Key Questions (Edexcel A-Level Psychology): Revision Notes
Encouraging the Cessation of Smoking
Introduction to the key question
Can we encourage the cessation of smoking? This question addresses what health psychologists can do to effectively promote and encourage non-smoking behavior in today's society. Understanding how to support smoking cessation requires examining the influences that lead people to smoke and the psychological processes that can facilitate behavior change.
Influences on smoking behavior
Several factors shape an individual's smoking behavior:
- Role models: Family members who smoke may influence an individual to adopt similar behavior. Children and young people often imitate those close to them.
- Peer influence: Friends and peers who smoke can encourage others to try smoking as individuals may want to be like their social group.
- Media exposure: Television and other media portray smoking, which can normalise the behavior.
- Observational learning: Through observation, individuals learn smoking behaviors and may be influenced to smoke themselves.
When attempting to encourage smoking cessation, it is essential to consider how the person was initially persuaded to smoke. The same mechanisms of persuasion that led to smoking can be used to encourage stopping.
The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion
The elaboration likelihood model (ELM) suggests that individuals can be encouraged to stop smoking through a specific approach. According to this model, cessation is most effective when:
- The individual is initially motivated to stop smoking
- They receive a clear, concise message about the behavior change
- The message contains minimal distractions or irrelevant information
This model emphasises that health campaigns should be straightforward and avoid overwhelming individuals with excessive additional information that might dilute the core message. Health providers should focus on delivering concise, focused messages that directly address the behavior change required.
The Hovland-Yale model of persuasion
The Hovland-Yale model takes a different approach to persuasion, emphasising two main components:
Message content
The content of the persuasive message is highly important in encouraging behavior change. This model advocates for:
- Two-sided, balanced arguments: Messages should outline both the benefits of smoking cessation and the implications of continuing to smoke. This balanced approach is more persuasive than presenting only one side of the argument.
- Sufficient fear: The message needs to create an appropriate level of concern about the harmful effects of smoking to motivate change.
Source credibility
The credibility of the source delivering the message plays a substantial role in its effectiveness:
- Credible organisations: Smoking campaigns initiated by agencies such as Stoptober, the Department of Health, and the National Health Service have inherent credibility.
- Expert influence: Health experts are more likely to be influential than organisations or individuals without established authority in health matters.
- Clear credibility: Ensuring the credibility of the source is clearly understood maximises its influence on individuals.
The Hovland-Yale model differs from the ELM by emphasizing not just the clarity of the message, but also the balance of arguments presented and the credibility of the message source. Both the content and the messenger matter equally in this approach.
Designing effective health campaigns
Health campaigns must carefully consider several factors to successfully encourage smoking cessation:
Targeting cognitions
Campaigns need to address the cognitive processes underlying smoking behavior. The health message should be pitched at a level that:
- Creates sufficient awareness of the harmful effects
- Generates appropriate concern without causing excessive fear
- Targets the specific cognitions that maintain smoking behavior
Managing fear appeals
While fear can motivate behavior change, there are important limitations:
Janis and Feshbach (1953) demonstrated that generating excessively high levels of fear, such as using graphic images of smoking-related harm, may not produce the desired effect on behavior change. Messages that are too frightening can lead to defensive reactions where individuals dismiss or avoid the information rather than acting on it.
Health campaigns must balance creating sufficient concern with avoiding counterproductive fear responses.
Ensuring effectiveness
Research supports the effectiveness of well-designed interventions:
- Penggid et al. (2013) showed that raising awareness of the risks of substance use can be as effective as brief treatment interventions.
- Health promotion campaigns such as Stoptober can achieve meaningful behavior change.
- Campaigns must appeal to the audience and avoid making people feel forced to change, as this reduces effectiveness.
Treatment approaches for nicotine addiction
Before any treatment begins, the person must be ready to make the change. This readiness is essential for overcoming difficulties encountered when stopping smoking.
Hypnotherapy
Hypnotherapy has been shown to be effective as it gently persuades the person that they need to stop smoking. This approach works by:
- Creating a receptive mental state for accepting the need to change
- Supporting the individual's motivation through suggestion
- Complementing other treatment methods
Medicinal treatments
Various medical treatments can support smoking cessation:
- Nicotine replacement drugs: These reduce the physical withdrawal symptoms experienced when stopping smoking.
- Cost considerations: Such treatments may not be available to everyone due to cost implications for the smoker.
- Accessibility: Treatment availability varies, and not all smokers can access these options.
Addressing dependencies
Effective treatment must consider both types of dependency:
Physiological dependency: The physical addiction to nicotine creates withdrawal symptoms such as:
- Reduced concentration
- Physical cravings
- Other withdrawal symptoms that can persist for weeks or months
Psychological dependency: The behavioral and situational associations with smoking, such as:
- Smoking after certain activities
- Smoking in particular situations
- Conditioned responses to environmental cues
Treatments need to address the reduction in concentration and manage the psychological associations that the smoker has developed with the behavior.
The importance of holistic support
While treatments help with the physical aspects of dependency, comprehensive support must also address psychological needs. Without an all-round (holistic) approach to smoking cessation, the person is highly likely to smoke again due to the addictive and reinforcing properties of nicotine.
Key considerations for holistic support include:
- Ongoing support for cravings: Cravings can continue for many months after withdrawal symptoms have been addressed.
- Managing the addictive nature: The reinforcing properties of nicotine require sustained intervention beyond initial treatment.
- Preventing relapse: Continuous support helps prevent individuals from returning to smoking after initially stopping.
Comprehensive approach to cessation
To successfully support smoking cessation, consideration should be given to:
- Reasons for smoking: Understanding why the individual chooses to smoke in the first place.
- Cognitive maintenance: Identifying the cognitions that maintain the smoking behavior and how these can be changed.
- Belief modification: Using appropriate techniques to change beliefs about smoking.
- Treatment options: Selecting appropriate treatment methods based on individual needs and circumstances.
- Targeted campaigns: Designing health campaigns carefully targeted to the specific audience to ensure they are meaningful to the individual.
- Appeal not coercion: Ensuring campaigns and treatment options appeal to the individual rather than making them feel forced, as this is unlikely to support effective cessation.
Remember!
Key Points to Remember:
- Multiple influences shape smoking behavior, including role models, peers, and media exposure, and these same influences can be used to encourage cessation.
- The elaboration likelihood model emphasises providing clear, concise messages to motivated individuals, whilst the Hovland-Yale model stresses the importance of two-sided arguments and source credibility.
- Effective health campaigns must balance fear appeals appropriately, as excessive fear can be counterproductive (Janis and Feshbach, 1953), whilst well-designed campaigns can be as effective as brief interventions (Penggid et al., 2013).
- Treatment must address both physiological and psychological dependencies, using approaches such as hypnotherapy and nicotine replacement drugs where appropriate.
- A holistic approach providing ongoing support is essential to prevent relapse, as without comprehensive support addressing both physical and psychological aspects, individuals are highly likely to return to smoking.