall improvement.
The national curriculum had unintended positive effects for gender equality, making mathematics, English, and science compulsory until 16. This particularly benefited girls, who could no longer avoid science subjects. Programmes like GIST (Girls into Science and Technology) and WISE (Women into Science and Engineering) further encouraged female participation in traditionally male-dominated fields.
Labour government policies 1997-2010
New Labour continued many Conservative marketisation policies whilst introducing compensatory measures for disadvantaged groups. Tony Blair's famous declaration that his priorities were "education, education, education" reflected the party's commitment to educational investment.
Key New Labour policies included:
- Academies - new school type, partially funded by local businesses
- Free childcare - for preschool children in deprived areas
- Sure Start - integrated childcare, health, and family support services
- Excellence in Cities - targeted resources at inner-city areas
- University tuition fees - introduced means-tested charges for higher education
Contradictions in Labour's Approach
Critics like Whitty (2002) identified contradictions in Labour's strategy. While compensatory policies aimed to reduce inequality, continued marketisation and the introduction of tuition fees created new barriers. The persistence of selective grammar schools and fee-paying private schools further undermined equality objectives.
Vocational education became increasingly important during this period. The Wolf Report (2011) criticised existing provision, arguing that many vocational courses failed to lead to employment or further education opportunities, recommending extended compulsory education and improved work-based training.
The emphasis on parental choice led some sociologists to describe the emerging system as a parentocracy, where parents' ability to navigate educational choices increasingly determined children's opportunities. However, working-class parents often lacked the cultural capital, time, or resources to effectively utilise these choices.
Coalition government policies 2010-2015
The Conservative-Liberal Democrat Coalition introduced controversial changes, often justified through economic necessity during austerity:
Major policy changes:
- Education Maintenance Allowance cuts - removed financial support for working-class students
- Tuition fee increases - raised university charges to £9,000 annually
- Traditional discipline emphasis - strict uniform codes and classroom behaviour
- Student premium - additional funding for disadvantaged children
- Enhanced Ofsted inspections - increased accountability pressures
- Free schools - new schools outside local authority control
- A-level system changes - reintroduced two-year linear courses
Impact of Austerity Policies
Critics argued that cuts to compensatory programmes like EMA would increase educational inequalities, whilst policies emphasising choice primarily benefited families with cultural and economic capital to utilise them effectively. The shift towards traditional teaching methods and assessment potentially disadvantaged girls, who had succeeded particularly well under coursework-based systems.
These policies reflected postmodern emphasis on choice and diversity whilst implementing austerity measures, continuing the tension between equality and market-based approaches.
Contemporary developments
Recent education policy continues themes of standards, choice, and accountability. Current initiatives include employing ex-military personnel in schools to improve discipline and behaviour standards, though this has received mixed responses from education professionals who argue that trained teachers should supervise students.
The Conservative government elected in 2015 has continued expanding free schools and raising standards through marketisation, maintaining policy continuity across different political periods whilst adapting to contemporary challenges.
Key Points to Remember:
-
Education policies reflect broader political ideologies about equality versus choice, with left-wing approaches emphasising redistribution and right-wing approaches prioritising market mechanisms
-
Marketisation since 1979 has created both opportunities for parental choice and risks of increased polarisation between successful and struggling schools
-
Compensatory education policies attempt to address disadvantage but may conflict with market-based approaches that can reinforce existing inequalities
-
Different sociological theories provide contrasting explanations for policy effectiveness, from functionalist optimism about meritocracy to Marxist concerns about ruling-class interests
-
Policy continuity across governments suggests that educational change is often incremental rather than revolutionary, with each administration building upon previous reforms whilst adding ideological emphases