The Role of the Family (AQA A-Level Sociology): Revision Notes
The Role of the Family
Introduction to family roles in society
The family serves multiple functions within society, operating both for individual family members and supporting broader social institutions. Understanding family roles requires examining various sociological perspectives that explain how families have changed over time and their relationship with wider society.
Family structures and functions have transformed alongside societal changes. These changes reflect the family's connection with other social institutions, particularly in areas like education and childcare. Sociologists have developed different theoretical approaches to explain these changes and the family's evolving role.
Sociological analysis of family roles involves examining both micro-level interactions within families and macro-level relationships between families and broader social structures. This dual perspective helps us understand how individual family experiences connect to larger social patterns.
Modern vs postmodern family characteristics
The shift from modern to postmodern family structures represents one of the most significant social transformations of recent decades:
Modern family (1900-1970s):
- Nuclear structure with heterosexual married couples and children
- Traditional gender roles with clear divisions of labour
- Women focused on expressive and caring roles while men provided economically
- Stable, formal relationships based on economic dependence
- Extended family played lesser geographical and social roles
- Children viewed separately from adults with distinct experiences
- Religion played important role in shaping family attitudes
Postmodern family (1980s-present):
- Diverse structures including single-parent families, cohabiting couples, same-sex families, reconstituted families, and childless households
- Negotiated roles with dual-worker arrangements and flexible gender responsibilities
- Relationships characterised by choice and confluent love rather than economic necessity
- Greater involvement of extended family as grandparents live longer
- Child-centred approach with shared leisure time between generations
- Secularisation has reduced religious influence on family decisions
- State involvement varies according to political perspectives in power
This transformation from modern to postmodern families represents a fundamental shift in how we understand family structures. The movement from fixed, traditional roles to flexible, negotiated arrangements has created both opportunities and challenges for contemporary families.
Functionalism and family functions
Functionalism represents a consensus theory that views the family positively for both individuals and wider society. Key functionalist thinkers have identified specific roles the family performs.
Durkheim's perspective emphasises that families create value consensus - the shared understanding of what society considers important. This process helps integrate individuals into society and develops both social solidarity (group belonging) and collective conscience (shared societal values).
Parsons (1951) argued that families have become increasingly specialised, performing two main functions:
- Primary socialisation: Children learn and internalise society's norms and values through family interaction
- Stabilisation of adult personalities: Adults use family relationships as sources of emotional comfort and support
Worked Example: Parsons' Family Functions in Practice
Primary socialisation example: A family teaches their child to say "please" and "thank you," share toys with siblings, and respect authority figures. Through daily interactions, the child internalises these social norms as natural and expected behaviour.
Stabilisation example: After a stressful day at work, an adult returns home to their family for emotional support, relaxation, and comfort. The family unit provides a "safe haven" where they can express feelings and recharge emotionally.
Functionalists often argue that different family roles reflect biological differences between men and women. They suggest women naturally take expressive (caring) roles while men adopt instrumental (providing) roles.
Criticisms of functionalism:
- Ignores negative aspects of family life such as domestic violence and conflict
- Assumptions about 'natural' gender roles are challenged by feminists
- Theory may not apply to contemporary family diversity
- Overlooks power imbalances within families
The New Right perspective
The New Right (sometimes called political functionalism) consists of politicians, sociologists and researchers who champion traditional family values. They argue that the nuclear family serves as society's cornerstone and that maintaining conventional family structures is essential.
Key New Right arguments:
- Men and women should adopt traditional roles: women responsible for childcare and domestic work, men as breadwinners
- Single-parent families lack adequate male role models for children, particularly boys
- Family breakdown leads to inadequate socialisation and potentially antisocial behaviour
- Individuals should take personal responsibility for their families rather than relying on state support
- Growing welfare dependency creates an underclass (Murray 1984) of people who lack work ethic and depend on benefits
Key Criticisms of New Right Views:
- Feminists argue these perspectives oppress women by restricting their choices
- Many sociologists contend that alternative family structures can successfully raise children
- Critics argue state benefits serve important social functions and aren't inherently problematic
Marxist analysis of family roles
Marxist theory takes a conflict perspective, arguing that families primarily serve to maintain and strengthen capitalist economic systems rather than benefiting individuals or society broadly.
