The State and the Family (AQA A-Level Sociology): Revision Notes
The State and the Family
Introduction to state-family relationships
The relationship between government and families is complex and constantly evolving. State policies shape many aspects of family life, including marriage patterns, divorce rates, cohabitation choices, parenting practices, and care arrangements for elderly relatives. These policies don't just solve practical problems - they also communicate powerful messages about what types of family arrangements are considered acceptable or desirable in society.
Government decisions reflect broader social attitudes, but they also influence how people think about family structures and relationships. This creates a dynamic two-way relationship between policy and social norms.
Different political parties bring different philosophies about the role of state intervention in family life, creating shifts in policy direction when governments change.
What is a social policy?
A social policy is a planned course of action implemented by government to address specific social problems or issues. These policies emerge from various sources: sociological research highlighting social problems, national statistics revealing concerning trends, or data collected by governmental and non-governmental organisations.
Sometimes policies are created not just to solve problems, but to promote particular political messages about desirable family arrangements. The types of policies introduced (or deliberately avoided) reveal much about a government's values and priorities regarding family life.
Social policies affecting families have developed since the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, coinciding with the emergence of the welfare state. This marked a turning point where governments began taking active responsibility for citizen welfare and family support.
Political perspectives on the family
Political parties hold different views about ideal family structures and the appropriate level of state intervention. These differences can be understood along a political spectrum:
Left-wing perspectives
- View the nuclear family as desirable but not exclusively ideal
- Accept alternative family structures as equally valid and successful for raising children
- Support active state involvement in family life through supportive policies
- Encourage policies enabling both parents to work
- Favour comprehensive welfare provision
Right-wing perspectives
- Consider the nuclear family as the ideal family form
- View alternatives to nuclear families as inadequate or problematic
- See nuclear family decline as contributing to social problems like crime
- Advocate limited state intervention in family matters
- Support traditional gender roles within families
- Prefer policies that encourage marriage and conventional arrangements
Common misconception to avoid: Don't assume that left-wing always means more government control. In family policy, left-wing approaches often focus on providing support and choices, while right-wing approaches may use policies to enforce particular family structures.
Historical development of family policies
Government involvement in family matters expanded significantly with welfare state development. The Beveridge Report (1942) represented a watershed moment, establishing comprehensive social insurance including National Insurance contributions and the National Health Service. This was the first major policy initiative to treat family welfare as a legitimate state concern, helping reduce poverty and improve health outcomes for vulnerable families.
The relationship between sociological research and policy development remains strong. For example, research by Barter et al. (2009) identifying increasing domestic violence in teenage relationships led to media campaigns and support programmes for young people. This demonstrates how academic findings directly influence government responses to family-related social problems.
Key legislation affecting families
Several major pieces of legislation have transformed family life in Britain:
Divorce Reform Act (1969/1971)
This act revolutionised marriage dissolution by introducing 'no-fault' divorce. Couples could divorce after two years of separation (or five years if only one partner wanted divorce) without proving wrongdoing. The divorce rate increased dramatically from 58,239 in 1970 to 119,025 in 1972. This legislation provided greater relationship choices and enabled people to leave unhappy marriages more easily.
Policy Impact Example: Divorce Law Changes
Before 1969: Couples had to prove adultery, desertion, or cruelty to obtain divorce After 1971: Couples could divorce simply by living apart for 2 years (mutual consent) or 5 years (one-sided)
Result: Divorce rates more than doubled within two years, demonstrating how legal changes can rapidly transform social behaviour.
Sex Discrimination Act (1975) and Equal Pay Act (1970)
These acts made discrimination based on gender or marital status illegal in employment and other areas. They sent clear messages about gender equality expectations in both public and private spheres, though significant pay gaps between men and women persist.
Marital rape legislation (1991)
This relatively recent change made rape within marriage a criminal offence, representing state intervention in previously private marital relationships. Though difficult to prosecute, this law communicated clear messages about unacceptable behaviour in intimate relationships.
Civil Partnership Act (2004) and Gay Marriage Act (2014)
These highly controversial laws recognised same-sex relationships as valid alternatives to heterosexual marriage. This represented a fundamental shift from treating homosexuality as criminal behaviour to acknowledging same-sex couples as suitable parents with equal rights to heterosexual couples.
Conservative government policies (1979-1997)
Conservative policies during this period, often called New Right approaches, aimed to strengthen traditional nuclear family structures while reducing state dependency. Key policies included:
Benefit reductions: Many benefits were cut to encourage individual responsibility, particularly targeting single-parent families. The government believed this would discourage alternative family structures and promote traditional arrangements.
Child Support Agency: Established to make fathers pay maintenance for their children and discourage unmarried parenthood. However, the CSA proved expensive and largely ineffective in practice.
Marriage incentives: Tax and welfare benefits favoured married couples, creating financial incentives for marriage while suggesting alternatives were less desirable.
Limited childcare support: The government avoided providing free or subsidised childcare, reinforcing assumptions about women staying home with children while men worked.
Privatisation of elderly care: This policy placed responsibility for elderly relatives primarily on families, particularly women, rather than state services.
Evaluation of Conservative policies
Critical analysis: Critics, especially feminists, argued these policies undermined gender equality and unfairly blamed single-parent families for social problems. Many single-parent families were headed by working parents who didn't rely heavily on benefits. Some sociologists argued that Conservative policies actually increased inequality and poverty rather than strengthening families.
New Labour policies (1997-2010)
New Labour represented the first government to seriously address massive changes occurring in family structures and gender roles. They recognised that most families now involved both parents working and needed supportive policies accordingly.