Marx's contributions:
- Suggested women in capitalist families function as commodities - essentially property owned by men
- Family structures ensure wealth concentration among ruling classes
Engels' analysis:
- Marriage and inheritance rules maintain ruling class power by keeping wealth within specific families
- Primogeniture (inheritance through male family lines) ensures capitalism's wealth passes to sons
- Monogamous nuclear families protect wealthy families' economic interests
Worked Example: Zaretsky's Analysis of Family and Capitalism
Zaretsky (1986) identified three ways families support capitalism:
Step 1: Workforce reproduction
- Families provide unpaid domestic labour that reproduces the workforce
- Women cook, clean, and care for workers without wages
Step 2: Future worker creation
- Families raise and socialise children to become future workers
- This process costs capitalism nothing but provides essential labour supply
Step 3: Consumption unit
- Families operate as a unit of consumption purchasing goods and services
- This drives economic demand and profits for capitalist enterprises
The family also provides an emotional outlet for capitalism's frustrations without threatening the economic system, and prevents working-class unity by focusing energy on family rather than collective action.
Poststructuralist perspectives
Foucault (1975) offered a poststructuralist analysis focusing on how families become sites of state surveillance and control. He argued that understanding family roles requires examining how government institutions monitor and regulate family life.
Examples of state family surveillance include:
- Health visitors monitoring child welfare
- Teachers observing family situations through school interactions
- Social services involvement in family decisions
Foucault viewed this knowledge-gathering as creating power relationships between state institutions and individual families, shaping how family roles develop and function. This perspective highlights how external forces influence what we might consider "private" family decisions.
Feminist approaches to family analysis
Feminism encompasses diverse perspectives on family roles, though feminists generally agree that family life has historically benefited men more than women. Different feminist approaches offer varying solutions to gender inequality within families.
Common feminist arguments about family roles:
- Families perform gendered socialisation that teaches different expectations for boys and girls
- Women undertake disproportionate shares of domestic and emotional labour
- Family decision-making often reflects male dominance rather than equal partnership
- Women frequently lack control over finances and major family choices
- Some feminists argue that family structures inevitably lead to female exploitation
Types of feminist perspective:
- Liberal feminism: Seeks gradual reform and equal opportunities
- Radical feminism: Views patriarchy as fundamental problem requiring major structural change
- Marxist feminism: Links women's oppression to capitalist economic systems
- Difference feminism: Recognises diversity among women's experiences
- Postmodern feminism: Emphasises individual choice and multiple family forms
While feminist perspectives vary significantly, they share a common focus on examining how power relationships within families often disadvantage women. This analysis has been crucial in revealing previously hidden aspects of family life and challenging assumptions about "natural" gender roles.
Postmodernist views on contemporary families
Postmodernist sociologists like Beck (1992) argue that traditional family concepts no longer apply to contemporary society. Instead, people make individual decisions about relationships and family structures based on personal preferences rather than social expectations.
Key postmodernist arguments:
- Reduced social pressure to conform to expected family norms
- Greater individual choice in relationship types and family arrangements
- Families characterised by negotiation and flexibility rather than fixed roles
- Individual choice and family structure diversity are now normal
- Some postmodernists acknowledge that increased choice may create greater relationship instability
Life Course Analysis offers an alternative postmodernist approach developed by Hareven (1978). This method focuses on understanding the meanings family members attach to their experiences rather than imposing external theoretical frameworks. This approach provides deeper insights into gender roles, relationships, and family change by prioritising family members' own perspectives.
Life Course Analysis is particularly valuable because it recognises that family experiences vary significantly based on factors like social class, ethnicity, age, and historical period. Rather than assuming all families function similarly, this approach examines the unique meanings and experiences of different family members.
Key contemporary sociologists
Stacey (1997), a feminist postmodernist, argues that increased family choice has particularly benefited women. She challenges assumptions that nuclear families are necessary for successful child-rearing and predicts that family diversity will continue expanding rather than reverting to traditional forms.
Giddens developed the concept of confluent love to describe postmodern relationships based on emotional closeness and mutual choice rather than economic dependency or social obligation.
Key Points to Remember:
-
Functionalists view families as performing essential social functions including socialisation and emotional stabilisation, though critics argue this ignores family problems and gender inequality
-
The New Right champions traditional nuclear families while expressing concern about single-parent families and welfare dependency, facing criticism for restricting women's choices
-
Marxists analyse families as supporting capitalist systems through unpaid labour, consumption, and inheritance patterns that maintain class inequalities
-
Feminists highlight how family roles often disadvantage women through gendered socialisation, unequal domestic labour, and male-dominated decision-making structures
-
Postmodernists emphasise contemporary family diversity, individual choice, and negotiated relationships, while acknowledging potential relationship instability in modern society