New Labour created new governmental structures, including a Minister for Children (2003) and the Department for Children, Schools and Families (2007), demonstrating their commitment to family policy as a priority area.
New Labour Policy Innovation: The New Deal (1998)
Objective: Support lone parents entering paid employment
Key features:
- Childcare assistance for working parents
- Training opportunities to improve employment prospects
- Personal advisors to help navigate work-benefit transitions
Impact: Helped thousands of single parents move from welfare dependency to economic independence while maintaining family stability.
Key New Labour initiatives:
Childcare support: Policies helped single parents access childcare to enable work, training, or education. Rather than viewing single parenthood as problematic, these policies provided practical support.
Parental leave expansion: More generous maternity and paternity leave acknowledged both parents' roles in childcare and supported work-life balance.
Free early years education: Childcare for two and half-year-olds helped working parents while ensuring children from diverse backgrounds were prepared for formal education.
Flexible working arrangements: Policies enabled parents to balance work and family responsibilities more effectively.
Elderly support: Winter fuel payments and other measures helped elderly people maintain independence while reducing family care burdens.
Adoption and Children Act (2002): This enabled same-sex couples to adopt, clearly signalling acceptance of diverse family structures as suitable for child-rearing.
Evaluation of New Labour policies
Many welcomed New Labour's family-friendly approaches, possibly reflecting the significant number of women in ministerial positions and Tony Blair's own experience as a working parent. However, critics argued that excessive state intervention created a nanny state where people relied too heavily on government support rather than taking personal responsibility.
Coalition government policies (2010-2015)
The Conservative-Liberal Democrat Coalition continued some New Right ideas while introducing significant policy changes. Prime Minister David Cameron expressed concerns about 'Broken Britain', suggesting traditional family breakdown caused social problems.
Major Coalition policies:
Austerity measures: Significant cuts to public spending particularly affected women, who were more likely to work in public sector jobs and rely on welfare benefits. Research showed Coalition cuts hit women three times harder than men.
Married persons' tax allowance: Reintroduced financial incentives for marriage, clearly indicating preferences for traditional arrangements over cohabitation.
Legal Aid cuts: Substantial reductions in legal aid availability particularly affected vulnerable groups, including women experiencing domestic violence who needed legal support.
Child Benefit means testing: Universal Child Benefit became restricted to families below certain income thresholds, suggesting higher earners should take greater personal responsibility for child costs.
Universal Credit: This new benefit system aimed to reduce welfare dependency by making work more financially attractive than claiming benefits.
Troubled Families programme: Targeted interventions for families causing community problems, working with local authorities to address youth crime and antisocial behaviour.
Evaluation of Coalition policies
Critical perspective: Critics argued Coalition policies failed to support family diversity and disproportionately affected the poorest and most vulnerable groups. Feminists contended that women and children experienced greater hardship as austerity measures reduced support services. Given that most families no longer fit traditional nuclear family models, these policies seemed disconnected from contemporary family realities.
Key sociological perspectives
Donzelot (1997) - surveillance and control
Donzelot argues that family policy functions as governmental surveillance over individuals and families. He suggests policies are applied differently depending on social class, with middle-class families receiving more supportive interventions while working-class families face more controlling measures. Health visitors, social workers, and other professionals ensure family life conforms to government expectations about appropriate behaviour.
Donzelot's key insight: The state doesn't just provide support - it also monitors and shapes family behaviour through professional interventions. This creates what he calls the "policing of families" through seemingly helpful services.
Murray (1984) - welfare dependency
Murray contends that overly generous welfare states create a culture of dependency where individuals lose motivation to work and take responsibility for their families. His views align closely with New Right ideology, arguing that reducing benefits encourages people to become self-reliant rather than dependent on state support.
Murray's controversial argument: He suggests that well-intentioned welfare policies can actually harm families by removing incentives for self-improvement and personal responsibility. This perspective remains highly debated among sociologists and policymakers.
Leonard (2001) - nuclear family ideology
Leonard argues that government policies consistently reflect strong preferences for nuclear family ideology, emphasising women's nurturing roles and children's subordination. She suggests family policy encourages focus on work and consumption while reinforcing traditional gender role expectations.
Leonard's feminist perspective: Even policies that appear gender-neutral often contain hidden assumptions about women's primary responsibility for childcare and domestic work, maintaining traditional power structures within families.
Contemporary issues and applications
Recent developments continue shaping state-family relationships. The emergence of fourth-wave feminism, utilising internet and social media platforms, has created new ways to challenge traditional assumptions about family roles and gender equality. This has enabled women to organise more effectively and voice concerns about various forms of discrimination.
The Coalition government's focus on 'troubled families' raises questions about which family types are considered problematic and why. This approach suggests certain families are viewed as causing social problems rather than experiencing difficulties requiring support.
Current policy debates often centre on balancing individual responsibility with state support, particularly regarding childcare, elderly care, and family poverty. These discussions reflect ongoing tensions between different political philosophies about appropriate levels of government intervention in family life.
Remember!
Key Points to Remember:
-
Social policies both respond to and shape family attitudes - they address social problems while communicating messages about desirable family arrangements
-
Political ideology strongly influences family policy direction - Conservative governments typically favour traditional nuclear families while Labour governments show greater acceptance of family diversity
-
Major legislation has transformed family life over decades - from easier divorce and gender equality laws to recognition of same-sex relationships
-
Different government eras reflect different priorities - Conservative focus on traditional values, New Labour emphasis on work-life balance, Coalition austerity and targeted interventions
-
Sociologists offer different explanations for state involvement - ranging from surveillance and control to welfare dependency concerns and nuclear family ideology promotion